Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer
Counties |
Priority Index1 1=highest 9=lowest |
Recent Trend2 |
County Death Rate Compared to US Rate |
Average Annual Count |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
Rate Ratio3 County to US |
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
United States | - | falling | - | 142,497 | 35.0 (34.9, 35.0) | - | -4.8 (-5.1, -4.6) |
Tennessee | - | falling | - | 4,060 | 47.0 (46.3, 47.6) | - | -4.4 (-5.2, -3.5) |
Dyer County | 4 | stable | higher | 33 | 65.3 (55.6, 76.4) | 1.9 | -0.1 (-1.0, 0.7) |
Carroll County | 4 | stable | higher | 30 | 68.9 (58.1, 81.3) | 2.0 | -0.1 (-1.0, 0.8) |
McNairy County | 4 | stable | higher | 25 | 60.1 (49.8, 72.3) | 1.7 | -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8) |
Hawkins County | 4 | stable | higher | 53 | 58.6 (51.6, 66.4) | 1.7 | -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6) |
Hardeman County | 4 | stable | higher | 22 | 64.4 (52.7, 78.1) | 1.8 | -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8) |
DeKalb County | 4 | stable | higher | 18 | 60.4 (48.2, 75.1) | 1.7 | -0.2 (-1.3, 1.0) |
Grundy County | 4 | stable | higher | 12 | 58.2 (44.1, 76.0) | 1.7 | -0.2 (-1.8, 1.5) |
Macon County | 4 | stable | higher | 21 | 68.8 (56.1, 83.6) | 2.0 | -0.3 (-1.1, 0.4) |
Lauderdale County | 4 | stable | higher | 24 | 75.0 (62.0, 90.0) | 2.1 | -0.3 (-1.2, 0.7) |
Hardin County | 4 | stable | higher | 25 | 56.5 (46.7, 68.1) | 1.6 | -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8) |
Wayne County | 4 | stable | higher | 13 | 54.6 (42.2, 70.2) | 1.6 | -0.3 (-1.5, 0.8) |
Monroe County | 4 | stable | higher | 46 | 63.6 (55.4, 72.8) | 1.8 | -0.4 (-1.1, 0.3) |
Jackson County | 4 | stable | higher | 15 | 70.4 (54.9, 90.0) | 2.0 | -0.4 (-1.8, 0.9) |
Rhea County | 4 | stable | higher | 33 | 70.7 (60.1, 82.8) | 2.0 | -0.5 (-1.3, 0.2) |
Overton County | 4 | stable | higher | 23 | 66.5 (54.8, 80.3) | 1.9 | -0.5 (-1.5, 0.4) |
Hickman County | 4 | stable | higher | 22 | 60.8 (49.7, 73.9) | 1.7 | -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6) |
Crockett County | 4 | stable | higher | 12 | 60.2 (45.9, 78.0) | 1.7 | -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7) |
Chester County | 4 | stable | higher | 12 | 54.6 (41.7, 70.5) | 1.6 | -0.5 (-1.8, 0.8) |
Claiborne County | 4 | stable | higher | 31 | 65.0 (54.8, 76.7) | 1.9 | -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3) |
Warren County | 4 | stable | higher | 31 | 54.0 (45.8, 63.5) | 1.5 | -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5) |
Campbell County | 4 | stable | higher | 46 | 75.2 (65.7, 85.9) | 2.2 | -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0) |
McMinn County | 4 | stable | higher | 47 | 57.6 (50.4, 65.8) | 1.6 | -0.7 (-1.4, 0.1) |
Gibson County | 4 | stable | higher | 41 | 60.6 (52.5, 69.6) | 1.7 | -0.7 (-1.5, 0.1) |
Scott County | 4 | stable | higher | 23 | 76.5 (63.0, 92.4) | 2.2 | -0.7 (-1.6, 0.1) |
Weakley County | 4 | stable | higher | 24 | 52.6 (43.5, 63.2) | 1.5 | -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2) |
White County | 4 | stable | higher | 23 | 57.1 (47.0, 68.9) | 1.6 | -0.7 (-1.7, 0.2) |
Lewis County | 4 | stable | higher | 12 | 62.5 (47.0, 82.2) | 1.8 | -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5) |
Sevier County | 5 | falling | higher | 75 | 51.9 (46.6, 57.7) | 1.5 | -0.8 (-1.3, -0.2) |
Putnam County | 4 | stable | higher | 52 | 52.3 (46.1, 59.3) | 1.5 | -0.8 (-1.6, 0.0) |
Fentress County | 4 | stable | higher | 20 | 68.9 (55.6, 85.0) | 2.0 | -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2) |
Union County | 4 | stable | higher | 17 | 62.1 (49.1, 77.7) | 1.8 | -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2) |
Perry County | 4 | stable | higher | 8 | 69.0 (49.0, 95.4) | 2.0 | -0.8 (-2.1, 0.5) |
Hancock County | 4 | stable | higher | 7 | 64.9 (43.6, 94.5) | 1.9 | -0.8 (-2.1, 0.6) |
Jefferson County | 5 | falling | higher | 44 | 53.9 (46.9, 61.9) | 1.5 | -0.9 (-1.6, -0.3) |
Henry County | 5 | falling | higher | 30 | 54.5 (46.1, 64.4) | 1.6 | -0.9 (-1.8, -0.1) |
Humphreys County | 4 | stable | higher | 16 | 53.6 (42.3, 67.5) | 1.5 | -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2) |
Polk County | 4 | stable | higher | 16 | 62.2 (49.3, 78.2) | 1.8 | -0.9 (-2.1, 0.3) |
Dickson County | 5 | falling | higher | 41 | 61.0 (52.8, 70.2) | 1.7 | -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5) |
Washington County | 5 | falling | higher | 85 | 47.0 (42.6, 51.8) | 1.3 | -1.0 (-1.5, -0.5) |
Coffee County | 5 | falling | higher | 38 | 52.0 (44.8, 60.2) | 1.5 | -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3) |
Franklin County | 5 | falling | higher | 27 | 43.3 (36.1, 51.7) | 1.2 | -1.0 (-1.8, -0.1) |
Marion County | 4 | stable | higher | 23 | 52.7 (43.4, 63.7) | 1.5 | -1.0 (-2.0, 0.1) |
Lawrence County | 5 | falling | higher | 36 | 60.4 (51.8, 70.1) | 1.7 | -1.1 (-1.7, -0.5) |
Bedford County | 5 | falling | higher | 33 | 57.4 (48.9, 67.1) | 1.6 | -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3) |
Cumberland County | 5 | falling | higher | 52 | 41.8 (36.5, 48.0) | 1.2 | -1.2 (-1.9, -0.4) |
Tipton County | 5 | falling | higher | 43 | 60.8 (52.8, 69.8) | 1.7 | -1.2 (-2.1, -0.3) |
Cannon County | 4 | stable | higher | 11 | 52.8 (39.3, 69.9) | 1.5 | -1.2 (-2.5, 0.1) |
Stewart County | 4 | stable | higher | 12 | 57.5 (43.6, 75.2) | 1.6 | -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3) |
Madison County | 5 | falling | higher | 57 | 43.9 (38.8, 49.5) | 1.3 | -1.4 (-2.0, -0.7) |
Carter County | 5 | falling | higher | 39 | 43.8 (37.8, 50.7) | 1.3 | -1.4 (-2.2, -0.6) |
Cheatham County | 5 | falling | higher | 27 | 54.6 (45.4, 65.3) | 1.6 | -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3) |
Haywood County | 5 | falling | higher | 12 | 48.0 (36.5, 62.5) | 1.4 | -1.4 (-2.5, -0.4) |
Bradley County | 5 | falling | higher | 64 | 45.0 (40.2, 50.4) | 1.3 | -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0) |
Giles County | 5 | falling | higher | 21 | 46.0 (37.4, 56.3) | 1.3 | -1.5 (-2.4, -0.6) |
Wilson County | 5 | falling | higher | 72 | 42.1 (37.8, 46.8) | 1.2 | -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9) |
Hamblen County | 5 | falling | higher | 44 | 48.9 (42.6, 56.0) | 1.4 | -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8) |
Trousdale County | 5 | falling | higher | 7 | 60.2 (41.6, 84.6) | 1.7 | -1.6 (-3.2, -0.1) |
Bledsoe County | 5 | falling | higher | 11 | 52.5 (39.4, 69.2) | 1.5 | -1.7 (-2.7, -0.6) |
Loudon County | 5 | falling | higher | 44 | 43.9 (38.0, 50.5) | 1.3 | -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0) |
Grainger County | 5 | falling | higher | 25 | 67.5 (55.9, 81.3) | 1.9 | -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2) |
Morgan County | 5 | falling | higher | 16 | 55.9 (44.3, 70.1) | 1.6 | -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2) |
Blount County | 5 | falling | higher | 91 | 45.0 (40.9, 49.5) | 1.3 | -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0) |
Fayette County | 8 | falling | similar | 24 | 34.7 (28.6, 41.9) | 1.0 | -1.9 (-3.0, -0.7) |
Cocke County | 5 | falling | higher | 33 | 56.6 (48.0, 66.6) | 1.6 | -10.9 (-19.8, -1.0) |
Maury County | 5 | falling | higher | 58 | 48.6 (43.0, 54.8) | 1.4 | -12.3 (-22.6, -0.7) |
Clay County | 5 | falling | higher | 7 | 52.0 (36.5, 74.0) | 1.5 | -2.0 (-3.2, -0.9) |
Lincoln County | 5 | falling | higher | 24 | 46.3 (38.2, 55.8) | 1.3 | -2.1 (-3.1, -1.1) |
Rutherford County | 5 | falling | higher | 120 | 43.0 (39.5, 46.8) | 1.2 | -2.2 (-2.8, -1.7) |
Montgomery County | 5 | falling | higher | 80 | 49.2 (44.3, 54.4) | 1.4 | -2.5 (-3.2, -1.9) |
Sumner County | 5 | falling | higher | 103 | 44.4 (40.6, 48.5) | 1.3 | -2.7 (-3.6, -1.7) |
Sullivan County | 5 | falling | higher | 126 | 49.2 (45.3, 53.3) | 1.4 | -2.7 (-3.9, -1.5) |
Henderson County | 5 | falling | higher | 23 | 57.0 (46.8, 68.9) | 1.6 | -2.9 (-4.4, -1.3) |
Robertson County | 5 | falling | higher | 46 | 53.8 (46.9, 61.5) | 1.5 | -3.1 (-5.0, -1.2) |
Greene County | 5 | falling | higher | 67 | 60.2 (53.8, 67.3) | 1.7 | -3.3 (-5.0, -1.6) |
Knox County | 5 | falling | higher | 238 | 41.4 (39.0, 43.8) | 1.2 | -3.9 (-4.8, -3.0) |
Obion County | 5 | falling | higher | 26 | 54.8 (45.6, 65.7) | 1.6 | -3.9 (-7.1, -0.7) |
Anderson County | 5 | falling | higher | 52 | 45.2 (39.7, 51.3) | 1.3 | -4.6 (-6.8, -2.4) |
Lake County | 5 | falling | higher | 5 | 57.5 (37.6, 85.4) | 1.6 | -4.7 (-7.3, -1.9) |
Shelby County | 5 | falling | higher | 405 | 39.6 (37.9, 41.5) | 1.1 | -5.2 (-7.1, -3.3) |
Roane County | 5 | falling | higher | 46 | 49.1 (42.8, 56.2) | 1.4 | -5.3 (-8.0, -2.5) |
Williamson County | 9 | falling | lower | 54 | 22.5 (19.8, 25.5) | 0.6 | -6.4 (-8.0, -4.9) |
Hamilton County | 8 | falling | similar | 181 | 37.4 (35.0, 40.0) | 1.1 | -6.7 (-9.7, -3.6) |
Davidson County | 8 | falling | similar | 263 | 38.2 (36.1, 40.4) | 1.1 | -7.6 (-10.3, -4.7) |
Sequatchie County | 8 | falling | similar | 11 | 44.9 (33.3, 59.8) | 1.3 | -8.4 (-15.7, -0.5) |
Unicoi County | 4 | stable | higher | 16 | 52.8 (41.6, 66.6) | 1.5 | 0.0 (-1.1, 1.1) |
Decatur County | 4 | stable | higher | 13 | 65.1 (49.6, 85.0) | 1.9 | 0.0 (-1.2, 1.2) |
Smith County | 4 | stable | higher | 15 | 57.7 (44.9, 73.2) | 1.6 | 0.0 (-1.2, 1.3) |
Johnson County | 4 | stable | higher | 17 | 58.8 (46.8, 73.5) | 1.7 | 0.2 (-1.1, 1.4) |
Meigs County | 4 | stable | higher | 11 | 62.2 (46.3, 82.5) | 1.8 | 0.2 (-1.2, 1.6) |
Van Buren County | 6 | stable | similar | 5 | 54.7 (35.2, 83.3) | 1.6 | 0.2 (-2.1, 2.5) |
Benton County | 4 | stable | higher | 20 | 73.3 (59.1, 90.7) | 2.1 | 0.3 (-0.8, 1.5) |
Pickett County | 4 | stable | higher | 7 | 65.8 (44.8, 97.2) | 1.9 | 0.3 (-1.6, 2.2) |
Houston County | 4 | stable | higher | 9 | 73.2 (53.5, 99.0) | 2.1 | 0.6 (-0.6, 1.9) |
Marshall County | 4 | stable | higher | 24 | 55.2 (45.5, 66.6) | 1.6 | 4.9 (-8.3, 19.9) |
Moore County |
|
** | similar | 4 | 40.0 (24.2, 64.3) | 1.1 |
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/17/2024 8:19 pm.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).
Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Moore County
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/17/2024 8:19 pm.
Trend2
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
Above when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
Similar when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
Below when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
Above when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
Similar when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
Below when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).
Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Moore County
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.