Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Utah by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Utah 7 N/A 24.9 (24.1, 25.7) N/A 712 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 53.1 (53.0, 53.2) N/A 216,523 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.2, -2.9)
Weber County 7 Urban 28.7 (25.7, 31.9) 8 (5, 15) 70 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Washington County 7 Urban 24.9 (22.2, 27.7) 15 (8, 19) 69 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.2)
Wasatch County 7 Rural 14.6 (9.2, 22.0) 23 (15, 23) 5
*
*
Utah County 7 Urban 17.0 (15.2, 18.9) 21 (18, 23) 69 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
Uintah County 7 Rural 26.6 (19.0, 36.1) 13 (3, 22) 8 falling falling trend -4.6 (-16.6, -2.0)
Tooele County 7 Urban 35.2 (28.3, 43.2) 5 (1, 13) 19 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.5, -0.2)
Summit County 7 Rural 24.6 (17.7, 33.4) 17 (4, 22) 10 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 1.6)
Sevier County 7 Rural 25.3 (17.2, 36.2) 14 (3, 23) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.1, 1.5)
Sanpete County 7 Rural 27.3 (19.6, 37.2) 9 (3, 21) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.3, 1.2)
San Juan County 7 Rural 29.3 (18.6, 44.2) 7 (1, 23) 5
*
*
Salt Lake County 7 Urban 27.0 (25.6, 28.5) 12 (6, 16) 281 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Millard County 7 Rural 18.2 (10.3, 30.4) 20 (7, 23) 3
*
*
Kane County 7 Rural 24.9 (13.7, 43.3) 16 (2, 23) 3
*
*
Juab County 7 Urban 38.9 (23.5, 60.3) 4 (1, 21) 4
*
*
Iron County 7 Rural 27.3 (21.3, 34.3) 10 (4, 20) 15 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 1.0)
Grand County 7 Rural 31.8 (19.4, 49.9) 6 (1, 23) 4
*
*
Garfield County 7 Rural 40.9 (23.3, 69.2) 3 (1, 22) 3
*
*
Emery County 7 Rural 27.2 (16.0, 44.1) 11 (1, 23) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.8, 3.1)
Duchesne County 7 Rural 42.5 (30.2, 58.1) 1 (1, 13) 8 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.5, 1.8)
Davis County 7 Urban 22.4 (20.0, 24.9) 18 (11, 20) 67 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.6, 0.0)
Carbon County 7 Rural 41.4 (31.0, 54.6) 2 (1, 12) 11 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.5)
Cache County 7 Urban 16.3 (13.0, 20.3) 22 (17, 23) 17 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.9, 3.1)
Box Elder County 7 Rural 21.7 (16.5, 27.9) 19 (8, 23) 12 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.1)
Beaver County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Daggett County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 7 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Piute County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rich County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 7 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/04/2024 1:46 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Beaver, Daggett, Morgan, Piute, Rich, Wayne

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top