Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Minnesota Counties versus United States

Lung & Bronchus

All Races, Both Sexes

Sorted by priority index
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 142,497 35.0 (34.9, 35.0) - -4.8 (-5.1, -4.6)
Minnesota - falling falling trend - 2,223 31.9 (31.3, 32.5) - -4.8 (-5.7, -4.0)
Mahnomen County 1 rising rising trend higher 5 68.3 (44.3, 102.1) 2.0 2.2 (0.4, 4.0)
Aitkin County 4 stable stable trend higher 18 49.6 (39.1, 63.4) 1.4 -0.9 (-2.0, 0.1)
Cass County 4 stable stable trend higher 25 47.7 (39.2, 57.9) 1.4 -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Isanti County 4 stable stable trend higher 22 43.3 (35.4, 52.4) 1.2 -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Norman County 4 stable stable trend higher 6 57.3 (38.5, 83.8) 1.6 0.4 (-1.5, 2.4)
Itasca County 5 falling falling trend higher 32 43.4 (36.7, 51.1) 1.2 -0.9 (-1.5, -0.3)
St. Louis County 5 falling falling trend higher 116 39.5 (36.2, 42.9) 1.1 -2.1 (-3.1, -1.0)
Blue Earth County 6 stable stable trend similar 22 31.5 (25.8, 38.1) 0.9 -0.9 (-1.8, 0.1)
Brown County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 32.2 (24.7, 41.7) 0.9 0.3 (-0.8, 1.5)
Chippewa County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 42.5 (29.9, 59.4) 1.2 -0.2 (-1.7, 1.3)
Clay County 6 stable stable trend similar 25 37.8 (31.3, 45.1) 1.1 -0.3 (-1.3, 0.8)
Cottonwood County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 31.7 (20.9, 46.9) 0.9 0.1 (-1.5, 1.6)
Douglas County 6 stable stable trend similar 22 34.2 (28.0, 41.7) 1.0 -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Faribault County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 32.3 (22.9, 45.3) 0.9 0.8 (-0.5, 2.2)
Fillmore County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 32.6 (23.9, 43.9) 0.9 -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Freeborn County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 35.7 (28.6, 44.5) 1.0 -0.2 (-1.3, 0.8)
Goodhue County 6 stable stable trend similar 24 33.5 (27.7, 40.4) 1.0 -0.6 (-1.5, 0.4)
Houston County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 28.1 (19.9, 39.0) 0.8 -0.9 (-2.3, 0.4)
Kanabec County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 43.8 (33.0, 57.6) 1.3 -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Kandiyohi County 6 stable stable trend similar 18 30.6 (24.5, 37.9) 0.9 -0.2 (-1.3, 0.9)
Le Sueur County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 35.5 (27.5, 45.3) 1.0 -0.7 (-2.3, 0.9)
Lincoln County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 40.0 (24.1, 65.2) 1.1 -1.4 (-3.3, 0.5)
Lyon County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 34.6 (25.9, 45.3) 1.0 -0.3 (-1.6, 1.1)
Marshall County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 27.8 (17.6, 43.4) 0.8 0.8 (-1.0, 2.6)
Martin County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 41.4 (31.5, 54.0) 1.2 0.3 (-1.1, 1.7)
McLeod County 6 stable stable trend similar 16 30.6 (24.1, 38.4) 0.9 0.4 (-0.8, 1.6)
Meeker County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 33.5 (25.5, 43.7) 1.0 0.1 (-1.1, 1.4)
Mille Lacs County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 38.2 (29.7, 48.7) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Morrison County 6 stable stable trend similar 20 40.0 (32.3, 49.2) 1.1 -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Mower County 6 stable stable trend similar 22 39.1 (32.0, 47.5) 1.1 -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Murray County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 26.1 (15.3, 43.4) 0.7 0.4 (-1.5, 2.3)
Nicollet County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 30.3 (23.3, 39.0) 0.9 -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Otter Tail County 6 stable stable trend similar 32 31.7 (26.8, 37.5) 0.9 -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Pennington County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 41.0 (29.3, 56.3) 1.2 -0.8 (-2.0, 0.4)
Pipestone County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 36.7 (24.0, 55.0) 1.1 -0.9 (-2.8, 1.1)
Redwood County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 27.0 (18.5, 38.9) 0.8 -0.2 (-1.6, 1.3)
Renville County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 30.4 (21.1, 43.3) 0.9 -0.3 (-1.6, 1.0)
Sibley County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 25.3 (16.4, 37.7) 0.7 -0.2 (-1.9, 1.5)
Steele County 6 stable stable trend similar 15 29.2 (22.8, 37.0) 0.8 -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3)
Swift County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 34.1 (22.3, 51.3) 1.0 -0.1 (-1.8, 1.6)
Wabasha County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 30.4 (22.8, 40.3) 0.9 -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Wadena County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 43.4 (31.8, 58.6) 1.2 0.3 (-0.9, 1.5)
Watonwan County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 36.9 (24.6, 54.1) 1.1 -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Yellow Medicine County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 36.6 (24.2, 54.4) 1.0 -0.4 (-1.9, 1.2)
Carver County 7 stable stable trend lower 24 24.2 (20.0, 29.1) 0.7 -11.8 (-22.6, 0.4)
Jackson County 7 stable stable trend lower 4 23.0 (13.7, 37.6) 0.7 -0.2 (-2.1, 1.7)
Anoka County 8 falling falling trend similar 146 36.9 (34.2, 39.8) 1.1 -13.3 (-22.3, -3.3)
Becker County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 33.5 (26.9, 41.5) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Beltrami County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 34.6 (27.9, 42.5) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.4, -0.3)
Benton County 8 falling falling trend similar 16 35.6 (28.0, 44.6) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Carlton County 8 falling falling trend similar 16 33.2 (26.3, 41.5) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.6, -0.3)
Chisago County 8 falling falling trend similar 28 40.5 (34.0, 48.0) 1.2 -1.4 (-2.2, -0.5)
Crow Wing County 8 falling falling trend similar 39 35.1 (30.3, 40.6) 1.0 -5.0 (-7.7, -2.2)
Hubbard County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 36.4 (28.1, 47.1) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Koochiching County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 33.3 (23.1, 47.8) 1.0 -6.5 (-10.5, -2.4)
Lake County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 31.7 (22.1, 45.9) 0.9 -2.3 (-3.6, -0.9)
Nobles County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 32.4 (23.3, 44.0) 0.9 -1.2 (-2.3, -0.1)
Pine County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 39.4 (31.7, 48.7) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Polk County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 38.2 (30.3, 47.7) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Rice County 8 falling falling trend similar 26 32.6 (27.2, 38.9) 0.9 -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
Roseau County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 30.2 (20.5, 43.4) 0.9 -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Scott County 8 falling falling trend similar 40 30.8 (26.6, 35.5) 0.9 -1.5 (-2.3, -0.7)
Sherburne County 8 falling falling trend similar 29 32.0 (26.8, 37.8) 0.9 -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Todd County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 27.4 (20.4, 36.6) 0.8 -5.4 (-7.2, -3.6)
Winona County 8 falling falling trend similar 22 33.5 (27.4, 40.8) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6)
Wright County 8 falling falling trend similar 50 36.5 (32.1, 41.4) 1.0 -2.9 (-4.6, -1.2)
Dakota County 9 falling falling trend lower 141 29.6 (27.4, 31.9) 0.8 -5.9 (-8.2, -3.5)
Dodge County 9 falling falling trend lower 6 25.6 (17.4, 36.5) 0.7 -15.9 (-28.9, -0.5)
Hennepin County 9 falling falling trend lower 385 27.5 (26.2, 28.7) 0.8 -3.7 (-4.3, -3.1)
Olmsted County 9 falling falling trend lower 48 25.3 (22.2, 28.8) 0.7 -2.0 (-2.7, -1.3)
Pope County 9 falling falling trend lower 5 24.8 (15.8, 38.5) 0.7 -1.9 (-3.5, -0.1)
Ramsey County 9 falling falling trend lower 192 31.0 (29.0, 33.1) 0.9 -3.8 (-4.5, -3.0)
Stearns County 9 falling falling trend lower 59 31.2 (27.7, 35.1) 0.9 -1.1 (-1.6, -0.7)
Waseca County 9 falling falling trend lower 6 24.3 (16.4, 35.1) 0.7 -1.6 (-3.0, -0.2)
Washington County 9 falling falling trend lower 86 28.8 (26.1, 31.8) 0.8 -2.3 (-2.9, -1.7)
Clearwater County
**
** similar 6 42.7 (28.8, 62.4) 1.2
**
Cook County
**
** similar 3 35.7 (19.3, 63.6) 1.0
**
Rock County
**
** similar 4 27.5 (16.5, 44.3) 0.8
**
Wilkin County
**
** higher 6 65.9 (44.3, 95.9) 1.9
**
Big Stone County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Grant County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Kittson County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Lac qui Parle County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Lake of the Woods County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Red Lake County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Stevens County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Traverse County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 04/28/2024 6:39 pm.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Big Stone County, Grant County, Kittson County, Lac qui Parle County, Lake of the Woods County, Red Lake County, Stevens County, Traverse County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Clearwater County, Cook County, Rock County, Wilkin County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top