Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin 6 507.2 (503.8, 510.6) N/A 17,937 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 480.6 (480.1, 481.1) N/A 863,255 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Adams County 6 616.0 (564.1, 672.6) 1 (1, 21) 126 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.7)
Langlade County 6 608.5 (552.7, 669.2) 2 (1, 24) 98 rising rising trend 9.3 (0.8, 15.4)
Vilas County 6 588.3 (539.7, 641.2) 3 (1, 31) 134 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7)
Racine County 6 564.4 (544.6, 584.8) 4 (2, 21) 655 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.6)
Marinette County 6 561.2 (523.8, 601.1) 5 (1, 36) 188 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.7, 1.1)
Barron County 6 557.7 (521.0, 596.6) 6 (1, 39) 187 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 2.0)
Rock County 6 557.3 (535.7, 579.5) 7 (2, 27) 533 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Burnett County 6 553.7 (498.1, 615.5) 8 (1, 56) 87 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5)
Kenosha County 6 550.4 (528.4, 573.2) 9 (3, 30) 507 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Trempealeau County 6 549.3 (502.5, 599.5) 10 (1, 51) 108 rising rising trend 8.6 (6.5, 11.9)
Iron County 6 547.0 (461.4, 650.4) 11 (1, 67) 33 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.2, 1.4)
Lincoln County 6 545.7 (500.5, 594.5) 12 (1, 51) 118 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7)
Juneau County 6 544.4 (498.0, 594.5) 13 (1, 51) 109 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.8, 5.0)
Price County 6 544.1 (483.1, 612.3) 14 (1, 59) 67 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.5)
Lafayette County 6 541.5 (479.8, 609.4) 15 (1, 61) 62 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4)
Washington County 6 540.5 (518.3, 563.6) 16 (4, 34) 476 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.3)
Oconto County 6 539.8 (500.3, 581.9) 17 (2, 50) 156 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Green Lake County 6 538.7 (484.3, 598.2) 18 (1, 58) 79 rising rising trend 5.4 (0.2, 11.2)
Manitowoc County 6 538.6 (510.6, 567.9) 19 (3, 41) 305 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Milwaukee County 6 537.3 (527.6, 547.2) 20 (9, 27) 2,485 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Waukesha County 6 529.2 (516.4, 542.2) 21 (10, 34) 1,388 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.5, 3.6)
Vernon County 6 528.2 (483.9, 575.8) 22 (2, 56) 115 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Walworth County 6 526.2 (500.9, 552.5) 23 (6, 46) 350 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.7)
Door County 6 522.8 (480.8, 568.4) 24 (3, 58) 136 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
Clark County 6 520.9 (477.1, 567.8) 25 (3, 59) 111 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.0, 1.2)
Oneida County 6 520.1 (482.9, 560.0) 26 (4, 57) 164 stable stable trend -2.1 (-11.4, 0.2)
Brown County 6 519.7 (502.6, 537.2) 27 (11, 42) 747 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Ozaukee County 6 516.8 (490.6, 544.2) 28 (7, 50) 311 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.1, 0.5)
Sheboygan County 6 515.1 (491.4, 539.7) 29 (10, 49) 379 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Jackson County 6 512.9 (460.9, 569.6) 30 (2, 64) 75 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.1, 0.9)
Sawyer County 6 512.2 (457.6, 572.6) 31 (2, 64) 76 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.6)
Chippewa County 6 507.3 (476.3, 539.8) 32 (9, 56) 214 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Fond du Lac County 6 504.0 (479.3, 529.7) 33 (12, 54) 335 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Grant County 6 503.7 (467.7, 542.0) 34 (7, 61) 155 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.7, 1.7)
Douglas County 6 502.2 (464.8, 542.1) 35 (7, 62) 145 rising rising trend 2.0 (0.2, 4.1)
Marathon County 6 501.4 (480.0, 523.6) 36 (17, 54) 436 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 2.3)
Ashland County 6 499.5 (439.1, 566.7) 37 (2, 68) 54 stable stable trend -3.1 (-12.4, 0.9)
Winnebago County 6 495.6 (475.8, 516.0) 38 (21, 55) 497 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Wood County 6 495.5 (467.8, 524.5) 39 (15, 59) 256 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Waushara County 6 495.3 (451.8, 542.5) 40 (6, 65) 106 rising rising trend 5.8 (0.6, 11.6)
La Crosse County 6 492.1 (468.0, 517.2) 41 (19, 59) 330 stable stable trend 3.3 (-1.2, 6.1)
Monroe County 6 491.2 (455.1, 529.6) 42 (11, 65) 146 falling falling trend -1.0 (-2.0, -0.1)
Dodge County 6 488.8 (463.0, 515.7) 43 (19, 61) 285 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.3)
Waupaca County 6 487.6 (455.3, 521.8) 44 (16, 63) 185 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Forest County 6 484.2 (414.6, 564.3) 45 (2, 71) 38 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 1.8)
Florence County 6 479.1 (383.4, 598.9) 46 (1, 72) 21 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.8)
Jefferson County 6 475.2 (448.3, 503.3) 47 (25, 64) 252 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Outagamie County 6 473.3 (454.2, 493.1) 48 (33, 63) 492 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.7)
Crawford County 6 470.8 (416.2, 531.5) 49 (6, 70) 60 falling falling trend -3.0 (-12.7, -0.1)
Dane County 6 470.3 (458.4, 482.5) 50 (39, 61) 1,260 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Sauk County 6 468.6 (438.4, 500.4) 51 (25, 66) 192 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Marquette County 6 468.2 (413.7, 529.0) 52 (9, 70) 62 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Rusk County 6 468.1 (409.5, 533.9) 53 (5, 71) 54 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.5)
Bayfield County 6 468.0 (414.8, 527.7) 54 (7, 70) 69 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.4)
Portage County 6 467.7 (437.9, 499.2) 55 (26, 66) 197 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Kewaunee County 6 464.2 (414.6, 518.6) 56 (12, 70) 69 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.8)
Columbia County 6 459.9 (428.9, 492.6) 57 (30, 67) 178 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.3, 0.4)
Shawano County 6 458.5 (423.3, 496.2) 58 (27, 68) 137 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
Buffalo County 6 456.2 (397.5, 522.4) 59 (11, 71) 48 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.4, 2.9)
Green County 6 455.7 (417.3, 496.9) 60 (25, 69) 112 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Eau Claire County 6 452.0 (426.7, 478.5) 61 (38, 68) 253 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.5)
Polk County 6 449.1 (415.9, 484.7) 62 (32, 69) 148 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.5, 1.3)
Iowa County 6 445.1 (398.3, 496.3) 63 (22, 71) 73 falling falling trend -2.1 (-9.7, -0.5)
Calumet County 6 426.4 (392.6, 462.5) 64 (44, 71) 127 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5)
Pepin County 6 419.7 (345.6, 507.4) 65 (8, 72) 24 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.8, -0.4)
Taylor County 6 416.4 (369.6, 468.1) 66 (37, 72) 62 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.0, 0.0)
Washburn County 6 407.4 (357.1, 464.4) 67 (38, 72) 56 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.2, 2.0)
Richland County 6 397.6 (350.6, 450.1) 68 (45, 72) 57 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.1)
Menominee County 6 396.2 (291.0, 529.1) 69 (4, 72) 10 falling falling trend -3.0 (-6.0, -0.1)
St. Croix County 6 395.1 (369.6, 421.9) 70 (61, 72) 197 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 1.2)
Dunn County 6 391.3 (356.5, 428.7) 71 (59, 72) 99 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.6)
Pierce County 6 349.1 (314.9, 386.2) 72 (66, 72) 82 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.8)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/19/2024 8:24 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.


Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top