Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Oklahoma Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Female

Sorted by name
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 283,896 128.7 (128.5, 129.0) - -1.9 (-2.2, -1.7)
Oklahoma - falling falling trend - 3,833 149.6 (147.4, 151.8) - -0.7 (-0.9, -0.5)
Adair County 5 falling falling trend higher 23 167.5 (138.0, 201.9) 1.3 -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0)
Alfalfa County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 106.8 (67.1, 168.3) 0.8 -0.5 (-2.1, 1.2)
Atoka County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 144.8 (112.4, 185.0) 1.1 0.1 (-1.2, 1.4)
Beaver County 7 stable stable trend lower 3 81.5 (45.1, 139.6) 0.6 -1.5 (-3.6, 0.7)
Beckham County 4 stable stable trend higher 22 162.8 (132.7, 198.2) 1.3 -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Blaine County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 162.5 (120.9, 215.1) 1.3 -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Bryan County 8 falling falling trend similar 42 128.6 (111.4, 147.9) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Caddo County 4 stable stable trend higher 36 183.4 (156.9, 213.7) 1.4 0.6 (-0.2, 1.4)
Canadian County 8 falling falling trend similar 114 141.3 (129.8, 153.6) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Carter County 4 stable stable trend higher 59 168.8 (149.5, 190.1) 1.3 3.3 (-0.7, 7.3)
Cherokee County 4 stable stable trend higher 47 148.4 (129.5, 169.4) 1.2 -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Choctaw County 6 stable stable trend similar 19 158.0 (126.9, 195.6) 1.2 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
Cimarron County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Cleveland County 8 falling falling trend similar 207 129.4 (121.5, 137.7) 1.0 -0.7 (-1.1, -0.4)
Coal County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 148.9 (104.3, 210.6) 1.2 -0.1 (-1.4, 1.2)
Comanche County 5 falling falling trend higher 100 153.2 (139.9, 167.5) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Cotton County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 136.0 (90.9, 199.1) 1.1 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6)
Craig County 6 stable stable trend similar 16 146.6 (113.6, 187.0) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.7, 0.6)
Creek County 4 stable stable trend higher 86 168.7 (152.7, 186.2) 1.3 -0.1 (-0.7, 0.4)
Custer County 4 stable stable trend higher 26 157.8 (131.1, 188.5) 1.2 0.1 (-0.6, 0.7)
Delaware County 8 falling falling trend similar 50 139.5 (121.8, 159.6) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Dewey County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 148.9 (97.6, 221.5) 1.2 -1.3 (-2.8, 0.3)
Ellis County
**
** similar 5 163.4 (104.6, 249.1) 1.3
**
Garfield County 4 stable stable trend higher 62 147.7 (131.1, 165.9) 1.1 -0.1 (-0.6, 0.5)
Garvin County 1 rising rising trend higher 39 206.9 (177.9, 239.6) 1.6 0.8 (0.3, 1.4)
Grady County 6 stable stable trend similar 54 145.6 (128.4, 164.7) 1.1 0.1 (-0.6, 0.8)
Grant County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 181.4 (116.3, 272.7) 1.4 1.4 (-0.3, 3.2)
Greer County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 107.6 (66.2, 170.3) 0.8 -0.8 (-2.3, 0.6)
Harmon County 6 stable stable trend similar 3 162.0 (90.7, 274.1) 1.3 1.2 (-1.3, 3.8)
Harper County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Haskell County 4 stable stable trend higher 16 166.9 (131.0, 210.7) 1.3 -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Hughes County 4 stable stable trend higher 18 179.4 (143.7, 222.9) 1.4 0.7 (-0.3, 1.7)
Jackson County 4 stable stable trend higher 25 163.5 (135.7, 195.5) 1.3 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Jefferson County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 132.9 (88.7, 194.6) 1.0 0.7 (-0.6, 2.1)
Johnston County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 138.1 (101.7, 184.1) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Kay County 4 stable stable trend higher 52 155.9 (136.6, 177.5) 1.2 0.1 (-0.4, 0.6)
Kingfisher County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 131.5 (101.5, 168.2) 1.0 0.1 (-1.0, 1.1)
Kiowa County 4 stable stable trend higher 12 183.7 (138.2, 241.0) 1.4 0.8 (-0.6, 2.2)
Latimer County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 115.2 (84.7, 155.3) 0.9 -0.9 (-2.4, 0.7)
Le Flore County 4 stable stable trend higher 61 173.8 (154.4, 195.2) 1.3 0.1 (-0.5, 0.7)
Lincoln County 6 stable stable trend similar 37 148.8 (127.5, 173.0) 1.2 -0.2 (-1.0, 0.5)
Logan County 6 stable stable trend similar 41 131.6 (113.7, 151.7) 1.0 -0.6 (-1.4, 0.2)
Love County 4 stable stable trend higher 15 212.4 (165.8, 269.2) 1.6 0.9 (-0.3, 2.1)
Major County 2 rising rising trend similar 10 172.5 (124.1, 234.8) 1.3 1.6 (0.1, 3.1)
Marshall County 6 stable stable trend similar 20 151.6 (121.8, 187.3) 1.2 0.8 (-0.2, 1.9)
Mayes County 4 stable stable trend higher 48 166.1 (145.1, 189.5) 1.3 -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
McClain County 4 stable stable trend higher 40 159.2 (137.5, 183.5) 1.2 -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3)
McCurtain County 4 stable stable trend higher 41 182.8 (157.5, 211.1) 1.4 -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
McIntosh County 6 stable stable trend similar 28 154.2 (128.3, 185.0) 1.2 -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8)
Murray County 4 stable stable trend higher 19 191.4 (153.6, 236.5) 1.5 0.2 (-0.8, 1.3)
Muskogee County 4 stable stable trend higher 81 171.1 (154.4, 189.3) 1.3 -0.1 (-0.5, 0.3)
Noble County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 144.0 (109.6, 187.3) 1.1 -0.1 (-1.1, 1.0)
Nowata County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 159.1 (121.3, 206.7) 1.2 -0.1 (-1.3, 1.2)
Okfuskee County 4 stable stable trend higher 14 175.7 (135.8, 225.0) 1.4 0.2 (-0.7, 1.1)
Oklahoma County 5 falling falling trend higher 710 151.7 (146.6, 156.9) 1.2 -0.6 (-0.8, -0.5)
Okmulgee County 4 stable stable trend higher 45 157.7 (137.1, 180.9) 1.2 -0.4 (-0.9, 0.2)
Osage County 6 stable stable trend similar 50 142.8 (124.8, 162.9) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.1, 0.2)
Ottawa County 5 falling falling trend higher 41 176.6 (152.6, 203.6) 1.4 -0.6 (-1.1, 0.0)
Pawnee County 6 stable stable trend similar 19 150.8 (121.2, 186.5) 1.2 0.1 (-0.8, 1.0)
Payne County 4 stable stable trend higher 62 151.9 (134.9, 170.5) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Pittsburg County 4 stable stable trend higher 54 157.0 (138.2, 178.1) 1.2 0.2 (-0.4, 0.7)
Pontotoc County 6 stable stable trend similar 36 140.1 (119.9, 162.9) 1.1 -0.6 (-1.3, 0.1)
Pottawatomie County 4 stable stable trend higher 82 164.3 (148.5, 181.5) 1.3 -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Pushmataha County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 157.1 (123.0, 199.7) 1.2 -0.9 (-2.0, 0.3)
Roger Mills County
**
** similar 4 137.6 (82.5, 222.2) 1.1
**
Rogers County 5 falling falling trend higher 93 151.7 (138.0, 166.5) 1.2 -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Seminole County 6 stable stable trend similar 27 155.3 (129.4, 185.2) 1.2 -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
Sequoyah County 4 stable stable trend higher 53 175.3 (154.5, 198.4) 1.4 -0.5 (-1.2, 0.2)
Stephens County 6 stable stable trend similar 51 146.3 (128.0, 166.9) 1.1 -0.2 (-0.7, 0.4)
Texas County 1 rising rising trend higher 16 168.7 (133.5, 210.4) 1.3 5.1 (1.5, 8.8)
Tillman County 4 stable stable trend higher 10 184.4 (134.6, 248.7) 1.4 -0.3 (-1.5, 0.9)
Tulsa County 5 falling falling trend higher 580 142.1 (136.9, 147.5) 1.1 -0.9 (-1.1, -0.6)
Wagoner County 8 falling falling trend similar 61 116.0 (103.1, 130.2) 0.9 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3)
Washington County 4 stable stable trend higher 62 151.7 (134.5, 170.8) 1.2 -0.2 (-0.8, 0.5)
Washita County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 143.9 (107.9, 189.2) 1.1 0.5 (-0.6, 1.6)
Woods County 6 stable stable trend similar 9 155.4 (111.8, 212.1) 1.2 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Woodward County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 117.8 (92.2, 148.8) 0.9 -1.8 (-3.0, -0.6)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/19/2024 6:45 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Cimarron County, Harper County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Ellis County, Roger Mills County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top