Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Pennsylvania by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Pennsylvania 6 108.9 (107.9, 109.9) N/A 9,412 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.3, 7.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 110.5 (110.2, 110.7) N/A 212,734 rising rising trend 2.5 (1.0, 4.1)
Clarion County 6 68.6 (55.2, 84.7) 65 (49, 67) 19 falling falling trend -9.0 (-19.3, -6.8)
Warren County 6 105.8 (90.6, 123.4) 25 (5, 58) 36 falling falling trend -7.6 (-15.2, -5.7)
Butler County 6 99.2 (91.6, 107.3) 38 (19, 54) 135 falling falling trend -7.2 (-19.1, -4.5)
Indiana County 6 75.3 (65.7, 86.1) 62 (48, 67) 46 falling falling trend -7.1 (-18.3, -5.6)
Greene County 6 60.8 (47.8, 76.5) 66 (56, 67) 16 falling falling trend -6.8 (-9.7, -4.4)
Bedford County 6 94.5 (81.5, 109.5) 49 (14, 62) 38 falling falling trend -6.3 (-8.3, -4.5)
Potter County 6 80.7 (61.5, 105.7) 59 (17, 67) 12 falling falling trend -6.3 (-22.5, -3.9)
Fayette County 6 73.4 (66.1, 81.6) 64 (53, 67) 75 falling falling trend -5.8 (-7.2, -4.6)
Mercer County 6 107.9 (98.0, 118.6) 23 (8, 49) 92 falling falling trend -5.4 (-13.3, -3.8)
Armstrong County 6 101.4 (89.4, 114.8) 34 (10, 57) 55 stable stable trend -5.1 (-10.4, 1.5)
York County 6 87.2 (82.4, 92.1) 52 (43, 60) 263 falling falling trend -5.0 (-6.5, -3.5)
Juniata County 6 59.2 (44.1, 78.4) 67 (54, 67) 11 falling falling trend -4.9 (-8.0, -2.0)
Delaware County 6 112.5 (107.4, 117.7) 17 (10, 30) 392 falling falling trend -4.6 (-11.1, -3.3)
Forest County 6 78.4 (52.2, 144.9) 60 (1, 67) 6 stable stable trend -4.6 (-9.6, 0.2)
Elk County 6 147.9 (127.0, 171.9) 2 (1, 16) 38 falling falling trend -4.5 (-19.3, -0.7)
Wyoming County 6 101.6 (83.6, 123.1) 33 (4, 62) 23 falling falling trend -4.1 (-6.7, -1.7)
Fulton County 6 83.3 (61.6, 111.7) 57 (8, 67) 10 stable stable trend -4.0 (-8.1, 0.1)
Wayne County 6 81.2 (69.7, 94.4) 58 (33, 66) 38 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.0, -1.0)
Chester County 6 105.8 (100.8, 110.9) 26 (16, 42) 357 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.4, -2.5)
Lawrence County 6 96.4 (86.1, 107.8) 43 (17, 59) 66 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.1, -2.0)
Crawford County 6 102.0 (91.1, 114.0) 32 (12, 55) 67 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.0, -1.7)
Mifflin County 6 84.8 (71.3, 100.5) 55 (23, 66) 29 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.4, -1.2)
Susquehanna County 6 94.8 (81.0, 110.8) 46 (13, 63) 35 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.8, -1.9)
Tioga County 6 104.5 (89.4, 121.9) 27 (5, 59) 35 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.5, -1.1)
Cambria County 6 109.3 (100.3, 119.0) 21 (8, 44) 115 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.3, -2.1)
Snyder County 6 92.1 (77.0, 109.7) 50 (11, 64) 27 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.9, -0.2)
Lackawanna County 6 86.7 (80.0, 94.0) 53 (39, 61) 128 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.3, -1.7)
McKean County 6 83.6 (69.5, 100.2) 56 (22, 66) 26 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.1, -0.9)
Perry County 6 76.3 (63.3, 91.6) 61 (39, 67) 26 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.2, -0.6)
Adams County 6 94.6 (85.0, 105.2) 48 (18, 59) 74 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.7, -1.8)
Lycoming County 6 98.0 (88.4, 108.6) 40 (17, 57) 80 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.6, -1.8)
Beaver County 6 94.7 (87.1, 103.0) 47 (23, 58) 119 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.6, -1.8)
Jefferson County 6 111.5 (95.9, 129.2) 20 (3, 53) 38 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.8, -0.5)
Washington County 6 98.6 (91.6, 106.0) 39 (21, 53) 156 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.6, -1.6)
Centre County 6 102.4 (93.1, 112.5) 31 (12, 53) 92 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.9, -1.1)
Westmoreland County 6 91.9 (86.9, 97.2) 51 (34, 57) 265 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.4, -1.7)
Venango County 6 113.5 (99.2, 129.5) 16 (3, 50) 49 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.7, -1.0)
Philadelphia County 6 136.9 (133.2, 140.8) 3 (1, 7) 1,079 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.4, -0.9)
Clearfield County 6 115.6 (103.7, 128.6) 15 (4, 44) 72 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.6, -0.4)
Erie County 6 119.3 (112.2, 126.8) 12 (4, 25) 221 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -0.9)
Berks County 6 117.9 (112.1, 124.0) 14 (5, 24) 320 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.4, -1.2)
Cameron County 6 96.2 (59.4, 157.0) 44 (1, 67) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.7, 2.0)
Carbon County 6 99.8 (87.8, 113.3) 37 (12, 59) 53 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.3)
Dauphin County 6 97.3 (90.6, 104.3) 42 (23, 55) 168 falling falling trend -2.1 (-4.0, -0.1)
Montour County 6 124.8 (99.1, 156.2) 7 (1, 56) 17 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.3, 2.0)
Luzerne County 6 124.2 (117.6, 131.1) 8 (3, 19) 277 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Sullivan County 6 153.7 (111.1, 214.6) 1 (1, 53) 10 stable stable trend 0.8 (-3.1, 5.1)
Montgomery County 6 118.2 (114.1, 122.5) 13 (6, 22) 640 stable stable trend 3.0 (-0.6, 8.0)
Monroe County 6 108.1 (99.8, 117.0) 22 (9, 45) 134 stable stable trend 3.4 (-5.6, 11.5)
Northampton County 6 125.8 (119.0, 132.9) 5 (2, 18) 266 stable stable trend 3.5 (-2.9, 9.2)
Somerset County 6 111.9 (100.0, 125.0) 19 (5, 48) 67 stable stable trend 3.6 (-5.5, 17.1)
Lehigh County 6 124.0 (117.5, 130.8) 9 (3, 20) 281 stable stable trend 4.7 (-2.0, 10.9)
Allegheny County 6 103.5 (100.4, 106.8) 29 (21, 41) 854 stable stable trend 5.1 (-0.2, 8.2)
Lebanon County 6 97.4 (88.8, 106.7) 41 (18, 56) 97 stable stable trend 5.3 (-2.4, 15.5)
Huntingdon County 6 101.2 (86.7, 117.7) 35 (7, 60) 36 stable stable trend 5.7 (-1.8, 15.0)
Northumberland County 6 102.5 (92.1, 113.9) 30 (11, 55) 74 stable stable trend 6.7 (-2.0, 13.4)
Bucks County 6 135.7 (130.9, 140.7) 4 (1, 7) 623 rising rising trend 7.3 (3.7, 12.0)
Lancaster County 6 100.6 (95.9, 105.4) 36 (22, 49) 356 rising rising trend 8.0 (1.9, 16.3)
Blair County 6 112.1 (102.3, 122.8) 18 (6, 43) 100 rising rising trend 9.1 (0.1, 20.6)
Pike County 6 95.8 (83.8, 109.6) 45 (16, 61) 48 rising rising trend 9.2 (1.0, 20.0)
Bradford County 6 106.2 (93.4, 120.5) 24 (5, 54) 51 stable stable trend 9.8 (-2.1, 19.2)
Columbia County 6 125.4 (110.9, 141.4) 6 (1, 33) 57 rising rising trend 9.9 (1.4, 21.1)
Schuylkill County 6 122.2 (112.8, 132.2) 10 (3, 25) 131 rising rising trend 10.1 (1.5, 20.8)
Franklin County 6 74.2 (67.0, 82.0) 63 (53, 67) 80 rising rising trend 10.5 (2.9, 22.9)
Cumberland County 6 85.0 (78.7, 91.6) 54 (43, 62) 142 rising rising trend 11.3 (3.6, 17.3)
Clinton County 6 104.3 (87.4, 123.9) 28 (4, 60) 28 rising rising trend 13.2 (1.5, 30.1)
Union County 6 120.8 (103.5, 140.4) 11 (1, 47) 35 rising rising trend 20.7 (10.4, 28.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/21/2024 11:16 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2022 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2022 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2022 data.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top