Mortality > Table
Death Rates Table
County |
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ |
Met Healthy People Objective of 8.9? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate † deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank ⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend ‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Indiana | N/A | No | 14.6 (14.2, 15.0) | N/A | 1,189 | falling | -1.1 (-1.5, -0.4) |
United States | N/A | No | 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) | N/A | 52,325 | falling | -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8) |
Orange County | Rural | No | 21.9 (14.8, 31.6) | 1 (1, 79) | 6 | stable | -0.9 (-2.4, 0.8) |
Starke County | Rural | No | 20.3 (13.8, 29.1) | 2 (1, 79) | 7 | stable | -1.4 (-3.0, 0.3) |
Henry County | Rural | No | 20.2 (15.6, 25.8) | 3 (1, 67) | 14 | stable | 0.7 (-0.5, 6.7) |
Sullivan County | Urban | No | 20.0 (12.9, 29.8) | 4 (1, 82) | 5 | falling | -2.3 (-3.9, -1.0) |
Posey County | Urban | No | 19.9 (13.5, 28.4) | 5 (1, 78) | 7 | falling | -2.1 (-3.6, -0.6) |
Pike County | Rural | No | 19.8 (10.9, 33.5) | 6 (1, 83) | 3 |
|
|
Miami County | Rural | No | 19.4 (14.1, 26.1) | 7 (1, 77) | 9 |
|
|
Wayne County | Rural | No | 19.2 (15.3, 23.8) | 8 (1, 64) | 18 | falling | -1.3 (-2.4, -0.2) |
Fulton County | Rural | No | 19.0 (12.1, 28.8) | 9 (1, 82) | 5 |
|
|
Marshall County | Rural | No | 18.9 (14.1, 25.0) | 10 (1, 76) | 11 | falling | -1.9 (-3.5, -0.5) |
Rush County | Rural | No | 18.4 (10.9, 29.3) | 11 (1, 83) | 4 | stable | 21.3 (-1.9, 63.8) |
Howard County | Urban | No | 18.3 (14.8, 22.5) | 12 (1, 70) | 20 | stable | 2.2 (-1.5, 9.7) |
Wabash County | Rural | No | 18.2 (13.1, 25.0) | 13 (1, 79) | 9 | stable | -1.4 (-2.9, 0.0) |
Clinton County | Rural | No | 18.2 (12.7, 25.4) | 14 (1, 82) | 7 | stable | -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2) |
Greene County | Rural | No | 18.1 (12.7, 25.2) | 15 (1, 80) | 8 | falling | -1.8 (-3.0, -0.7) |
Washington County | Urban | No | 18.1 (12.1, 26.1) | 16 (1, 82) | 6 | stable | -1.5 (-3.1, 0.2) |
Clay County | Urban | No | 17.8 (12.1, 25.6) | 17 (1, 81) | 7 | stable | -1.2 (-3.0, 0.5) |
Daviess County | Rural | No | 17.8 (12.2, 25.2) | 18 (1, 82) | 7 | stable | -0.6 (-2.4, 1.2) |
Jay County | Rural | No | 17.7 (11.2, 27.0) | 19 (1, 83) | 5 | stable | -0.5 (-2.5, 1.5) |
Jefferson County | Rural | No | 17.6 (12.4, 24.5) | 20 (1, 82) | 8 | stable | -1.5 (-3.0, 0.1) |
Grant County | Rural | No | 17.5 (13.8, 21.9) | 21 (2, 74) | 16 | falling | -1.6 (-2.7, -0.7) |
Pulaski County | Rural | No | 17.4 (10.2, 28.9) | 22 (1, 83) | 4 |
|
|
Lawrence County | Rural | No | 17.4 (13.0, 23.0) | 23 (1, 79) | 11 | falling | -2.0 (-3.4, -0.5) |
Jackson County | Rural | No | 17.0 (12.5, 22.7) | 24 (1, 79) | 10 | stable | -0.7 (-1.8, 0.6) |
Gibson County | Rural | No | 16.6 (11.5, 23.5) | 25 (1, 82) | 7 | stable | -1.6 (-3.2, 0.0) |
Vigo County | Urban | No | 16.6 (13.6, 20.1) | 26 (4, 73) | 22 | falling | -2.3 (-3.2, -1.5) |
Newton County | Urban | No | 16.5 (9.2, 27.9) | 27 (1, 83) | 3 | falling | -1.9 (-3.9, -0.1) |
Porter County | Urban | No | 16.5 (14.1, 19.2) | 28 (7, 69) | 36 | falling | -2.1 (-2.8, -1.3) |
Blackford County | Rural | No | 16.4 (9.2, 28.0) | 29 (1, 83) | 3 | stable | -1.2 (-3.2, 0.9) |
Harrison County | Urban | No | 16.4 (11.8, 22.3) | 30 (2, 81) | 9 | falling | -2.3 (-4.1, -0.5) |
LaPorte County | Urban | No | 16.3 (13.4, 19.6) | 31 (5, 74) | 23 | falling | -2.0 (-2.8, -1.3) |
Scott County | Rural | No | 16.2 (10.4, 24.5) | 32 (1, 83) | 5 |
|
|
LaGrange County | Rural | No | 16.2 (11.2, 22.8) | 33 (1, 83) | 7 | falling | -2.6 (-4.3, -1.0) |
Jennings County | Rural | No | 16.2 (10.6, 23.8) | 34 (1, 83) | 6 | stable | -1.6 (-3.2, 0.1) |
Shelby County | Urban | No | 16.1 (11.8, 21.7) | 35 (2, 81) | 10 | stable | -1.2 (-2.6, 0.3) |
Whitley County | Urban | No | 16.0 (11.1, 22.6) | 36 (1, 82) | 7 | falling | -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2) |
Floyd County | Urban | No | 15.9 (12.5, 20.0) | 37 (4, 79) | 16 | falling | -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2) |
Steuben County | Rural | No | 15.9 (11.3, 22.0) | 38 (1, 82) | 8 | falling | -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1) |
Ripley County | Rural | No | 15.9 (10.7, 22.9) | 39 (1, 83) | 6 | stable | -1.5 (-3.2, 0.2) |
Owen County | Urban | No | 15.7 (9.8, 24.3) | 40 (1, 83) | 5 | falling | -5.4 (-23.7, -1.4) |
Fountain County | Rural | No | 15.7 (9.7, 24.8) | 41 (1, 83) | 4 | falling | -1.4 (-2.9, -0.1) |
Montgomery County | Rural | No | 15.6 (11.0, 21.8) | 42 (2, 83) | 8 | falling | -2.8 (-4.4, -1.4) |
Randolph County | Rural | No | 15.6 (10.3, 23.1) | 43 (1, 83) | 6 | falling | -1.9 (-3.6, -0.4) |
Fayette County | Rural | No | 15.6 (10.2, 23.2) | 44 (1, 83) | 5 | falling | -1.9 (-3.7, -0.1) |
Cass County | Rural | No | 15.4 (11.0, 21.3) | 45 (2, 83) | 8 | stable | 0.1 (-3.6, 12.3) |
Lake County | Urban | No | 15.4 (14.0, 16.9) | 46 (21, 65) | 98 | falling | -2.5 (-3.0, -2.0) |
Delaware County | Urban | No | 15.3 (12.5, 18.8) | 47 (8, 78) | 21 | falling | -1.7 (-2.6, -0.8) |
Vermillion County | Urban | No | 15.3 (8.3, 26.1) | 48 (1, 83) | 3 | stable | -1.9 (-4.3, 0.0) |
Carroll County | Urban | No | 15.1 (9.4, 23.5) | 49 (1, 83) | 4 | stable | -0.9 (-2.7, 0.8) |
Putnam County | Rural | No | 15.1 (10.4, 21.3) | 50 (3, 83) | 7 | stable | -1.1 (-2.7, 0.6) |
Tipton County | Urban | No | 15.0 (8.8, 24.9) | 51 (1, 83) | 4 |
|
|
Dubois County | Rural | No | 14.9 (10.6, 20.6) | 52 (2, 83) | 8 | stable | -0.9 (-2.3, 0.6) |
Adams County | Rural | No | 14.9 (10.2, 21.1) | 53 (2, 83) | 7 | falling | -1.9 (-3.5, -0.5) |
Franklin County | Urban | No | 14.8 (9.2, 22.8) | 54 (1, 83) | 5 | stable | -1.9 (-4.3, 0.6) |
Huntington County | Rural | No | 14.8 (10.2, 20.9) | 55 (3, 83) | 7 | falling | -2.4 (-4.0, -1.0) |
Decatur County | Rural | No | 14.8 (9.5, 22.0) | 56 (1, 83) | 5 | falling | -1.8 (-3.3, -0.3) |
Madison County | Urban | No | 14.7 (12.2, 17.6) | 57 (15, 78) | 26 | stable | 10.4 (-2.0, 18.8) |
Morgan County | Urban | No | 14.5 (11.2, 18.7) | 58 (8, 81) | 13 | falling | -1.7 (-2.9, -0.5) |
Boone County | Urban | No | 14.5 (11.0, 18.9) | 59 (7, 82) | 12 | falling | -1.9 (-3.0, -0.7) |
Elkhart County | Urban | No | 14.5 (12.4, 16.9) | 60 (18, 78) | 34 | falling | -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1) |
Vanderburgh County | Urban | No | 14.5 (12.3, 16.9) | 61 (19, 77) | 34 | falling | -2.2 (-2.8, -1.5) |
Noble County | Rural | No | 14.4 (10.3, 19.8) | 62 (4, 83) | 8 | falling | -1.9 (-3.3, -0.5) |
DeKalb County | Rural | No | 14.4 (10.1, 20.0) | 63 (5, 83) | 8 | falling | -2.2 (-3.6, -1.0) |
Jasper County | Urban | No | 14.4 (9.8, 20.7) | 64 (2, 83) | 6 | falling | -1.8 (-3.2, -0.3) |
Tippecanoe County | Urban | No | 14.2 (11.8, 17.1) | 65 (16, 79) | 24 | stable | -1.2 (-2.1, 2.6) |
St. Joseph County | Urban | No | 14.1 (12.3, 16.2) | 66 (26, 77) | 46 | falling | -2.3 (-2.9, -1.8) |
Knox County | Rural | No | 14.1 (9.6, 20.0) | 67 (4, 83) | 7 | falling | -1.8 (-3.5, -0.3) |
Bartholomew County | Urban | No | 13.9 (10.9, 17.7) | 68 (12, 81) | 14 | falling | -2.2 (-3.4, -1.0) |
White County | Rural | No | 13.9 (9.1, 20.9) | 69 (3, 83) | 5 | stable | -1.5 (-3.8, 0.7) |
Wells County | Urban | No | 13.8 (8.9, 20.8) | 70 (3, 83) | 5 | stable | -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1) |
Clark County | Urban | No | 13.7 (11.1, 16.8) | 71 (18, 81) | 20 | falling | -2.9 (-3.9, -1.9) |
Kosciusko County | Rural | No | 13.7 (10.6, 17.4) | 72 (14, 82) | 14 | falling | -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2) |
Marion County | Urban | No | 13.5 (12.5, 14.6) | 73 (42, 75) | 132 | falling | -2.2 (-2.6, -1.7) |
Allen County | Urban | No | 13.3 (11.8, 14.9) | 74 (37, 78) | 58 | falling | -2.3 (-3.0, -1.6) |
Parke County | Rural | No | 13.2 (7.7, 22.1) | 75 (2, 83) | 3 |
|
|
Johnson County | Urban | No | 13.1 (10.9, 15.7) | 76 (26, 81) | 25 | falling | -2.0 (-2.9, -1.1) |
Spencer County | Rural | No | 13.1 (7.6, 21.5) | 77 (2, 83) | 4 | falling | -1.8 (-3.4, -0.1) |
Dearborn County | Urban | No | 13.0 (9.3, 17.7) | 78 (11, 83) | 9 | falling | -2.4 (-4.3, -0.7) |
Monroe County | Urban | No | 11.2 (8.8, 14.1) | 79 (41, 83) | 16 | falling | -2.4 (-3.5, -1.4) |
Hancock County | Urban | No | 11.1 (8.4, 14.6) | 80 (35, 83) | 11 | falling | -2.2 (-3.6, -0.5) |
Hendricks County | Urban | No | 10.4 (8.5, 12.8) | 81 (57, 83) | 20 | falling | -3.3 (-4.1, -2.4) |
Warrick County | Urban | No | 9.7 (7.0, 13.3) | 82 (48, 83) | 8 | falling | -4.2 (-5.7, -2.9) |
Hamilton County | Urban | Yes | 8.8 (7.4, 10.3) | 83 (75, 83) | 31 | falling | -3.3 (-4.2, -2.1) |
Benton County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Brown County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Crawford County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Martin County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Ohio County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Perry County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Switzerland County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Union County | Rural | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Warren County | Urban | *** |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/03/2024 1:06 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/03/2024 1:06 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.