Death Rates Table
County
|
Met Healthy People Objective of ***? |
Age-Adjusted Death Rate† deaths per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Death Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michigan | *** | 162.7 (161.6, 163.7) | N/A | 20,843 |
falling 
|
-1.4 (-1.6, -1.2) |
| United States | *** | 152.4 (152.3, 152.6) | N/A | 598,381 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-2.3, -1.8) |
| Keweenaw County | *** | 118.5 (74.8, 191.7) | 83 (2, 83) | 6 |
falling
|
-2.6 (-4.1, -1.1) |
| Leelanau County | *** | 123.8 (107.8, 142.1) | 82 (66, 83) | 54 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.2, -0.9) |
| Ottawa County | *** | 135.4 (129.7, 141.3) | 81 (73, 83) | 436 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.3, -0.8) |
| Grand Traverse County | *** | 137.5 (128.5, 147.0) | 80 (65, 83) | 184 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.9, -1.1) |
| Benzie County | *** | 138.8 (119.6, 160.7) | 79 (31, 83) | 43 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.1, -0.4) |
| Washtenaw County | *** | 139.8 (134.4, 145.4) | 78 (68, 82) | 527 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.7, -1.3) |
| Clinton County | *** | 141.1 (130.6, 152.3) | 77 (59, 83) | 138 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-1.8, -1.0) |
| Missaukee County | *** | 142.9 (121.1, 168.1) | 76 (16, 83) | 33 |
stable 
|
-0.7 (-1.5, 0.2) |
| Oakland County | *** | 143.1 (140.4, 145.8) | 75 (68, 80) | 2,287 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-1.6, -1.3) |
| Midland County | *** | 144.6 (134.7, 155.1) | 74 (54, 82) | 166 |
stable
|
2.5 (-1.2, 6.4) |
| Livingston County | *** | 146.3 (139.4, 153.6) | 73 (59, 81) | 352 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-1.9, -1.4) |
| Kent County | *** | 148.0 (143.9, 152.2) | 72 (62, 78) | 1,020 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.4, -1.1) |
| Kalamazoo County | *** | 150.6 (144.3, 157.1) | 71 (53, 78) | 444 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.5, -0.9) |
| Dickinson County | *** | 151.0 (134.4, 169.5) | 70 (19, 83) | 65 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.5, -0.7) |
| Antrim County | *** | 152.1 (135.3, 171.0) | 69 (20, 83) | 66 |
falling
|
-1.5 (-2.1, -1.0) |
| Marquette County | *** | 154.2 (142.7, 166.5) | 68 (30, 81) | 142 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.4, -0.5) |
| Barry County | *** | 156.0 (143.8, 169.0) | 67 (22, 80) | 129 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.5, -0.5) |
| Gogebic County | *** | 156.3 (135.5, 180.3) | 66 (8, 83) | 44 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.9, -0.6) |
| Charlevoix County | *** | 157.0 (139.8, 176.1) | 65 (10, 82) | 68 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.7, -0.6) |
| Isabella County | *** | 157.4 (143.9, 171.9) | 64 (15, 80) | 103 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.6, -0.4) |
| Ingham County | *** | 157.6 (151.1, 164.3) | 63 (41, 73) | 464 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.2, -0.6) |
| Presque Isle County | *** | 159.3 (136.3, 186.2) | 62 (4, 83) | 43 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.8, -0.3) |
| Mason County | *** | 159.3 (143.0, 177.2) | 61 (10, 81) | 76 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.5, -0.4) |
| Eaton County | *** | 160.0 (150.8, 169.7) | 60 (25, 74) | 236 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.1, -0.4) |
| Saginaw County | *** | 160.5 (153.7, 167.6) | 59 (33, 71) | 435 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.5, -1.1) |
| Otsego County | *** | 161.4 (142.8, 182.0) | 58 (6, 81) | 58 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.5, -0.2) |
| Iron County | *** | 162.3 (137.7, 191.4) | 57 (3, 83) | 39 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-2.0, -0.7) |
| Ontonagon County | *** | 162.4 (133.2, 201.5) | 56 (2, 83) | 24 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.6, 0.4) |
| Menominee County | *** | 162.5 (145.1, 182.0) | 55 (7, 80) | 68 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.2, 0.1) |
| Emmet County | *** | 163.7 (148.3, 180.5) | 54 (7, 78) | 88 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.1, 0.0) |
| Allegan County | *** | 165.1 (155.6, 175.1) | 53 (15, 70) | 236 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.3, -0.7) |
| Cheboygan County | *** | 165.7 (149.1, 184.2) | 52 (6, 79) | 79 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.6, -0.3) |
| Huron County | *** | 166.2 (150.9, 183.0) | 51 (7, 77) | 94 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.1, -0.4) |
| Berrien County | *** | 166.3 (158.7, 174.3) | 50 (19, 66) | 376 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.4, -0.8) |
| Montcalm County | *** | 167.1 (154.7, 180.2) | 49 (9, 71) | 141 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.5, -0.6) |
| Shiawassee County | *** | 167.6 (155.8, 180.1) | 48 (9, 71) | 157 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.4, -0.7) |
| Houghton County | *** | 169.4 (152.5, 187.7) | 47 (5, 75) | 78 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.5, -0.5) |
| Macomb County | *** | 169.6 (166.2, 173.1) | 46 (25, 54) | 1,919 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.1, -0.8) |
| Iosco County | *** | 170.2 (153.7, 188.7) | 45 (4, 74) | 87 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.7, -0.8) |
| St. Clair County | *** | 170.6 (162.8, 178.7) | 44 (13, 63) | 380 |
falling
|
-1.2 (-1.4, -0.9) |
| Ionia County | *** | 170.9 (157.4, 185.3) | 43 (6, 70) | 124 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.4, -0.6) |
| Tuscola County | *** | 171.0 (158.0, 184.9) | 42 (6, 69) | 135 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.2, -0.3) |
| Oscoda County | *** | 171.3 (140.6, 208.2) | 41 (1, 83) | 26 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-2.0, -0.2) |
| Wexford County | *** | 171.4 (154.7, 189.7) | 40 (4, 74) | 81 |
falling
|
-3.8 (-6.5, -1.1) |
| Lenawee County | *** | 171.6 (161.6, 182.2) | 39 (9, 64) | 230 |
falling
|
-0.8 (-1.1, -0.6) |
| Newaygo County | *** | 171.6 (157.6, 186.7) | 38 (5, 69) | 117 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.5, -0.5) |
| Oceana County | *** | 171.7 (153.4, 191.9) | 37 (3, 73) | 68 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.5, -0.3) |
| Arenac County | *** | 172.0 (149.3, 197.9) | 36 (1, 79) | 46 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.6, -0.5) |
| Lapeer County | *** | 172.1 (161.4, 183.5) | 35 (7, 65) | 202 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.3, -0.5) |
| Chippewa County | *** | 172.2 (156.1, 189.6) | 34 (4, 73) | 86 |
falling
|
-0.6 (-1.1, -0.1) |
| Van Buren County | *** | 172.2 (160.5, 184.6) | 33 (7, 66) | 170 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.3, -0.5) |
| Gratiot County | *** | 172.6 (156.8, 189.7) | 32 (4, 72) | 91 |
falling
|
-0.6 (-1.1, -0.1) |
| Monroe County | *** | 172.9 (164.7, 181.5) | 31 (10, 61) | 347 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.3, -0.8) |
| Cass County | *** | 173.0 (159.7, 187.3) | 30 (5, 69) | 133 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-2.1, 1.8) |
| Genesee County | *** | 173.4 (168.3, 178.6) | 29 (14, 53) | 931 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.1, -1.1) |
| Delta County | *** | 174.1 (159.2, 190.3) | 28 (4, 69) | 109 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.4, -0.5) |
| Bay County | *** | 174.6 (165.0, 184.6) | 27 (7, 60) | 266 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.1, -0.7) |
| Wayne County | *** | 174.7 (172.1, 177.3) | 26 (17, 43) | 3,662 |
falling
|
-2.1 (-2.6, -1.6) |
| St. Joseph County | *** | 174.8 (161.8, 188.5) | 25 (5, 65) | 141 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.4, -0.7) |
| Crawford County | *** | 176.3 (152.7, 203.5) | 24 (2, 78) | 44 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.2, -0.2) |
| Osceola County | *** | 177.1 (157.5, 198.8) | 23 (2, 72) | 63 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.3, -0.4) |
| Hillsdale County | *** | 177.8 (163.1, 193.5) | 22 (3, 63) | 116 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.1, -0.3) |
| Alpena County | *** | 178.4 (161.6, 196.8) | 21 (2, 69) | 88 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.4, -0.4) |
| Branch County | *** | 178.4 (163.0, 195.0) | 20 (3, 67) | 103 |
falling
|
-0.6 (-1.1, -0.1) |
| Muskegon County | *** | 178.5 (170.5, 186.7) | 19 (6, 50) | 394 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.0, -0.5) |
| Alcona County | *** | 178.7 (153.8, 208.7) | 18 (1, 78) | 44 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.4, -0.4) |
| Calhoun County | *** | 179.4 (170.5, 188.7) | 17 (5, 51) | 318 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.2, -0.7) |
| Mackinac County | *** | 179.8 (153.7, 210.3) | 16 (1, 78) | 37 |
falling
|
-1.6 (-2.3, -0.8) |
| Mecosta County | *** | 179.9 (163.8, 197.2) | 15 (2, 66) | 100 |
falling
|
-0.7 (-1.1, -0.3) |
| Gladwin County | *** | 180.0 (161.8, 200.1) | 14 (2, 68) | 82 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.5, -0.4) |
| Luce County | *** | 180.4 (143.8, 224.9) | 13 (1, 82) | 18 |
falling
|
-1.4 (-2.5, -0.3) |
| Alger County | *** | 181.6 (151.8, 217.0) | 12 (1, 81) | 29 |
falling
|
-1.0 (-1.9, -0.2) |
| Jackson County | *** | 184.3 (176.0, 192.9) | 11 (4, 39) | 390 |
falling
|
-0.9 (-1.2, -0.6) |
| Baraga County | *** | 184.4 (152.2, 222.5) | 10 (1, 81) | 24 |
stable
|
-0.4 (-1.2, 0.4) |
| Manistee County | *** | 185.4 (167.3, 205.4) | 9 (2, 64) | 82 |
falling
|
-1.1 (-1.5, -0.7) |
| Lake County | *** | 186.3 (159.9, 216.9) | 8 (1, 74) | 43 |
falling
|
-1.9 (-2.5, -1.3) |
| Sanilac County | *** | 188.2 (172.8, 204.8) | 7 (1, 52) | 118 |
stable
|
-3.2 (-16.4, 12.2) |
| Schoolcraft County | *** | 190.2 (159.3, 227.1) | 6 (1, 76) | 29 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-0.7, 0.4) |
| Kalkaska County | *** | 194.1 (169.3, 221.9) | 5 (1, 67) | 48 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.2, 0.0) |
| Ogemaw County | *** | 194.2 (173.9, 216.7) | 4 (1, 59) | 74 |
falling
|
-1.3 (-1.8, -0.7) |
| Montmorency County | *** | 204.9 (173.2, 242.4) | 3 (1, 67) | 38 |
stable
|
-0.6 (-1.6, 0.3) |
| Roscommon County | *** | 210.5 (190.4, 232.8) | 2 (1, 20) | 104 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-0.8, 0.4) |
| Clare County | *** | 215.1 (196.5, 235.4) | 1 (1, 13) | 107 |
falling
|
-0.6 (-1.0, -0.2) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/07/2022 5:54 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 08/07/2022 5:54 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.