Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Texas by County

Prostate (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Texas 7 N/A 108.3 (107.5, 109.1) N/A 15,638 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.6, 1.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 113.2 (113.0, 113.4) N/A 224,883 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.4, 3.7)
Anderson County 7 Rural 93.2 (79.2, 109.0) 143 (47, 185) 33 stable stable trend 2.2 (-3.5, 18.8)
Andrews County 7 Rural 65.2 (40.7, 98.3) 193 (59, 201) 5 falling falling trend -4.0 (-6.3, -1.7)
Angelina County 7 Rural 119.1 (105.9, 133.6) 51 (12, 124) 62 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.2, -3.2)
Bailey County 7 Rural 112.9 (70.8, 171.9) 66 (1, 201) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-3.7, 2.8)
Bee County 7 Rural 63.5 (46.6, 84.4) 196 (122, 201) 10 stable stable trend -1.6 (-6.6, 14.7)
Blanco County 7 Rural 124.2 (96.0, 161.2) 38 (1, 178) 14 stable stable trend -0.6 (-4.5, 3.7)
Brewster County 7 Rural 78.9 (53.9, 114.2) 178 (33, 201) 7 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.1, 2.0)
Brown County 7 Rural 82.8 (67.9, 100.4) 170 (84, 196) 22 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.9, -1.2)
Burnet County 7 Rural 110.6 (96.2, 126.9) 71 (18, 158) 45 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.2, -1.4)
Calhoun County 7 Rural 79.9 (60.5, 104.3) 175 (53, 200) 12 falling falling trend -4.2 (-6.5, -2.1)
Camp County 7 Rural 169.8 (132.5, 215.6) 1 (1, 90) 15 rising rising trend 30.9 (5.3, 48.6)
Cass County 7 Rural 103.3 (85.0, 125.1) 101 (13, 183) 23 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.9, -1.5)
Castro County 7 Rural 69.7 (40.8, 113.0) 187 (19, 201) 4
*
*
Cherokee County 7 Rural 128.1 (111.1, 147.2) 25 (3, 121) 42 stable stable trend 6.9 (-6.1, 23.4)
Childress County 7 Rural 89.0 (52.5, 142.5) 152 (2, 201) 4 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.5, -0.3)
Coleman County 7 Rural 55.0 (33.8, 89.3) 200 (97, 201) 4 falling falling trend -5.5 (-10.0, -2.2)
Colorado County 7 Rural 108.2 (87.1, 133.9) 80 (9, 181) 19 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.0, 1.0)
Comanche County 7 Rural 67.0 (47.4, 94.0) 191 (96, 201) 8 falling falling trend -4.4 (-7.0, -2.2)
Cooke County 7 Rural 107.9 (91.4, 127.0) 82 (19, 170) 32 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.1)
Crockett County 7 Rural 148.7 (83.5, 250.4) 6 (1, 201) 3
*
*
Dallam County 7 Rural 102.5 (57.1, 168.2) 106 (1, 201) 3
*
*
Dawson County 7 Rural 92.5 (61.1, 134.1) 147 (5, 201) 6 falling falling trend -3.1 (-6.4, -0.2)
DeWitt County 7 Rural 86.0 (65.5, 111.7) 164 (36, 199) 12 falling falling trend -3.6 (-7.3, -0.3)
Deaf Smith County 7 Rural 93.1 (67.1, 125.8) 145 (14, 199) 9 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.7)
Delta County 7 Rural 140.8 (90.0, 212.8) 13 (1, 196) 5 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.4, 7.3)
Dimmit County 7 Rural 73.0 (42.9, 116.7) 185 (25, 201) 4 falling falling trend -5.9 (-9.2, -3.4)
Eastland County 7 Rural 97.1 (74.2, 125.8) 131 (8, 195) 13 stable stable trend -1.6 (-4.7, 1.3)
Erath County 7 Rural 100.1 (82.4, 120.6) 119 (23, 187) 23 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.1, 0.1)
Fannin County 7 Rural 99.8 (83.1, 119.4) 120 (28, 184) 26 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.3, -0.7)
Fayette County 7 Rural 125.7 (105.3, 150.0) 33 (2, 144) 28 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.9, 1.1)
Floyd County 7 Rural 94.8 (56.7, 152.3) 136 (1, 201) 4 falling falling trend -3.5 (-7.6, -0.3)
Franklin County 7 Rural 100.4 (72.4, 137.7) 116 (6, 198) 9 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.7, 0.3)
Freestone County 7 Rural 136.1 (110.5, 166.7) 18 (1, 136) 20 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.7, 1.9)
Frio County 7 Rural 46.5 (27.7, 72.8) 201 (141, 201) 4 falling falling trend -6.5 (-9.0, -4.5)
Gaines County 7 Rural 98.1 (67.8, 136.4) 127 (4, 200) 7 falling falling trend -3.3 (-6.1, -0.7)
Gillespie County 7 Rural 149.1 (127.4, 174.4) 5 (1, 74) 38 stable stable trend 4.2 (-4.0, 22.3)
Gonzales County 7 Rural 101.2 (77.7, 130.1) 113 (10, 193) 13 stable stable trend -2.1 (-5.0, 0.5)
Gray County 7 Rural 93.3 (71.0, 120.6) 142 (21, 197) 12 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.5, -1.3)
Grimes County 7 Rural 87.9 (70.9, 108.2) 156 (50, 196) 20 stable stable trend -2.3 (-5.0, 0.3)
Hale County 7 Rural 111.9 (90.0, 137.6) 67 (5, 177) 19 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.8, 0.1)
Hamilton County 7 Rural 95.1 (66.1, 135.8) 135 (7, 200) 7 stable stable trend -3.7 (-9.4, 1.1)
Hansford County 7 Rural 114.8 (64.6, 188.8) 64 (1, 201) 3
*
*
Haskell County 7 Rural 84.5 (49.5, 139.0) 167 (5, 201) 4 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.7, -0.2)
Henderson County 7 Rural 116.9 (105.2, 129.7) 60 (15, 126) 77 stable stable trend 2.9 (-3.3, 15.7)
Hill County 7 Rural 126.4 (107.8, 147.8) 31 (4, 132) 34 rising rising trend 8.5 (0.1, 26.4)
Hood County 7 Rural 104.2 (92.2, 117.8) 97 (35, 162) 57 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.8, -2.1)
Hopkins County 7 Rural 103.5 (86.1, 123.7) 100 (22, 184) 26 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.8, -0.3)
Houston County 7 Rural 106.5 (85.9, 131.2) 91 (10, 183) 19 stable stable trend 5.4 (-0.1, 21.1)
Howard County 7 Rural 107.3 (86.6, 131.3) 87 (11, 182) 20 stable stable trend -2.2 (-14.3, 14.1)
Hutchinson County 7 Rural 117.9 (92.9, 147.9) 55 (3, 177) 16 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.6, -0.6)
Jack County 7 Rural 94.0 (60.0, 140.8) 140 (4, 201) 5 stable stable trend -3.1 (-8.3, 1.3)
Jackson County 7 Rural 106.9 (80.2, 140.7) 89 (4, 194) 11 rising rising trend 15.8 (1.0, 40.8)
Jasper County 7 Rural 151.0 (129.3, 175.6) 3 (1, 72) 36 rising rising trend 10.4 (1.0, 27.0)
Jim Wells County 7 Rural 67.9 (53.0, 85.7) 189 (116, 201) 15 stable stable trend 3.4 (-2.9, 21.1)
Karnes County 7 Rural 75.7 (50.2, 109.4) 184 (29, 201) 6 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.4, -1.9)
Kerr County 7 Rural 105.9 (93.0, 120.7) 93 (25, 164) 51 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.4, -2.2)
Kimble County 7 Rural 67.7 (38.3, 122.8) 190 (24, 201) 3 stable stable trend -3.9 (-7.7, 0.0)
Kleberg County 7 Rural 66.9 (49.3, 88.9) 192 (104, 201) 10 falling falling trend -5.2 (-9.1, -1.7)
Lamar County 7 Rural 98.7 (84.2, 115.2) 126 (38, 180) 34 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.7, -1.1)
Lamb County 7 Rural 94.5 (66.5, 130.9) 139 (7, 199) 8 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.1, -1.4)
Lavaca County 7 Rural 105.4 (83.7, 132.0) 96 (9, 184) 17 stable stable trend 6.9 (-1.9, 25.6)
Lee County 7 Rural 123.5 (97.4, 155.4) 40 (1, 175) 16 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.9, 1.9)
Leon County 7 Rural 97.9 (76.1, 125.6) 128 (17, 193) 14 stable stable trend -2.7 (-5.8, 0.3)
Limestone County 7 Rural 82.7 (64.4, 105.5) 172 (56, 199) 14 falling falling trend -4.3 (-6.0, -2.8)
Live Oak County 7 Rural 59.5 (39.2, 88.2) 198 (93, 201) 5 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.5, 1.0)
Llano County 7 Rural 96.7 (79.3, 119.0) 132 (28, 189) 24 rising rising trend 10.4 (2.6, 28.0)
Madison County 7 Rural 91.6 (63.5, 128.2) 149 (12, 201) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-5.2, 2.4)
Marion County 7 Rural 119.9 (89.8, 160.5) 48 (1, 185) 11 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.7, 0.5)
Mason County 7 Rural 102.5 (63.1, 168.1) 107 (1, 201) 4
*
*
Matagorda County 7 Rural 88.6 (72.0, 108.1) 155 (47, 197) 22 falling falling trend -5.0 (-6.6, -3.6)
McCulloch County 7 Rural 101.3 (69.2, 146.4) 112 (2, 199) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-4.5, 1.4)
Milam County 7 Rural 124.5 (103.0, 149.8) 36 (2, 156) 24 stable stable trend -1.8 (-3.7, 0.2)
Mills County 7 Rural 124.3 (75.7, 198.2) 37 (1, 200) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-5.8, 4.2)
Mitchell County 7 Rural 124.7 (82.8, 180.3) 35 (1, 196) 6 stable stable trend -0.7 (-5.3, 3.7)
Montague County 7 Rural 109.6 (87.7, 136.3) 77 (6, 183) 18 stable stable trend 2.7 (-15.3, 20.3)
Moore County 7 Rural 86.4 (61.5, 117.6) 163 (19, 200) 8 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.8, 1.0)
Morris County 7 Rural 158.5 (122.4, 203.2) 2 (1, 121) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.1, 4.5)
Nacogdoches County 7 Rural 99.2 (85.0, 115.2) 125 (44, 179) 37 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.4, -1.9)
Navarro County 7 Rural 106.6 (91.1, 124.2) 90 (19, 171) 35 stable stable trend 9.9 (-0.6, 27.1)
Newton County 7 Rural 110.3 (83.1, 145.6) 72 (3, 192) 11 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.4, 1.7)
Nolan County 7 Rural 107.3 (80.0, 141.8) 86 (2, 194) 11 stable stable trend 12.3 (-6.2, 33.9)
Ochiltree County 7 Rural 78.5 (46.5, 124.0) 179 (8, 201) 4 falling falling trend -5.2 (-10.2, -0.8)
Palo Pinto County 7 Rural 86.5 (69.3, 107.4) 161 (60, 196) 18 falling falling trend -4.8 (-7.3, -2.6)
Panola County 7 Rural 117.1 (94.4, 144.3) 59 (5, 170) 20 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.0, 8.9)
Parmer County 7 Rural 97.2 (64.2, 141.8) 130 (3, 201) 6 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.2, 0.4)
Pecos County 7 Rural 55.7 (34.7, 84.5) 199 (117, 201) 5 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.9, -0.4)
Polk County 7 Rural 148.4 (129.2, 169.8) 7 (1, 61) 56 falling falling trend -3.9 (-6.1, -2.0)
Presidio County 7 Rural 84.0 (50.7, 134.0) 168 (5, 201) 4 falling falling trend -4.0 (-7.6, -0.9)
Rains County 7 Rural 137.2 (107.3, 174.9) 17 (1, 141) 15 rising rising trend 21.9 (2.7, 37.5)
Real County 7 Rural 101.6 (56.7, 186.0) 110 (1, 201) 3
*
*
Red River County 7 Rural 109.9 (82.3, 145.9) 75 (3, 193) 11 falling falling trend -4.6 (-6.6, -3.0)
Refugio County 7 Rural 85.5 (54.0, 132.6) 165 (10, 201) 5 falling falling trend -3.5 (-6.6, -0.8)
Runnels County 7 Rural 110.8 (79.9, 151.6) 70 (2, 193) 9 stable stable trend -2.6 (-6.8, 1.2)
Sabine County 7 Rural 107.6 (80.5, 144.9) 84 (4, 194) 11 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.6, -0.6)
San Augustine County 7 Rural 111.5 (78.4, 157.6) 69 (1, 197) 8 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.7, 0.5)
San Saba County 7 Rural 76.9 (46.0, 125.8) 182 (12, 201) 4
*
*
Scurry County 7 Rural 116.1 (87.6, 151.1) 62 (2, 185) 12 falling falling trend -6.1 (-22.2, -2.4)
Shelby County 7 Rural 93.6 (73.6, 117.8) 141 (27, 194) 16 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.5, -1.1)
Somervell County 7 Rural 130.7 (93.9, 179.3) 23 (1, 186) 9 rising rising trend 15.1 (3.5, 42.1)
Starr County 7 Rural 99.3 (82.9, 117.9) 124 (30, 181) 26 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.4)
Stephens County 7 Rural 63.4 (39.0, 99.1) 197 (54, 201) 4 falling falling trend -6.4 (-17.4, -4.0)
Sutton County 7 Rural 149.8 (89.3, 241.4) 4 (1, 198) 4
*
*
Swisher County 7 Rural 95.8 (59.1, 148.0) 133 (2, 201) 4 stable stable trend -3.3 (-7.7, 0.1)
Terry County 7 Rural 132.3 (94.4, 180.4) 21 (1, 189) 8 stable stable trend -2.7 (-6.8, 1.0)
Titus County 7 Rural 139.4 (115.1, 167.3) 15 (1, 125) 24 stable stable trend 14.1 (-4.1, 34.8)
Trinity County 7 Rural 89.8 (67.8, 118.8) 151 (20, 198) 12 falling falling trend -3.4 (-6.2, -0.9)
Tyler County 7 Rural 97.8 (77.3, 122.9) 129 (20, 192) 16 falling falling trend -3.2 (-6.6, -0.2)
Uvalde County 7 Rural 64.8 (47.3, 86.9) 195 (108, 201) 9 falling falling trend -4.3 (-7.5, -1.6)
Val Verde County 7 Rural 76.7 (61.7, 94.3) 183 (93, 199) 18 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.3, -2.1)
Van Zandt County 7 Rural 103.1 (89.8, 118.1) 104 (35, 172) 45 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.8)
Walker County 7 Rural 140.5 (125.5, 156.9) 14 (1, 73) 68 rising rising trend 12.8 (3.0, 27.9)
Ward County 7 Rural 82.7 (51.8, 125.1) 171 (9, 201) 5 falling falling trend -4.2 (-7.5, -1.4)
Washington County 7 Rural 115.8 (98.1, 136.3) 63 (7, 157) 32 falling falling trend -10.6 (-18.9, -1.1)
Wharton County 7 Rural 87.6 (72.1, 105.7) 158 (54, 194) 24 stable stable trend 1.8 (-3.8, 12.7)
Wheeler County 7 Rural 141.9 (91.6, 213.4) 12 (1, 196) 5 stable stable trend -0.1 (-4.1, 4.0)
Wilbarger County 7 Rural 95.3 (68.2, 130.8) 134 (8, 199) 8 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.7, -0.6)
Willacy County 7 Rural 79.6 (57.2, 107.8) 177 (39, 201) 8 stable stable trend -2.3 (-6.3, 1.3)
Wood County 7 Rural 129.0 (113.8, 146.2) 24 (4, 110) 55 stable stable trend 9.5 (-1.0, 24.9)
Yoakum County 7 Rural 123.4 (78.0, 186.1) 41 (1, 199) 5
*
*
Young County 7 Rural 79.9 (59.6, 105.9) 176 (49, 200) 11 falling falling trend -4.5 (-7.4, -2.0)
Zapata County 7 Rural 100.3 (69.4, 140.5) 117 (3, 200) 7 stable stable trend -1.8 (-4.9, 1.1)
Zavala County 7 Rural 87.8 (55.1, 133.2) 157 (5, 201) 5 stable stable trend -2.7 (-7.6, 1.7)
Aransas County 7 Urban 86.6 (69.9, 107.3) 159 (50, 196) 20 falling falling trend -5.5 (-7.7, -3.7)
Archer County 7 Urban 117.5 (83.9, 162.8) 58 (1, 191) 8 rising rising trend 12.7 (4.7, 36.6)
Atascosa County 7 Urban 69.0 (55.6, 84.7) 188 (125, 200) 19 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.4, -0.6)
Austin County 7 Urban 99.5 (81.9, 120.5) 123 (24, 184) 23 falling falling trend -3.7 (-5.1, -2.3)
Bandera County 7 Urban 78.2 (62.3, 98.7) 180 (81, 199) 18 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.9, -1.6)
Bastrop County 7 Urban 109.0 (96.9, 122.3) 79 (25, 152) 65 stable stable trend 4.9 (-0.1, 16.4)
Bell County 7 Urban 145.8 (137.2, 154.7) 8 (2, 31) 227 stable stable trend 3.7 (-1.6, 12.7)
Bexar County 7 Urban 80.3 (77.7, 83.0) 174 (152, 182) 745 falling falling trend -5.5 (-10.2, -1.7)
Bosque County 7 Urban 101.6 (80.4, 128.0) 111 (9, 189) 17 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.7, 0.5)
Bowie County 7 Urban 92.7 (81.5, 105.1) 146 (73, 180) 52 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.8, -2.0)
Brazoria County 7 Urban 124.8 (117.3, 132.6) 34 (17, 76) 231 stable stable trend -0.9 (-6.8, 4.9)
Brazos County 7 Urban 119.8 (109.2, 131.1) 50 (18, 111) 101 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.8, -1.5)
Burleson County 7 Urban 105.8 (82.8, 134.5) 94 (7, 190) 15 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.3, 0.3)
Caldwell County 7 Urban 99.7 (83.1, 118.8) 121 (29, 183) 27 falling falling trend -3.0 (-5.2, -0.7)
Callahan County 7 Urban 103.8 (77.7, 137.3) 98 (5, 195) 11 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.3, 2.8)
Cameron County 7 Urban 83.2 (77.6, 89.0) 169 (134, 183) 169 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.2, -1.7)
Chambers County 7 Urban 138.8 (116.9, 163.6) 16 (1, 118) 32 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.5, 1.0)
Clay County 7 Urban 106.1 (76.5, 145.7) 92 (2, 195) 9 stable stable trend -2.2 (-4.9, 0.6)
Collin County 7 Urban 116.9 (112.4, 121.5) 61 (36, 86) 567 rising rising trend 4.7 (1.7, 9.9)
Comal County 7 Urban 92.5 (84.2, 101.4) 148 (89, 174) 100 falling falling trend -5.6 (-11.5, -0.3)
Coryell County 7 Urban 100.1 (84.9, 117.2) 118 (32, 180) 32 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.9, 7.8)
Crosby County 7 Urban 108.1 (64.3, 173.1) 81 (1, 201) 4
*
*
Dallas County 7 Urban 107.8 (105.0, 110.6) 83 (65, 112) 1,247 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.1, 6.1)
Denton County 7 Urban 117.8 (112.8, 123.0) 56 (32, 87) 469 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.6, 5.3)
Ector County 7 Urban 88.8 (78.1, 100.4) 154 (82, 184) 56 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.7, 12.3)
El Paso County 7 Urban 100.6 (96.1, 105.2) 115 (81, 142) 391 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.4, -2.4)
Ellis County 7 Urban 107.4 (98.0, 117.6) 85 (36, 144) 105 stable stable trend 3.9 (-2.5, 10.9)
Falls County 7 Urban 127.7 (100.5, 161.2) 27 (1, 169) 15 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.2, 2.8)
Fort Bend County 7 Urban 123.0 (117.9, 128.4) 42 (22, 72) 489 falling falling trend -3.6 (-7.8, -0.5)
Galveston County 7 Urban 103.8 (97.3, 110.5) 99 (60, 138) 212 stable stable trend -4.4 (-8.8, 0.6)
Garza County 7 Urban 119.9 (67.3, 196.2) 49 (1, 201) 3
*
*
Goliad County 7 Urban 91.3 (60.0, 137.2) 150 (3, 201) 6 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.0, 1.7)
Grayson County 7 Urban 109.8 (100.0, 120.3) 76 (32, 135) 98 stable stable trend 1.2 (-2.9, 10.6)
Gregg County 7 Urban 126.1 (114.3, 138.8) 32 (8, 95) 88 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.6, 9.4)
Guadalupe County 7 Urban 88.9 (80.4, 98.2) 153 (92, 181) 83 stable stable trend -7.4 (-14.3, 0.0)
Hardin County 7 Urban 105.6 (90.7, 122.4) 95 (24, 167) 38 stable stable trend 2.5 (-3.8, 15.8)
Harris County 7 Urban 111.9 (109.8, 114.1) 68 (57, 95) 2,322 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 0.4)
Harrison County 7 Urban 121.8 (107.2, 137.9) 43 (8, 126) 54 stable stable trend -2.5 (-11.6, 8.9)
Hays County 7 Urban 143.5 (132.7, 155.0) 11 (2, 42) 148 rising rising trend 9.5 (3.0, 20.2)
Hidalgo County 7 Urban 94.5 (89.9, 99.2) 138 (102, 157) 330 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.7)
Hockley County 7 Urban 133.1 (104.9, 166.7) 19 (1, 156) 16 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.9, 0.3)
Hunt County 7 Urban 99.7 (88.7, 111.8) 122 (46, 168) 62 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -0.9)
Jefferson County 7 Urban 118.3 (110.4, 126.7) 54 (24, 102) 175 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.5, 12.0)
Johnson County 7 Urban 120.9 (110.9, 131.6) 45 (16, 105) 116 rising rising trend 4.8 (0.6, 12.3)
Jones County 7 Urban 93.1 (70.0, 121.8) 144 (14, 199) 11 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.9, -0.4)
Kaufman County 7 Urban 102.5 (91.1, 114.8) 108 (43, 164) 67 stable stable trend 4.2 (-2.7, 12.2)
Kendall County 7 Urban 113.6 (97.3, 132.2) 65 (13, 158) 36 rising rising trend 3.8 (0.3, 9.9)
Lampasas County 7 Urban 126.6 (102.5, 155.3) 29 (1, 160) 20 rising rising trend 5.4 (1.6, 16.9)
Liberty County 7 Urban 101.0 (88.0, 115.3) 114 (36, 172) 48 stable stable trend 2.1 (-4.1, 14.0)
Lubbock County 7 Urban 124.0 (115.7, 132.7) 39 (16, 80) 175 stable stable trend 1.7 (-2.2, 7.5)
Lynn County 7 Urban 117.7 (72.3, 183.0) 57 (1, 201) 4
*
*
Maverick County 7 Urban 118.9 (100.1, 140.0) 52 (5, 155) 29 falling falling trend -13.0 (-26.0, -4.7)
McLennan County 7 Urban 126.6 (118.2, 135.4) 28 (15, 79) 176 stable stable trend 4.2 (-1.8, 14.4)
Medina County 7 Urban 80.7 (67.3, 96.3) 173 (96, 197) 27 stable stable trend 4.1 (-0.7, 12.3)
Midland County 7 Urban 85.1 (75.2, 95.9) 166 (104, 187) 59 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.4, -0.9)
Montgomery County 7 Urban 94.7 (89.8, 99.7) 137 (99, 158) 312 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.5, 7.2)
Nueces County 7 Urban 64.9 (59.8, 70.3) 194 (175, 199) 128 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.3, -3.4)
Orange County 7 Urban 102.0 (89.8, 115.5) 109 (41, 167) 53 stable stable trend 6.3 (-2.2, 21.0)
Parker County 7 Urban 120.3 (110.1, 131.2) 46 (17, 106) 110 rising rising trend 7.6 (2.0, 16.9)
Potter County 7 Urban 120.0 (107.8, 133.2) 47 (13, 117) 74 falling falling trend -2.4 (-4.0, -0.9)
Randall County 7 Urban 128.1 (116.9, 140.2) 26 (8, 88) 101 stable stable trend 2.7 (-3.1, 12.8)
Robertson County 7 Urban 131.2 (103.4, 165.1) 22 (1, 167) 16 stable stable trend -2.2 (-5.0, 0.3)
Rockwall County 7 Urban 102.9 (90.5, 116.5) 105 (36, 164) 55 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.7)
Rusk County 7 Urban 109.1 (93.8, 126.4) 78 (19, 170) 38 stable stable trend 3.4 (-15.2, 21.2)
San Jacinto County 7 Urban 78.1 (62.7, 96.9) 181 (82, 199) 19 falling falling trend -3.0 (-4.5, -1.5)
San Patricio County 7 Urban 72.9 (61.1, 86.4) 186 (123, 199) 28 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.9, -2.2)
Smith County 7 Urban 145.0 (136.0, 154.5) 9 (3, 32) 200 rising rising trend 5.3 (2.1, 11.6)
Tarrant County 7 Urban 110.1 (107.1, 113.3) 74 (59, 103) 1,087 stable stable trend 2.6 (-2.2, 8.1)
Taylor County 7 Urban 103.3 (93.0, 114.3) 102 (47, 156) 77 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Tom Green County 7 Urban 107.0 (96.1, 118.9) 88 (31, 151) 73 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.5, -0.5)
Travis County 7 Urban 132.9 (128.3, 137.6) 20 (12, 42) 715 rising rising trend 5.7 (2.8, 11.5)
Upshur County 7 Urban 103.1 (86.9, 121.9) 103 (23, 177) 30 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.0, -1.3)
Victoria County 7 Urban 118.8 (105.9, 132.9) 53 (11, 127) 64 rising rising trend 9.4 (3.5, 20.4)
Waller County 7 Urban 126.5 (107.6, 147.8) 30 (3, 139) 34 rising rising trend 3.0 (0.9, 6.9)
Webb County 7 Urban 86.6 (78.1, 95.7) 160 (104, 183) 81 stable stable trend 4.7 (-4.2, 21.0)
Wichita County 7 Urban 110.3 (99.4, 122.2) 73 (29, 142) 79 rising rising trend 5.6 (1.0, 16.8)
Williamson County 7 Urban 144.7 (138.4, 151.4) 10 (3, 28) 408 stable stable trend 0.0 (-4.2, 3.0)
Wilson County 7 Urban 86.5 (72.5, 102.6) 162 (75, 193) 29 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.1, -1.4)
Wise County 7 Urban 121.7 (106.6, 138.5) 44 (8, 130) 51 rising rising trend 9.3 (0.3, 27.4)
Armstrong County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Baylor County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Borden County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Briscoe County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooks County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carson County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cochran County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Coke County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Collingsworth County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Concho County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cottle County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crane County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Culberson County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Dickens County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Donley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Duval County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Edwards County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fisher County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Foard County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Glasscock County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hall County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardeman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hartley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hemphill County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hudspeth County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Irion County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jeff Davis County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jim Hogg County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kenedy County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kent County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
King County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kinney County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Knox County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
La Salle County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lipscomb County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Loving County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McMullen County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menard County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Motley County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Oldham County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reagan County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Reeves County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roberts County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Schleicher County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shackelford County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sherman County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sterling County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stonewall County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Terrell County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Throckmorton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upton County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winkler County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/04/2024 2:25 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Armstrong, Baylor, Borden, Briscoe, Brooks, Carson, Cochran, Coke, Collingsworth, Concho, Cottle, Crane, Culberson, Dickens, Donley, Duval, Edwards, Fisher, Foard, Glasscock, Hall, Hardeman, Hartley, Hemphill, Hudspeth, Irion, Jeff Davis, Jim Hogg, Kenedy, Kent, King, Kinney, Knox, La Salle, Lipscomb, Loving, Martin, McMullen, Menard, Motley, Oldham, Reagan, Reeves, Roberts, Schleicher, Shackelford, Sherman, Sterling, Stonewall, Terrell, Throckmorton, Upton, Winkler

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top