Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Pennsylvania by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Pennsylvania 6 N/A 459.1 (457.7, 460.6) N/A 79,444 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -1.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 444.4 (444.1, 444.7) N/A 1,744,459 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.7, -0.3)
Adams County 6 Urban 444.9 (429.2, 461.2) 50 (27, 61) 668 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Allegheny County 6 Urban 464.7 (459.9, 469.5) 34 (24, 42) 7,884 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.5)
Armstrong County 6 Urban 472.8 (452.7, 493.5) 29 (6, 52) 477 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.4, 0.8)
Beaver County 6 Urban 474.4 (461.8, 487.4) 26 (11, 41) 1,196 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.1)
Berks County 6 Urban 475.7 (467.2, 484.2) 23 (14, 36) 2,589 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.0)
Blair County 6 Urban 489.2 (474.0, 504.8) 14 (3, 35) 865 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.7)
Bucks County 6 Urban 464.9 (458.4, 471.5) 33 (23, 43) 4,219 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.9, -1.0)
Butler County 6 Urban 424.7 (413.2, 436.3) 60 (49, 66) 1,140 falling falling trend -6.8 (-9.8, -4.9)
Cambria County 6 Urban 475.3 (461.3, 489.7) 24 (10, 43) 990 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Carbon County 6 Urban 490.7 (470.4, 511.8) 13 (3, 40) 484 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Centre County 6 Urban 417.2 (403.3, 431.6) 62 (51, 67) 715 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Chester County 6 Urban 427.2 (420.0, 434.5) 59 (51, 63) 2,843 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.7, -1.9)
Cumberland County 6 Urban 430.0 (419.9, 440.3) 57 (46, 64) 1,460 falling falling trend -1.1 (-3.9, -0.5)
Dauphin County 6 Urban 449.0 (438.9, 459.2) 45 (32, 56) 1,614 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.6, 0.0)
Delaware County 6 Urban 445.1 (437.9, 452.3) 49 (37, 56) 3,166 falling falling trend -6.1 (-10.2, -2.7)
Erie County 6 Urban 482.1 (471.6, 492.9) 19 (9, 34) 1,723 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.5, 0.1)
Fayette County 6 Urban 453.7 (439.6, 468.1) 42 (23, 56) 873 falling falling trend -4.8 (-8.7, -1.0)
Franklin County 6 Urban 402.7 (390.3, 415.4) 66 (59, 67) 860 falling falling trend -7.4 (-10.3, -5.7)
Lackawanna County 6 Urban 482.2 (470.7, 494.0) 18 (8, 34) 1,447 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.7, 0.0)
Lancaster County 6 Urban 446.0 (438.8, 453.2) 48 (37, 56) 3,184 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.8, -0.3)
Lawrence County 6 Urban 461.6 (444.2, 479.6) 36 (15, 55) 601 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Lebanon County 6 Urban 437.2 (423.7, 451.0) 54 (36, 63) 859 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.3, -0.8)
Lehigh County 6 Urban 499.9 (490.6, 509.3) 10 (3, 19) 2,318 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.6, 0.2)
Luzerne County 6 Urban 505.4 (495.8, 515.2) 5 (2, 16) 2,284 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.3, 0.3)
Lycoming County 6 Urban 487.5 (471.6, 503.9) 15 (4, 36) 773 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 441.6 (436.0, 447.3) 52 (41, 57) 4,960 falling falling trend -4.6 (-8.6, -1.2)
Northampton County 6 Urban 505.3 (495.4, 515.3) 6 (2, 16) 2,158 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.3)
Perry County 6 Urban 482.5 (457.7, 508.5) 17 (3, 50) 309 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Philadelphia County 6 Urban 448.7 (444.2, 453.3) 46 (37, 52) 7,762 falling falling trend -4.6 (-7.2, -2.2)
Washington County 6 Urban 496.3 (484.6, 508.2) 12 (3, 24) 1,514 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.4, 0.2)
Westmoreland County 6 Urban 412.9 (404.9, 421.1) 64 (58, 67) 2,300 falling falling trend -8.4 (-10.5, -6.8)
Wyoming County 6 Urban 502.5 (469.8, 537.2) 7 (1, 45) 198 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
York County 6 Urban 464.4 (456.4, 472.5) 35 (21, 43) 2,765 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.9, -0.3)
Bedford County 6 Rural 456.3 (433.2, 480.4) 40 (13, 61) 335 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Bradford County 6 Rural 474.6 (453.2, 496.9) 25 (5, 51) 417 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Cameron County 6 Rural 510.6 (433.3, 599.7) 3 (1, 66) 41 stable stable trend -1.3 (-7.3, 0.2)
Clarion County 6 Rural 420.2 (394.4, 447.4) 61 (35, 67) 219 falling falling trend -6.7 (-10.7, -1.7)
Clearfield County 6 Rural 429.4 (412.3, 447.2) 58 (39, 66) 509 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Clinton County 6 Rural 485.2 (457.1, 514.6) 16 (2, 50) 245 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Columbia County 6 Rural 510.2 (488.3, 532.8) 4 (1, 26) 453 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7)
Crawford County 6 Rural 459.8 (442.2, 478.1) 37 (14, 56) 570 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Elk County 6 Rural 456.4 (427.9, 486.4) 39 (8, 64) 219 falling falling trend -2.0 (-6.1, -0.7)
Forest County 6 Rural 437.7 (371.5, 521.5) 53 (1, 67) 46 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.7)
Fulton County 6 Rural 390.3 (352.7, 431.3) 67 (42, 67) 86 falling falling trend -4.7 (-9.4, -2.5)
Greene County 6 Rural 501.4 (472.7, 531.5) 9 (1, 40) 248 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Huntingdon County 6 Rural 436.8 (413.4, 461.4) 55 (23, 66) 281 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Indiana County 6 Rural 431.3 (413.3, 449.9) 56 (37, 66) 485 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 2.1)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 451.8 (427.7, 477.0) 44 (14, 63) 293 falling falling trend -5.2 (-10.0, -0.4)
Juniata County 6 Rural 474.4 (440.4, 510.6) 27 (2, 60) 158 rising rising trend 1.9 (1.1, 2.7)
McKean County 6 Rural 415.2 (390.5, 441.1) 63 (39, 67) 235 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Mercer County 6 Rural 459.2 (444.0, 474.9) 38 (18, 54) 770 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.4, -0.8)
Mifflin County 6 Rural 477.5 (453.3, 502.8) 21 (3, 51) 323 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.8, 0.9)
Monroe County 6 Rural 502.1 (488.5, 516.1) 8 (2, 23) 1,138 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.2, 3.1)
Montour County 6 Rural 548.0 (506.3, 592.4) 1 (1, 19) 143 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.5, 1.5)
Northumberland County 6 Rural 497.6 (480.3, 515.5) 11 (2, 29) 685 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.2, 0.6)
Pike County 6 Rural 446.0 (425.7, 467.3) 47 (21, 64) 415 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1)
Potter County 6 Rural 453.7 (414.4, 496.2) 41 (3, 67) 118 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Schuylkill County 6 Rural 533.4 (519.0, 548.2) 2 (1, 6) 1,120 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.1, 0.7)
Snyder County 6 Rural 466.0 (439.6, 493.6) 32 (5, 59) 253 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Somerset County 6 Rural 476.0 (457.1, 495.5) 22 (6, 47) 542 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Sullivan County 6 Rural 479.5 (414.7, 554.0) 20 (1, 67) 54 stable stable trend -2.6 (-15.1, 0.0)
Susquehanna County 6 Rural 452.9 (427.7, 479.3) 43 (11, 64) 284 falling falling trend -2.5 (-5.0, -1.1)
Tioga County 6 Rural 444.7 (420.2, 470.5) 51 (19, 65) 279 falling falling trend -1.6 (-5.1, -0.6)
Union County 6 Rural 471.4 (445.7, 498.3) 30 (4, 57) 266 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Venango County 6 Rural 474.0 (451.2, 497.8) 28 (5, 53) 379 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Warren County 6 Rural 467.2 (441.7, 494.0) 31 (5, 60) 288 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.2)
Wayne County 6 Rural 410.3 (390.0, 431.6) 65 (50, 67) 348 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/14/2024 12:38 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top