Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Indiana by County

Pancreas, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Indiana *** 12.0 (11.6, 12.3) N/A 979 rising rising trend 0.4 (0.3, 0.5)
United States *** 11.1 (11.0, 11.1) N/A 44,868 stable stable trend 0.1 (0.0, 0.2)
Tipton County *** 19.7 (12.0, 31.1) 1 (1, 70) 4
*
*
Pulaski County *** 17.7 (10.5, 29.2) 2 (1, 71) 4
*
*
Huntington County *** 16.5 (11.7, 22.9) 3 (1, 63) 8 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.8, 3.0)
Cass County *** 16.1 (11.3, 22.3) 4 (1, 67) 8 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.4, 2.9)
Shelby County *** 15.8 (11.5, 21.2) 5 (1, 62) 9 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.1, 3.6)
DeKalb County *** 15.0 (10.6, 20.6) 6 (1, 68) 8
*
*
Clinton County *** 14.9 (10.0, 21.6) 7 (1, 71) 6
*
*
LaPorte County *** 14.9 (12.2, 18.1) 8 (1, 51) 22 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.2, 2.0)
Henry County *** 14.9 (11.0, 19.8) 9 (1, 66) 10 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.3, 2.8)
Kosciusko County *** 14.7 (11.5, 18.6) 10 (1, 60) 14 rising rising trend 1.9 (0.6, 3.2)
Ripley County *** 14.5 (9.6, 21.2) 11 (1, 71) 6
*
*
Dearborn County *** 14.1 (10.3, 19.1) 12 (1, 69) 9 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.6, 1.9)
Franklin County *** 14.1 (8.8, 21.7) 13 (1, 73) 5
*
*
St. Joseph County *** 13.6 (11.9, 15.6) 14 (4, 49) 45 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.3, 1.3)
Knox County *** 13.5 (9.2, 19.2) 15 (1, 71) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.4, 1.9)
Hancock County *** 13.5 (10.3, 17.3) 16 (2, 66) 13 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.0, 1.7)
Howard County *** 13.2 (10.4, 16.7) 17 (2, 64) 16 stable stable trend 0.6 (-0.7, 2.0)
Jennings County *** 13.1 (8.2, 20.1) 18 (1, 73) 5
*
*
Vanderburgh County *** 13.1 (11.1, 15.4) 19 (4, 60) 31 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.5)
Fountain County *** 13.0 (7.5, 21.6) 20 (1, 73) 3
*
*
Lawrence County *** 12.9 (9.3, 17.7) 21 (1, 71) 9
*
*
Vigo County *** 12.9 (10.2, 16.0) 22 (3, 65) 17 rising rising trend 1.8 (0.6, 3.1)
Marion County *** 12.6 (11.6, 13.7) 23 (11, 49) 124 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.5)
Starke County *** 12.5 (7.4, 20.1) 24 (1, 73) 4
*
*
Allen County *** 12.3 (10.9, 13.9) 25 (10, 57) 54 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 0.9)
Tippecanoe County *** 12.3 (10.0, 14.9) 26 (5, 66) 21 stable stable trend -7.9 (-22.6, 9.6)
Boone County *** 12.2 (8.8, 16.7) 27 (2, 71) 8 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.5, 1.9)
Grant County *** 12.2 (9.1, 16.0) 28 (3, 70) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3)
Greene County *** 12.1 (8.0, 17.9) 29 (1, 73) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.5, 3.4)
Scott County *** 12.1 (7.3, 19.2) 30 (1, 73) 4 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.2, 3.0)
Jackson County *** 12.0 (8.3, 17.0) 31 (2, 73) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.9)
Fulton County *** 11.9 (7.0, 19.4) 32 (1, 73) 4
*
*
Madison County *** 11.9 (9.7, 14.5) 33 (7, 67) 21 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.6, 1.2)
Harrison County *** 11.9 (8.0, 17.2) 34 (2, 73) 6
*
*
Morgan County *** 11.8 (8.8, 15.7) 35 (3, 70) 11 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.6, 1.3)
Montgomery County *** 11.8 (8.1, 16.9) 36 (2, 72) 7 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.1)
Lake County *** 11.8 (10.6, 13.1) 37 (15, 58) 74 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.9, 0.3)
Floyd County *** 11.8 (8.9, 15.3) 38 (5, 70) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.0, 1.8)
Noble County *** 11.7 (8.0, 16.6) 39 (2, 73) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Clay County *** 11.6 (7.2, 18.0) 40 (1, 73) 4 stable stable trend 1.5 (-0.5, 3.5)
Hamilton County *** 11.6 (9.9, 13.4) 41 (13, 64) 37 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.3, 1.8)
Porter County *** 11.5 (9.5, 13.8) 42 (10, 67) 25 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.4)
Daviess County *** 11.5 (7.2, 17.5) 43 (2, 73) 4
*
*
Hendricks County *** 11.5 (9.3, 13.9) 44 (9, 68) 21 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Orange County *** 11.3 (6.4, 19.1) 45 (1, 73) 3
*
*
Posey County *** 11.2 (6.6, 17.9) 46 (1, 73) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.3)
Decatur County *** 11.2 (6.8, 17.6) 47 (2, 73) 4
*
*
Johnson County *** 11.1 (9.0, 13.5) 48 (11, 69) 19 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Wayne County *** 11.0 (8.2, 14.7) 49 (6, 72) 10 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.8, 0.7)
Whitley County *** 11.0 (7.2, 16.4) 50 (3, 73) 5
*
*
Warrick County *** 10.9 (8.0, 14.8) 51 (5, 73) 9 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.3, 2.2)
Bartholomew County *** 10.9 (8.2, 14.3) 52 (7, 71) 11 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.2, 2.1)
Clark County *** 10.7 (8.4, 13.5) 53 (11, 71) 15 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.5, 2.5)
Delaware County *** 10.6 (8.4, 13.4) 54 (12, 72) 16 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.3)
Monroe County *** 10.6 (8.3, 13.3) 55 (12, 72) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.9, 0.8)
White County *** 10.5 (6.3, 16.8) 56 (2, 73) 4
*
*
Marshall County *** 10.5 (7.2, 14.9) 57 (5, 73) 7 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.2, 1.7)
Fayette County *** 10.4 (6.1, 17.1) 58 (2, 73) 4 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.6, 1.2)
Gibson County *** 10.4 (6.7, 15.7) 59 (3, 73) 5
*
*
Jasper County *** 10.3 (6.4, 15.9) 60 (3, 73) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.6, 1.1)
Carroll County *** 10.3 (5.8, 17.4) 61 (2, 73) 3
*
*
Elkhart County *** 10.2 (8.5, 12.3) 62 (21, 71) 24 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Miami County *** 9.8 (6.1, 15.0) 63 (5, 73) 5 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.9, 1.5)
Adams County *** 9.7 (5.9, 15.0) 64 (4, 73) 4 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.6, 1.7)
Putnam County *** 9.6 (6.0, 14.7) 65 (5, 73) 5 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.5, 2.4)
Wabash County *** 9.5 (5.9, 14.9) 66 (5, 73) 5
*
*
Washington County *** 9.5 (5.5, 15.6) 67 (4, 73) 3 stable stable trend 0.5 (-1.9, 3.0)
Steuben County *** 9.1 (5.8, 14.0) 68 (8, 73) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.3, 1.6)
LaGrange County *** 8.6 (5.1, 13.6) 69 (6, 73) 4
*
*
Randolph County *** 8.6 (5.0, 14.3) 70 (8, 73) 3
*
*
Wells County *** 8.0 (4.6, 13.3) 71 (10, 73) 3
*
*
Dubois County *** 7.9 (5.0, 12.0) 72 (20, 73) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.5)
Jefferson County *** 7.7 (4.3, 12.8) 73 (11, 73) 3 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
Benton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Blackford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Brown County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jay County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Martin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ohio County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Owen County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Parke County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pike County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Rush County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Spencer County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sullivan County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Switzerland County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Union County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Vermillion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Warren County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/29/2024 11:08 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2030 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top