Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Oklahoma Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Female

Sorted by count
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 283,896 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) - -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Oklahoma - falling falling trend - 3,833 149.6 (147.4, 151.8) - -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Oklahoma County 5 falling falling trend higher 710 151.7 (146.6, 156.9) 1.2 -0.6 (-0.8, -0.5)
Tulsa County 5 falling falling trend higher 580 142.1 (136.9, 147.5) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Cleveland County 8 falling falling trend similar 207 129.4 (121.5, 137.7) 1.0 -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Canadian County 8 falling falling trend similar 114 141.3 (129.8, 153.6) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Comanche County 5 falling falling trend higher 100 153.2 (139.9, 167.5) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Rogers County 5 falling falling trend higher 93 151.7 (138.0, 166.5) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Creek County 4 stable stable trend higher 86 168.7 (152.7, 186.2) 1.3 -0.1 (-0.7, 0.4)
Pottawatomie County 4 stable stable trend higher 82 164.3 (148.5, 181.5) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Muskogee County 4 stable stable trend higher 81 171.1 (154.4, 189.3) 1.3 -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Washington County 4 stable stable trend higher 62 151.7 (134.5, 170.8) 1.2 -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Garfield County 4 stable stable trend higher 62 147.7 (131.1, 165.9) 1.1 -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
Payne County 4 stable stable trend higher 62 151.9 (134.9, 170.5) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Le Flore County 4 stable stable trend higher 61 173.8 (154.4, 195.2) 1.3 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7)
Wagoner County 8 falling falling trend similar 61 116.0 (103.1, 130.2) 0.9 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Carter County 4 stable stable trend higher 59 168.8 (149.5, 190.1) 1.3 3.3 (-0.7, 7.3)
Grady County 6 stable stable trend similar 54 145.6 (128.4, 164.7) 1.1 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Pittsburg County 4 stable stable trend higher 54 157.0 (138.2, 178.1) 1.2 0.2 (-0.4, 0.7)
Sequoyah County 4 stable stable trend higher 53 175.3 (154.5, 198.4) 1.4 -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Kay County 4 stable stable trend higher 52 155.9 (136.6, 177.5) 1.2 0.1 (-0.4, 0.6)
Stephens County 6 stable stable trend similar 51 146.3 (128.0, 166.9) 1.1 -0.2 (-0.7, 0.4)
Delaware County 8 falling falling trend similar 50 139.5 (121.8, 159.6) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Osage County 6 stable stable trend similar 50 142.8 (124.8, 162.9) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Mayes County 4 stable stable trend higher 48 166.1 (145.1, 189.5) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Cherokee County 4 stable stable trend higher 47 148.4 (129.5, 169.4) 1.2 -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Okmulgee County 4 stable stable trend higher 45 157.7 (137.1, 180.9) 1.2 -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Bryan County 8 falling falling trend similar 42 128.6 (111.4, 147.9) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Logan County 6 stable stable trend similar 41 131.6 (113.7, 151.7) 1.0 -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Ottawa County 5 falling falling trend higher 41 176.6 (152.6, 203.6) 1.4 -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
McCurtain County 4 stable stable trend higher 41 182.8 (157.5, 211.1) 1.4 -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
McClain County 4 stable stable trend higher 40 159.2 (137.5, 183.5) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
Garvin County 1 rising rising trend higher 39 206.9 (177.9, 239.6) 1.6 0.8 (0.3, 1.4)
Lincoln County 6 stable stable trend similar 37 148.8 (127.5, 173.0) 1.2 -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Pontotoc County 6 stable stable trend similar 36 140.1 (119.9, 162.9) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Caddo County 4 stable stable trend higher 36 183.4 (156.9, 213.7) 1.4 0.6 (-0.2, 1.4)
McIntosh County 6 stable stable trend similar 28 154.2 (128.3, 185.0) 1.2 -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Seminole County 6 stable stable trend similar 27 155.3 (129.4, 185.2) 1.2 -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Custer County 4 stable stable trend higher 26 157.8 (131.1, 188.5) 1.2 0.1 (-0.6, 0.7)
Jackson County 4 stable stable trend higher 25 163.5 (135.7, 195.5) 1.3 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Adair County 5 falling falling trend higher 23 167.5 (138.0, 201.9) 1.3 -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Beckham County 4 stable stable trend higher 22 162.8 (132.7, 198.2) 1.3 -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Marshall County 6 stable stable trend similar 20 151.6 (121.8, 187.3) 1.2 0.8 (-0.2, 1.9)
Murray County 4 stable stable trend higher 19 191.4 (153.6, 236.5) 1.5 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3)
Pawnee County 6 stable stable trend similar 19 150.8 (121.2, 186.5) 1.2 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Choctaw County 6 stable stable trend similar 19 158.0 (126.9, 195.6) 1.2 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
Hughes County 4 stable stable trend higher 18 179.4 (143.7, 222.9) 1.4 0.7 (-0.3, 1.7)
Haskell County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 166.9 (131.0, 210.7) 1.3 -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Texas County 1 rising rising trend higher 16 168.7 (133.5, 210.4) 1.3 5.1 (1.5, 8.8)
Craig County 6 stable stable trend similar 16 146.6 (113.6, 187.0) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Pushmataha County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 157.1 (123.0, 199.7) 1.2 -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Woodward County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 117.8 (92.2, 148.8) 0.9 -1.8 (-3.0, -0.6)
Atoka County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 144.8 (112.4, 185.0) 1.1 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Love County 4 stable stable trend higher 15 212.4 (165.8, 269.2) 1.6 0.9 (-0.3, 2.1)
Okfuskee County 4 stable stable trend higher 14 175.7 (135.8, 225.0) 1.4 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Kingfisher County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 131.5 (101.5, 168.2) 1.0 0.1 (-1.0, 1.1)
Nowata County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 159.1 (121.3, 206.7) 1.2 -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2)
Noble County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 144.0 (109.6, 187.3) 1.1 -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Kiowa County 4 stable stable trend higher 12 183.7 (138.2, 241.0) 1.4 0.8 (-0.6, 2.2)
Washita County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 143.9 (107.9, 189.2) 1.1 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Blaine County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 162.5 (120.9, 215.1) 1.3 -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Johnston County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 138.1 (101.7, 184.1) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Tillman County 4 stable stable trend higher 10 184.4 (134.6, 248.7) 1.4 -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Latimer County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 115.2 (84.7, 155.3) 0.9 -0.9 (-2.4, 0.7)
Major County 2 rising rising trend similar 10 172.5 (124.1, 234.8) 1.3 1.6 (0.1, 3.1)
Woods County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 155.4 (111.8, 212.1) 1.2 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Coal County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 148.9 (104.3, 210.6) 1.2 -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Jefferson County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 132.9 (88.7, 194.6) 1.0 0.7 (-0.6, 2.1)
Cotton County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 136.0 (90.9, 199.1) 1.1 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6)
Grant County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 181.4 (116.3, 272.7) 1.4 1.4 (-0.3, 3.2)
Dewey County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 148.9 (97.6, 221.5) 1.2 -1.3 (-2.8, 0.3)
Alfalfa County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 106.8 (67.1, 168.3) 0.8 -0.5 (-2.1, 1.2)
Greer County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 107.6 (66.2, 170.3) 0.8 -0.8 (-2.3, 0.6)
Beaver County 7 stable stable trend lower 3 81.5 (45.1, 139.6) 0.6 -1.5 (-3.6, 0.7)
Harmon County 6 stable stable trend similar 3 162.0 (90.7, 274.1) 1.3 1.2 (-1.3, 3.8)
Ellis County
**
** similar 5 163.4 (104.6, 249.1) 1.3
**
Roger Mills County
**
** similar 4 137.6 (82.5, 222.2) 1.1
**
Cimarron County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Harper County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/19/2024 6:17 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Cimarron County, Harper County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Ellis County, Roger Mills County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top