Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Pennsylvania by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Pennsylvania 6 N/A 20.2 (19.9, 20.5) N/A 3,368 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.3, -3.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 22.7 (22.6, 22.8) N/A 86,630 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.5)
Allegheny County 6 Urban 19.5 (18.5, 20.5) 41 (31, 52) 306 falling falling trend -6.3 (-9.0, -4.6)
Montgomery County 6 Urban 19.1 (17.9, 20.3) 43 (32, 54) 211 falling falling trend -18.4 (-25.8, -12.1)
Bucks County 6 Urban 21.5 (20.1, 23.0) 32 (22, 44) 192 falling falling trend -13.7 (-22.7, -7.7)
Lancaster County 6 Urban 26.4 (24.7, 28.3) 17 (9, 26) 183 falling falling trend -5.5 (-13.4, -0.5)
York County 6 Urban 31.1 (29.0, 33.3) 9 (3, 15) 177 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.5, 3.0)
Philadelphia County 6 Urban 8.5 (7.9, 9.2) 65 (64, 65) 145 falling falling trend -8.6 (-16.1, -4.3)
Chester County 6 Urban 20.4 (18.9, 22.1) 37 (25, 51) 133 falling falling trend -23.0 (-37.6, -10.3)
Delaware County 6 Urban 17.2 (15.8, 18.7) 54 (40, 60) 119 falling falling trend -13.1 (-23.8, -7.3)
Berks County 6 Urban 19.3 (17.6, 21.1) 42 (29, 55) 105 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Northampton County 6 Urban 23.6 (21.5, 25.9) 23 (14, 38) 99 falling falling trend -2.3 (-5.8, -0.7)
Dauphin County 6 Urban 28.0 (25.5, 30.7) 13 (6, 25) 98 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.9, 3.3)
Cumberland County 6 Urban 28.9 (26.3, 31.7) 11 (5, 22) 96 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.5, 3.1)
Lehigh County 6 Urban 19.7 (17.9, 21.7) 40 (26, 54) 91 stable stable trend -6.4 (-24.1, 1.7)
Luzerne County 6 Urban 20.6 (18.6, 22.7) 35 (22, 53) 89 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.9, 3.1)
Westmoreland County 6 Urban 13.7 (12.2, 15.3) 64 (54, 64) 71 falling falling trend -16.9 (-26.8, -12.2)
Lackawanna County 6 Urban 23.4 (20.8, 26.2) 25 (13, 44) 66 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.7, 4.9)
Butler County 6 Urban 25.9 (23.0, 29.2) 18 (8, 33) 64 falling falling trend -9.6 (-23.0, -1.8)
Erie County 6 Urban 18.7 (16.6, 21.0) 47 (28, 58) 63 stable stable trend 1.9 (0.0, 3.8)
Franklin County 6 Urban 28.1 (24.8, 31.7) 12 (5, 28) 58 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.5, 4.3)
Centre County 6 Urban 33.6 (29.7, 38.0) 6 (1, 15) 56 stable stable trend -0.6 (-17.3, 3.7)
Adams County 6 Urban 35.4 (31.0, 40.5) 4 (1, 13) 51 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.4, 5.4)
Washington County 6 Urban 17.7 (15.4, 20.2) 52 (31, 62) 49 stable stable trend -5.8 (-21.6, 1.3)
Lebanon County 6 Urban 24.6 (21.3, 28.2) 22 (9, 42) 46 stable stable trend 1.7 (0.0, 3.6)
Cambria County 6 Urban 22.4 (19.3, 25.8) 28 (14, 51) 44 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.8, 4.1)
Monroe County 6 Rural 20.5 (17.7, 23.6) 36 (20, 57) 43 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.3, 3.4)
Schuylkill County 6 Rural 20.9 (18.1, 24.1) 33 (18, 55) 42 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.6, 2.9)
Lycoming County 6 Urban 25.0 (21.4, 29.0) 20 (8, 43) 39 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.3, 5.0)
Beaver County 6 Urban 16.3 (13.9, 19.0) 57 (36, 64) 38 stable stable trend -6.6 (-30.9, 3.3)
Blair County 6 Urban 20.1 (17.0, 23.6) 39 (18, 59) 34 falling falling trend -11.2 (-33.7, -0.5)
Mercer County 6 Rural 22.1 (18.6, 26.0) 31 (12, 55) 33 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.6, 6.5)
Northumberland County 6 Rural 24.6 (20.8, 29.1) 21 (7, 47) 32 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.0, 5.0)
Columbia County 6 Rural 27.1 (22.3, 32.8) 15 (4, 43) 24 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.3, 3.1)
Armstrong County 6 Urban 25.6 (20.8, 31.3) 19 (5, 50) 24 rising rising trend 4.7 (2.1, 8.0)
Somerset County 6 Rural 22.7 (18.5, 27.7) 26 (9, 56) 24 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.2, 4.1)
Fayette County 6 Urban 13.7 (11.2, 16.7) 63 (48, 64) 23 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.6, 7.5)
Huntingdon County 6 Rural 35.8 (29.1, 43.7) 3 (1, 22) 22 rising rising trend 4.6 (2.1, 7.7)
Lawrence County 6 Urban 16.6 (13.4, 20.5) 56 (28, 64) 21 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.2, 4.3)
Union County 6 Rural 37.1 (30.0, 45.4) 1 (1, 18) 20 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.8, 5.6)
Crawford County 6 Rural 16.7 (13.4, 20.6) 55 (27, 64) 20 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.7, 3.6)
Carbon County 6 Urban 20.3 (16.3, 25.2) 38 (14, 61) 19 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.7)
Perry County 6 Urban 31.4 (25.1, 39.0) 8 (1, 32) 19 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.3, 7.3)
Pike County 6 Rural 18.0 (14.4, 22.5) 51 (21, 64) 19 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.3, 3.5)
Mifflin County 6 Rural 27.6 (21.9, 34.4) 14 (2, 46) 18 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.2, 5.0)
Clearfield County 6 Rural 14.7 (11.6, 18.5) 60 (38, 64) 17 falling falling trend -3.8 (-21.9, -0.8)
Bradford County 6 Rural 18.9 (14.9, 23.8) 46 (18, 63) 17 falling falling trend -6.5 (-23.9, -0.2)
Wayne County 6 Rural 18.3 (14.4, 23.3) 50 (18, 64) 16 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.3, 8.8)
Indiana County 6 Rural 14.4 (11.1, 18.4) 62 (37, 64) 15 stable stable trend -8.2 (-24.6, 1.1)
Snyder County 6 Rural 29.4 (22.9, 37.4) 10 (1, 44) 15 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.3, 5.1)
Bedford County 6 Rural 20.6 (15.7, 26.5) 34 (11, 63) 14 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.7, 3.6)
Venango County 6 Rural 19.0 (14.4, 24.7) 45 (13, 64) 14 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.9, 2.8)
McKean County 6 Rural 22.1 (16.5, 29.2) 30 (6, 61) 12 stable stable trend 0.8 (-2.4, 4.1)
Susquehanna County 6 Rural 19.0 (14.1, 25.3) 44 (13, 64) 12 stable stable trend -6.3 (-17.4, 4.3)
Warren County 6 Rural 22.1 (16.2, 29.6) 29 (5, 63) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-4.5, 2.4)
Clarion County 6 Rural 22.7 (16.8, 30.1) 27 (5, 63) 11 stable stable trend -29.3 (-45.3, 0.4)
Clinton County 6 Rural 23.6 (17.4, 31.4) 24 (4, 60) 11 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.7, 5.0)
Juniata County 6 Rural 35.4 (26.0, 47.3) 5 (1, 33) 11 stable stable trend 4.3 (-0.3, 10.4)
Wyoming County 6 Urban 26.8 (19.2, 36.5) 16 (1, 59) 10 stable stable trend 0.5 (-3.3, 4.6)
Tioga County 6 Rural 15.5 (11.1, 21.2) 58 (24, 64) 10 falling falling trend -14.9 (-40.1, -2.2)
Montour County 6 Rural 36.9 (26.6, 50.3) 2 (1, 35) 9 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.4, 5.5)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 15.0 (10.8, 20.5) 59 (27, 65) 9 falling falling trend -4.0 (-16.6, -0.9)
Elk County 6 Rural 18.4 (12.8, 25.8) 49 (11, 64) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-12.0, 3.2)
Greene County 6 Rural 17.6 (12.3, 24.6) 53 (14, 64) 8 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.1, 6.3)
Potter County 6 Rural 18.5 (10.9, 29.8) 48 (6, 65) 4 stable stable trend 3.2 (-2.8, 11.1)
Sullivan County 6 Rural 32.7 (17.9, 59.3) 7 (1, 64) 4
*
*
Fulton County 6 Rural 14.6 (8.4, 24.5) 61 (15, 65) 3 falling falling trend -18.1 (-49.0, -6.0)
Cameron County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/09/2024 1:22 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Cameron, Forest

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top