Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

Colon & Rectum, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Count
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count ascending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana *** 14.9 (14.5, 15.3) N/A 1,175 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
United States *** 13.4 (13.4, 13.5) N/A 52,258 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7)
Marion County *** 14.5 (13.4, 15.7) 52 (31, 66) 137 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.8)
Lake County *** 16.6 (15.1, 18.1) 25 (14, 54) 101 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.9, -2.1)
Allen County *** 12.2 (10.7, 13.9) 72 (45, 78) 51 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.3, -2.6)
St. Joseph County *** 15.8 (13.9, 18.0) 38 (14, 66) 50 falling falling trend -2.4 (-2.9, -1.8)
Vanderburgh County *** 15.5 (13.3, 18.0) 42 (13, 71) 37 stable stable trend 7.8 (-7.5, 25.7)
Elkhart County *** 14.0 (11.8, 16.4) 59 (22, 75) 31 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.1)
Hamilton County *** 10.1 (8.6, 11.9) 79 (63, 80) 31 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.1, -2.2)
Porter County *** 14.7 (12.4, 17.4) 50 (15, 74) 30 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.2, -1.7)
Tippecanoe County *** 15.4 (12.8, 18.3) 46 (12, 73) 26 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.4, 0.0)
LaPorte County *** 16.4 (13.5, 19.8) 32 (7, 72) 23 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.9, -1.4)
Madison County *** 13.5 (11.1, 16.3) 66 (22, 78) 23 falling falling trend -3.1 (-3.8, -2.4)
Hendricks County *** 13.4 (10.9, 16.2) 67 (22, 78) 22 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.0, -2.2)
Vigo County *** 16.6 (13.5, 20.2) 26 (6, 71) 21 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.3, -1.7)
Delaware County *** 14.5 (11.8, 17.8) 51 (14, 77) 21 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.0)
Johnson County *** 12.1 (9.9, 14.7) 73 (35, 80) 21 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.2, -1.3)
Monroe County *** 13.7 (11.1, 16.9) 64 (16, 78) 19 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.6, -1.4)
Clark County *** 13.2 (10.6, 16.2) 71 (22, 79) 19 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.2, -2.3)
Howard County *** 16.9 (13.5, 20.8) 21 (5, 72) 19 stable stable trend 2.7 (-3.3, 9.1)
Wayne County *** 16.3 (12.8, 20.6) 33 (5, 74) 16 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.9, -0.6)
Kosciusko County *** 15.7 (12.3, 19.8) 40 (6, 77) 15 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -0.9)
Grant County *** 15.7 (12.3, 20.0) 39 (6, 77) 15 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -1.0)
Floyd County *** 15.5 (12.1, 19.7) 43 (6, 77) 15 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.8, -1.1)
Hancock County *** 13.8 (10.6, 17.8) 62 (13, 80) 13 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.2)
Morgan County *** 14.1 (10.8, 18.3) 58 (11, 80) 13 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.1, -0.7)
Bartholomew County *** 11.3 (8.6, 14.8) 74 (32, 80) 11 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.9, -1.7)
Jackson County *** 20.7 (15.6, 27.1) 8 (1, 66) 11 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.6, 0.8)
Henry County *** 15.5 (11.5, 20.5) 45 (6, 79) 11 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Shelby County *** 17.9 (13.2, 23.7) 19 (1, 76) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.1)
Steuben County *** 19.9 (14.7, 26.6) 12 (1, 71) 10 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.8, -0.1)
Knox County *** 21.2 (15.5, 28.4) 7 (1, 67) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.8, 0.2)
Wabash County *** 21.4 (15.5, 28.9) 4 (1, 68) 10 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.4)
Boone County *** 14.3 (10.5, 19.1) 56 (8, 80) 10 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.3, -1.1)
Dubois County *** 16.6 (12.1, 22.3) 30 (2, 78) 9 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.4)
Lawrence County *** 13.8 (10.0, 18.6) 63 (9, 80) 9 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.8, -1.0)
Marshall County *** 16.6 (12.0, 22.3) 29 (2, 78) 9 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.4, -0.7)
Warrick County *** 10.8 (7.8, 14.6) 78 (29, 80) 9 falling falling trend -4.4 (-5.9, -3.0)
Gibson County *** 20.3 (14.7, 27.6) 11 (1, 73) 9 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.8, 0.5)
Jefferson County *** 21.3 (15.3, 28.9) 6 (1, 70) 9 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.1)
Miami County *** 18.4 (13.3, 25.0) 17 (1, 77) 9
*
*
Harrison County *** 16.1 (11.6, 22.1) 34 (2, 79) 8 falling falling trend -2.7 (-4.5, -0.8)
Cass County *** 17.2 (12.2, 23.5) 20 (1, 78) 8 stable stable trend 0.3 (-3.7, 4.4)
Daviess County *** 21.4 (15.3, 29.2) 3 (1, 68) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Montgomery County *** 14.8 (10.5, 20.6) 49 (5, 80) 8 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.6, -1.7)
Putnam County *** 16.6 (11.7, 23.0) 24 (1, 79) 8 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.6)
Noble County *** 14.5 (10.1, 20.1) 54 (5, 80) 8 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.3)
Greene County *** 16.6 (11.6, 23.2) 27 (2, 79) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.6)
DeKalb County *** 13.2 (9.2, 18.5) 69 (9, 80) 7 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.9, -1.4)
Dearborn County *** 11.1 (7.7, 15.7) 76 (18, 80) 7 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.9, -1.5)
Whitley County *** 15.9 (11.1, 22.4) 36 (2, 80) 7 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.6)
Clinton County *** 16.5 (11.4, 23.3) 31 (1, 80) 7 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.2)
Huntington County *** 14.4 (9.9, 20.3) 55 (5, 80) 7 falling falling trend -2.6 (-4.2, -1.1)
Fayette County *** 20.7 (14.2, 29.5) 9 (1, 74) 7 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.2, 0.0)
Clay County *** 19.6 (13.4, 27.9) 13 (1, 77) 7 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.9, 0.5)
Jasper County *** 15.5 (10.5, 22.1) 44 (3, 80) 7 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.3)
Orange County *** 24.0 (16.3, 34.4) 2 (1, 69) 7 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.8, 0.6)
Wells County *** 16.6 (11.1, 24.0) 28 (1, 80) 6 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.4, 0.3)
Posey County *** 18.6 (12.4, 27.0) 15 (1, 79) 6 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.0, -0.6)
Adams County *** 14.5 (9.6, 21.0) 53 (3, 80) 6 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.6, -0.2)
Jay County *** 20.6 (13.8, 30.0) 10 (1, 78) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.2)
LaGrange County *** 14.3 (9.4, 20.8) 57 (4, 80) 6 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.6, -1.3)
Jennings County *** 14.9 (9.7, 22.1) 48 (2, 80) 5 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.3, -0.2)
Scott County *** 19.0 (12.4, 28.0) 14 (1, 80) 5
*
*
Starke County *** 15.9 (10.3, 23.9) 37 (2, 80) 5 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.4, -0.2)
Washington County *** 16.6 (10.8, 24.7) 23 (1, 80) 5 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.4)
Owen County *** 18.5 (11.8, 28.1) 16 (1, 80) 5 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.9, 2.3)
Sullivan County *** 16.7 (10.6, 25.4) 22 (1, 80) 5 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.6, -1.6)
Decatur County *** 13.2 (8.3, 20.1) 68 (5, 80) 5 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.8, -0.4)
Pulaski County *** 25.1 (15.7, 38.9) 1 (1, 75) 5
*
*
Spencer County *** 15.3 (9.4, 23.9) 47 (2, 80) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.9, 0.3)
Vermillion County *** 21.3 (12.8, 33.6) 5 (1, 80) 4 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.5, 0.2)
Franklin County *** 13.6 (8.3, 21.4) 65 (3, 80) 4 stable stable trend -2.3 (-4.8, 0.2)
Ripley County *** 11.0 (6.7, 17.2) 77 (15, 80) 4 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.4)
Carroll County *** 13.9 (8.3, 22.2) 60 (2, 80) 4 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.0, 0.9)
Fulton County *** 16.1 (9.7, 25.4) 35 (1, 80) 4
*
*
Randolph County *** 9.9 (6.0, 15.8) 80 (23, 80) 4 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.2, -1.4)
White County *** 11.3 (6.7, 18.2) 75 (10, 80) 4 stable stable trend -2.1 (-4.1, 0.0)
Fountain County *** 15.6 (9.3, 25.1) 41 (1, 80) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Parke County *** 13.9 (8.2, 22.8) 61 (2, 80) 4
*
*
Blackford County *** 18.3 (10.6, 30.5) 18 (1, 80) 3 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.2, 1.4)
Tipton County *** 13.2 (7.5, 22.5) 70 (2, 80) 3
*
*
Benton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ohio County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rush County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Switzerland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/30/2021 1:59 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top