Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer
|Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, death years through 2012
Texas Counties versus United States
All Cancer Sites
All Races, Both Sexes
|Above US Rate||Similar to US Rate||Below US Rate|
|Priority 1: rising and above
San Jacinto County
|Priority 2: rising and similar
|Priority 3: rising and below
|Priority 4: stable and above
Red River County
Van Zandt County
|Priority 6: stable and similar
Deaf Smith County
Jeff Davis County
Jim Hogg County
La Salle County
San Augustine County
San Saba County
|Priority 7: stable and below
|Priority 5: falling and above
San Patricio County
|Priority 8: falling and similar
Jim Wells County
Live Oak County
Palo Pinto County
Tom Green County
|Priority 9: falling and below
El Paso County
Fort Bend County
Val Verde County
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/01/2016 6:37 pm.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Regression Program (Version 4.2). Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2013 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).
Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Borden County, Culberson County, Foard County, Glasscock County, Kenedy County, Kent County, King County, Loving County, McMullen County, Roberts County, Sterling County, Terrell County
Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Armstrong County, Briscoe County, Hudspeth County, Irion County