Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

Melanoma of the Skin (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin 6 *** 24.3 (23.7, 24.8) N/A 1,656 stable stable trend -2.2 (-6.1, 2.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 *** 22.6 (22.5, 22.7) N/A 83,620 stable stable trend 0.2 (-2.5, 2.9)
Adams County 6 *** 20.6 (13.7, 30.6) 55 (4, 65) 7 stable stable trend 1.9 (-2.1, 6.1)
Ashland County 6 *** 20.4 (11.7, 33.1) 57 (2, 65) 4
*
*
Barron County 6 *** 29.2 (22.8, 36.9) 11 (1, 55) 16 rising rising trend 6.0 (2.4, 9.8)
Bayfield County 6 *** 23.8 (15.1, 36.6) 37 (1, 65) 6
*
*
Brown County 6 *** 26.5 (23.8, 29.4) 20 (8, 45) 74 falling falling trend -5.4 (-9.7, -0.9)
Buffalo County 6 *** 29.8 (19.3, 44.6) 9 (1, 63) 6
*
*
Burnett County 6 *** 23.7 (14.7, 36.8) 39 (1, 65) 6 rising rising trend 9.1 (4.6, 13.7)
Calumet County 6 *** 22.9 (17.4, 29.7) 40 (6, 64) 12 stable stable trend -14.8 (-28.5, 1.5)
Chippewa County 6 *** 28.7 (23.5, 34.7) 13 (2, 51) 23 rising rising trend 4.3 (0.4, 8.5)
Clark County 6 *** 21.2 (15.0, 29.2) 48 (6, 65) 8 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.7, 6.9)
Columbia County 6 *** 24.6 (19.6, 30.5) 32 (4, 61) 18 rising rising trend 4.4 (1.2, 7.7)
Crawford County 6 *** 21.3 (13.2, 32.9) 47 (2, 65) 5
*
*
Dane County 6 *** 28.9 (26.9, 31.1) 12 (5, 29) 156 rising rising trend 3.6 (1.7, 5.5)
Dodge County 6 *** 21.8 (17.9, 26.4) 45 (14, 62) 23 rising rising trend 2.9 (0.5, 5.4)
Door County 6 *** 27.8 (20.5, 37.1) 18 (1, 60) 13 stable stable trend -27.7 (-50.1, 4.8)
Douglas County 6 *** 29.9 (23.6, 37.6) 7 (1, 50) 16 rising rising trend 10.9 (6.6, 15.3)
Dunn County 6 *** 27.8 (21.2, 35.8) 17 (1, 59) 13 rising rising trend 7.9 (4.8, 11.0)
Eau Claire County 6 *** 36.8 (31.7, 42.5) 2 (1, 15) 40 stable stable trend 3.3 (-3.4, 10.6)
Fond du Lac County 6 *** 25.3 (21.5, 29.7) 25 (7, 57) 33 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.2, 2.0)
Grant County 6 *** 24.9 (19.3, 31.7) 31 (3, 61) 15 stable stable trend 2.5 (-0.7, 5.9)
Green County 6 *** 32.4 (25.0, 41.5) 4 (1, 49) 14 rising rising trend 6.3 (1.6, 11.3)
Green Lake County 6 *** 20.7 (13.2, 31.2) 54 (3, 65) 6 stable stable trend 1.5 (-3.6, 6.8)
Iowa County 6 *** 27.9 (19.6, 38.6) 16 (1, 63) 8
*
*
Jackson County 6 *** 21.6 (14.5, 31.4) 46 (3, 65) 6 stable stable trend 4.3 (-0.9, 9.9)
Jefferson County 6 *** 21.8 (17.8, 26.6) 44 (15, 62) 21 rising rising trend 4.5 (1.6, 7.5)
Juneau County 6 *** 26.5 (19.2, 35.8) 21 (1, 62) 9 rising rising trend 6.2 (1.6, 11.0)
Kenosha County 6 *** 24.4 (21.2, 27.9) 33 (10, 55) 45 rising rising trend 6.5 (3.3, 9.7)
Kewaunee County 6 *** 24.0 (16.2, 34.5) 36 (1, 65) 7 stable stable trend 3.1 (-0.9, 7.3)
La Crosse County 6 *** 28.7 (24.5, 33.3) 14 (3, 45) 37 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.8, 6.7)
Lafayette County 6 *** 20.7 (12.3, 32.7) 52 (2, 65) 4
*
*
Langlade County 6 *** 22.3 (14.3, 33.4) 43 (1, 65) 6
*
*
Lincoln County 6 *** 17.4 (11.5, 25.4) 62 (16, 65) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-5.7, 6.3)
Manitowoc County 6 *** 32.4 (27.4, 38.1) 5 (1, 33) 34 stable stable trend 1.3 (-1.7, 4.4)
Marathon County 6 *** 25.2 (21.8, 29.1) 27 (7, 54) 41 rising rising trend 4.3 (1.6, 7.0)
Marinette County 6 *** 25.3 (19.7, 32.4) 24 (3, 61) 16 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.1, 7.4)
Milwaukee County 6 *** 14.8 (13.7, 15.9) 64 (57, 65) 147 rising rising trend 1.4 (0.4, 2.4)
Monroe County 6 *** 22.5 (17.0, 29.3) 42 (7, 64) 12 stable stable trend 2.8 (-0.9, 6.7)
Oconto County 6 *** 26.0 (19.7, 33.9) 22 (2, 61) 13 stable stable trend 2.0 (-0.6, 4.7)
Oneida County 6 *** 20.5 (14.7, 27.9) 56 (9, 65) 11 stable stable trend 3.5 (-1.1, 8.2)
Outagamie County 6 *** 25.1 (22.0, 28.5) 30 (10, 52) 50 stable stable trend -8.1 (-15.5, 0.0)
Ozaukee County 6 *** 28.3 (23.9, 33.2) 15 (3, 47) 33 rising rising trend 2.9 (1.1, 4.7)
Pierce County 6 *** 20.8 (15.1, 28.0) 49 (7, 65) 9 rising rising trend 5.7 (1.0, 10.5)
Polk County 6 *** 15.8 (11.7, 21.2) 63 (37, 65) 10 stable stable trend 2.1 (-1.5, 5.9)
Portage County 6 *** 18.7 (14.6, 23.7) 60 (25, 65) 15 stable stable trend -2.9 (-6.7, 1.0)
Racine County 6 *** 24.2 (21.3, 27.3) 34 (13, 55) 56 rising rising trend 4.8 (2.1, 7.6)
Richland County 6 *** 17.9 (10.7, 28.4) 61 (6, 65) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-6.1, 5.2)
Rock County 6 *** 25.1 (22.0, 28.6) 28 (9, 53) 48 rising rising trend 2.2 (0.3, 4.1)
Rusk County 6 *** 25.3 (15.3, 39.6) 26 (1, 65) 5
*
*
Sauk County 6 *** 20.7 (16.2, 26.1) 50 (14, 64) 16 rising rising trend 6.9 (4.1, 9.9)
Sawyer County 6 *** 20.7 (12.3, 32.9) 53 (2, 65) 4 stable stable trend 3.6 (-3.0, 10.6)
Shawano County 6 *** 20.0 (14.8, 26.5) 59 (12, 65) 11 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.4, 5.4)
Sheboygan County 6 *** 26.0 (22.2, 30.3) 23 (6, 51) 36 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.7, 2.4)
St. Croix County 6 *** 22.5 (18.4, 27.3) 41 (12, 61) 22 rising rising trend 8.0 (4.9, 11.3)
Taylor County 6 *** 20.7 (13.1, 31.3) 51 (3, 65) 5
*
*
Trempealeau County 6 *** 34.0 (25.8, 44.0) 3 (1, 49) 13 rising rising trend 6.4 (2.3, 10.7)
Vernon County 6 *** 24.1 (17.1, 33.0) 35 (2, 64) 9 stable stable trend 3.4 (-0.9, 8.0)
Vilas County 6 *** 13.6 (9.0, 20.9) 65 (38, 65) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-5.7, 3.8)
Walworth County 6 *** 37.3 (32.5, 42.6) 1 (1, 13) 48 rising rising trend 4.1 (1.9, 6.2)
Washburn County 6 *** 29.5 (19.2, 43.8) 10 (1, 63) 7
*
*
Washington County 6 *** 25.1 (21.8, 28.9) 29 (8, 54) 43 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.8, 4.3)
Waukesha County 6 *** 30.5 (28.3, 32.8) 6 (3, 22) 155 rising rising trend 1.9 (1.0, 2.8)
Waupaca County 6 *** 29.9 (23.9, 36.9) 8 (1, 50) 20 rising rising trend 5.1 (1.1, 9.3)
Waushara County 6 *** 23.8 (16.4, 33.6) 38 (2, 65) 8 rising rising trend 6.7 (1.9, 11.8)
Winnebago County 6 *** 27.2 (24.0, 30.8) 19 (5, 46) 54 stable stable trend -3.7 (-9.8, 2.8)
Wood County 6 *** 20.3 (16.2, 25.1) 58 (17, 64) 19 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.5, 6.5)
Florence County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Forest County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iron County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marquette County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pepin County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Price County 6 ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/15/2022 11:51 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.

Data cannot be shown for the following areas. For more information on what areas are suppressed or not available, please refer to the table.
Florence, Forest, Iron, Marquette, Menominee, Pepin, Price

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top