Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Tennessee by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Tennessee 6 524.2 (520.8, 527.5) N/A 19,992 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 488.3 (487.8, 488.7) N/A 875,592 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.5)
Sequatchie County 6 502.1 (440.5, 570.8) 74 (7, 95) 52 falling falling trend -11.4 (-20.1, -1.7)
Lincoln County 6 404.7 (366.9, 445.8) 95 (87, 95) 90 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.1, -2.2)
Union County 6 519.2 (461.9, 582.1) 63 (5, 94) 67 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.9, -1.9)
Giles County 6 476.6 (432.9, 523.9) 90 (31, 95) 95 stable stable trend -3.0 (-6.1, 0.1)
Jackson County 6 433.0 (371.4, 503.3) 94 (38, 95) 40 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.2, -1.4)
Hamilton County 6 530.0 (515.9, 544.5) 50 (30, 72) 1,122 stable stable trend -2.7 (-9.1, 4.1)
Anderson County 6 507.1 (478.8, 536.7) 71 (28, 91) 257 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.9, -1.4)
Cumberland County 6 494.5 (466.1, 524.5) 82 (40, 93) 270 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -1.9)
Blount County 6 526.3 (504.2, 549.3) 55 (26, 82) 456 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.0)
Morgan County 6 479.1 (429.1, 533.8) 89 (26, 95) 71 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.0)
Davidson County 6 498.5 (486.9, 510.2) 77 (58, 88) 1,539 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.5, -1.3)
Bradley County 6 488.3 (463.3, 514.3) 84 (47, 94) 299 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.4)
Overton County 6 529.3 (477.2, 585.9) 52 (5, 92) 81 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.8, -0.1)
Tipton County 6 554.1 (517.5, 592.5) 28 (5, 79) 185 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2)
Sumner County 6 523.5 (503.3, 544.3) 60 (28, 82) 542 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.7)
DeKalb County 6 485.9 (432.6, 544.4) 85 (19, 95) 65 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Grainger County 6 533.8 (482.1, 590.0) 45 (5, 92) 87 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.4)
Putnam County 6 495.6 (465.5, 527.1) 80 (36, 93) 212 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.1, -0.1)
Shelby County 6 525.7 (515.7, 535.8) 57 (36, 70) 2,333 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.5, -0.7)
Hawkins County 6 537.1 (503.9, 572.1) 42 (12, 84) 212 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.2)
Henry County 6 584.0 (539.9, 631.3) 16 (1, 67) 141 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.4)
Lauderdale County 6 516.6 (463.9, 573.8) 64 (7, 94) 75 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Rhea County 6 549.2 (504.0, 597.5) 31 (5, 88) 116 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Fentress County 6 557.7 (497.7, 623.5) 27 (2, 91) 71 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Knox County 6 519.6 (506.7, 532.8) 62 (38, 78) 1,294 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
White County 6 575.6 (525.5, 629.5) 20 (1, 80) 103 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Williamson County 6 494.6 (475.7, 514.1) 81 (54, 91) 566 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Montgomery County 6 500.6 (477.0, 525.1) 76 (38, 92) 373 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Pickett County 6 470.8 (375.9, 587.0) 92 (2, 95) 20 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.9, 1.8)
Robertson County 6 529.6 (496.4, 564.5) 51 (13, 87) 207 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Sullivan County 6 513.9 (494.4, 534.0) 67 (35, 86) 561 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Coffee County 6 539.4 (503.5, 577.3) 39 (9, 85) 176 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.6)
Weakley County 6 532.4 (487.0, 581.2) 48 (5, 92) 107 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.1, 1.0)
Campbell County 6 587.0 (546.3, 630.2) 13 (1, 62) 163 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Loudon County 6 512.1 (480.2, 545.8) 68 (23, 91) 221 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.5, 0.7)
Marshall County 6 578.5 (529.7, 630.8) 19 (1, 74) 112 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Rutherford County 6 505.3 (487.4, 523.7) 72 (42, 88) 673 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.0)
Washington County 6 498.2 (475.8, 521.3) 78 (42, 91) 395 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.4)
Carter County 6 468.9 (438.6, 501.0) 93 (56, 95) 190 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Cheatham County 6 537.8 (493.3, 585.4) 41 (6, 90) 124 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.1)
Cocke County 6 534.3 (492.7, 578.7) 44 (7, 90) 136 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.3, 0.7)
Hamblen County 6 546.2 (513.0, 581.1) 34 (8, 82) 210 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Stewart County 6 527.4 (461.6, 600.8) 54 (2, 94) 50 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Clay County 6 501.5 (422.8, 593.2) 75 (3, 95) 31 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.8)
Lawrence County 6 565.1 (523.9, 608.7) 24 (3, 78) 148 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.1)
Maury County 6 566.4 (536.8, 597.3) 23 (5, 62) 298 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Polk County 6 497.9 (440.2, 561.8) 79 (9, 95) 59 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Sevier County 6 562.9 (536.0, 590.9) 25 (7, 61) 357 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Wilson County 6 521.7 (498.2, 546.0) 61 (26, 84) 406 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.4)
Grundy County 6 539.5 (472.2, 614.6) 38 (2, 94) 50 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.0)
Humphreys County 6 557.8 (499.0, 622.2) 26 (2, 92) 71 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Madison County 6 531.0 (503.4, 559.8) 49 (18, 83) 297 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Scott County 6 527.8 (471.4, 589.4) 53 (5, 94) 67 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Hickman County 6 568.3 (515.4, 625.4) 22 (2, 88) 90 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.2)
Jefferson County 6 535.1 (500.7, 571.4) 43 (11, 87) 195 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.9)
Lewis County 6 631.5 (553.7, 718.1) 2 (1, 70) 52 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.6, 1.5)
Marion County 6 587.1 (537.0, 640.9) 12 (1, 71) 111 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.0)
Perry County 6 548.9 (463.2, 647.2) 32 (1, 95) 32 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.9, 2.0)
Claiborne County 6 581.4 (533.9, 632.3) 18 (1, 70) 122 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
McMinn County 6 514.3 (480.4, 550.1) 66 (17, 91) 183 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.9, 1.0)
Macon County 6 624.3 (563.5, 689.9) 3 (1, 59) 84 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Monroe County 6 575.0 (536.9, 615.3) 21 (3, 65) 186 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Obion County 6 586.6 (538.4, 638.3) 14 (1, 68) 118 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.1)
Bledsoe County 6 507.9 (446.6, 575.9) 70 (7, 94) 54 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 2.1)
Decatur County 6 545.2 (476.0, 622.8) 36 (2, 93) 48 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5)
Dickson County 6 583.4 (544.1, 625.0) 17 (2, 62) 175 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.1)
Fayette County 6 549.9 (510.9, 591.4) 30 (5, 82) 164 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.1, 1.7)
Franklin County 6 524.8 (485.9, 566.2) 59 (12, 91) 145 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 2.7)
Gibson County 6 551.7 (513.7, 592.0) 29 (6, 84) 162 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
Smith County 6 510.7 (452.8, 574.3) 69 (6, 94) 62 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.4)
Benton County 6 603.4 (539.3, 673.8) 5 (1, 74) 72 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.9)
Greene County 6 546.8 (516.5, 578.5) 33 (9, 78) 264 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.1)
Henderson County 6 545.1 (496.0, 598.1) 37 (5, 90) 95 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.4)
Bedford County 6 545.9 (505.1, 589.2) 35 (6, 87) 142 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.5)
Wayne County 6 516.5 (458.2, 580.8) 65 (6, 94) 59 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.1)
Warren County 6 539.3 (497.8, 583.6) 40 (5, 88) 131 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.2, 1.6)
Hardin County 6 533.1 (485.6, 584.5) 46 (5, 92) 102 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.1)
Unicoi County 6 504.6 (449.3, 565.6) 73 (8, 94) 67 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.6)
Carroll County 6 607.2 (555.5, 662.6) 4 (1, 60) 109 stable stable trend 1.0 (0.0, 2.0)
Dyer County 6 526.3 (483.1, 572.5) 56 (10, 91) 116 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.1, 2.0)
McNairy County 6 532.8 (483.6, 586.1) 47 (5, 92) 93 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.1, 2.3)
Van Buren County 6 480.5 (390.5, 588.0) 88 (3, 95) 22 stable stable trend 1.1 (-2.0, 4.3)
Meigs County 6 588.7 (513.1, 673.2) 11 (1, 88) 50 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.7)
Moore County 6 471.0 (385.2, 572.9) 91 (4, 95) 23 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.6, 3.1)
Crockett County 6 594.2 (522.7, 673.4) 7 (1, 88) 53 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.2, 2.3)
Haywood County 6 584.5 (519.7, 655.9) 15 (1, 84) 64 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.1, 2.5)
Hardeman County 6 592.8 (540.2, 649.4) 8 (1, 72) 98 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.2, 2.6)
Lake County 6 493.8 (405.1, 597.3) 83 (2, 95) 23 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.2, 3.0)
Johnson County 6 484.4 (431.8, 542.3) 86 (18, 95) 65 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.4, 3.5)
Trousdale County 6 689.0 (587.3, 803.1) 1 (1, 51) 36 stable stable trend 1.7 (0.0, 3.4)
Hancock County 6 590.6 (491.0, 706.6) 10 (1, 94) 28 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.6, 5.3)
Houston County 6 591.0 (502.8, 691.9) 9 (1, 92) 34 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.3, 4.4)
Chester County 6 602.1 (533.6, 677.5) 6 (1, 80) 59 rising rising trend 2.5 (0.9, 4.0)
Roane County 6 483.5 (452.4, 516.4) 87 (44, 94) 197 stable stable trend 4.2 (-3.2, 12.2)
Cannon County 6 525.4 (458.5, 600.1) 58 (3, 94) 47 stable stable trend 5.4 (-5.6, 17.8)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/09/2022 3:24 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2021 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2019) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2021 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2021 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top