Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Kansas by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Kansas *** 158.3 (156.4, 160.2) N/A 5,561 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.3, -1.0)
United States *** 152.4 (152.3, 152.6) N/A 598,381 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Kingman County *** 315.8 (267.5, 371.2) 1 (1, 4) 35 rising rising trend 20.7 (2.2, 42.4)
Lane County *** 261.0 (181.2, 373.1) 2 (1, 97) 7 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.7, 2.5)
Greenwood County *** 209.0 (169.1, 257.1) 3 (2, 82) 22 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.7, 0.3)
Greeley County *** 208.0 (121.3, 340.8) 4 (1, 105) 4
*
*
Rush County *** 204.0 (151.0, 273.7) 5 (1, 102) 12 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.3, 1.4)
Crawford County *** 202.4 (183.9, 222.3) 6 (3, 42) 92 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.9, 0.1)
Chase County *** 202.4 (141.8, 283.4) 7 (1, 104) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.6)
Harper County *** 200.0 (160.0, 248.7) 8 (2, 95) 19 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.2, 1.1)
Elk County *** 198.9 (142.1, 276.8) 9 (1, 103) 10 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Geary County *** 198.2 (172.4, 226.5) 10 (2, 68) 43 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Rawlins County *** 194.7 (140.9, 268.6) 11 (1, 104) 10 rising rising trend 1.0 (0.2, 1.9)
Edwards County *** 194.6 (136.2, 272.2) 12 (1, 104) 8 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.4)
Doniphan County *** 193.6 (158.9, 234.7) 13 (2, 93) 22 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Cowley County *** 193.3 (175.4, 212.5) 14 (4, 55) 91 stable stable trend 5.8 (-3.2, 15.6)
Ellsworth County *** 192.4 (154.1, 238.8) 15 (2, 95) 19 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.1)
Wilson County *** 191.3 (158.5, 229.8) 16 (2, 95) 26 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 0.8)
Franklin County *** 190.9 (169.8, 214.0) 17 (3, 64) 62 stable stable trend -0.5 (-0.9, 0.0)
Grant County *** 190.8 (148.3, 241.5) 18 (2, 101) 14 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.6, 0.9)
Decatur County *** 190.5 (135.7, 264.4) 19 (2, 104) 11 stable stable trend 1.1 (-0.1, 2.2)
Clark County *** 190.1 (127.0, 278.8) 20 (1, 105) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.6)
Bourbon County *** 189.7 (163.1, 219.6) 21 (3, 81) 39 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.3)
Osborne County *** 189.5 (144.3, 248.3) 22 (2, 102) 13 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.4, 1.0)
Morton County *** 188.0 (134.1, 260.0) 23 (2, 105) 8 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.7, 1.4)
Cherokee County *** 186.1 (163.9, 210.8) 24 (4, 78) 53 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Anderson County *** 184.3 (151.7, 222.9) 25 (3, 97) 24 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Wyandotte County *** 183.1 (173.7, 192.9) 26 (13, 54) 297 falling falling trend -3.3 (-5.4, -1.3)
Atchison County *** 182.3 (156.9, 210.9) 27 (4, 89) 39 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.4, 0.0)
Labette County *** 181.8 (159.6, 206.5) 28 (4, 81) 52 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.6)
Russell County *** 181.6 (145.6, 225.0) 29 (3, 100) 21 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5)
Republic County *** 180.6 (137.8, 234.7) 30 (2, 104) 16 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.9, 1.0)
Woodson County *** 178.4 (125.5, 248.9) 31 (2, 105) 9 stable stable trend 1.0 (-0.4, 2.4)
Ness County *** 178.1 (125.5, 249.5) 32 (2, 105) 9 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.3, 1.5)
Sumner County *** 176.9 (156.6, 199.3) 33 (5, 84) 59 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Neosho County *** 176.9 (152.8, 204.0) 34 (5, 88) 41 stable stable trend -0.3 (-0.8, 0.2)
Linn County *** 176.5 (146.9, 211.3) 35 (4, 99) 27 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.8)
Hamilton County *** 175.1 (111.3, 262.8) 36 (1, 105) 5 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 0.9)
Butler County *** 174.2 (161.1, 188.1) 37 (15, 74) 137 falling falling trend -0.5 (-0.9, -0.1)
Phillips County *** 173.5 (135.0, 221.3) 38 (3, 104) 16 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.2)
Comanche County *** 171.4 (114.2, 257.1) 39 (2, 105) 6 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.1, 2.5)
Kiowa County *** 171.2 (116.8, 246.5) 40 (2, 105) 7 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.4, 1.9)
Smith County *** 171.0 (125.5, 231.1) 41 (2, 105) 12 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Shawnee County *** 170.9 (163.4, 178.7) 42 (25, 65) 412 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.6)
Nemaha County *** 170.9 (141.1, 205.7) 43 (5, 100) 27 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Marshall County *** 170.5 (141.9, 204.1) 44 (6, 99) 28 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.4)
Cloud County *** 170.4 (139.0, 207.7) 45 (5, 102) 23 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.6, 0.5)
Montgomery County *** 170.1 (153.6, 188.2) 46 (13, 84) 81 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.3)
Dickinson County *** 170.0 (148.9, 193.6) 47 (8, 94) 50 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.1, 0.1)
Osage County *** 169.6 (146.2, 196.2) 48 (6, 94) 40 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Saline County *** 169.6 (156.2, 183.8) 49 (17, 79) 125 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Leavenworth County *** 169.1 (157.1, 181.9) 50 (21, 76) 151 falling falling trend -1.6 (-1.9, -1.2)
Chautauqua County *** 168.6 (121.9, 231.0) 51 (2, 105) 10 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.4)
Pawnee County *** 167.7 (133.0, 210.1) 52 (4, 104) 17 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.7)
Scott County *** 167.0 (125.4, 219.2) 53 (2, 105) 12 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Wallace County *** 166.2 (92.5, 280.1) 54 (1, 105) 4
*
*
Marion County *** 164.8 (139.9, 193.7) 55 (8, 99) 35 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.5)
Brown County *** 164.6 (136.4, 197.8) 56 (6, 102) 25 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.0, 1.2)
Sherman County *** 162.9 (125.9, 208.5) 57 (4, 105) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.6)
Coffey County *** 162.8 (131.6, 200.1) 58 (5, 104) 20 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.8, 0.1)
Morris County *** 162.8 (125.9, 208.9) 59 (4, 105) 16 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.8, 0.4)
Allen County *** 161.8 (136.7, 190.7) 60 (11, 101) 31 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.5, -0.1)
Sedgwick County *** 161.2 (156.5, 166.0) 61 (43, 75) 925 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Ottawa County *** 160.2 (123.7, 205.7) 62 (4, 105) 14 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.9, 0.5)
Trego County *** 159.9 (116.4, 220.6) 63 (3, 105) 9 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.2)
Hodgeman County *** 159.5 (103.7, 243.1) 64 (2, 105) 5 stable stable trend -1.4 (-2.9, 0.1)
Wichita County *** 158.0 (98.1, 244.4) 65 (2, 105) 5 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.5, 1.6)
Lincoln County *** 158.0 (112.2, 221.0) 66 (3, 105) 9 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.0, 1.5)
Jefferson County *** 157.4 (136.2, 181.4) 67 (17, 102) 41 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Pratt County *** 156.8 (128.5, 190.4) 68 (8, 104) 23 stable stable trend -0.8 (-1.7, 0.1)
Graham County *** 156.2 (110.3, 222.4) 69 (3, 105) 8 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.9, -0.2)
McPherson County *** 155.8 (139.0, 174.2) 70 (27, 97) 70 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.7, 0.4)
Reno County *** 155.7 (144.2, 168.0) 71 (37, 93) 144 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.0, -0.2)
Logan County *** 155.4 (101.5, 229.7) 72 (2, 105) 6 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4)
Thomas County *** 155.1 (122.1, 194.9) 73 (7, 105) 16 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.3, 0.0)
Washington County *** 154.7 (121.2, 196.8) 74 (7, 105) 16 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Ford County *** 153.4 (134.0, 174.9) 75 (23, 102) 47 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.5)
Jewell County *** 153.1 (112.0, 211.7) 76 (4, 105) 10 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.2, 0.0)
Lyon County *** 151.4 (133.9, 170.6) 77 (29, 101) 58 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.2, 0.0)
Barton County *** 150.8 (133.4, 170.1) 78 (29, 101) 58 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.3, 0.0)
Finney County *** 147.7 (129.1, 168.3) 79 (29, 103) 48 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Seward County *** 147.5 (123.4, 174.8) 80 (18, 105) 27 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Rooks County *** 147.4 (110.8, 194.1) 81 (6, 105) 12 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.7, -1.3)
Kearny County *** 147.1 (100.3, 208.7) 82 (3, 105) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.7)
Harvey County *** 147.0 (131.8, 163.7) 83 (39, 102) 74 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
Barber County *** 146.4 (109.5, 194.3) 84 (6, 105) 11 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Gove County *** 145.4 (93.4, 218.9) 85 (3, 105) 6 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.8, 1.0)
Rice County *** 144.7 (117.2, 177.5) 86 (19, 105) 20 falling falling trend -4.1 (-7.1, -1.1)
Stafford County *** 143.8 (105.5, 194.2) 87 (7, 105) 10 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Clay County *** 143.2 (115.0, 177.3) 88 (16, 105) 20 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Ellis County *** 142.5 (124.4, 162.7) 89 (41, 104) 48 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.5, -0.4)
Miami County *** 141.8 (126.2, 159.0) 90 (46, 103) 62 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Pottawatomie County *** 141.6 (121.7, 164.0) 91 (33, 105) 37 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
Meade County *** 141.5 (100.1, 195.7) 92 (4, 105) 9 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Stevens County *** 141.4 (103.2, 189.7) 93 (8, 105) 9 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.5, 2.2)
Gray County *** 140.5 (103.0, 187.6) 94 (9, 105) 10 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.2, -0.2)
Riley County *** 140.0 (125.9, 155.4) 95 (53, 103) 76 falling falling trend -0.5 (-1.0, -0.1)
Mitchell County *** 139.8 (108.2, 179.5) 96 (15, 105) 15 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.6, 0.6)
Jackson County *** 138.4 (115.2, 165.5) 97 (32, 105) 26 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.3, -0.6)
Wabaunsee County *** 138.4 (107.5, 176.7) 98 (14, 105) 14 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.2)
Stanton County *** 138.1 (83.1, 219.5) 99 (3, 105) 4
*
*
Douglas County *** 137.5 (127.6, 148.0) 100 (66, 103) 150 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.7, -0.8)
Sheridan County *** 137.0 (89.9, 205.2) 101 (4, 105) 6 falling falling trend -1.6 (-3.1, -0.2)
Norton County *** 129.9 (96.6, 172.6) 102 (18, 105) 11 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.7)
Johnson County *** 129.2 (125.2, 133.3) 103 (86, 104) 843 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.6, -1.2)
Haskell County *** 128.2 (84.8, 186.5) 104 (7, 105) 6 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.8, 2.4)
Cheyenne County *** 126.7 (80.5, 193.8) 105 (6, 105) 6 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.0, 1.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/23/2021 8:21 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top