Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for South Carolina by County

Colon & Rectum (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
South Carolina 6 37.4 (36.7, 38.1) N/A 2,320 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.4, -0.1)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 37.7 (37.6, 37.7) N/A 143,166 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.3)
Allendale County 6 35.7 (20.9, 57.4) 35 (1, 46) 4 stable stable trend 19.5 (-10.3, 59.3)
Marion County 6 59.4 (48.9, 71.6) 2 (1, 17) 25 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.4, 2.7)
Saluda County 6 51.2 (39.2, 66.0) 3 (1, 41) 13 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.9, 4.1)
Williamsburg County 6 61.2 (50.6, 73.4) 1 (1, 14) 26 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.5)
Marlboro County 6 49.1 (38.9, 61.3) 6 (1, 39) 17 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.5)
Cherokee County 6 48.3 (41.1, 56.5) 8 (1, 28) 34 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.1)
Pickens County 6 41.7 (37.0, 46.9) 18 (7, 37) 61 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.6, 0.3)
Georgetown County 6 36.7 (31.1, 43.2) 30 (12, 46) 37 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.9)
Chesterfield County 6 47.2 (39.5, 56.1) 11 (2, 33) 28 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
Colleton County 6 48.3 (39.6, 58.5) 9 (1, 34) 24 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.1)
Union County 6 50.7 (40.6, 62.6) 4 (1, 33) 20 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.9, 1.1)
Clarendon County 6 40.1 (32.0, 49.8) 22 (4, 46) 20 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.1, 1.2)
McCormick County 6 38.4 (25.6, 57.8) 26 (1, 46) 7 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.7, 2.5)
Orangeburg County 6 50.6 (44.6, 57.2) 5 (1, 21) 57 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.2)
Darlington County 6 47.0 (40.6, 54.2) 12 (2, 29) 42 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.5)
Newberry County 6 48.3 (39.8, 58.3) 7 (1, 35) 24 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.7, 0.9)
Laurens County 6 48.0 (41.4, 55.3) 10 (2, 27) 41 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.4, -0.6)
Calhoun County 6 46.3 (33.9, 62.4) 13 (1, 46) 10 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.7, 0.6)
Anderson County 6 45.7 (41.9, 49.7) 15 (4, 24) 117 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.1)
Dillon County 6 45.8 (36.4, 56.9) 14 (1, 44) 18 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.3, 0.9)
Jasper County 6 37.7 (29.0, 48.3) 28 (4, 46) 14 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.7, 0.1)
Florence County 6 40.4 (36.2, 45.0) 21 (11, 38) 70 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.4)
Oconee County 6 38.5 (33.1, 44.6) 25 (10, 45) 43 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.0)
Spartanburg County 6 36.5 (33.7, 39.5) 32 (20, 43) 131 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.3, -1.7)
Sumter County 6 40.1 (35.1, 45.5) 23 (9, 41) 50 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.7, -1.6)
Aiken County 6 33.7 (30.3, 37.5) 42 (23, 46) 75 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -0.9)
Fairfield County 6 38.0 (28.7, 49.8) 27 (4, 46) 13 falling falling trend -2.7 (-5.0, -0.3)
Greenwood County 6 40.8 (34.9, 47.5) 19 (7, 43) 36 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.1, -1.3)
Lee County 6 45.2 (32.7, 61.0) 16 (1, 46) 10 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.7, 0.5)
Berkeley County 6 34.2 (30.8, 37.9) 41 (22, 46) 78 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.9, -1.6)
Lexington County 6 36.4 (33.5, 39.4) 33 (19, 43) 123 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.9, -1.6)
Charleston County 6 31.7 (29.4, 34.1) 45 (32, 46) 148 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.8, -2.1)
Greenville County 6 33.2 (31.1, 35.4) 43 (29, 46) 195 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.6, -2.2)
Lancaster County 6 34.7 (30.0, 39.9) 38 (18, 46) 44 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.9, -1.2)
Hampton County 6 44.6 (33.1, 58.9) 17 (1, 46) 11 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.5, 0.4)
Beaufort County 6 30.1 (27.0, 33.5) 46 (33, 46) 85 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.3, -2.1)
Dorchester County 6 34.7 (30.7, 39.0) 39 (20, 46) 58 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.8, -1.8)
Horry County 6 35.2 (32.8, 37.9) 37 (23, 44) 174 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.1, -2.6)
York County 6 35.4 (32.3, 38.6) 36 (21, 45) 104 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.5, -2.1)
Edgefield County 6 34.5 (26.3, 44.8) 40 (8, 46) 13 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.0, -0.6)
Abbeville County 6 39.9 (30.8, 51.1) 24 (3, 46) 14 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.9, -1.6)
Richland County 6 32.7 (30.2, 35.4) 44 (29, 46) 132 falling falling trend -4.0 (-5.0, -3.0)
Barnwell County 6 36.3 (26.6, 48.6) 34 (4, 46) 10 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.0, -1.0)
Bamberg County 6 40.5 (29.2, 55.5) 20 (1, 46) 9 falling falling trend -4.5 (-6.4, -2.6)
Kershaw County 6 36.6 (30.8, 43.2) 31 (12, 46) 30 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.0, -3.3)
Chester County 6 37.1 (29.4, 46.5) 29 (7, 46) 17 falling falling trend -5.4 (-7.6, -3.2)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2022 4:00 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top