Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Kansas Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by priority index
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 599,666 149.4 (149.3, 149.6) - -2.0 (-2.2, -1.8)
Kansas - falling falling trend - 5,548 155.6 (153.8, 157.5) - -1.2 (-1.3, -1.0)
Kingman County 1 rising rising trend higher 38 353.6 (301.6, 412.9) 2.4 17.7 (4.3, 32.9)
Anderson County 4 stable stable trend higher 25 201.2 (166.3, 242.3) 1.3 -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Bourbon County 4 stable stable trend higher 37 178.2 (152.4, 207.6) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Brown County 4 stable stable trend higher 27 184.5 (154.2, 220.0) 1.2 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3)
Crawford County 4 stable stable trend higher 94 205.1 (186.5, 225.0) 1.4 -0.4 (-0.8, 0.1)
Doniphan County 4 stable stable trend higher 23 205.4 (168.9, 248.4) 1.4 -0.4 (-1.3, 0.5)
Edwards County 4 stable stable trend higher 10 235.2 (169.3, 320.9) 1.6 1.2 (-0.3, 2.7)
Elk County 4 stable stable trend higher 11 216.2 (156.7, 297.0) 1.4 -0.7 (-2.0, 0.6)
Ellsworth County 4 stable stable trend higher 18 189.8 (151.7, 236.0) 1.3 0.3 (-0.8, 1.3)
Franklin County 4 stable stable trend higher 63 189.2 (168.4, 212.0) 1.3 -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Grant County 4 stable stable trend higher 15 198.7 (155.7, 250.0) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Greenwood County 4 stable stable trend higher 21 202.4 (162.9, 250.4) 1.4 -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2)
Harper County 4 stable stable trend higher 19 208.1 (166.9, 258.1) 1.4 -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Labette County 4 stable stable trend higher 50 171.8 (150.4, 195.6) 1.1 -0.3 (-0.9, 0.4)
Neosho County 4 stable stable trend higher 42 179.8 (155.5, 207.1) 1.2 -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Russell County 4 stable stable trend higher 22 196.0 (158.1, 241.4) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.6, 0.5)
Wilson County 4 stable stable trend higher 25 187.6 (155.3, 225.5) 1.3 -0.1 (-0.9, 0.7)
Cherokee County 5 falling falling trend higher 55 191.8 (169.3, 216.8) 1.3 -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Cowley County 5 falling falling trend higher 87 183.4 (166.1, 202.2) 1.2 -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Geary County 5 falling falling trend higher 41 185.2 (160.3, 212.6) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Leavenworth County 5 falling falling trend higher 153 166.2 (154.4, 178.7) 1.1 -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
Montgomery County 5 falling falling trend higher 79 166.6 (150.0, 184.6) 1.1 -3.9 (-6.4, -1.3)
Saline County 5 falling falling trend higher 124 165.9 (152.8, 179.9) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.0, -0.1)
Shawnee County 5 falling falling trend higher 401 165.3 (157.9, 172.9) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
Wyandotte County 5 falling falling trend higher 297 179.6 (170.4, 189.3) 1.2 -1.8 (-2.5, -1.2)
Barton County 6 stable stable trend similar 57 147.2 (129.9, 166.3) 1.0 -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Chase County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 188.7 (129.9, 268.4) 1.3 -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Chautauqua County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 160.2 (115.2, 220.8) 1.1 -0.2 (-1.8, 1.3)
Cheyenne County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 127.6 (80.2, 196.6) 0.9 -0.3 (-1.9, 1.2)
Clark County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 153.9 (96.2, 238.3) 1.0 -0.2 (-2.0, 1.6)
Clay County 6 stable stable trend similar 19 138.5 (110.7, 172.3) 0.9 -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Cloud County 6 stable stable trend similar 21 149.4 (120.8, 183.6) 1.0 -0.6 (-1.6, 0.3)
Comanche County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 179.3 (120.3, 267.3) 1.2 0.5 (-1.2, 2.2)
Decatur County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 200.1 (143.3, 276.4) 1.3 1.0 (0.0, 2.1)
Gove County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 122.9 (80.3, 185.2) 0.8 -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Hamilton County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 179.7 (115.1, 268.2) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.8, 1.0)
Harvey County 6 stable stable trend similar 78 154.7 (139.1, 171.7) 1.0 -0.3 (-0.9, 0.2)
Haskell County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 126.1 (82.6, 184.9) 0.8 0.6 (-1.0, 2.1)
Kearny County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 129.3 (86.3, 187.1) 0.9 -0.4 (-2.3, 1.5)
Kiowa County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 165.8 (112.1, 240.5) 1.1 0.1 (-1.5, 1.7)
Lane County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 220.8 (147.6, 327.1) 1.5 0.7 (-0.9, 2.3)
Lincoln County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 157.0 (111.1, 220.4) 1.1 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Linn County 6 stable stable trend similar 27 169.9 (141.5, 203.4) 1.1 -0.2 (-1.0, 0.7)
Logan County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 153.9 (101.1, 226.7) 1.0 -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Lyon County 6 stable stable trend similar 62 162.3 (144.4, 182.0) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.0, 0.1)
Marion County 6 stable stable trend similar 34 163.6 (138.5, 192.8) 1.1 -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4)
Marshall County 6 stable stable trend similar 27 162.2 (134.6, 194.6) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.2, 0.3)
McPherson County 6 stable stable trend similar 71 154.6 (138.1, 172.7) 1.0 -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4)
Meade County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 148.9 (108.2, 202.0) 1.0 -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Mitchell County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 135.4 (103.0, 176.2) 0.9 -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Morris County 6 stable stable trend similar 16 168.2 (130.5, 215.1) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Morton County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 175.1 (122.4, 246.8) 1.2 -0.2 (-1.7, 1.2)
Nemaha County 6 stable stable trend similar 28 175.1 (145.2, 209.9) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Ness County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 150.4 (101.6, 218.6) 1.0 -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Osborne County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 159.1 (117.5, 214.7) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Ottawa County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 167.1 (129.3, 213.9) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Pawnee County 6 stable stable trend similar 17 159.6 (126.4, 200.6) 1.1 -0.4 (-1.4, 0.5)
Pratt County 6 stable stable trend similar 24 159.5 (131.1, 193.1) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1)
Rawlins County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 160.6 (114.7, 225.8) 1.1 0.8 (-0.3, 1.8)
Republic County 6 stable stable trend similar 16 192.2 (146.9, 249.2) 1.3 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3)
Rice County 6 stable stable trend similar 22 162.8 (133.0, 197.9) 1.1 -2.7 (-5.6, 0.2)
Rush County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 200.9 (149.3, 269.1) 1.3 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Scott County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 156.9 (118.2, 206.0) 1.1 -0.4 (-1.5, 0.8)
Sherman County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 137.4 (103.8, 179.7) 0.9 -0.9 (-2.1, 0.4)
Smith County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 162.4 (118.3, 221.4) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.8, 0.5)
Stafford County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 142.7 (103.1, 194.9) 1.0 -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Stevens County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 148.6 (108.8, 198.8) 1.0 0.3 (-1.4, 2.1)
Trego County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 185.7 (138.2, 250.4) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Wabaunsee County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 145.1 (113.3, 184.4) 1.0 -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Washington County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 143.7 (111.2, 185.0) 1.0 -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Wichita County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 190.2 (122.8, 284.4) 1.3 0.1 (-1.8, 2.0)
Woodson County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 161.4 (114.2, 225.7) 1.1 0.7 (-0.6, 2.1)
Allen County 8 falling falling trend similar 31 159.0 (134.1, 187.7) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Atchison County 8 falling falling trend similar 36 171.8 (147.1, 199.7) 1.1 -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Barber County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 153.7 (115.1, 203.6) 1.0 -1.1 (-2.1, -0.2)
Butler County 8 falling falling trend similar 132 163.9 (151.3, 177.3) 1.1 -0.6 (-0.9, -0.2)
Coffey County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 149.7 (119.8, 185.7) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Dickinson County 8 falling falling trend similar 47 158.5 (138.3, 181.2) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Ellis County 8 falling falling trend similar 48 141.4 (123.4, 161.3) 0.9 -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Finney County 8 falling falling trend similar 48 149.9 (131.1, 170.6) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5)
Ford County 8 falling falling trend similar 46 148.6 (129.6, 169.6) 1.0 -1.3 (-1.8, -0.7)
Graham County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 145.9 (101.7, 210.7) 1.0 -1.7 (-2.9, -0.4)
Gray County 8 falling falling trend similar 10 140.0 (102.5, 187.2) 0.9 -1.8 (-3.2, -0.4)
Hodgeman County 8 falling falling trend similar 5 138.1 (87.7, 216.9) 0.9 -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Jefferson County 8 falling falling trend similar 41 156.3 (135.1, 180.2) 1.0 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Jewell County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 151.5 (110.1, 210.7) 1.0 -1.2 (-2.3, -0.2)
Norton County 8 falling falling trend similar 10 120.6 (88.7, 161.9) 0.8 -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Osage County 8 falling falling trend similar 39 167.4 (144.2, 193.9) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.1)
Phillips County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 154.6 (118.2, 200.5) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Pottawatomie County 8 falling falling trend similar 38 141.5 (121.7, 163.7) 0.9 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Reno County 8 falling falling trend similar 140 151.9 (140.5, 164.1) 1.0 -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Riley County 8 falling falling trend similar 78 139.3 (125.4, 154.3) 0.9 -0.6 (-1.1, -0.2)
Rooks County 8 falling falling trend similar 12 144.7 (109.6, 189.6) 1.0 -2.0 (-3.0, -1.0)
Sedgwick County 8 falling falling trend similar 929 159.2 (154.5, 163.9) 1.1 -1.0 (-1.4, -0.6)
Seward County 8 falling falling trend similar 26 138.5 (115.4, 164.6) 0.9 -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Sheridan County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 115.6 (76.4, 174.8) 0.8 -1.7 (-3.0, -0.3)
Sumner County 8 falling falling trend similar 57 168.8 (149.2, 190.6) 1.1 -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Thomas County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 142.7 (111.5, 180.6) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.3, -0.2)
Douglas County 9 falling falling trend lower 149 133.6 (124.0, 143.8) 0.9 -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Jackson County 9 falling falling trend lower 24 126.5 (104.8, 152.0) 0.8 -1.4 (-2.2, -0.7)
Johnson County 9 falling falling trend lower 865 129.0 (125.2, 133.0) 0.9 -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Miami County 9 falling falling trend lower 58 129.6 (114.9, 145.8) 0.9 -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Greeley County
**
** similar 4 220.9 (127.3, 362.9) 1.5
**
Stanton County
**
** similar 4 132.0 (78.4, 212.4) 0.9
**
Wallace County
**
** similar 3 159.1 (86.5, 272.1) 1.1
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/29/2024 12:51 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).
Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Greeley County, Stanton County, Wallace County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top