Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Carolina by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
South Carolina 6 N/A 35.6 (34.9, 36.3) N/A 2,268 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.3, 1.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 36.4 (36.3, 36.4) N/A 140,088 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.3, -0.9)
Abbeville County 6 Rural 32.6 (24.7, 42.7) 37 (9, 46) 12 falling falling trend -3.7 (-7.0, -0.6)
Aiken County 6 Urban 33.0 (29.6, 36.8) 35 (21, 46) 74 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.4)
Allendale County 6 Rural 34.3 (19.8, 56.1) 33 (1, 46) 4 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.7, -1.3)
Anderson County 6 Urban 41.8 (38.3, 45.6) 17 (7, 28) 109 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.1)
Bamberg County 6 Rural 43.5 (30.5, 60.8) 12 (1, 46) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-16.6, 15.0)
Barnwell County 6 Rural 38.9 (28.9, 51.5) 24 (1, 46) 11 stable stable trend 3.2 (-8.2, 26.6)
Beaufort County 6 Urban 29.6 (26.5, 33.1) 45 (30, 46) 83 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.4, -1.7)
Berkeley County 6 Urban 31.5 (28.3, 34.9) 40 (25, 46) 78 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -0.8)
Calhoun County 6 Urban 49.8 (35.9, 67.8) 6 (1, 43) 10 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.1, 0.9)
Charleston County 6 Urban 30.5 (28.2, 32.9) 43 (31, 46) 146 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.6)
Cherokee County 6 Rural 46.0 (39.0, 54.0) 8 (1, 31) 33 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.9, 1.0)
Chester County 6 Urban 34.5 (27.0, 43.7) 32 (8, 46) 15 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.6, -2.3)
Chesterfield County 6 Rural 41.9 (34.5, 50.6) 16 (2, 41) 24 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.4)
Clarendon County 6 Rural 44.5 (35.6, 55.3) 9 (1, 39) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.2, 1.9)
Colleton County 6 Rural 41.8 (33.8, 51.2) 18 (2, 42) 22 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.9, 1.3)
Darlington County 6 Urban 51.9 (45.0, 59.6) 4 (1, 18) 44 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.3)
Dillon County 6 Rural 51.9 (41.8, 63.9) 3 (1, 26) 19 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.0, 1.9)
Dorchester County 6 Urban 35.8 (31.7, 40.1) 28 (14, 44) 61 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.4, -0.8)
Edgefield County 6 Urban 29.3 (21.6, 39.1) 46 (15, 46) 10 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.4, -0.1)
Fairfield County 6 Urban 40.5 (30.6, 53.0) 20 (1, 46) 13 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.8, 1.4)
Florence County 6 Urban 39.2 (35.0, 43.7) 23 (9, 36) 68 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 2.7)
Georgetown County 6 Rural 44.5 (38.2, 51.7) 10 (2, 32) 46 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4)
Greenville County 6 Urban 31.9 (29.9, 34.0) 39 (28, 45) 196 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.4, -1.6)
Greenwood County 6 Rural 40.2 (34.3, 46.9) 21 (5, 40) 36 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.1, -1.2)
Hampton County 6 Rural 52.8 (40.1, 68.5) 2 (1, 35) 12 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.4, 2.0)
Horry County 6 Urban 35.2 (32.8, 37.8) 31 (20, 40) 184 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.6, -2.1)
Jasper County 6 Urban 30.2 (22.5, 39.9) 44 (12, 46) 12 falling falling trend -4.9 (-14.5, -2.6)
Kershaw County 6 Urban 31.1 (25.7, 37.4) 41 (19, 46) 25 falling falling trend -4.5 (-5.9, -3.3)
Lancaster County 6 Urban 32.1 (27.8, 37.0) 38 (20, 46) 43 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.3, -1.0)
Laurens County 6 Urban 43.3 (37.2, 50.2) 13 (2, 32) 38 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Lee County 6 Rural 39.5 (28.6, 53.7) 22 (1, 46) 9 falling falling trend -3.2 (-7.0, -0.1)
Lexington County 6 Urban 33.8 (31.0, 36.7) 34 (22, 44) 117 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.2)
Marion County 6 Rural 53.7 (43.8, 65.4) 1 (1, 21) 23 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.6, 3.2)
Marlboro County 6 Rural 40.9 (31.8, 52.0) 19 (2, 45) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.6, 1.9)
McCormick County 6 Rural 43.1 (27.5, 66.2) 14 (1, 46) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.9, 2.4)
Newberry County 6 Rural 42.1 (34.1, 51.5) 15 (2, 42) 21 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.5, 0.6)
Oconee County 6 Rural 37.7 (32.4, 43.7) 25 (9, 43) 43 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.2, -0.3)
Orangeburg County 6 Rural 50.7 (44.7, 57.4) 5 (1, 18) 58 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.0)
Pickens County 6 Urban 36.5 (32.2, 41.3) 26 (12, 43) 55 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.9, 0.1)
Richland County 6 Urban 30.7 (28.3, 33.2) 42 (30, 46) 130 stable stable trend -2.0 (-3.6, 3.5)
Saluda County 6 Urban 35.7 (25.3, 49.3) 29 (2, 46) 8 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.2, 4.9)
Spartanburg County 6 Urban 35.7 (33.0, 38.6) 30 (18, 40) 135 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 4.8)
Sumter County 6 Urban 36.4 (31.7, 41.6) 27 (12, 44) 46 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.7, -1.7)
Union County 6 Urban 44.3 (34.8, 56.0) 11 (1, 42) 17 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.9, 0.5)
Williamsburg County 6 Rural 46.0 (37.1, 56.7) 7 (1, 37) 20 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.1, 2.2)
York County 6 Urban 32.9 (30.0, 36.0) 36 (23, 45) 102 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.1, -2.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/03/2024 1:56 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top