Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Iowa by County

Colon & Rectum, 2018-2022

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 8.9?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank ⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Iowa N/A No 13.5 (13.0, 14.1) N/A 562 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.4, -2.1)
United States N/A No 12.9 (12.8, 12.9) N/A 52,325 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Van Buren County Rural No 31.5 (18.3, 52.2) 1 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Emmet County Rural No 24.0 (13.8, 40.0) 2 (1, 57) 4 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.7, 3.3)
Keokuk County Rural No 23.9 (13.2, 40.5) 3 (1, 59) 3
*
*
Cherokee County Rural No 23.0 (13.5, 37.4) 4 (1, 56) 4 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.6, 1.2)
Appanoose County Rural No 22.9 (14.8, 35.1) 5 (1, 50) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-3.4, 0.8)
Greene County Rural No 22.3 (12.1, 38.9) 6 (1, 59) 3 stable stable trend -0.7 (-3.0, 1.1)
Madison County Urban No 21.2 (13.0, 33.0) 7 (1, 57) 4 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.1)
Allamakee County Rural No 20.8 (13.0, 32.5) 8 (1, 55) 5
*
*
Montgomery County Rural No 20.3 (11.3, 34.9) 9 (1, 59) 3 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.4, 1.3)
Buena Vista County Rural No 19.8 (12.4, 30.2) 10 (1, 57) 5 falling falling trend -2.7 (-19.0, -0.5)
Calhoun County Rural No 19.3 (10.5, 33.6) 11 (1, 59) 3
*
*
Union County Rural No 18.6 (10.5, 31.3) 12 (1, 59) 3 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.6, 0.5)
Monona County Rural No 17.9 (10.1, 31.6) 13 (1, 59) 3
*
*
Mahaska County Rural No 17.3 (10.8, 26.4) 14 (1, 59) 5 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.2)
Dickinson County Rural No 17.2 (10.8, 26.9) 15 (2, 58) 5 stable stable trend -1.9 (-3.9, 0.0)
Jackson County Rural No 17.0 (10.7, 26.1) 16 (2, 59) 5 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.4, 0.2)
Marion County Rural No 16.8 (12.0, 23.2) 17 (2, 56) 8 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.4)
Clayton County Rural No 16.7 (11.0, 25.3) 18 (2, 58) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.7, -0.4)
Poweshiek County Rural No 16.3 (10.6, 24.9) 19 (2, 59) 5 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.6, -0.8)
Bremer County Urban No 16.2 (10.4, 24.3) 20 (2, 59) 5 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.9, -0.8)
Boone County Urban No 16.2 (10.6, 23.8) 21 (3, 59) 6 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.7, -0.8)
Harrison County Urban No 16.0 (9.6, 26.0) 22 (2, 59) 4
*
*
Wapello County Rural No 15.9 (11.1, 22.2) 23 (4, 58) 7 falling falling trend -2.2 (-3.9, -0.8)
Mitchell County Rural No 15.7 (8.9, 27.3) 24 (2, 59) 3
*
*
Tama County Rural No 15.6 (9.4, 24.9) 25 (3, 59) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 0.4)
Buchanan County Rural No 15.5 (9.3, 24.3) 26 (2, 59) 4 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -1.1)
Plymouth County Rural No 15.4 (10.0, 23.0) 27 (3, 59) 5
*
*
Pottawattamie County Urban No 15.2 (12.1, 18.8) 28 (9, 52) 18 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.2)
Carroll County Rural No 14.9 (9.3, 23.1) 29 (3, 59) 5 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.1, -1.0)
Butler County Rural No 14.8 (8.6, 24.7) 30 (2, 59) 4 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.2, -1.1)
Lee County Rural No 14.6 (10.3, 20.4) 31 (6, 58) 8 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.4)
Page County Rural No 14.5 (8.8, 23.6) 32 (4, 59) 4
*
*
Muscatine County Rural No 14.0 (9.9, 19.4) 33 (7, 59) 8 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.5, -0.3)
Clinton County Rural No 13.9 (10.2, 18.8) 34 (9, 58) 10 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.5, -1.5)
Woodbury County Urban No 13.9 (11.0, 17.3) 35 (12, 55) 17 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Polk County Urban No 13.6 (12.2, 15.1) 36 (19, 48) 69 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.2, -1.3)
Winneshiek County Rural No 13.4 (7.9, 21.8) 37 (4, 59) 4
*
*
Floyd County Rural No 13.3 (7.6, 22.3) 38 (4, 59) 3 falling falling trend -2.2 (-4.3, -0.4)
Des Moines County Rural No 13.1 (9.0, 18.7) 39 (9, 59) 7 falling falling trend -3.4 (-4.8, -2.2)
Dubuque County Urban No 13.1 (10.3, 16.4) 40 (15, 58) 17 stable stable trend 11.7 (-2.5, 28.0)
Cedar County Rural No 13.0 (7.4, 21.6) 41 (5, 59) 4
*
*
Webster County Rural No 12.7 (8.4, 18.5) 42 (8, 59) 6 falling falling trend -1.5 (-3.2, -0.1)
Jones County Urban No 12.3 (7.4, 19.8) 43 (6, 59) 4 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.4, 0.1)
Scott County Urban No 12.2 (10.2, 14.6) 44 (22, 57) 26 falling falling trend -2.9 (-3.7, -2.2)
Benton County Urban No 12.0 (7.0, 19.3) 45 (8, 59) 4
*
*
Warren County Urban No 12.0 (8.4, 16.6) 46 (13, 59) 8 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.0, -1.5)
Black Hawk County Urban No 12.0 (9.7, 14.7) 47 (20, 58) 20 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.8)
Story County Urban No 11.9 (8.9, 15.7) 48 (15, 59) 11 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.4)
Linn County Urban No 11.9 (10.1, 13.9) 49 (24, 57) 34 falling falling trend -3.0 (-3.7, -2.3)
Jefferson County Rural No 11.6 (6.3, 20.5) 50 (7, 59) 3
*
*
Fayette County Rural No 11.4 (6.6, 19.1) 51 (9, 59) 4 falling falling trend -3.1 (-5.1, -1.4)
Washington County Urban No 11.2 (6.4, 18.6) 52 (8, 59) 4
*
*
Delaware County Rural No 11.0 (6.4, 18.6) 53 (9, 59) 3 falling falling trend -4.7 (-23.6, -3.1)
Cerro Gordo County Rural No 11.0 (7.3, 15.9) 54 (17, 59) 7 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.4)
Marshall County Rural No 10.7 (7.1, 15.6) 55 (16, 59) 6 falling falling trend -3.2 (-4.3, -2.2)
Jasper County Urban No 10.4 (7.0, 15.2) 56 (17, 59) 6 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.3, -0.1)
Sioux County Rural No 10.1 (6.5, 15.3) 57 (16, 59) 5 stable stable trend 21.4 (-3.8, 42.9)
Johnson County Urban No 10.0 (7.8, 12.7) 58 (31, 59) 14 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.6, -1.2)
Dallas County Urban No 10.0 (7.4, 13.4) 59 (27, 59) 10 falling falling trend -3.5 (-5.1, -1.8)
Adair County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Adams County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Audubon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Cass County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Chickasaw County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Crawford County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Davis County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Decatur County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Fremont County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Grundy County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Guthrie County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hamilton County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hancock County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Hardin County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Henry County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Howard County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humboldt County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ida County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Iowa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kossuth County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Louisa County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lucas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lyon County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Mills County Urban ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Monroe County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
O'Brien County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Osceola County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Palo Alto County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pocahontas County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Ringgold County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sac County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Shelby County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Taylor County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winnebago County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Worth County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wright County Rural ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/09/2024 5:26 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top