Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for West Virginia by County

Ovary (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban

County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
West Virginia 6 N/A 11.9 (11.0, 12.9) N/A 141 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 10.1 (10.0, 10.1) N/A 20,027 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.3, -1.1)
Harrison County 6 Rural 11.5 (7.0, 17.9) 14 (3, 16) 4 stable stable trend -0.3 (-5.4, 4.7)
Jackson County 6 Rural 17.3 (9.7, 29.2) 3 (1, 16) 3
*
*
Logan County 6 Rural 17.3 (9.6, 28.9) 4 (1, 16) 3
*
*
Marion County 6 Rural 15.2 (9.6, 22.9) 5 (1, 16) 5 stable stable trend 0.2 (-3.1, 3.5)
Mercer County 6 Rural 12.3 (7.7, 18.9) 10 (2, 16) 5 stable stable trend -2.1 (-7.2, 2.6)
Mineral County 6 Rural 21.6 (12.5, 35.2) 2 (1, 13) 4
*
*
Berkeley County 6 Urban 10.4 (7.2, 14.7) 15 (5, 16) 7 falling falling trend -3.4 (-5.6, -1.4)
Boone County 6 Urban 21.8 (12.5, 36.2) 1 (1, 14) 4
*
*
Cabell County 6 Urban 12.4 (8.5, 17.5) 9 (3, 16) 7 stable stable trend -1.0 (-5.0, 2.7)
Fayette County 6 Urban 13.6 (8.1, 21.7) 7 (2, 16) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-7.8, 3.1)
Jefferson County 6 Urban 10.2 (5.9, 16.5) 16 (4, 16) 4 stable stable trend -2.2 (-8.4, 4.1)
Kanawha County 6 Urban 12.3 (9.6, 15.6) 11 (4, 16) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.7, 4.9)
Monongalia County 6 Urban 12.0 (7.9, 17.4) 13 (3, 16) 6 stable stable trend -0.1 (-5.7, 6.2)
Ohio County 6 Urban 13.8 (7.8, 22.8) 6 (1, 16) 4 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.1, 5.0)
Raleigh County 6 Urban 12.2 (8.0, 18.0) 12 (3, 16) 6 stable stable trend 0.9 (-2.6, 4.3)
Wood County 6 Urban 13.2 (9.2, 18.5) 8 (2, 16) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-4.7, 5.4)
Barbour County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Braxton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brooke County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Doddridge County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Gilmer County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grant County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greenbrier County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hampshire County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardy County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lewis County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lincoln County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marshall County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mason County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
McDowell County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mingo County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Morgan County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Nicholas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pendleton County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pleasants County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pocahontas County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Preston County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Putnam County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Randolph County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ritchie County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Roane County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Summers County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tucker County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tyler County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Upshur County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wetzel County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wirt County 6 Urban
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wyoming County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/13/2024 3:36 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Barbour, Braxton, Brooke, Calhoun, Clay, Doddridge, Gilmer, Grant, Greenbrier, Hampshire, Hancock, Hardy, Lewis, Lincoln, Marshall, Mason, McDowell, Mingo, Monroe, Morgan, Nicholas, Pendleton, Pleasants, Pocahontas, Preston, Putnam, Randolph, Ritchie, Roane, Summers, Taylor, Tucker, Tyler, Upshur, Wayne, Webster, Wetzel, Wirt, Wyoming

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top