Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Kentucky Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Female

Sorted by rateratio
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 283,896 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) - -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Kentucky - falling falling trend - 4,740 155.3 (153.3, 157.3) - -1.1 (-1.2, -0.9)
Boone County 8 falling falling trend similar 91 118.4 (107.6, 130.1) 0.9 -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
Ballard County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 121.6 (87.8, 167.5) 0.9 -1.5 (-2.6, -0.4)
Spencer County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 123.3 (94.0, 159.1) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Oldham County 8 falling falling trend similar 44 123.3 (107.1, 141.4) 1.0 -1.0 (-1.7, -0.2)
Jessamine County 8 falling falling trend similar 44 129.7 (112.7, 148.6) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6)
Harrison County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 130.4 (104.2, 162.0) 1.0 -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1)
Fayette County 8 falling falling trend similar 254 132.8 (125.4, 140.4) 1.0 -1.4 (-1.8, -1.1)
Trimble County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 133.6 (92.3, 188.3) 1.0 -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Casey County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 136.6 (109.3, 169.8) 1.1 -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Owen County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 137.4 (102.4, 182.0) 1.1 -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Woodford County 6 stable stable trend similar 26 138.2 (114.9, 165.3) 1.1 0.7 (-2.8, 4.2)
Bracken County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 138.4 (98.9, 190.4) 1.1 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Calloway County 6 stable stable trend similar 36 139.7 (119.3, 162.8) 1.1 -0.1 (-0.7, 0.6)
Caldwell County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 139.8 (109.0, 178.2) 1.1 -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Marion County 8 falling falling trend similar 20 141.1 (113.6, 173.8) 1.1 -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Crittenden County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 141.1 (103.9, 189.7) 1.1 -0.1 (-1.6, 1.4)
Shelby County 8 falling falling trend similar 44 141.5 (123.0, 162.1) 1.1 -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
McCracken County 8 falling falling trend similar 77 141.9 (127.3, 157.9) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Franklin County 8 falling falling trend similar 54 143.0 (126.1, 161.8) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.0, -0.7)
Jefferson County 5 falling falling trend higher 784 145.1 (140.5, 149.9) 1.1 -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
Madison County 5 falling falling trend higher 77 145.8 (131.4, 161.5) 1.1 -2.0 (-3.6, -0.3)
Hickman County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 146.1 (99.0, 215.5) 1.1 -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Bullitt County 5 falling falling trend higher 77 146.1 (131.6, 161.9) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Bath County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 147.1 (112.4, 190.0) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.9, 0.6)
Mercer County 6 stable stable trend similar 26 147.5 (122.9, 176.4) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Daviess County 5 falling falling trend higher 106 147.9 (135.2, 161.5) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
Nelson County 5 falling falling trend higher 45 148.7 (129.6, 170.1) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Christian County 5 falling falling trend higher 56 149.6 (132.3, 168.5) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Wayne County 6 stable stable trend similar 23 150.3 (122.4, 183.2) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.3, 0.3)
Menifee County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 150.9 (107.2, 210.6) 1.2 -1.3 (-2.8, 0.3)
Scott County 5 falling falling trend higher 44 151.2 (131.6, 172.9) 1.2 -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Lyon County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 151.2 (110.1, 207.8) 1.2 -0.3 (-1.8, 1.3)
Hardin County 4 stable stable trend higher 103 151.3 (138.3, 165.3) 1.2 -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Adair County 6 stable stable trend similar 21 151.7 (123.0, 185.8) 1.2 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
Campbell County 5 falling falling trend higher 95 151.8 (138.1, 166.6) 1.2 -1.3 (-1.6, -0.9)
Barren County 4 stable stable trend higher 50 152.2 (133.6, 172.9) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Muhlenberg County 4 stable stable trend higher 37 152.8 (130.8, 178.0) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Kenton County 5 falling falling trend higher 159 153.6 (142.9, 165.0) 1.2 -1.0 (-1.4, -0.7)
Warren County 5 falling falling trend higher 111 153.9 (141.1, 167.5) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Trigg County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 154.3 (122.8, 192.7) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Edmonson County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 155.3 (121.4, 197.4) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.3, 0.6)
Boyle County 4 stable stable trend higher 36 155.5 (132.6, 181.8) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.6, 0.2)
Nicholas County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 155.8 (109.4, 217.0) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.9, 1.0)
Union County 6 stable stable trend similar 16 156.8 (123.2, 197.8) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.9, 0.3)
Magoffin County 8 falling falling trend similar 13 156.8 (120.7, 201.5) 1.2 -1.5 (-2.7, -0.3)
Breathitt County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 157.4 (121.0, 202.3) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Clark County 4 stable stable trend higher 42 158.3 (137.3, 182.0) 1.2 -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Washington County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 158.4 (124.0, 200.7) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8)
Greenup County 5 falling falling trend higher 49 158.4 (138.8, 180.6) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Allen County 4 stable stable trend higher 24 158.6 (130.8, 191.3) 1.2 -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Marshall County 4 stable stable trend higher 42 158.6 (136.9, 183.4) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Boyd County 5 falling falling trend higher 59 158.8 (140.5, 179.3) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Henderson County 4 stable stable trend higher 52 158.9 (139.6, 180.3) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Meade County 4 stable stable trend higher 26 158.9 (132.4, 189.3) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.6, 0.4)
Breckinridge County 5 falling falling trend higher 25 159.1 (131.7, 191.5) 1.2 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.3)
Green County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 159.3 (124.5, 202.8) 1.2 0.6 (-0.8, 2.0)
Fulton County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 160.0 (109.1, 229.1) 1.2 -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Rowan County 4 stable stable trend higher 23 160.3 (131.8, 193.5) 1.2 0.3 (-0.8, 1.4)
Hopkins County 5 falling falling trend higher 55 160.4 (141.4, 181.6) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Lee County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 160.5 (113.6, 223.6) 1.2 -3.5 (-5.5, -1.5)
Livingston County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 160.7 (122.4, 209.8) 1.2 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Simpson County 4 stable stable trend higher 20 161.0 (130.6, 197.0) 1.3 0.5 (-0.4, 1.3)
Estill County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 161.5 (128.7, 201.3) 1.3 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Montgomery County 4 stable stable trend higher 31 161.9 (137.0, 190.4) 1.3 -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Jackson County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 161.9 (126.9, 204.7) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.6, 0.7)
Graves County 4 stable stable trend higher 45 163.0 (141.7, 186.8) 1.3 -0.1 (-0.8, 0.5)
Lincoln County 4 stable stable trend higher 30 163.9 (138.4, 193.3) 1.3 0.6 (-0.1, 1.3)
Rockcastle County 4 stable stable trend higher 20 164.6 (132.7, 202.7) 1.3 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Letcher County 5 falling falling trend higher 28 165.4 (138.5, 196.6) 1.3 -0.7 (-1.4, -0.1)
Logan County 4 stable stable trend higher 33 165.7 (140.5, 194.6) 1.3 -0.3 (-1.1, 0.6)
Mason County 4 stable stable trend higher 21 166.7 (135.5, 203.7) 1.3 -0.2 (-1.1, 0.6)
Carroll County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 167.2 (126.0, 218.5) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Laurel County 4 stable stable trend higher 69 167.5 (150.0, 186.6) 1.3 -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Anderson County 4 stable stable trend higher 25 168.0 (139.3, 201.2) 1.3 -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Ohio County 4 stable stable trend higher 28 168.5 (141.0, 200.3) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Pendleton County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 169.0 (133.2, 212.3) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Larue County 4 stable stable trend higher 17 169.3 (134.7, 211.1) 1.3 -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Garrard County 4 stable stable trend higher 22 169.7 (138.1, 207.0) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Carter County 5 falling falling trend higher 35 169.8 (144.8, 198.4) 1.3 -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5)
Russell County 4 stable stable trend higher 24 169.9 (139.7, 205.6) 1.3 0.1 (-0.7, 1.0)
Webster County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 170.2 (133.5, 214.7) 1.3 -0.2 (-1.2, 0.9)
Grant County 4 stable stable trend higher 24 170.4 (140.9, 204.4) 1.3 -0.1 (-1.0, 0.7)
Pulaski County 4 stable stable trend higher 84 172.0 (155.5, 190.0) 1.3 -0.1 (-0.4, 0.3)
Lewis County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 173.1 (136.4, 217.6) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
McLean County 5 falling falling trend higher 12 173.4 (132.4, 225.1) 1.3 -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Owsley County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 173.6 (115.6, 254.8) 1.3 -0.1 (-1.7, 1.5)
Grayson County 4 stable stable trend higher 33 174.6 (148.2, 204.8) 1.4 0.1 (-0.6, 0.9)
McCreary County 5 falling falling trend higher 19 176.2 (141.8, 217.2) 1.4 -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Henry County 4 stable stable trend higher 20 176.5 (142.5, 216.8) 1.4 -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Hart County 4 stable stable trend higher 24 179.4 (147.8, 216.4) 1.4 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Pike County 4 stable stable trend higher 79 180.5 (162.5, 200.2) 1.4 0.1 (-0.4, 0.5)
Bell County 4 stable stable trend higher 37 180.6 (154.9, 209.9) 1.4 -0.4 (-1.1, 0.2)
Elliott County 4 stable stable trend higher 10 182.4 (132.7, 247.7) 1.4 -0.3 (-1.9, 1.3)
Bourbon County 4 stable stable trend higher 28 183.2 (153.3, 218.0) 1.4 -0.5 (-1.4, 0.5)
Harlan County 4 stable stable trend higher 37 184.4 (157.8, 214.7) 1.4 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Taylor County 4 stable stable trend higher 35 187.3 (159.5, 219.0) 1.5 0.5 (-0.4, 1.3)
Powell County 4 stable stable trend higher 15 188.5 (147.5, 238.2) 1.5 -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Whitley County 4 stable stable trend higher 45 188.7 (164.4, 215.8) 1.5 -0.2 (-1.0, 0.6)
Cumberland County 4 stable stable trend higher 11 189.8 (143.1, 250.7) 1.5 0.7 (-0.7, 2.2)
Fleming County 4 stable stable trend higher 19 192.6 (154.9, 237.4) 1.5 0.6 (-0.5, 1.6)
Morgan County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 192.7 (151.6, 242.9) 1.5 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Monroe County 4 stable stable trend higher 15 192.9 (150.3, 245.2) 1.5 0.3 (-0.6, 1.3)
Lawrence County 4 stable stable trend higher 22 195.4 (159.3, 238.0) 1.5 -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Gallatin County 4 stable stable trend higher 10 197.2 (145.5, 262.1) 1.5 0.0 (-1.6, 1.6)
Clinton County 4 stable stable trend higher 15 198.2 (155.3, 250.9) 1.5 0.3 (-1.2, 1.9)
Knott County 4 stable stable trend higher 23 202.7 (166.1, 245.9) 1.6 0.5 (-0.4, 1.4)
Todd County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 203.2 (160.7, 254.2) 1.6 0.2 (-1.0, 1.4)
Butler County 4 stable stable trend higher 19 203.7 (163.9, 251.3) 1.6 0.4 (-0.8, 1.5)
Metcalfe County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 205.2 (162.6, 257.4) 1.6 1.3 (-0.1, 2.6)
Knox County 4 stable stable trend higher 45 206.7 (179.8, 236.7) 1.6 0.6 (0.0, 1.2)
Clay County 4 stable stable trend higher 28 218.4 (183.1, 259.1) 1.7 0.6 (-0.2, 1.4)
Wolfe County 4 stable stable trend higher 12 226.3 (171.3, 295.3) 1.8 -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
Johnson County 4 stable stable trend higher 36 226.4 (193.8, 263.4) 1.8 0.4 (-0.2, 1.0)
Leslie County 1 rising rising trend higher 17 232.3 (184.2, 290.7) 1.8 1.7 (0.3, 3.0)
Floyd County 4 stable stable trend higher 62 233.9 (207.7, 262.9) 1.8 -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Martin County 4 stable stable trend higher 17 236.3 (187.1, 295.7) 1.8 0.3 (-1.0, 1.6)
Perry County 4 stable stable trend higher 44 244.4 (212.1, 280.5) 1.9 0.3 (-0.4, 1.0)
Carlisle County
**
** similar 8 183.5 (127.3, 260.6) 1.4
**
Hancock County
**
** higher 11 186.3 (138.5, 246.7) 1.4
**
Robertson County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/18/2024 11:35 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Robertson County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Carlisle County, Hancock County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top