Incidence Rates Table
Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County
Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2017-2021
All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages
Sorted by Name
County
|
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
|
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate † cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval)
|
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval)
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin 6 | N/A | 24.3 (23.7, 24.8) | N/A | 1,735 |
stable 
|
1.0 (-1.0, 2.2) |
| US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | N/A | 22.7 (22.6, 22.8) | N/A | 86,630 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-2.5, 1.5) |
| Adams County 6 | Rural | 21.5 (14.0, 32.2) | 45 (2, 66) | 7 |
stable
|
2.4 (-1.1, 6.4) |
| Barron County 6 | Rural | 24.0 (18.6, 30.6) | 33 (5, 62) | 16 |
rising 
|
4.6 (0.6, 9.6) |
| Bayfield County 6 | Rural | 29.6 (19.6, 43.4) | 14 (1, 64) | 8 |
|
|
| Brown County 6 | Urban | 26.1 (23.5, 28.9) | 23 (11, 45) | 78 |
stable
|
-2.6 (-8.4, 0.0) |
| Buffalo County 6 | Rural | 30.2 (19.6, 45.2) | 11 (1, 64) | 6 |
|
|
| Burnett County 6 | Rural | 21.2 (13.2, 33.0) | 47 (2, 66) | 6 |
rising
|
6.4 (1.6, 13.0) |
| Calumet County 6 | Urban | 23.8 (18.6, 30.1) | 36 (5, 63) | 15 |
stable
|
-2.6 (-12.8, 0.8) |
| Chippewa County 6 | Urban | 26.6 (21.9, 32.2) | 19 (3, 55) | 23 |
stable
|
4.3 (-0.6, 6.8) |
| Clark County 6 | Rural | 22.6 (16.3, 30.6) | 42 (4, 65) | 9 |
stable
|
2.7 (-0.8, 7.0) |
| Columbia County 6 | Urban | 25.6 (20.5, 31.6) | 25 (4, 58) | 19 |
rising
|
3.6 (1.3, 6.4) |
| Crawford County 6 | Rural | 20.4 (12.1, 32.7) | 53 (2, 66) | 4 |
|
|
| Dane County 6 | Urban | 28.9 (27.0, 31.0) | 16 (6, 27) | 169 |
rising
|
3.2 (1.6, 5.1) |
| Dodge County 6 | Rural | 20.3 (16.6, 24.5) | 54 (22, 64) | 23 |
stable
|
-1.6 (-14.0, 1.8) |
| Door County 6 | Rural | 20.5 (14.0, 29.2) | 52 (6, 66) | 9 |
falling 
|
-12.5 (-40.9, -3.2) |
| Douglas County 6 | Urban | 29.1 (22.6, 37.0) | 15 (1, 54) | 15 |
stable
|
6.4 (-7.8, 11.1) |
| Dunn County 6 | Rural | 28.4 (21.7, 36.5) | 17 (1, 58) | 13 |
rising
|
9.0 (5.9, 13.4) |
| Eau Claire County 6 | Urban | 34.8 (29.9, 40.3) | 2 (1, 23) | 40 |
stable
|
4.2 (-2.8, 8.5) |
| Fond du Lac County 6 | Urban | 24.4 (20.6, 28.7) | 31 (10, 57) | 32 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-3.6, 2.7) |
| Grant County 6 | Rural | 23.6 (18.2, 30.2) | 39 (6, 63) | 14 |
rising
|
2.8 (0.4, 5.7) |
| Green County 6 | Urban | 31.1 (24.1, 39.6) | 7 (1, 51) | 15 |
rising
|
4.7 (1.2, 9.6) |
| Green Lake County 6 | Rural | 17.3 (11.4, 26.0) | 60 (15, 66) | 6 |
falling
|
-16.4 (-38.0, -2.5) |
| Iowa County 6 | Urban | 27.0 (18.8, 37.8) | 18 (1, 64) | 8 |
|
|
| Jackson County 6 | Rural | 19.4 (12.5, 29.0) | 57 (7, 66) | 5 |
stable
|
3.6 (-0.5, 9.2) |
| Jefferson County 6 | Rural | 25.3 (21.0, 30.3) | 26 (6, 55) | 26 |
rising
|
4.2 (2.1, 6.8) |
| Juneau County 6 | Rural | 21.1 (14.5, 29.8) | 48 (5, 66) | 7 |
rising
|
4.4 (0.7, 9.1) |
| Kenosha County 6 | Urban | 25.1 (22.0, 28.6) | 27 (11, 51) | 48 |
rising
|
6.2 (2.8, 10.8) |
| Kewaunee County 6 | Urban | 26.3 (18.3, 36.9) | 21 (1, 65) | 8 |
stable
|
2.3 (-1.2, 6.7) |
| La Crosse County 6 | Urban | 33.6 (29.2, 38.5) | 3 (1, 22) | 46 |
rising
|
3.9 (1.9, 6.3) |
| Lafayette County 6 | Rural | 32.9 (22.2, 47.2) | 5 (1, 60) | 7 |
|
|
| Langlade County 6 | Rural | 25.0 (16.9, 35.9) | 29 (1, 65) | 8 |
|
|
| Lincoln County 6 | Rural | 19.4 (13.3, 27.6) | 58 (10, 66) | 8 |
stable
|
0.5 (-5.5, 6.7) |
| Manitowoc County 6 | Rural | 31.1 (26.3, 36.5) | 8 (1, 36) | 35 |
stable
|
1.6 (-1.4, 4.8) |
| Marathon County 6 | Urban | 23.7 (20.4, 27.4) | 38 (13, 56) | 40 |
stable
|
-2.6 (-11.5, 1.3) |
| Marinette County 6 | Rural | 23.1 (17.6, 30.0) | 41 (6, 63) | 15 |
stable
|
2.3 (-1.3, 6.7) |
| Marquette County 6 | Rural | 16.5 (10.0, 26.7) | 63 (16, 66) | 5 |
stable
|
-2.0 (-6.9, 2.7) |
| Milwaukee County 6 | Urban | 14.5 (13.4, 15.6) | 65 (58, 66) | 144 |
rising
|
1.4 (0.5, 2.3) |
| Monroe County 6 | Rural | 25.6 (19.9, 32.6) | 24 (2, 60) | 15 |
stable
|
2.7 (-1.1, 7.1) |
| Oconto County 6 | Urban | 20.9 (15.3, 28.1) | 49 (9, 66) | 11 |
stable
|
0.8 (-2.5, 4.4) |
| Oneida County 6 | Rural | 19.7 (14.8, 26.0) | 55 (16, 66) | 13 |
stable
|
0.2 (-11.5, 4.6) |
| Outagamie County 6 | Urban | 23.8 (20.9, 27.1) | 34 (14, 55) | 50 |
falling
|
-4.2 (-11.0, -0.4) |
| Ozaukee County 6 | Urban | 30.3 (25.8, 35.4) | 10 (1, 39) | 36 |
rising
|
2.6 (0.7, 4.8) |
| Pepin County 6 | Rural | 30.0 (17.4, 50.1) | 12 (1, 66) | 4 |
|
|
| Pierce County 6 | Urban | 18.8 (13.5, 25.7) | 59 (14, 66) | 9 |
stable
|
-6.0 (-30.4, 3.0) |
| Polk County 6 | Rural | 21.9 (16.7, 28.3) | 43 (9, 64) | 14 |
rising
|
2.9 (0.2, 6.4) |
| Portage County 6 | Rural | 16.7 (12.8, 21.6) | 61 (34, 66) | 13 |
falling
|
-3.0 (-6.3, -0.5) |
| Price County 6 | Rural | 12.4 (6.9, 22.2) | 66 (34, 66) | 3 |
stable
|
-2.9 (-7.0, 1.0) |
| Racine County 6 | Urban | 24.5 (21.7, 27.7) | 30 (14, 53) | 59 |
rising
|
4.9 (2.3, 8.4) |
| Richland County 6 | Rural | 16.7 (10.2, 26.3) | 62 (15, 66) | 5 |
stable
|
-1.3 (-7.3, 5.3) |
| Rock County 6 | Urban | 23.8 (20.8, 27.2) | 35 (15, 55) | 48 |
stable
|
1.8 (-0.1, 4.0) |
| Sauk County 6 | Rural | 21.3 (17.0, 26.4) | 46 (14, 63) | 18 |
stable
|
-1.4 (-15.2, 4.7) |
| Sawyer County 6 | Rural | 26.5 (17.5, 38.9) | 20 (1, 65) | 7 |
stable
|
-1.9 (-17.4, 3.9) |
| Shawano County 6 | Rural | 20.6 (15.5, 27.1) | 51 (11, 65) | 12 |
stable
|
2.3 (-0.6, 5.7) |
| Sheboygan County 6 | Urban | 24.3 (20.7, 28.3) | 32 (10, 57) | 36 |
stable
|
0.6 (-1.1, 2.4) |
| St. Croix County 6 | Urban | 30.4 (25.8, 35.7) | 9 (1, 39) | 32 |
rising
|
8.2 (6.0, 11.7) |
| Taylor County 6 | Rural | 15.8 (9.5, 25.1) | 64 (17, 66) | 4 |
|
|
| Trempealeau County 6 | Rural | 35.0 (26.5, 45.4) | 1 (1, 45) | 13 |
rising
|
6.6 (3.7, 10.6) |
| Vernon County 6 | Urban | 25.1 (18.3, 33.7) | 28 (1, 64) | 10 |
stable
|
3.2 (-0.9, 8.1) |
| Vilas County 6 | Rural | 19.6 (13.4, 28.3) | 56 (9, 66) | 9 |
stable
|
2.4 (-2.0, 8.3) |
| Walworth County 6 | Rural | 33.6 (29.2, 38.5) | 4 (1, 23) | 46 |
rising
|
3.0 (0.9, 5.6) |
| Washburn County 6 | Rural | 23.7 (15.8, 35.1) | 37 (1, 66) | 7 |
|
|
| Washington County 6 | Urban | 29.9 (26.3, 34.0) | 13 (1, 34) | 53 |
rising
|
3.0 (1.3, 5.2) |
| Waukesha County 6 | Urban | 31.6 (29.4, 33.9) | 6 (2, 19) | 169 |
rising
|
2.1 (1.4, 2.9) |
| Waupaca County 6 | Rural | 21.5 (16.9, 27.2) | 44 (13, 64) | 17 |
stable
|
-9.7 (-38.5, 4.2) |
| Waushara County 6 | Rural | 26.1 (18.5, 36.1) | 22 (1, 64) | 9 |
rising
|
5.6 (2.0, 10.2) |
| Winnebago County 6 | Urban | 23.4 (20.4, 26.6) | 40 (16, 56) | 48 |
falling
|
-3.2 (-7.7, -0.4) |
| Wood County 6 | Rural | 20.8 (16.7, 25.7) | 50 (18, 65) | 20 |
stable
|
2.8 (-1.1, 7.4) |
| Ashland County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Florence County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Forest County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Iron County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Menominee County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
| Rusk County 6 | Rural |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2024 1:20 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Ashland, Florence, Forest, Iron, Menominee, Rusk
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2024 1:20 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Ashland, Florence, Forest, Iron, Menominee, Rusk
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.