Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Carolina by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, Ages <50

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Carolina 6 101.5 (99.9, 103.2) N/A 3,026 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.9, -0.2)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 105.2 (105.0, 105.5) N/A 202,435 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.1, 0.3)
Lancaster County 6 92.3 (81.5, 104.1) 38 (11, 45) 53 falling falling trend -8.2 (-13.3, -2.1)
Fairfield County 6 74.9 (54.4, 100.6) 45 (10, 46) 9 falling falling trend -6.8 (-34.4, -2.0)
Spartanburg County 6 103.3 (96.9, 110.1) 18 (7, 36) 193 falling falling trend -5.1 (-9.9, -0.5)
Marion County 6 89.9 (70.6, 112.6) 39 (4, 46) 15 falling falling trend -3.9 (-10.8, -0.8)
Berkeley County 6 95.8 (88.6, 103.3) 33 (12, 42) 134 stable stable trend -3.4 (-10.4, 1.0)
Beaufort County 6 85.9 (77.6, 94.8) 42 (26, 46) 80 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Newberry County 6 94.5 (76.7, 115.2) 34 (4, 46) 20 stable stable trend -0.9 (-4.1, 2.3)
Barnwell County 6 75.2 (54.5, 101.0) 46 (11, 46) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.1, 2.2)
Kershaw County 6 100.6 (86.7, 116.1) 24 (4, 44) 38 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.2)
Florence County 6 96.5 (87.1, 106.5) 30 (9, 43) 78 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Sumter County 6 103.9 (92.4, 116.3) 16 (4, 41) 61 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.0)
Charleston County 6 98.9 (93.4, 104.7) 28 (12, 38) 248 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Dorchester County 6 101.2 (92.6, 110.3) 22 (7, 39) 104 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 1.0)
Orangeburg County 6 102.4 (89.4, 116.7) 20 (3, 42) 45 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Horry County 6 97.1 (90.8, 103.7) 29 (13, 41) 179 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.1, 0.4)
Marlboro County 6 94.5 (74.1, 118.8) 35 (2, 46) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.6)
Lee County 6 94.0 (68.2, 126.3) 37 (1, 46) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.2, 4.0)
Richland County 6 100.9 (95.3, 106.7) 21 (10, 37) 249 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.1)
Dillon County 6 96.5 (76.7, 119.8) 32 (2, 46) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-3.2, 2.7)
Greenville County 6 104.4 (99.4, 109.6) 14 (7, 30) 331 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.3)
Oconee County 6 103.7 (90.2, 118.6) 15 (2, 42) 43 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.5, 2.2)
Jasper County 6 78.3 (60.2, 100.0) 44 (11, 46) 13 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.2, 3.3)
Darlington County 6 96.8 (83.2, 112.0) 31 (5, 45) 36 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.6)
Lexington County 6 103.0 (96.5, 109.8) 19 (8, 35) 189 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
York County 6 100.6 (94.1, 107.4) 23 (9, 38) 181 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3)
Cherokee County 6 115.0 (99.3, 132.6) 5 (1, 37) 39 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7)
Chester County 6 109.3 (88.9, 133.0) 11 (1, 44) 20 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.3, 2.5)
Clarendon County 6 83.6 (65.2, 105.3) 41 (7, 46) 14 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.9, 3.1)
Colleton County 6 124.2 (103.5, 147.9) 3 (1, 35) 25 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.5, 3.9)
Edgefield County 6 100.0 (79.5, 124.2) 27 (2, 46) 17 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.0, 4.3)
Allendale County 6 100.3 (65.1, 147.6) 26 (1, 46) 5 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.1, 3.7)
Chesterfield County 6 103.2 (86.6, 122.0) 17 (2, 44) 28 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.7, 2.5)
Aiken County 6 93.6 (85.1, 102.8) 36 (13, 44) 89 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 1.8)
Calhoun County 6 111.4 (80.7, 150.0) 8 (1, 46) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.8, 4.8)
Hampton County 6 100.8 (76.5, 130.4) 25 (1, 46) 12 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.8, 3.2)
Anderson County 6 114.0 (105.5, 123.0) 6 (2, 24) 134 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.1, 1.8)
Pickens County 6 117.5 (106.0, 129.8) 4 (1, 26) 79 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.3, 2.4)
Bamberg County 6 84.4 (57.0, 120.2) 40 (2, 46) 6 stable stable trend 1.1 (-3.1, 5.4)
Williamsburg County 6 114.0 (92.4, 139.0) 7 (1, 42) 20 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.5, 4.8)
Saluda County 6 105.5 (80.4, 135.9) 13 (1, 46) 12 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.5, 4.3)
Laurens County 6 108.5 (94.1, 124.5) 10 (2, 39) 41 stable stable trend 1.5 (0.0, 3.0)
Abbeville County 6 111.2 (86.7, 140.2) 9 (1, 45) 14 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.3, 5.9)
Union County 6 138.3 (112.8, 167.7) 1 (1, 27) 21 stable stable trend 1.9 (-0.8, 4.8)
Georgetown County 6 133.7 (115.8, 153.6) 2 (1, 16) 41 rising rising trend 3.2 (1.9, 4.7)
Greenwood County 6 106.1 (92.2, 121.5) 12 (2, 41) 42 stable stable trend 7.3 (-1.7, 14.5)
McCormick County 6 82.9 (49.6, 131.5) 43 (1, 46) 4
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 9:50 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top