Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report by State

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma, 2012-2016

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States *** 5.6 (5.6, 5.7) 20,262 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -2.0)
Michigan *** 6.4 (6.2, 6.7) 769 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -1.9)
Kentucky *** 6.4 (6.1, 6.7) 323 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.6)
Iowa *** 6.4 (6.0, 6.8) 252 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6)
Indiana *** 6.4 (6.1, 6.6) 472 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.9, -1.9)
Idaho *** 6.3 (5.8, 6.9) 110 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -1.0)
Oklahoma *** 6.3 (6.0, 6.7) 272 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.6)
Tennessee *** 6.3 (6.0, 6.6) 466 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.9)
Delaware *** 6.3 (5.6, 7.0) 72 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -0.9)
Minnesota *** 6.2 (5.9, 6.5) 384 falling falling trend -5.4 (-8.3, -2.5)
Ohio *** 6.2 (6.0, 6.3) 870 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.0, -2.2)
Oregon *** 6.1 (5.8, 6.5) 294 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.4, -2.1)
West Virginia *** 6.1 (5.7, 6.6) 154 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.8, -1.8)
Maine *** 6.1 (5.6, 6.6) 113 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.0, -1.8)
Louisiana *** 6.1 (5.8, 6.4) 299 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.8, -1.9)
Vermont *** 6.0 (5.3, 6.9) 48 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.6)
Pennsylvania *** 6.0 (5.9, 6.2) 1,025 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.7, -2.4)
Washington *** 6.0 (5.7, 6.2) 456 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.1, -2.3)
Wisconsin *** 5.9 (5.6, 6.2) 407 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.6)
Kansas *** 5.9 (5.5, 6.2) 196 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.6, -2.1)
Illinois *** 5.7 (5.5, 5.8) 815 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.8, -2.4)
Wyoming *** 5.6 (4.8, 6.6) 36 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.3)
Nebraska *** 5.6 (5.2, 6.1) 123 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.3, -1.4)
New Hampshire *** 5.6 (5.1, 6.2) 92 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.2, -1.8)
North Dakota *** 5.6 (4.9, 6.4) 50 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.2, -1.9)
Montana *** 5.6 (5.0, 6.2) 72 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.7)
Arkansas *** 5.6 (5.2, 5.9) 196 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.2, -2.0)
Texas *** 5.5 (5.3, 5.6) 1,332 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.8, -2.3)
Alabama *** 5.5 (5.2, 5.7) 308 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.6, -2.1)
New Jersey *** 5.4 (5.2, 5.7) 573 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.0, 0.6)
Virginia *** 5.4 (5.2, 5.7) 484 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.7, -2.2)
South Carolina *** 5.4 (5.1, 5.7) 301 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.6, -1.6)
Rhode Island *** 5.4 (4.9, 6.0) 74 falling falling trend -3.7 (-4.6, -2.7)
Utah *** 5.4 (5.0, 5.9) 125 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.5)
Missouri *** 5.4 (5.2, 5.7) 394 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.7, -2.6)
North Carolina *** 5.4 (5.2, 5.6) 602 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.9, -2.1)
South Dakota *** 5.4 (4.8, 6.1) 57 falling falling trend -3.9 (-5.2, -2.6)
New York *** 5.3 (5.2, 5.5) 1,243 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.4, -1.5)
Florida *** 5.3 (5.2, 5.5) 1,516 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.0, -2.5)
Connecticut *** 5.3 (5.0, 5.6) 244 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.7)
California *** 5.3 (5.2, 5.4) 2,120 falling falling trend -2.6 (-2.8, -2.5)
Georgia *** 5.3 (5.1, 5.5) 514 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.6, -1.9)
Mississippi *** 5.3 (5.0, 5.7) 173 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.5, -1.7)
Alaska *** 5.2 (4.4, 6.2) 29 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Maryland *** 5.2 (5.0, 5.5) 342 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.3, -2.2)
Massachusetts *** 5.2 (5.0, 5.5) 426 falling falling trend -3.2 (-3.6, -2.8)
Arizona *** 5.1 (4.9, 5.3) 403 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.2, -2.4)
Nevada *** 5.1 (4.7, 5.5) 151 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.7)
Colorado *** 4.9 (4.6, 5.2) 255 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.7, -2.6)
New Mexico *** 4.9 (4.5, 5.3) 119 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.4)
Hawaii 8 *** 4.7 (4.3, 5.2) 87 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.7, -1.2)
District of Columbia *** 4.4 (3.7, 5.3) 27 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.6, -1.8)
Puerto Rico 8 *** 3.5 (3.2, 3.7) 153 stable stable trend -2.1 (-8.3, 4.5)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 06/04/2020 5:25 am.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2016 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Health Service Areas are a single county or cluster of contiguous counties which are relatively self-contained with respect to hospital care. For more detailed information, please see Health Service Area information page.
8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top