Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Pennsylvania by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Pennsylvania 6 21.3 (21.0, 21.6) N/A 3,484 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.4, -1.9)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 22.5 (22.4, 22.5) N/A 83,836 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.9, 2.7)
Potter County 6 19.8 (12.0, 31.2) 44 (4, 65) 5 rising rising trend 20.8 (2.1, 40.9)
Juniata County 6 31.5 (22.8, 42.4) 6 (1, 51) 10 stable stable trend 4.6 (-0.6, 11.6)
Huntingdon County 6 35.0 (28.4, 42.9) 4 (1, 22) 21 rising rising trend 4.5 (1.4, 8.7)
Armstrong County 6 23.8 (19.3, 29.2) 25 (6, 55) 22 rising rising trend 4.4 (1.6, 8.0)
Centre County 6 32.8 (29.0, 37.1) 5 (1, 18) 56 rising rising trend 3.6 (2.2, 5.3)
Fayette County 6 12.5 (10.1, 15.3) 64 (55, 65) 22 stable stable trend 3.5 (-0.4, 8.4)
Clarion County 6 28.2 (21.6, 36.3) 13 (1, 50) 14 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.9, 6.4)
Adams County 6 35.8 (31.2, 41.0) 2 (1, 14) 50 rising rising trend 3.3 (1.0, 6.1)
Mercer County 6 23.1 (19.5, 27.1) 31 (10, 53) 35 stable stable trend 3.2 (-0.3, 7.7)
Lackawanna County 6 22.8 (20.2, 25.6) 32 (17, 49) 63 rising rising trend 3.1 (1.4, 5.1)
Cambria County 6 23.3 (20.0, 27.0) 30 (12, 50) 42 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.9, 4.8)
Union County 6 35.6 (28.8, 43.7) 3 (1, 24) 20 stable stable trend 2.7 (0.0, 6.0)
Northumberland County 6 27.8 (23.7, 32.6) 16 (3, 37) 36 stable stable trend 2.6 (-0.4, 6.1)
Lycoming County 6 26.1 (22.4, 30.3) 20 (5, 42) 39 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.1, 5.5)
Franklin County 6 28.2 (24.9, 31.9) 12 (4, 31) 57 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.5, 4.6)
Snyder County 6 31.0 (24.3, 39.1) 8 (1, 40) 16 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.4, 6.0)
Erie County 6 19.6 (17.5, 22.0) 46 (29, 58) 66 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.4, 4.4)
Dauphin County 6 27.5 (25.0, 30.2) 17 (6, 29) 94 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.8, 3.8)
Luzerne County 6 20.3 (18.3, 22.4) 40 (27, 56) 88 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.8, 3.3)
York County 6 31.3 (29.2, 33.6) 7 (2, 15) 176 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.9, 3.3)
Perry County 6 24.8 (19.2, 31.6) 23 (3, 57) 15 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.6, 6.2)
Lebanon County 6 25.4 (22.0, 29.1) 21 (8, 42) 46 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.2, 4.2)
Mifflin County 6 27.4 (21.6, 34.3) 18 (1, 51) 17 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.5, 5.8)
Somerset County 6 21.5 (17.4, 26.4) 36 (13, 60) 22 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.5, 4.4)
Schuylkill County 6 22.2 (19.3, 25.5) 33 (16, 53) 44 stable stable trend 1.6 (0.0, 3.5)
Columbia County 6 29.6 (24.4, 35.6) 10 (1, 36) 26 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.4, 3.6)
McKean County 6 23.5 (17.8, 30.6) 27 (4, 61) 13 stable stable trend 1.5 (-1.6, 4.9)
Venango County 6 19.6 (15.0, 25.4) 45 (13, 63) 14 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.5, 3.7)
Lawrence County 6 17.0 (13.6, 20.9) 55 (31, 64) 21 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.9, 5.0)
Bradford County 6 20.7 (16.4, 25.9) 38 (13, 62) 18 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.7, 6.0)
Cumberland County 6 29.5 (26.8, 32.4) 11 (4, 23) 94 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.6, 3.6)
Greene County 6 15.7 (10.8, 22.2) 61 (22, 65) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.8, 7.1)
Monroe County 6 19.1 (16.4, 22.1) 48 (26, 61) 40 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.9, 3.4)
Montour County 6 36.7 (26.2, 50.3) 1 (1, 41) 9 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.3, 6.5)
Wyoming County 6 30.8 (22.6, 41.1) 9 (1, 50) 11 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.8, 5.5)
Bedford County 6 21.8 (16.8, 27.8) 35 (9, 62) 15 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.5, 3.8)
Clinton County 6 23.5 (17.4, 31.2) 26 (3, 62) 11 stable stable trend 1.0 (-3.2, 5.5)
Pike County 6 18.3 (14.6, 23.0) 50 (22, 64) 18 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.9, 4.3)
Crawford County 6 17.3 (13.9, 21.3) 54 (30, 64) 20 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.8, 4.2)
Elk County 6 20.0 (13.9, 28.1) 42 (7, 64) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-8.6, 5.3)
Lehigh County 6 20.1 (18.3, 22.1) 41 (28, 56) 92 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.1)
Berks County 6 19.9 (18.1, 21.7) 43 (30, 56) 106 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.7, 1.0)
Warren County 6 20.6 (15.0, 27.8) 39 (6, 64) 11 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.3, 3.0)
Carbon County 6 18.8 (14.8, 23.7) 49 (21, 64) 17 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.4, 1.3)
Clearfield County 6 17.9 (14.4, 22.0) 52 (26, 64) 20 stable stable trend -1.7 (-12.4, 0.6)
Northampton County 6 24.8 (22.6, 27.2) 22 (12, 37) 102 stable stable trend -2.2 (-8.4, 0.1)
Jefferson County 6 16.4 (11.9, 22.1) 58 (24, 64) 10 stable stable trend -3.1 (-16.6, 0.6)
Lancaster County 6 28.0 (26.2, 30.0) 15 (7, 24) 191 stable stable trend -3.1 (-9.7, 1.9)
Chester County 6 23.3 (21.6, 25.1) 29 (18, 42) 148 stable stable trend -5.9 (-15.0, 0.0)
Allegheny County 6 20.8 (19.8, 21.9) 37 (29, 49) 319 falling falling trend -6.8 (-10.4, -4.2)
Philadelphia County 6 9.2 (8.5, 9.9) 65 (63, 65) 155 falling falling trend -6.9 (-12.1, -0.8)
Bucks County 6 24.6 (23.0, 26.2) 24 (16, 35) 209 falling falling trend -7.2 (-9.5, -4.5)
Blair County 6 23.3 (20.0, 27.1) 28 (11, 51) 39 stable stable trend -7.7 (-23.4, 6.7)
Delaware County 6 19.4 (17.9, 21.0) 47 (33, 56) 133 falling falling trend -7.9 (-15.1, -2.7)
Montgomery County 6 22.1 (20.8, 23.5) 34 (23, 43) 238 falling falling trend -8.0 (-11.8, -5.0)
Butler County 6 28.1 (25.0, 31.5) 14 (4, 31) 67 stable stable trend -8.3 (-18.0, 3.5)
Susquehanna County 6 16.9 (12.4, 22.8) 57 (22, 64) 11 stable stable trend -9.1 (-22.1, 3.7)
Washington County 6 17.6 (15.3, 20.2) 53 (35, 62) 48 stable stable trend -10.4 (-28.5, 0.6)
Wayne County 6 16.3 (12.5, 21.2) 60 (27, 64) 14 stable stable trend -15.3 (-38.8, 7.2)
Beaver County 6 16.9 (14.5, 19.7) 56 (37, 64) 39 stable stable trend -18.4 (-38.4, 0.8)
Westmoreland County 6 15.5 (13.9, 17.2) 62 (49, 64) 79 falling falling trend -20.3 (-30.8, -14.3)
Indiana County 6 13.9 (10.6, 17.9) 63 (44, 65) 14 falling falling trend -20.4 (-34.6, -2.1)
Fulton County 6 16.3 (8.9, 27.9) 59 (4, 65) 3 falling falling trend -21.3 (-47.2, -4.0)
Tioga County 6 18.2 (13.4, 24.3) 51 (18, 64) 11 falling falling trend -22.1 (-39.4, -4.0)
Sullivan County 6 26.3 (14.2, 49.6) 19 (1, 65) 3
*
*
Cameron County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 02/24/2024 1:34 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Cameron, Forest

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top