Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Kentucky Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Female

Sorted by count
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 283,896 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) - -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Kentucky - falling falling trend - 4,740 155.3 (153.3, 157.3) - -1.1 (-1.2, -0.9)
Owsley County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 173.6 (115.6, 254.8) 1.3 -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Hickman County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 146.1 (99.0, 215.5) 1.1 -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Trimble County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 133.6 (92.3, 188.3) 1.0 -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Fulton County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 160.0 (109.1, 229.1) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Nicholas County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 155.8 (109.4, 217.0) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0)
Menifee County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 150.9 (107.2, 210.6) 1.2 -1.3 (-2.8, 0.3)
Bracken County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 138.4 (98.9, 190.4) 1.1 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Lee County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 160.5 (113.6, 223.6) 1.2 -3.5 (-5.5, -1.5)
Ballard County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 121.6 (87.8, 167.5) 0.9 -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Elliott County 4 stable stable trend higher 10 182.4 (132.7, 247.7) 1.4 -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Crittenden County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 141.1 (103.9, 189.7) 1.1 -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
Gallatin County 4 stable stable trend higher 10 197.2 (145.5, 262.1) 1.5 0.0 (-1.6, 1.6)
Owen County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 137.4 (102.4, 182.0) 1.1 -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Lyon County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 151.2 (110.1, 207.8) 1.2 -0.3 (-1.8, 1.3)
Cumberland County 4 stable stable trend higher 11 189.8 (143.1, 250.7) 1.5 0.7 (-0.7, 2.2)
Carroll County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 167.2 (126.0, 218.5) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Wolfe County 4 stable stable trend higher 12 226.3 (171.3, 295.3) 1.8 -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
McLean County 5 falling falling trend higher 12 173.4 (132.4, 225.1) 1.3 -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Bath County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 147.1 (112.4, 190.0) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.9, 0.6)
Livingston County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 160.7 (122.4, 209.8) 1.2 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Spencer County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 123.3 (94.0, 159.1) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Magoffin County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 156.8 (120.7, 201.5) 1.2 -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Breathitt County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 157.4 (121.0, 202.3) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Green County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 159.3 (124.5, 202.8) 1.2 0.6 (-0.8, 2.0)
Caldwell County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 139.8 (109.0, 178.2) 1.1 -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Edmonson County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 155.3 (121.4, 197.4) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Jackson County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 161.9 (126.9, 204.7) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Monroe County 4 stable stable trend higher 15 192.9 (150.3, 245.2) 1.5 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3)
Powell County 4 stable stable trend higher 15 188.5 (147.5, 238.2) 1.5 -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Washington County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 158.4 (124.0, 200.7) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Clinton County 4 stable stable trend higher 15 198.2 (155.3, 250.9) 1.5 0.3 (-1.2, 1.9)
Webster County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 170.2 (133.5, 214.7) 1.3 -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Union County 6 stable stable trend similar 16 156.8 (123.2, 197.8) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Morgan County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 192.7 (151.6, 242.9) 1.5 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Pendleton County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 169.0 (133.2, 212.3) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Lewis County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 173.1 (136.4, 217.6) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Metcalfe County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 205.2 (162.6, 257.4) 1.6 1.3 (-0.1, 2.6)
Todd County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 203.2 (160.7, 254.2) 1.6 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Leslie County 1 rising rising trend higher 17 232.3 (184.2, 290.7) 1.8 1.7 (0.3, 3.0)
Martin County 4 stable stable trend higher 17 236.3 (187.1, 295.7) 1.8 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Larue County 4 stable stable trend higher 17 169.3 (134.7, 211.1) 1.3 -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Estill County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 161.5 (128.7, 201.3) 1.3 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Harrison County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 130.4 (104.2, 162.0) 1.0 -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Trigg County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 154.3 (122.8, 192.7) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Casey County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 136.6 (109.3, 169.8) 1.1 -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Butler County 4 stable stable trend higher 19 203.7 (163.9, 251.3) 1.6 0.4 (-0.8, 1.5)
Fleming County 4 stable stable trend higher 19 192.6 (154.9, 237.4) 1.5 0.6 (-0.5, 1.6)
McCreary County 5 falling falling trend higher 19 176.2 (141.8, 217.2) 1.4 -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Marion County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 141.1 (113.6, 173.8) 1.1 -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Henry County 4 stable stable trend higher 20 176.5 (142.5, 216.8) 1.4 -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Rockcastle County 4 stable stable trend higher 20 164.6 (132.7, 202.7) 1.3 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Simpson County 4 stable stable trend higher 20 161.0 (130.6, 197.0) 1.3 0.5 (-0.4, 1.3)
Adair County 6 stable stable trend similar 21 151.7 (123.0, 185.8) 1.2 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
Mason County 4 stable stable trend higher 21 166.7 (135.5, 203.7) 1.3 -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Lawrence County 4 stable stable trend higher 22 195.4 (159.3, 238.0) 1.5 -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Garrard County 4 stable stable trend higher 22 169.7 (138.1, 207.0) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Wayne County 6 stable stable trend similar 23 150.3 (122.4, 183.2) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Knott County 4 stable stable trend higher 23 202.7 (166.1, 245.9) 1.6 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Rowan County 4 stable stable trend higher 23 160.3 (131.8, 193.5) 1.2 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
Allen County 4 stable stable trend higher 24 158.6 (130.8, 191.3) 1.2 -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Hart County 4 stable stable trend higher 24 179.4 (147.8, 216.4) 1.4 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Russell County 4 stable stable trend higher 24 169.9 (139.7, 205.6) 1.3 0.1 (-0.7, 1.0)
Grant County 4 stable stable trend higher 24 170.4 (140.9, 204.4) 1.3 -0.1 (-1.0, 0.7)
Breckinridge County 5 falling falling trend higher 25 159.1 (131.7, 191.5) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Anderson County 4 stable stable trend higher 25 168.0 (139.3, 201.2) 1.3 -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Mercer County 6 stable stable trend similar 26 147.5 (122.9, 176.4) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Meade County 4 stable stable trend higher 26 158.9 (132.4, 189.3) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Woodford County 6 stable stable trend similar 26 138.2 (114.9, 165.3) 1.1 0.7 (-2.8, 4.2)
Bourbon County 4 stable stable trend higher 28 183.2 (153.3, 218.0) 1.4 -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Letcher County 5 falling falling trend higher 28 165.4 (138.5, 196.6) 1.3 -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Ohio County 4 stable stable trend higher 28 168.5 (141.0, 200.3) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Clay County 4 stable stable trend higher 28 218.4 (183.1, 259.1) 1.7 0.6 (-0.2, 1.4)
Lincoln County 4 stable stable trend higher 30 163.9 (138.4, 193.3) 1.3 0.6 (-0.1, 1.3)
Montgomery County 4 stable stable trend higher 31 161.9 (137.0, 190.4) 1.3 -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Grayson County 4 stable stable trend higher 33 174.6 (148.2, 204.8) 1.4 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
Logan County 4 stable stable trend higher 33 165.7 (140.5, 194.6) 1.3 -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Carter County 5 falling falling trend higher 35 169.8 (144.8, 198.4) 1.3 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Taylor County 4 stable stable trend higher 35 187.3 (159.5, 219.0) 1.5 0.5 (-0.4, 1.3)
Boyle County 4 stable stable trend higher 36 155.5 (132.6, 181.8) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Calloway County 6 stable stable trend similar 36 139.7 (119.3, 162.8) 1.1 -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Johnson County 4 stable stable trend higher 36 226.4 (193.8, 263.4) 1.8 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0)
Muhlenberg County 4 stable stable trend higher 37 152.8 (130.8, 178.0) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Bell County 4 stable stable trend higher 37 180.6 (154.9, 209.9) 1.4 -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Harlan County 4 stable stable trend higher 37 184.4 (157.8, 214.7) 1.4 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Marshall County 4 stable stable trend higher 42 158.6 (136.9, 183.4) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Clark County 4 stable stable trend higher 42 158.3 (137.3, 182.0) 1.2 -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Jessamine County 8 falling falling trend similar 44 129.7 (112.7, 148.6) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Shelby County 8 falling falling trend similar 44 141.5 (123.0, 162.1) 1.1 -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Oldham County 8 falling falling trend similar 44 123.3 (107.1, 141.4) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Perry County 4 stable stable trend higher 44 244.4 (212.1, 280.5) 1.9 0.3 (-0.4, 1.0)
Scott County 5 falling falling trend higher 44 151.2 (131.6, 172.9) 1.2 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Whitley County 4 stable stable trend higher 45 188.7 (164.4, 215.8) 1.5 -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Knox County 4 stable stable trend higher 45 206.7 (179.8, 236.7) 1.6 0.6 (0.0, 1.2)
Graves County 4 stable stable trend higher 45 163.0 (141.7, 186.8) 1.3 -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
Nelson County 5 falling falling trend higher 45 148.7 (129.6, 170.1) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Greenup County 5 falling falling trend higher 49 158.4 (138.8, 180.6) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Barren County 4 stable stable trend higher 50 152.2 (133.6, 172.9) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Henderson County 4 stable stable trend higher 52 158.9 (139.6, 180.3) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Franklin County 8 falling falling trend similar 54 143.0 (126.1, 161.8) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Hopkins County 5 falling falling trend higher 55 160.4 (141.4, 181.6) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Christian County 5 falling falling trend higher 56 149.6 (132.3, 168.5) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Boyd County 5 falling falling trend higher 59 158.8 (140.5, 179.3) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Floyd County 4 stable stable trend higher 62 233.9 (207.7, 262.9) 1.8 -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Laurel County 4 stable stable trend higher 69 167.5 (150.0, 186.6) 1.3 -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
McCracken County 8 falling falling trend similar 77 141.9 (127.3, 157.9) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Bullitt County 5 falling falling trend higher 77 146.1 (131.6, 161.9) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Madison County 5 falling falling trend higher 77 145.8 (131.4, 161.5) 1.1 -2.0 (-3.6, -0.3)
Pike County 4 stable stable trend higher 79 180.5 (162.5, 200.2) 1.4 0.1 (-0.4, 0.5)
Pulaski County 4 stable stable trend higher 84 172.0 (155.5, 190.0) 1.3 -0.1 (-0.4, 0.3)
Boone County 8 falling falling trend similar 91 118.4 (107.6, 130.1) 0.9 -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
Campbell County 5 falling falling trend higher 95 151.8 (138.1, 166.6) 1.2 -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Hardin County 4 stable stable trend higher 103 151.3 (138.3, 165.3) 1.2 -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Daviess County 5 falling falling trend higher 106 147.9 (135.2, 161.5) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Warren County 5 falling falling trend higher 111 153.9 (141.1, 167.5) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Kenton County 5 falling falling trend higher 159 153.6 (142.9, 165.0) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Fayette County 8 falling falling trend similar 254 132.8 (125.4, 140.4) 1.0 -1.4 (-1.8, -1.1)
Jefferson County 5 falling falling trend higher 784 145.1 (140.5, 149.9) 1.1 -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
Carlisle County
**
** similar 8 183.5 (127.3, 260.6) 1.4
**
Hancock County
**
** higher 11 186.3 (138.5, 246.7) 1.4
**
Robertson County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/18/2024 2:02 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Robertson County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Carlisle County, Hancock County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top