Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Male, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 480.6 (480.1, 481.1) N/A 863,255 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Kentucky 7 554.3 (550.1, 558.5) 1 (1, 2) 14,273 falling falling trend -0.8 (-0.9, -0.6)
Louisiana 7 549.7 (545.5, 553.9) 2 (1, 2) 14,165 stable stable trend 0.9 (0.0, 1.7)
Mississippi 6 537.1 (532.0, 542.3) 3 (3, 5) 8,931 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.5, 0.5)
Iowa 7 531.7 (526.9, 536.5) 4 (3, 7) 9,971 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.2, 1.9)
New Jersey 7 530.8 (527.9, 533.7) 5 (3, 7) 26,897 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Georgia 7 527.2 (524.4, 530.1) 6 (4, 7) 28,195 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 1.0)
Arkansas 6 526.4 (521.5, 531.3) 7 (4, 7) 9,309 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.2, 1.7)
New York 7 517.8 (515.8, 519.7) 8 (8, 10) 57,391 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.8, 0.6)
Tennessee 6 514.7 (511.4, 518.0) 9 (8, 13) 20,069 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
North Carolina 6 514.7 (512.0, 517.4) 10 (8, 13) 30,209 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.5)
West Virginia 6 512.0 (506.1, 517.9) 11 (8, 17) 6,237 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.8)
New Hampshire 6 510.3 (503.3, 517.2) 12 (8, 19) 4,510 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 2.6)
Minnesota 6 510.0 (506.4, 513.6) 13 (9, 16) 16,416 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.1, 2.6)
Wisconsin 6 507.2 (503.8, 510.6) 14 (11, 18) 17,937 falling falling trend -0.6 (-0.8, -0.4)
Maine 6 507.1 (500.4, 513.8) 15 (9, 22) 4,764 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.3, 1.1)
Ohio 6 506.4 (504.0, 508.9) 16 (12, 18) 35,070 stable stable trend 0.6 (0.0, 1.6)
Pennsylvania 6 503.2 (500.9, 505.5) 17 (14, 20) 40,033 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Delaware 6 500.2 (492.0, 508.5) 18 (11, 28) 3,058 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.6)
Alabama 6 498.6 (494.9, 502.4) 19 (17, 25) 14,234 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.8, -0.1)
Nebraska 6 498.3 (492.2, 504.4) 20 (14, 27) 5,384 stable stable trend 0.8 (0.0, 2.1)
Illinois 7 496.8 (494.4, 499.2) 21 (18, 25) 35,024 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.9)
Rhode Island 6 496.2 (488.2, 504.2) 22 (14, 30) 3,121 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.6, 2.1)
South Dakota 6 495.0 (486.2, 503.9) 23 (14, 32) 2,588 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 1.4)
Montana 6 494.4 (486.8, 502.1) 24 (16, 31) 3,485 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.8, 2.6)
Connecticut 7 494.2 (489.9, 498.5) 25 (18, 29) 10,619 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.6)
Kansas 6 491.0 (486.1, 496.0) 26 (20, 31) 8,056 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.6)
Maryland 6 490.4 (486.9, 493.9) 27 (22, 30) 16,319 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.4, 2.3)
North Dakota 6 487.9 (478.3, 497.7) 28 (18, 36) 2,072 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Florida 6 487.3 (485.7, 489.0) 29 (26, 31) 69,845 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.3, -1.2)
Idaho 7 486.1 (479.8, 492.4) 30 (22, 35) 4,858 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.1, 2.7)
Oklahoma 6 482.7 (478.5, 487.0) 31 (27, 36) 10,586 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Massachusetts 7 482.3 (479.2, 485.5) 32 (29, 35) 19,082 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.7)
Vermont 6 481.1 (471.3, 491.0) 33 (22, 36) 2,005 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.2, 2.8)
Missouri 6 481.0 (477.7, 484.3) 34 (29, 36) 17,314 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.4, -0.8)
Michigan 6 477.2 (474.7, 479.8) 35 (32, 36) 28,754 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.1, -1.4)
South Carolina 6 476.6 (473.0, 480.2) 36 (32, 36) 14,617 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.8, -1.4)
Washington 5 458.7 (455.8, 461.7) 37 (37, 38) 19,201 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.6)
Texas 7 455.7 (454.1, 457.4) 38 (37, 39) 61,877 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.3, 1.5)
Alaska 6 444.7 (434.3, 455.2) 39 (37, 45) 1,650 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.9, 2.1)
Utah 7 442.8 (437.7, 448.0) 40 (39, 44) 5,998 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 1.4)
Hawaii 7 438.9 (432.6, 445.3) 41 (39, 45) 3,889 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.2, 1.1)
Virginia 6 438.0 (435.3, 440.8) 42 (39, 45) 20,736 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 1.4)
District of Columbia 6 437.8 (427.1, 448.7) 43 (39, 45) 1,343 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.5)
Oregon 6 436.5 (432.8, 440.3) 44 (40, 45) 11,127 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.6, -1.0)
Wyoming 6 430.5 (420.5, 440.6) 45 (39, 46) 1,545 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7)
California 7 419.9 (418.7, 421.2) 46 (45, 46) 86,184 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.2)
Colorado 6 410.8 (407.5, 414.2) 47 (47, 47) 12,340 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.1)
Arizona 6 398.1 (395.4, 400.9) 48 (48, 48) 17,186 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.5, -1.0)
New Mexico 7 385.9 (380.9, 390.9) 49 (49, 49) 4,844 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.8)
Indiana 6
data not available
N/A
data not available
data not available
data not available
Nevada 6
data not available
N/A
data not available
data not available
data not available
Puerto Rico 6 391.6 (387.5, 395.7) N/A 7,504 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.1)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 10:50 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Indiana, Nevada, Puerto Rico

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Data not available for this combination of data selections.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data not available for this combination of geography, cancer site, age, and race/ethnicity.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top