Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin 6 23.8 (23.3, 24.3) N/A 1,673 stable stable trend -1.4 (-4.5, 0.8)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 22.5 (22.4, 22.5) N/A 83,836 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.9, 2.7)
Waukesha County 6 30.4 (28.2, 32.7) 7 (2, 21) 161 rising rising trend 2.1 (1.3, 2.9)
Dane County 6 27.8 (25.9, 29.9) 16 (7, 32) 159 falling falling trend -10.1 (-20.6, -0.6)
Milwaukee County 6 14.2 (13.2, 15.4) 66 (60, 67) 143 rising rising trend 1.3 (0.4, 2.3)
Brown County 6 24.5 (22.0, 27.3) 27 (13, 53) 70 falling falling trend -4.4 (-11.2, -1.2)
Racine County 6 24.7 (21.8, 27.8) 25 (11, 54) 58 rising rising trend 5.1 (2.3, 9.0)
Washington County 6 29.4 (25.8, 33.4) 10 (2, 38) 52 rising rising trend 3.0 (1.1, 5.4)
Winnebago County 6 24.2 (21.2, 27.6) 31 (11, 55) 50 stable stable trend -3.6 (-10.8, 0.3)
Rock County 6 24.6 (21.5, 28.0) 26 (10, 56) 49 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.4, 4.4)
Outagamie County 6 23.2 (20.2, 26.4) 40 (15, 58) 48 stable stable trend -7.9 (-24.8, 6.7)
Walworth County 6 34.2 (29.8, 39.2) 2 (1, 20) 46 rising rising trend 3.8 (1.7, 6.6)
Kenosha County 6 24.3 (21.1, 27.7) 30 (11, 56) 46 rising rising trend 6.0 (2.6, 11.0)
La Crosse County 6 32.9 (28.5, 37.8) 4 (1, 25) 43 rising rising trend 4.3 (2.1, 7.2)
Marathon County 6 24.3 (20.9, 28.1) 29 (9, 57) 40 stable stable trend -2.3 (-13.1, 2.8)
Sheboygan County 6 25.2 (21.5, 29.4) 21 (7, 56) 36 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.4, 2.5)
Eau Claire County 6 31.0 (26.4, 36.2) 6 (1, 37) 35 stable stable trend 0.9 (-8.3, 6.7)
Ozaukee County 6 28.4 (24.1, 33.3) 11 (2, 46) 34 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.3, 4.6)
Manitowoc County 6 28.1 (23.5, 33.3) 13 (2, 48) 31 stable stable trend 0.7 (-2.6, 4.3)
Fond du Lac County 6 23.0 (19.3, 27.3) 41 (11, 61) 30 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.8, 2.3)
St. Croix County 6 29.5 (24.9, 34.8) 9 (1, 45) 30 rising rising trend 8.9 (6.6, 12.6)
Jefferson County 6 25.4 (21.1, 30.4) 20 (4, 57) 26 rising rising trend 4.0 (1.5, 7.3)
Dodge County 6 20.9 (17.2, 25.3) 51 (17, 64) 23 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.2, 5.7)
Wood County 6 21.0 (16.8, 25.9) 50 (13, 66) 20 stable stable trend 3.8 (-0.2, 8.7)
Chippewa County 6 24.2 (19.6, 29.7) 32 (5, 61) 20 stable stable trend 1.6 (-7.6, 6.1)
Waupaca County 6 25.1 (19.7, 31.5) 22 (3, 61) 18 stable stable trend 4.1 (-0.5, 10.3)
Sauk County 6 20.5 (16.2, 25.7) 55 (15, 66) 17 stable stable trend -3.9 (-14.2, 4.3)
Columbia County 6 22.0 (17.3, 27.7) 47 (10, 64) 16 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.3, 8.0)
Douglas County 6 30.2 (23.6, 38.0) 8 (1, 52) 16 rising rising trend 10.2 (6.9, 15.9)
Grant County 6 26.9 (21.0, 33.9) 18 (1, 59) 16 rising rising trend 3.9 (2.0, 6.2)
Green County 6 33.8 (26.3, 42.8) 3 (1, 45) 16 rising rising trend 5.3 (1.5, 11.1)
Barron County 6 24.3 (18.6, 31.3) 28 (3, 63) 15 stable stable trend 4.2 (-0.3, 10.3)
Portage County 6 17.2 (13.3, 21.9) 63 (31, 67) 14 falling falling trend -3.6 (-7.0, -0.7)
Monroe County 6 24.9 (19.2, 31.7) 23 (3, 63) 14 rising rising trend 3.4 (0.2, 7.5)
Calumet County 6 23.6 (18.2, 30.1) 38 (4, 64) 14 stable stable trend -4.5 (-17.8, 0.5)
Marinette County 6 21.9 (16.5, 28.7) 48 (6, 66) 14 rising rising trend 2.8 (0.1, 6.3)
Polk County 6 21.6 (16.3, 28.2) 49 (8, 66) 13 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.2, 7.2)
Trempealeau County 6 36.0 (27.3, 46.7) 1 (1, 40) 13 rising rising trend 7.5 (4.6, 11.6)
Oconto County 6 23.8 (17.6, 31.6) 36 (3, 65) 11 stable stable trend 1.7 (-1.1, 5.0)
Oneida County 6 19.0 (13.8, 25.8) 61 (11, 67) 11 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.4, 7.7)
Shawano County 6 19.2 (14.1, 25.7) 60 (13, 67) 11 stable stable trend 1.8 (-1.9, 6.2)
Dunn County 6 20.8 (15.2, 27.8) 53 (8, 67) 10 rising rising trend 6.9 (4.3, 10.8)
Vernon County 6 24.0 (17.3, 32.5) 34 (2, 66) 10 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.3, 8.2)
Door County 6 22.7 (15.7, 31.9) 45 (3, 67) 10 stable stable trend -12.7 (-42.1, 0.2)
Pierce County 6 20.9 (15.2, 28.1) 52 (7, 67) 10 rising rising trend 5.6 (1.2, 12.4)
Clark County 6 23.5 (17.0, 31.6) 39 (3, 66) 9 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.2, 8.2)
Waushara County 6 23.7 (16.5, 33.5) 37 (2, 67) 8 rising rising trend 6.1 (2.2, 11.5)
Juneau County 6 22.8 (16.0, 31.8) 43 (3, 66) 8 rising rising trend 6.1 (2.4, 11.0)
Iowa County 6 27.9 (19.4, 39.0) 14 (1, 65) 8
*
*
Kewaunee County 6 26.4 (18.3, 37.1) 19 (1, 65) 8 stable stable trend 2.7 (-0.9, 7.6)
Langlade County 6 23.8 (15.9, 34.8) 35 (1, 67) 7
*
*
Lincoln County 6 17.1 (11.5, 24.7) 64 (18, 67) 7 stable stable trend -0.7 (-7.9, 7.2)
Vilas County 6 16.7 (11.0, 25.1) 65 (17, 67) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-5.1, 7.4)
Bayfield County 6 27.9 (17.8, 42.2) 15 (1, 66) 7
*
*
Adams County 6 19.9 (12.6, 30.5) 57 (3, 67) 7 stable stable trend 1.8 (-2.6, 6.9)
Burnett County 6 24.8 (15.6, 38.1) 24 (1, 67) 7 rising rising trend 7.6 (2.8, 14.7)
Jackson County 6 22.9 (15.5, 33.0) 42 (1, 67) 6 stable stable trend 4.0 (-0.4, 10.2)
Sawyer County 6 28.4 (18.2, 42.5) 12 (1, 66) 6 stable stable trend 4.1 (-1.6, 11.6)
Buffalo County 6 32.4 (21.3, 48.0) 5 (1, 63) 6
*
*
Green Lake County 6 19.8 (13.3, 29.1) 59 (6, 67) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-4.3, 8.3)
Washburn County 6 20.3 (12.7, 31.7) 56 (2, 67) 6
*
*
Lafayette County 6 24.0 (15.6, 35.8) 33 (1, 67) 5
*
*
Richland County 6 19.9 (12.4, 30.7) 58 (3, 67) 5 stable stable trend 7.2 (-2.8, 43.5)
Crawford County 6 22.7 (14.0, 35.0) 44 (1, 67) 5
*
*
Marquette County 6 20.5 (12.4, 32.6) 54 (1, 67) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-7.1, 4.8)
Ashland County 6 22.4 (13.1, 35.8) 46 (1, 67) 4
*
*
Rusk County 6 17.3 (9.5, 29.4) 62 (4, 67) 4
*
*
Pepin County 6 27.0 (15.0, 46.5) 17 (1, 67) 3
*
*
Taylor County 6 12.6 (7.0, 21.3) 67 (28, 67) 3
*
*
Florence County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Price County 6
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/23/2024 6:58 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Florence, Forest, Iron, Menominee, Price

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top