Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2013-2017

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 6 *** 50.6 (50.2, 51.0) N/A 13,317 falling falling trend -2.7 (-2.9, -2.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 58.3 (58.2, 58.4) N/A 221,568 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.2, -1.9)
Maverick County 6 *** 25.5 (19.6, 32.7) 197 (176, 197) 13 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.6, 1.8)
Hidalgo County 6 *** 28.0 (26.2, 29.8) 196 (186, 197) 192 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.4, -2.6)
Webb County 6 *** 28.4 (25.1, 31.9) 195 (180, 197) 56 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.0, -0.3)
Reeves County 6 *** 29.6 (18.3, 45.3) 194 (112, 197) 4 falling falling trend -7.9 (-11.8, -3.9)
Dimmit County 6 *** 30.0 (17.6, 48.0) 193 (109, 197) 4
*
*
Brewster County 6 *** 30.6 (18.0, 49.4) 192 (90, 197) 4
*
*
El Paso County 6 *** 30.9 (29.1, 32.7) 191 (180, 195) 234 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.8, -2.5)
Val Verde County 6 *** 32.2 (25.6, 39.9) 190 (158, 197) 17 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.1, 0.6)
Jim Wells County 6 *** 32.4 (25.3, 40.8) 189 (154, 197) 15 stable stable trend -3.5 (-7.1, 0.3)
Cameron County 6 *** 33.0 (30.5, 35.6) 188 (175, 194) 136 falling falling trend -8.0 (-14.5, -1.1)
Pecos County 6 *** 33.9 (22.4, 49.2) 187 (94, 197) 6 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.0, 0.8)
Duval County 6 *** 35.6 (23.4, 52.4) 186 (81, 197) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-5.1, 4.3)
Andrews County 6 *** 35.7 (23.2, 52.4) 185 (84, 197) 5 falling falling trend -6.1 (-10.0, -2.0)
Castro County 6 *** 35.8 (20.7, 58.3) 184 (27, 197) 3 stable stable trend 3.0 (-2.7, 9.0)
Lamb County 6 *** 37.4 (25.5, 53.3) 183 (62, 197) 6 stable stable trend -3.1 (-6.6, 0.6)
Willacy County 6 *** 37.5 (26.8, 50.9) 182 (91, 197) 8 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.7, 0.1)
Washington County 6 *** 38.2 (31.2, 46.7) 181 (123, 196) 21 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.3, -2.0)
Fort Bend County 6 *** 38.3 (35.9, 40.7) 180 (160, 186) 226 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.6, -2.3)
Somervell County 6 *** 39.4 (25.0, 60.1) 179 (41, 197) 5 stable stable trend -3.6 (-8.3, 1.4)
Frio County 6 *** 39.5 (27.3, 55.2) 178 (69, 197) 7 stable stable trend -2.8 (-8.0, 2.7)
Deaf Smith County 6 *** 39.9 (27.8, 55.4) 177 (63, 197) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-4.6, 5.1)
Hays County 6 *** 40.0 (35.6, 44.8) 176 (140, 188) 66 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.8, -1.0)
Gonzales County 6 *** 40.6 (30.5, 53.1) 175 (83, 197) 11 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.0, -0.6)
Floyd County 6 *** 41.5 (24.5, 67.4) 174 (12, 197) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-6.9, 4.6)
Gillespie County 6 *** 41.7 (33.8, 51.4) 173 (105, 194) 22 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.6, 0.5)
Travis County 6 *** 41.7 (39.7, 43.7) 172 (151, 180) 369 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.2, -2.8)
Bexar County 6 *** 41.7 (40.3, 43.1) 171 (152, 179) 726 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.9, -1.9)
Starr County 6 *** 42.1 (34.7, 50.5) 170 (109, 192) 23 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.5, 4.1)
Uvalde County 6 *** 42.2 (32.7, 53.8) 169 (84, 196) 14 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.6, 2.3)
Ochiltree County 6 *** 42.4 (25.6, 65.8) 168 (16, 197) 4 stable stable trend -1.2 (-8.4, 6.4)
Collin County 6 *** 42.5 (40.3, 44.7) 167 (148, 179) 317 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.5, -2.9)
Atascosa County 6 *** 42.6 (35.0, 51.3) 166 (102, 192) 23 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.6, -1.5)
Gaines County 6 *** 43.0 (29.2, 60.7) 165 (32, 197) 6 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.8, -1.7)
Wilson County 6 *** 43.3 (35.8, 52.0) 164 (102, 190) 25 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.3, -0.8)
Refugio County 6 *** 44.2 (28.0, 67.6) 163 (13, 197) 5 stable stable trend -3.1 (-8.5, 2.7)
Austin County 6 *** 44.8 (36.0, 55.4) 162 (81, 193) 19 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.7, -1.3)
San Saba County 6 *** 45.0 (27.2, 72.0) 161 (9, 197) 4 stable stable trend -3.3 (-8.0, 1.7)
Bee County 6 *** 45.1 (35.0, 57.1) 160 (64, 193) 14 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.9, 0.7)
Bandera County 6 *** 45.1 (36.2, 56.4) 159 (78, 190) 19 stable stable trend -3.0 (-5.9, 0.1)
Brazos County 6 *** 45.7 (40.9, 51.0) 158 (110, 180) 67 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.9, -1.7)
Comanche County 6 *** 45.8 (34.2, 61.0) 157 (48, 196) 11 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.1, 0.4)
Fayette County 6 *** 46.0 (37.0, 57.0) 156 (65, 190) 20 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.7, -0.7)
Wharton County 6 *** 46.5 (38.5, 55.9) 155 (76, 187) 24 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.1, -2.4)
Denton County 6 *** 46.7 (44.1, 49.4) 154 (125, 167) 275 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.5, -2.3)
Williamson County 6 *** 46.8 (43.9, 49.8) 153 (124, 171) 211 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.7)
Runnels County 6 *** 46.8 (33.0, 65.5) 152 (28, 197) 8 stable stable trend -2.8 (-6.0, 0.4)
Midland County 6 *** 47.4 (42.3, 52.9) 151 (101, 177) 66 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.7, -2.4)
Harris County 6 *** 47.5 (46.4, 48.5) 150 (130, 159) 1,758 falling falling trend -3.3 (-3.8, -2.8)
Hale County 6 *** 47.6 (37.9, 59.1) 149 (60, 188) 17 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.2, 3.6)
Kendall County 6 *** 47.6 (39.7, 56.9) 148 (72, 184) 26 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.6, 0.3)
Lavaca County 6 *** 47.6 (37.5, 60.2) 147 (54, 191) 16 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.4, -0.4)
Comal County 6 *** 47.6 (43.0, 52.7) 146 (105, 175) 82 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.1)
Nueces County 6 *** 47.8 (44.7, 51.1) 145 (117, 166) 183 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.3, -1.8)
Terry County 6 *** 47.9 (33.5, 66.7) 144 (20, 197) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-6.2, 3.5)
Hockley County 6 *** 48.7 (37.3, 62.5) 143 (32, 191) 13 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.7, -1.0)
Jack County 6 *** 48.7 (32.2, 71.3) 142 (6, 197) 6 falling falling trend -5.1 (-8.4, -1.6)
Fisher County 6 *** 49.2 (28.9, 82.9) 141 (2, 197) 4 stable stable trend -3.7 (-7.5, 0.3)
Dallas County 6 *** 49.2 (47.9, 50.6) 140 (122, 152) 1,067 falling falling trend -3.3 (-3.7, -2.9)
Lubbock County 6 *** 49.7 (46.1, 53.6) 139 (100, 164) 140 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.3, -1.7)
Kleberg County 6 *** 50.0 (39.4, 62.7) 138 (45, 187) 15 falling falling trend -3.8 (-6.2, -1.3)
Caldwell County 6 *** 50.3 (41.2, 60.8) 137 (51, 184) 22 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.0, -0.9)
Colorado County 6 *** 50.5 (40.1, 63.3) 136 (47, 186) 17 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.6, -1.2)
Hardeman County 6 *** 50.6 (28.9, 85.8) 135 (1, 197) 3 stable stable trend -1.5 (-8.3, 5.8)
Yoakum County 6 *** 50.7 (30.8, 78.6) 134 (3, 197) 4 stable stable trend 1.0 (-5.5, 7.9)
Rockwall County 6 *** 50.9 (44.1, 58.4) 133 (68, 176) 43 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.8, -1.3)
Kerr County 6 *** 51.0 (44.6, 58.4) 132 (74, 173) 49 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.1, -0.7)
Blanco County 6 *** 51.6 (38.0, 69.8) 131 (13, 191) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.7, 3.3)
Moore County 6 *** 51.8 (38.0, 68.8) 130 (18, 194) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-4.6, 2.2)
Medina County 6 *** 53.0 (45.0, 62.1) 129 (51, 176) 32 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.9, 2.9)
Real County 6 *** 53.5 (31.8, 91.8) 128 (1, 197) 4
*
*
Goliad County 6 *** 53.6 (36.7, 77.2) 127 (5, 195) 7 stable stable trend -4.7 (-9.1, 0.0)
Randall County 6 *** 53.6 (48.3, 59.3) 126 (73, 158) 78 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Taylor County 6 *** 53.6 (48.5, 59.3) 125 (77, 159) 80 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Winkler County 6 *** 53.9 (32.1, 84.3) 124 (1, 197) 4 stable stable trend -3.6 (-8.2, 1.2)
Titus County 6 *** 54.0 (43.6, 66.3) 123 (29, 181) 19 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.3, -0.4)
Live Oak County 6 *** 54.3 (40.1, 72.7) 122 (9, 193) 10 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.8, 1.5)
Brazoria County 6 *** 54.4 (50.8, 58.2) 121 (81, 145) 175 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.4, -2.7)
Montgomery County 6 *** 54.4 (51.6, 57.4) 120 (85, 140) 299 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.3, -3.4)
Karnes County 6 *** 54.6 (39.9, 73.1) 119 (7, 191) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.1, 4.0)
Franklin County 6 *** 54.7 (38.9, 75.4) 118 (7, 193) 9 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.4, 1.1)
Howard County 6 *** 54.8 (44.8, 66.4) 117 (31, 179) 22 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.3, 0.2)
Tom Green County 6 *** 55.1 (49.6, 61.1) 116 (62, 157) 74 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.5, 0.6)
Tarrant County 6 *** 55.3 (53.6, 56.9) 115 (92, 129) 959 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.2, -2.5)
Galveston County 6 *** 55.3 (51.8, 59.0) 114 (82, 144) 195 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.6, -2.9)
San Patricio County 6 *** 55.6 (48.2, 63.9) 113 (48, 161) 42 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -0.7)
Victoria County 6 *** 55.9 (49.6, 62.7) 112 (55, 157) 59 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.5, -1.2)
Callahan County 6 *** 55.9 (42.1, 73.4) 111 (10, 187) 12 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.8, -0.1)
Ector County 6 *** 56.0 (50.2, 62.3) 110 (53, 154) 71 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.6, -1.6)
Erath County 6 *** 56.1 (46.4, 67.2) 109 (26, 174) 24 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.3, 1.5)
Mitchell County 6 *** 56.2 (37.2, 82.0) 108 (1, 196) 6 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.9, 2.0)
Garza County 6 *** 56.4 (32.7, 90.8) 107 (1, 197) 3 stable stable trend -3.4 (-9.3, 2.9)
Waller County 6 *** 56.9 (47.1, 68.0) 106 (24, 171) 25 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.4, 0.9)
Ellis County 6 *** 56.9 (51.8, 62.5) 105 (59, 144) 95 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.1, -2.3)
Grimes County 6 *** 57.0 (46.4, 69.5) 104 (18, 174) 21 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.6, 1.5)
Haskell County 6 *** 57.1 (36.0, 87.8) 103 (1, 197) 5
*
*
Guadalupe County 6 *** 57.4 (52.2, 63.0) 102 (57, 141) 92 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.0, -0.4)
Coleman County 6 *** 57.5 (41.6, 79.2) 101 (6, 189) 9 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.0, -0.9)
Wilbarger County 6 *** 58.1 (43.1, 77.1) 100 (5, 184) 10 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.1, 1.8)
Nacogdoches County 6 *** 58.2 (50.2, 67.0) 99 (32, 159) 40 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.3, -1.4)
Walker County 6 *** 58.2 (50.4, 67.0) 98 (36, 157) 41 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.9, -1.4)
Wheeler County 6 *** 58.4 (36.4, 90.1) 97 (1, 197) 4 stable stable trend -2.5 (-7.4, 2.6)
Clay County 6 *** 58.5 (43.0, 78.9) 96 (5, 187) 10 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.3, 1.6)
Brown County 6 *** 58.9 (49.9, 69.2) 95 (24, 159) 32 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.1, -0.7)
McCulloch County 6 *** 59.0 (42.0, 82.1) 94 (3, 189) 8 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.5, 1.3)
Eastland County 6 *** 59.4 (47.5, 73.9) 93 (11, 171) 18 falling falling trend -2.9 (-5.0, -0.7)
Llano County 6 *** 59.4 (49.4, 71.9) 92 (14, 167) 29 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.8, 1.7)
Jefferson County 6 *** 59.5 (55.5, 63.7) 91 (56, 124) 172 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.1)
Hamilton County 6 *** 59.5 (43.1, 81.9) 90 (3, 187) 9 stable stable trend -1.7 (-5.1, 1.9)
McLennan County 6 *** 59.6 (55.5, 64.0) 89 (53, 125) 159 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.4)
Matagorda County 6 *** 59.8 (50.1, 70.9) 88 (20, 162) 28 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.6, -0.8)
Tyler County 6 *** 61.4 (50.0, 75.1) 87 (6, 165) 21 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.1, -1.0)
Jones County 6 *** 61.5 (47.8, 78.0) 86 (4, 179) 14 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.1, 0.4)
Baylor County 6 *** 62.2 (37.8, 100.9) 85 (1, 197) 4 stable stable trend -3.1 (-7.6, 1.5)
Dawson County 6 *** 62.2 (45.7, 83.1) 84 (2, 188) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.0, 3.8)
Milam County 6 *** 62.4 (51.2, 75.7) 83 (8, 162) 22 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.2, 1.1)
Hood County 6 *** 62.5 (55.3, 70.5) 82 (24, 135) 60 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.3)
Archer County 6 *** 62.6 (44.6, 86.6) 81 (1, 184) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-3.2, 5.8)
Houston County 6 *** 62.6 (51.7, 75.5) 80 (7, 158) 23 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.7, 1.8)
Swisher County 6 *** 62.6 (42.4, 90.0) 79 (1, 193) 6 stable stable trend 3.8 (-0.9, 8.7)
Cooke County 6 *** 62.6 (53.2, 73.4) 78 (12, 152) 33 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.4)
Calhoun County 6 *** 62.7 (50.1, 77.7) 77 (6, 169) 18 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.9, 1.0)
Hardin County 6 *** 62.8 (54.6, 71.8) 76 (16, 143) 44 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.3, 0.0)
Scurry County 6 *** 63.5 (48.4, 81.9) 75 (2, 179) 12 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.9, 3.4)
Navarro County 6 *** 63.7 (54.9, 73.6) 74 (14, 143) 39 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.6, -1.8)
Smith County 6 *** 63.8 (59.5, 68.2) 73 (37, 108) 173 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Bastrop County 6 *** 63.8 (56.4, 71.8) 72 (21, 132) 59 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.4)
Coke County 6 *** 63.9 (39.5, 104.4) 71 (1, 196) 4 stable stable trend 1.4 (-3.7, 6.8)
Lee County 6 *** 64.1 (50.3, 80.9) 70 (3, 169) 15 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.2, 2.8)
Knox County 6 *** 64.1 (37.9, 104.5) 69 (1, 196) 4 stable stable trend 1.1 (-5.0, 7.6)
Newton County 6 *** 64.5 (50.0, 82.6) 68 (2, 173) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.8, 1.1)
Wichita County 6 *** 64.5 (58.8, 70.7) 67 (28, 119) 95 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.4, -2.2)
Jasper County 6 *** 65.0 (55.1, 76.4) 66 (8, 149) 32 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.3, 0.7)
Rusk County 6 *** 65.2 (56.7, 74.8) 65 (11, 134) 43 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.9, -1.7)
Potter County 6 *** 65.3 (58.8, 72.4) 64 (17, 117) 77 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.3)
Hill County 6 *** 65.7 (56.0, 76.8) 63 (6, 138) 35 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.7, -0.2)
Robertson County 6 *** 66.0 (52.2, 82.8) 62 (3, 170) 16 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.2, 1.5)
Ward County 6 *** 66.1 (47.4, 89.9) 61 (1, 187) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-5.3, 2.9)
Harrison County 6 *** 66.1 (58.4, 74.7) 60 (13, 124) 55 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.5)
Chambers County 6 *** 66.2 (54.4, 79.8) 59 (4, 151) 24 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.0, 0.1)
Gregg County 6 *** 66.2 (60.3, 72.6) 58 (18, 107) 94 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -0.8)
Freestone County 6 *** 67.0 (54.3, 82.3) 57 (3, 161) 20 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.9)
Nolan County 6 *** 67.3 (52.1, 85.9) 56 (2, 172) 14 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.6, 1.5)
Burleson County 6 *** 67.6 (54.0, 84.1) 55 (2, 163) 18 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 2.6)
Parker County 6 *** 67.7 (61.8, 74.1) 54 (17, 102) 102 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.8)
Morris County 6 *** 67.8 (51.6, 88.1) 53 (1, 171) 13 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.7, 3.2)
Gray County 6 *** 68.0 (55.0, 83.3) 52 (2, 159) 19 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.4, 1.2)
Falls County 6 *** 68.0 (53.6, 85.5) 51 (1, 165) 16 stable stable trend -3.3 (-6.7, 0.3)
Johnson County 6 *** 68.4 (63.0, 74.3) 50 (17, 95) 121 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.1)
Leon County 6 *** 68.6 (55.6, 84.3) 49 (3, 149) 20 stable stable trend -11.6 (-25.3, 4.7)
Burnet County 6 *** 68.6 (60.0, 78.2) 48 (6, 118) 49 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.4)
Stephens County 6 *** 68.7 (50.3, 92.5) 47 (1, 179) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.1, 1.3)
Camp County 6 *** 69.0 (52.0, 90.2) 46 (1, 172) 12 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.1, 4.6)
San Augustine County 6 *** 69.3 (50.2, 94.6) 45 (1, 179) 10 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.2, 4.8)
Angelina County 6 *** 69.3 (62.4, 76.9) 44 (7, 101) 73 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.0, -1.4)
Hutchinson County 6 *** 69.5 (55.8, 85.8) 43 (2, 159) 18 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.6, 3.4)
Upshur County 6 *** 69.7 (60.2, 80.5) 42 (6, 122) 39 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.5)
Marion County 6 *** 70.0 (53.4, 91.6) 41 (1, 165) 13 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.3, 2.0)
Madison County 6 *** 70.3 (52.6, 92.0) 40 (1, 173) 11 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.9, 1.2)
Donley County 6 *** 70.3 (43.3, 112.7) 39 (1, 194) 4 falling falling trend -4.6 (-8.6, -0.5)
Grayson County 6 *** 70.4 (64.7, 76.4) 38 (12, 90) 118 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.9)
Orange County 6 *** 70.6 (63.4, 78.3) 37 (7, 104) 74 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.5, -1.8)
Panola County 6 *** 70.7 (58.3, 85.1) 36 (2, 134) 24 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.2, 0.5)
Red River County 6 *** 70.7 (55.4, 89.8) 35 (1, 152) 15 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.7)
DeWitt County 6 *** 70.7 (57.8, 86.0) 34 (2, 144) 21 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.4, 1.6)
Van Zandt County 6 *** 71.1 (62.9, 80.1) 33 (6, 103) 57 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
Hopkins County 6 *** 71.4 (60.9, 83.4) 32 (2, 123) 34 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.3)
Wise County 6 *** 72.1 (63.4, 81.6) 31 (3, 98) 53 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6)
Jackson County 6 *** 72.7 (56.4, 92.7) 30 (1, 160) 14 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.4, 3.9)
Childress County 6 *** 73.1 (48.6, 106.0) 29 (1, 190) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-5.9, 3.0)
Crosby County 6 *** 73.3 (48.8, 106.9) 28 (1, 189) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.9, 4.8)
Sabine County 6 *** 73.4 (57.8, 93.7) 27 (1, 147) 16 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.8, 4.5)
San Jacinto County 6 *** 74.0 (62.6, 87.2) 26 (2, 111) 32 falling falling trend -8.2 (-12.5, -3.7)
Kaufman County 6 *** 74.5 (67.3, 82.2) 25 (5, 79) 84 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.5, 0.0)
Montague County 6 *** 74.5 (61.0, 90.5) 24 (1, 132) 23 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.2, 3.6)
Bowie County 6 *** 74.6 (67.6, 82.1) 23 (4, 77) 86 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
Limestone County 6 *** 74.6 (61.8, 89.6) 22 (1, 120) 24 stable stable trend -13.4 (-32.6, 11.3)
Hunt County 6 *** 74.8 (67.7, 82.5) 21 (4, 77) 84 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Anderson County 6 *** 74.8 (65.6, 84.9) 20 (3, 92) 49 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.8, 1.7)
Aransas County 6 *** 74.9 (63.6, 88.1) 19 (2, 102) 34 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.3, -1.3)
Bosque County 6 *** 75.3 (62.1, 91.1) 18 (1, 121) 24 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.8, 4.0)
Young County 6 *** 75.4 (61.2, 92.4) 17 (1, 120) 20 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.1)
Cherokee County 6 *** 75.9 (66.7, 86.1) 16 (2, 87) 50 stable stable trend -9.3 (-22.1, 5.5)
Wood County 6 *** 76.9 (68.0, 86.8) 15 (2, 82) 61 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.5)
Lamar County 6 *** 76.9 (67.9, 87.0) 14 (2, 86) 54 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.5, 0.0)
Bell County 6 *** 77.4 (72.7, 82.2) 13 (5, 51) 214 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Palo Pinto County 6 *** 77.9 (66.1, 91.3) 12 (1, 101) 32 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.9, 1.5)
Liberty County 6 *** 78.6 (70.1, 87.8) 11 (2, 75) 66 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.6, -1.0)
Rains County 6 *** 78.7 (61.8, 99.9) 10 (1, 142) 16 stable stable trend -0.2 (-4.0, 3.7)
Cass County 6 *** 79.3 (68.1, 92.0) 9 (1, 84) 38 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.5, 3.6)
Shelby County 6 *** 79.4 (66.3, 94.5) 8 (1, 104) 26 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.4, 3.2)
Lampasas County 6 *** 82.3 (67.9, 99.2) 7 (1, 103) 24 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.4, 3.9)
Delta County 6 *** 83.2 (56.4, 120.0) 6 (1, 180) 7 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.9, 7.4)
Fannin County 6 *** 83.9 (72.5, 96.7) 5 (1, 72) 40 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.9, 1.0)
Coryell County 6 *** 84.4 (73.9, 95.8) 4 (1, 58) 49 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.9)
Henderson County 6 *** 86.1 (78.9, 93.9) 3 (1, 32) 109 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.7, 0.0)
Trinity County 6 *** 90.0 (74.2, 109.0) 2 (1, 81) 24 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.1, 2.2)
Polk County 6 *** 99.1 (88.2, 111.1) 1 (1, 15) 65 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Armstrong County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zavala County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/21/2021 10:41 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2019 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2017) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2019 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2017 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2019 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top