Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
Texas 6 *** 49.5 (49.1, 49.9) N/A 13,456 falling falling trend -2.7 (-2.8, -2.5)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 57.3 (57.1, 57.4) N/A 222,811 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.8)
Galveston County 6 *** 57.2 (53.6, 60.8) 96 (61, 126) 209 stable stable trend 3.3 (-3.3, 10.3)
Swisher County 6 *** 62.6 (42.4, 89.9) 75 (1, 190) 6 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.6, 7.5)
Castro County 6 *** 34.1 (19.1, 56.7) 185 (47, 195) 3 stable stable trend 2.5 (-2.6, 7.8)
Delta County 6 *** 86.0 (59.1, 122.8) 3 (1, 171) 7 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.3, 6.1)
Leon County 6 *** 70.8 (57.6, 86.7) 28 (2, 135) 21 stable stable trend 1.6 (-1.8, 5.1)
Lampasas County 6 *** 83.8 (69.6, 100.4) 4 (1, 92) 25 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.1, 3.7)
Archer County 6 *** 53.3 (36.7, 75.9) 116 (2, 192) 7 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.6, 5.1)
Cass County 6 *** 78.5 (67.5, 91.1) 8 (1, 88) 38 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.5, 3.1)
Duval County 6 *** 35.3 (23.2, 52.0) 182 (69, 195) 5 stable stable trend 0.7 (-3.3, 4.9)
Sabine County 6 *** 69.4 (54.6, 88.8) 34 (1, 151) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.3, 3.6)
Coke County 6 *** 63.4 (39.2, 103.5) 72 (1, 194) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.9, 6.1)
Wise County 6 *** 70.8 (62.4, 80.1) 27 (4, 102) 54 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.8)
Montague County 6 *** 66.9 (54.1, 82.3) 53 (2, 149) 20 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.2, 2.9)
Limestone County 6 *** 71.7 (59.3, 86.2) 22 (2, 124) 24 stable stable trend 0.3 (-2.0, 2.6)
Coryell County 6 *** 89.6 (79.0, 101.2) 2 (1, 36) 53 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.6, 2.0)
Hale County 6 *** 49.8 (39.9, 61.4) 128 (33, 183) 18 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.1, 3.5)
Wood County 6 *** 76.7 (68.0, 86.4) 11 (2, 78) 62 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Bosque County 6 *** 70.5 (58.0, 85.7) 30 (1, 130) 23 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.9, 3.2)
Burnet County 6 *** 67.1 (58.8, 76.4) 50 (7, 116) 49 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.6, 1.8)
Camp County 6 *** 68.9 (52.4, 89.4) 41 (1, 158) 12 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.3, 3.6)
Medina County 6 *** 48.3 (40.7, 56.9) 135 (73, 178) 30 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.2)
Shelby County 6 *** 71.3 (58.9, 85.6) 24 (1, 125) 24 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.2, 2.4)
Starr County 6 *** 40.2 (33.1, 48.4) 172 (107, 190) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.3, 2.7)
Trinity County 6 *** 83.3 (68.2, 101.6) 5 (1, 96) 22 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.7, 1.8)
Karnes County 6 *** 54.3 (39.7, 72.6) 111 (6, 187) 9 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.1, 3.2)
Yoakum County 6 *** 52.9 (32.5, 81.2) 119 (2, 195) 4 stable stable trend 0.0 (-6.2, 6.6)
Burleson County 6 *** 65.7 (52.5, 81.7) 59 (2, 153) 18 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.1, 2.0)
Hutchinson County 6 *** 65.0 (51.8, 80.7) 63 (3, 162) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.9, 2.6)
San Augustine County 6 *** 62.9 (44.5, 87.7) 73 (1, 184) 9 stable stable trend -0.3 (-4.1, 3.7)
Crosby County 6 *** 65.5 (43.1, 96.8) 61 (1, 191) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-4.6, 4.0)
Polk County 6 *** 100.6 (89.6, 112.7) 1 (1, 12) 68 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Rains County 6 *** 78.2 (61.1, 99.6) 9 (1, 128) 16 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.9, 3.2)
Bell County 6 *** 74.9 (70.4, 79.5) 15 (6, 54) 215 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Cherokee County 6 *** 75.4 (66.3, 85.5) 12 (2, 86) 51 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.0, 0.8)
Deaf Smith County 6 *** 38.3 (26.5, 53.6) 174 (59, 195) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.9, 3.8)
Panola County 6 *** 72.8 (60.3, 87.4) 19 (1, 118) 24 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.2)
Red River County 6 *** 67.2 (52.9, 85.3) 49 (2, 160) 15 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.3)
Anderson County 6 *** 70.0 (61.2, 79.8) 33 (4, 103) 46 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.3)
Cooke County 6 *** 69.0 (59.2, 80.1) 40 (4, 118) 37 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.3, 1.0)
Tom Green County 6 *** 59.9 (54.2, 66.1) 85 (36, 128) 81 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.0, 0.7)
Freestone County 6 *** 74.4 (61.0, 90.2) 18 (1, 124) 22 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.4)
Hill County 6 *** 72.7 (62.5, 84.2) 20 (2, 104) 39 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.7, 1.0)
Morris County 6 *** 65.1 (49.4, 84.9) 62 (2, 173) 12 stable stable trend -0.8 (-3.9, 2.3)
Scurry County 6 *** 48.4 (35.4, 64.7) 134 (18, 192) 9 stable stable trend -0.8 (-4.0, 2.6)
Newton County 6 *** 68.8 (53.9, 87.2) 43 (2, 150) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.1, 1.3)
Smith County 6 *** 64.5 (60.3, 69.0) 68 (28, 97) 180 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Fannin County 6 *** 80.8 (69.8, 93.3) 6 (1, 76) 40 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.5)
Lee County 6 *** 68.2 (54.0, 85.5) 44 (2, 154) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-4.6, 2.4)
Palo Pinto County 6 *** 78.0 (66.3, 91.5) 10 (1, 92) 33 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.3, 0.9)
Hopkins County 6 *** 69.0 (58.8, 80.7) 38 (4, 115) 34 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Van Zandt County 6 *** 69.0 (61.0, 77.9) 39 (7, 105) 56 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.2)
Blanco County 6 *** 50.2 (37.0, 68.0) 127 (18, 190) 10 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.0, 2.4)
Dawson County 6 *** 57.6 (41.6, 77.9) 94 (3, 185) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.4, 2.8)
Houston County 6 *** 61.9 (51.1, 74.7) 79 (6, 154) 23 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.9, 1.3)
Johnson County 6 *** 66.2 (61.0, 71.8) 56 (18, 97) 122 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Jones County 6 *** 64.9 (51.0, 81.8) 65 (3, 164) 15 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 0.7)
Parker County 6 *** 69.3 (63.4, 75.6) 36 (9, 91) 108 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Randall County 6 *** 54.2 (49.0, 59.8) 112 (64, 146) 81 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Taylor County 6 *** 52.8 (47.6, 58.3) 121 (72, 154) 80 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Uvalde County 6 *** 41.5 (32.1, 53.0) 166 (84, 193) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.8, 2.2)
DeWitt County 6 *** 66.7 (54.0, 81.7) 54 (3, 154) 20 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 1.1)
Erath County 6 *** 59.2 (49.4, 70.5) 89 (15, 160) 26 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.1, 1.1)
Grimes County 6 *** 57.3 (46.8, 69.7) 95 (15, 169) 22 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.8, 0.9)
Harrison County 6 *** 64.2 (56.6, 72.6) 70 (14, 125) 54 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Kaufman County 6 *** 71.6 (64.7, 79.0) 23 (6, 84) 84 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Llano County 6 *** 62.3 (52.1, 75.1) 76 (6, 147) 31 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.3, 1.3)
Ochiltree County 6 *** 44.4 (27.1, 68.4) 155 (8, 195) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-7.6, 5.0)
Franklin County 6 *** 54.8 (39.5, 75.0) 107 (6, 189) 9 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.7, 1.7)
Henderson County 6 *** 80.4 (73.5, 87.8) 7 (2, 48) 105 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.4)
Hunt County 6 *** 70.3 (63.5, 77.6) 31 (7, 89) 82 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.7, -0.4)
Jackson County 6 *** 67.0 (51.6, 86.0) 52 (2, 163) 13 stable stable trend -1.6 (-5.7, 2.8)
Lamar County 6 *** 74.7 (65.9, 84.5) 17 (2, 87) 54 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.1)
Nolan County 6 *** 65.5 (50.4, 84.2) 60 (1, 167) 13 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.3, 1.2)
Webb County 6 *** 27.7 (24.5, 31.2) 192 (180, 195) 56 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.4)
Young County 6 *** 75.1 (60.9, 92.0) 13 (1, 125) 20 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.1, 0.0)
Grayson County 6 *** 68.9 (63.3, 74.8) 42 (13, 90) 119 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.5, -0.9)
Hardin County 6 *** 70.7 (62.2, 80.2) 29 (4, 104) 51 stable stable trend -1.7 (-4.1, 0.7)
Baylor County 6 *** 69.2 (43.2, 109.5) 37 (1, 193) 4 stable stable trend -1.8 (-5.8, 2.5)
Hood County 6 *** 60.6 (53.6, 68.4) 83 (26, 132) 59 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.4)
Jasper County 6 *** 66.2 (56.2, 77.6) 57 (5, 131) 33 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.9, 0.3)
Wheeler County 6 *** 66.1 (42.5, 99.4) 58 (1, 193) 5 stable stable trend -1.8 (-6.1, 2.6)
Wilbarger County 6 *** 66.5 (50.4, 86.6) 55 (2, 168) 12 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.7, 1.2)
Guadalupe County 6 *** 54.4 (49.4, 59.8) 109 (67, 145) 91 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.0, -0.7)
Jefferson County 6 *** 56.8 (53.0, 60.9) 98 (63, 129) 167 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.5)
Live Oak County 6 *** 56.2 (41.7, 74.9) 101 (5, 183) 10 stable stable trend -1.9 (-5.5, 1.9)
Milam County 6 *** 58.3 (47.5, 71.1) 91 (13, 171) 21 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.3, 0.5)
San Jacinto County 6 *** 71.2 (60.3, 83.9) 25 (2, 122) 32 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.8, 0.0)
Waller County 6 *** 52.8 (43.6, 63.2) 120 (39, 175) 25 stable stable trend -1.9 (-4.2, 0.4)
Madison County 6 *** 71.0 (53.5, 92.5) 26 (1, 167) 11 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.7, 0.7)
Moore County 6 *** 47.2 (34.1, 63.5) 144 (24, 194) 9 stable stable trend -2.0 (-5.2, 1.3)
Robertson County 6 *** 58.4 (45.7, 74.2) 90 (5, 176) 15 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.7, 0.8)
Bastrop County 6 *** 62.6 (55.5, 70.4) 74 (19, 123) 61 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.5)
Bowie County 6 *** 75.0 (68.1, 82.5) 14 (3, 72) 88 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.3, -1.0)
Comal County 6 *** 44.6 (40.2, 49.3) 153 (113, 175) 81 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.5)
Gregg County 6 *** 68.1 (62.1, 74.5) 46 (12, 91) 98 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.6)
Mitchell County 6 *** 56.0 (37.0, 81.7) 102 (2, 195) 6 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.6, 1.5)
Ward County 6 *** 61.4 (43.6, 84.3) 81 (2, 190) 8 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.8, 1.7)
Calhoun County 6 *** 59.8 (47.5, 74.5) 86 (5, 174) 17 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.8, 0.4)
Childress County 6 *** 68.1 (44.6, 100.1) 45 (1, 191) 5 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.2, 2.0)
Howard County 6 *** 48.7 (39.5, 59.6) 132 (58, 183) 20 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.1, -0.2)
Potter County 6 *** 64.7 (58.3, 71.6) 67 (17, 112) 77 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.4)
Upshur County 6 *** 67.3 (58.0, 77.9) 48 (3, 124) 38 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.0, -0.5)
Austin County 6 *** 47.6 (38.5, 58.4) 140 (53, 185) 20 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.6)
Hamilton County 6 *** 53.7 (38.0, 75.4) 113 (8, 191) 8 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.5, 1.1)
Marion County 6 *** 67.0 (51.2, 87.8) 51 (1, 170) 13 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.8, 1.4)
Maverick County 6 *** 23.5 (17.9, 30.3) 195 (177, 195) 12 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.5, 1.1)
McCulloch County 6 *** 69.3 (51.0, 93.6) 35 (1, 169) 10 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.6, 1.1)
Pecos County 6 *** 35.8 (23.9, 51.6) 180 (78, 195) 6 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.2, 0.8)
Stephens County 6 *** 59.4 (42.4, 81.9) 87 (2, 184) 8 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.4, 0.9)
Brown County 6 *** 59.3 (50.4, 69.5) 88 (18, 157) 33 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -1.0)
Gray County 6 *** 62.3 (49.8, 77.1) 77 (4, 165) 17 stable stable trend -2.4 (-5.3, 0.5)
Liberty County 6 *** 74.7 (66.6, 83.6) 16 (3, 81) 65 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
Terry County 6 *** 42.6 (29.1, 60.6) 159 (39, 195) 6 stable stable trend -2.4 (-7.1, 2.5)
Val Verde County 6 *** 32.5 (26.0, 40.2) 188 (146, 195) 17 stable stable trend -2.4 (-4.9, 0.1)
Williamson County 6 *** 47.0 (44.2, 49.9) 145 (115, 161) 225 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.6)
Bee County 6 *** 42.6 (32.9, 54.2) 160 (76, 191) 14 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.0, 0.0)
Bexar County 6 *** 40.4 (39.1, 41.8) 171 (151, 177) 724 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.9, -2.0)
Hays County 6 *** 41.6 (37.3, 46.3) 165 (127, 182) 72 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -0.8)
Matagorda County 6 *** 57.9 (48.4, 68.9) 92 (17, 162) 27 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -0.8)
McLennan County 6 *** 61.6 (57.5, 66.0) 80 (40, 111) 167 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.5)
Mills County 6 *** 33.3 (18.7, 59.3) 187 (54, 195) 3 stable stable trend -2.5 (-7.4, 2.7)
Runnels County 6 *** 49.4 (35.0, 68.8) 129 (8, 192) 8 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.1, 0.3)
Atascosa County 6 *** 47.5 (39.5, 56.7) 142 (74, 180) 26 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.5, -0.5)
Chambers County 6 *** 64.7 (53.3, 77.8) 66 (5, 144) 24 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.9, -0.3)
Kendall County 6 *** 47.8 (40.0, 56.8) 137 (75, 182) 27 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.2, 0.1)
Lamb County 6 *** 40.6 (27.9, 57.5) 169 (51, 195) 7 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.7, 0.7)
Nueces County 6 *** 45.5 (42.5, 48.6) 149 (118, 170) 179 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.3, -1.9)
Gillespie County 6 *** 41.0 (33.2, 50.6) 167 (98, 190) 22 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.4, 0.0)
Angelina County 6 *** 67.7 (60.9, 75.2) 47 (11, 102) 73 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.0, -1.6)
Bandera County 6 *** 47.0 (38.1, 58.1) 146 (60, 184) 20 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.3, -0.1)
Frio County 6 *** 35.7 (24.3, 50.5) 181 (71, 195) 6 stable stable trend -2.8 (-7.2, 1.7)
Lubbock County 6 *** 50.3 (46.7, 54.2) 126 (92, 155) 145 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.0, -1.7)
San Patricio County 6 *** 54.5 (47.2, 62.5) 108 (45, 162) 42 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.6, -1.0)
Willacy County 6 *** 36.8 (26.2, 50.3) 177 (91, 195) 8 falling falling trend -2.8 (-5.1, -0.5)
Tyler County 6 *** 60.8 (49.5, 74.4) 82 (6, 160) 21 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.1)
Victoria County 6 *** 55.7 (49.5, 62.5) 103 (48, 147) 60 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.3, -1.5)
El Paso County 6 *** 30.0 (28.3, 31.8) 190 (177, 193) 231 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.6, -2.5)
Midland County 6 *** 47.4 (42.3, 52.8) 143 (97, 173) 67 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.1, -1.8)
Navarro County 6 *** 64.3 (55.6, 74.1) 69 (9, 131) 40 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.2, -1.8)
Orange County 6 *** 72.0 (64.8, 79.8) 21 (5, 87) 76 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.2, -1.8)
Tarrant County 6 *** 53.4 (51.8, 55.0) 114 (95, 128) 963 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.4, -2.6)
Titus County 6 *** 56.9 (46.2, 69.4) 97 (15, 172) 20 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.6, -0.3)
Walker County 6 *** 57.7 (50.1, 66.3) 93 (36, 150) 42 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.1, -0.8)
Brazoria County 6 *** 54.9 (51.3, 58.6) 106 (75, 135) 183 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.9, -2.2)
Dallas County 6 *** 49.1 (47.8, 50.5) 130 (115, 144) 1,092 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.5, -2.8)
Ector County 6 *** 53.1 (47.5, 59.1) 118 (71, 155) 68 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.4, -1.8)
Gonzales County 6 *** 43.5 (33.0, 56.4) 157 (55, 192) 12 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.3, -0.7)
Kerr County 6 *** 48.8 (42.5, 56.1) 131 (81, 172) 47 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.1, -1.0)
Rusk County 6 *** 65.0 (56.6, 74.4) 64 (8, 128) 44 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.5, -1.6)
Wichita County 6 *** 63.8 (58.1, 69.9) 71 (22, 110) 95 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.1, -2.1)
Brazos County 6 *** 45.0 (40.3, 50.1) 151 (108, 178) 69 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.5, -1.8)
Denton County 6 *** 46.0 (43.5, 48.6) 148 (122, 164) 289 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.1, -2.2)
Falls County 6 *** 60.5 (47.1, 77.0) 84 (4, 172) 14 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.2, 0.0)
Lavaca County 6 *** 47.0 (37.0, 59.4) 147 (56, 188) 16 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.8, -0.6)
Travis County 6 *** 41.8 (39.8, 43.8) 163 (143, 176) 384 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.9, -2.6)
Wilson County 6 *** 42.3 (35.0, 50.6) 161 (96, 188) 25 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.2, -1.1)
Aransas County 6 *** 70.1 (59.3, 82.9) 32 (2, 117) 32 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.1, -1.5)
Fayette County 6 *** 40.8 (32.3, 51.3) 168 (88, 192) 17 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.1, -1.4)
Harris County 6 *** 45.4 (44.4, 46.4) 150 (132, 158) 1,747 falling falling trend -3.3 (-3.7, -2.8)
Kleberg County 6 *** 52.0 (41.2, 64.9) 123 (28, 182) 16 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.5, -1.1)
Ellis County 6 *** 56.5 (51.4, 61.9) 100 (50, 138) 97 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.6, -2.1)
Rockwall County 6 *** 48.2 (41.8, 55.3) 136 (79, 176) 43 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.1, -1.7)
Eastland County 6 *** 53.3 (42.2, 67.1) 115 (20, 181) 16 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.7, -1.3)
Somervell County 6 *** 34.6 (21.5, 53.8) 183 (64, 195) 4 stable stable trend -3.5 (-7.6, 0.8)
Collin County 6 *** 42.2 (40.2, 44.4) 162 (142, 175) 335 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.2, -2.9)
Comanche County 6 *** 38.1 (27.7, 52.1) 175 (90, 195) 9 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.7, -0.4)
Hidalgo County 6 *** 26.6 (24.9, 28.3) 193 (185, 195) 188 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.4, -2.8)
Jim Wells County 6 *** 34.3 (27.1, 42.8) 184 (126, 195) 16 falling falling trend -3.6 (-6.8, -0.3)
Nacogdoches County 6 *** 55.0 (47.3, 63.5) 105 (38, 161) 38 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.3, -1.8)
Caldwell County 6 *** 44.6 (36.2, 54.5) 152 (76, 187) 20 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.7, -1.7)
Clay County 6 *** 47.6 (34.0, 66.1) 141 (18, 192) 8 stable stable trend -3.7 (-7.9, 0.6)
Fort Bend County 6 *** 36.0 (33.8, 38.3) 179 (164, 186) 230 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.7, -2.6)
Washington County 6 *** 40.6 (33.3, 49.2) 170 (104, 191) 22 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.6, -1.8)
Wharton County 6 *** 47.7 (39.6, 57.0) 138 (72, 181) 25 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.4, -2.0)
Winkler County 6 *** 51.5 (30.7, 80.8) 125 (2, 195) 4 stable stable trend -3.7 (-7.6, 0.5)
Refugio County 6 *** 44.5 (28.7, 67.5) 154 (15, 195) 5 stable stable trend -3.8 (-8.6, 1.4)
Fisher County 6 *** 47.6 (27.4, 81.5) 139 (2, 195) 3 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.5, -0.3)
Coleman County 6 *** 52.0 (37.0, 73.0) 122 (5, 192) 8 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.8, -1.5)
Hockley County 6 *** 44.0 (33.3, 57.2) 156 (56, 192) 12 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.8, -1.6)
Montgomery County 6 *** 53.2 (50.4, 56.0) 117 (86, 135) 306 falling falling trend -4.2 (-5.1, -3.4)
San Saba County 6 *** 41.7 (24.9, 67.8) 164 (12, 195) 4 stable stable trend -4.3 (-8.6, 0.3)
Goliad County 6 *** 56.6 (39.2, 80.7) 99 (2, 190) 7 falling falling trend -4.5 (-8.3, -0.4)
Jack County 6 *** 51.8 (34.4, 75.5) 124 (3, 194) 6 falling falling trend -4.7 (-7.7, -1.6)
Donley County 6 *** 55.1 (32.0, 94.0) 104 (1, 195) 3 falling falling trend -5.2 (-9.1, -1.1)
Gaines County 6 *** 39.6 (26.3, 56.7) 173 (42, 195) 6 falling falling trend -5.4 (-8.3, -2.4)
Andrews County 6 *** 36.1 (23.4, 52.9) 178 (75, 195) 5 falling falling trend -6.3 (-9.8, -2.6)
Mason County 6 *** 37.9 (21.5, 67.5) 176 (27, 195) 3 falling falling trend -6.5 (-10.6, -2.3)
Reeves County 6 *** 29.3 (18.1, 44.8) 191 (116, 195) 4 falling falling trend -7.7 (-11.1, -4.0)
Colorado County 6 *** 43.1 (33.4, 55.2) 158 (75, 190) 14 falling falling trend -8.2 (-12.5, -3.6)
Cameron County 6 *** 31.1 (28.7, 33.6) 189 (174, 192) 130 falling falling trend -8.7 (-13.3, -3.9)
Callahan County 6 *** 48.6 (36.2, 64.6) 133 (35, 191) 11 falling falling trend -9.1 (-15.2, -2.6)
Brewster County 6 *** 33.8 (20.6, 53.0) 186 (58, 195) 5
*
*
Dimmit County 6 *** 25.9 (14.7, 42.8) 194 (123, 195) 3
*
*
Haskell County 6 *** 62.1 (40.3, 93.5) 78 (1, 192) 6
*
*
Real County 6 *** 54.3 (32.9, 92.0) 110 (1, 195) 4
*
*
Armstrong County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Bailey County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crockett County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dallam County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Floyd County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Garza County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hansford County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kimble County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lynn County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parmer County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Presidio County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sutton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zapata County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Zavala County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/20/2021 6:03 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each area for additional information.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2020 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database (2001-2018) - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2020 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modifed by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2020 data.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top