Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

Colon & Rectum, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 8.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank ascending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana No 14.6 (14.3, 15.0) N/A 1,171 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
United States No 13.1 (13.1, 13.2) N/A 52,152 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.8)
Warrick County No 10.0 (7.2, 13.7) 81 (42, 81) 9 falling falling trend -4.5 (-5.8, -3.1)
Hamilton County No 10.5 (8.9, 12.3) 80 (60, 81) 34 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.0, -2.2)
Hancock County No 11.4 (8.5, 15.0) 79 (31, 81) 11 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.5)
Huntington County No 11.5 (7.5, 16.9) 78 (18, 81) 6 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.4, -1.3)
Jasper County No 11.6 (7.4, 17.5) 77 (9, 81) 5 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.6)
Dearborn County No 11.6 (8.1, 16.3) 76 (21, 81) 7 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.9, -1.7)
Bartholomew County No 12.0 (9.2, 15.5) 75 (27, 81) 12 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.9, -1.9)
Morgan County No 12.0 (8.9, 15.9) 74 (19, 81) 11 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.8)
Johnson County No 12.5 (10.2, 15.1) 73 (31, 81) 22 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.1, -1.2)
Clark County No 12.6 (10.0, 15.6) 72 (27, 81) 18 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.2, -2.4)
Hendricks County No 12.7 (10.3, 15.3) 71 (29, 81) 21 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.0, -2.3)
Allen County No 12.8 (11.3, 14.4) 70 (40, 78) 54 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.1, -2.6)
Montgomery County No 12.8 (8.9, 18.1) 69 (11, 81) 7 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.7, -1.9)
Monroe County No 13.0 (10.4, 16.0) 68 (24, 81) 19 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.5, -1.4)
Randolph County No 13.1 (8.3, 20.0) 67 (5, 81) 5 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.9)
Elkhart County No 13.5 (11.4, 15.8) 66 (25, 79) 31 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Delaware County No 13.7 (11.0, 16.8) 65 (16, 80) 20 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.7, -1.2)
Adams County No 13.7 (9.0, 20.0) 64 (4, 81) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.5, -0.4)
Lawrence County No 13.7 (10.0, 18.6) 63 (9, 81) 9 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.1)
Marion County No 13.8 (12.7, 14.9) 62 (37, 71) 133 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.7, -1.9)
White County No 13.9 (8.8, 21.2) 61 (3, 81) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.3, 0.4)
Kosciusko County No 14.1 (10.9, 17.9) 60 (12, 80) 14 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.8, -1.0)
Madison County No 14.2 (11.7, 17.1) 59 (18, 79) 24 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.5, -2.2)
Tippecanoe County No 14.5 (12.0, 17.3) 58 (18, 77) 25 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
DeKalb County No 14.5 (10.3, 20.0) 57 (5, 81) 8 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.3)
Decatur County No 14.5 (9.4, 21.6) 56 (3, 81) 5 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.4)
Vanderburgh County No 14.6 (12.4, 17.0) 55 (18, 75) 35 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.6)
Boone County No 14.6 (10.8, 19.3) 54 (7, 81) 10 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.7)
St. Joseph County No 14.9 (13.0, 17.0) 53 (18, 72) 47 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.9, -1.8)
Ripley County No 14.9 (9.8, 22.0) 52 (3, 81) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Grant County No 15.0 (11.6, 19.1) 51 (7, 80) 14 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.9, -1.0)
Whitley County No 15.0 (10.3, 21.4) 50 (3, 81) 7 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.5, -0.8)
Owen County No 15.0 (9.2, 23.6) 49 (1, 81) 4 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.9)
Parke County No 15.1 (9.2, 24.1) 48 (1, 81) 4
*
*
Spencer County No 15.1 (9.3, 23.6) 47 (2, 81) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.1)
Rush County No 15.2 (8.9, 24.9) 46 (1, 81) 4 stable stable trend 37.0 (-12.2, 113.9)
Clinton County No 15.3 (10.3, 21.9) 45 (2, 81) 6 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Carroll County No 15.3 (9.4, 24.0) 44 (1, 81) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.1, 0.6)
Harrison County No 15.4 (11.0, 21.2) 43 (3, 81) 8 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -0.8)
Jennings County No 15.5 (10.2, 22.7) 42 (2, 81) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.4)
Vigo County No 15.6 (12.7, 19.0) 41 (9, 75) 21 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.4, -1.8)
LaGrange County No 15.7 (10.6, 22.3) 40 (2, 81) 6 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.2, -1.1)
Tipton County No 15.7 (9.4, 25.6) 39 (1, 81) 4
*
*
Lake County No 15.7 (14.3, 17.2) 38 (19, 60) 96 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.9, -2.1)
Wells County No 16.0 (10.6, 23.3) 37 (1, 81) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Steuben County No 16.3 (11.7, 22.4) 36 (2, 81) 9 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.3)
Noble County No 16.3 (11.7, 22.2) 35 (2, 80) 9 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.4)
Porter County No 16.4 (14.0, 19.2) 34 (8, 67) 34 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.4)
Wayne County No 16.6 (13.0, 20.9) 33 (4, 74) 16 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.7, -0.6)
Cass County No 16.6 (11.9, 22.7) 32 (1, 80) 8 stable stable trend 0.4 (-3.1, 3.9)
Clay County No 16.6 (11.0, 24.3) 31 (1, 81) 6 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Putnam County No 16.8 (11.8, 23.2) 30 (1, 80) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
Fulton County No 16.8 (10.4, 26.1) 29 (1, 81) 4
*
*
Floyd County No 17.1 (13.4, 21.4) 28 (3, 74) 16 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.5, -0.9)
LaPorte County No 17.1 (14.2, 20.6) 27 (5, 67) 25 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.8, -1.4)
Scott County No 17.3 (11.0, 26.1) 26 (1, 81) 5
*
*
Franklin County No 17.3 (11.0, 26.1) 25 (1, 81) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.7, 0.9)
Howard County No 17.4 (14.0, 21.4) 24 (3, 71) 20 stable stable trend 3.1 (-1.7, 8.0)
Shelby County No 17.5 (13.0, 23.2) 23 (1, 76) 10 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Henry County No 17.6 (13.3, 22.9) 22 (2, 76) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.9, 0.7)
Gibson County No 17.8 (12.5, 24.6) 21 (1, 80) 8 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Fountain County No 17.8 (11.2, 27.5) 20 (1, 81) 5 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.2)
Daviess County No 17.9 (12.3, 25.2) 19 (1, 80) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.6, 0.6)
Jay County No 17.9 (11.5, 26.9) 18 (1, 81) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 0.9)
Vermillion County No 18.1 (10.4, 29.7) 17 (1, 81) 4 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.2, 0.3)
Greene County No 18.1 (12.9, 25.1) 16 (1, 78) 8 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.2, -0.8)
Miami County No 18.4 (13.3, 25.0) 15 (1, 77) 9
*
*
Fayette County No 18.5 (12.4, 26.8) 14 (1, 80) 6 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.2)
Marshall County No 18.5 (13.7, 24.5) 13 (1, 75) 11 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.2, -0.6)
Knox County No 18.5 (13.3, 25.2) 12 (1, 76) 9 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.0, -0.1)
Washington County No 18.9 (12.6, 27.2) 11 (1, 80) 6 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.1, 0.1)
Pike County No 19.0 (10.5, 32.1) 10 (1, 81) 3
*
*
Wabash County No 19.1 (13.5, 26.5) 9 (1, 77) 9 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.2)
Starke County No 19.3 (13.1, 27.9) 8 (1, 79) 7 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.0, 0.0)
Sullivan County No 19.4 (12.7, 28.8) 7 (1, 81) 5 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.9, -0.9)
Jefferson County No 20.3 (14.5, 27.8) 6 (1, 75) 8 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.3)
Dubois County No 20.5 (15.4, 26.8) 5 (1, 65) 11 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.7, 0.7)
Posey County No 21.3 (14.6, 30.3) 4 (1, 76) 7 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.8, -0.6)
Orange County No 22.2 (15.0, 32.1) 3 (1, 74) 6 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Pulaski County No 22.6 (13.7, 35.8) 2 (1, 81) 4
*
*
Jackson County No 22.7 (17.3, 29.3) 1 (1, 53) 12 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.8)
Benton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blackford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ohio County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Switzerland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/01/2022 9:54 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top