Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Mississippi by County

Breast, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Name
County
 sort alphabetically by name descending
Met Healthy People Objective of 15.3?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi No 23.5 (22.5, 24.5) N/A 455 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.1, -0.7)
United States No 19.6 (19.5, 19.7) N/A 42,101 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.4, -1.1)
Adams County No 33.4 (23.2, 47.2) 5 (1, 37) 8 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.7, 1.2)
Alcorn County No 19.7 (12.6, 29.7) 37 (9, 43) 5 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.8, 0.4)
Attala County No 29.1 (17.5, 46.4) 14 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Bolivar County No 33.0 (22.8, 46.4) 7 (1, 37) 7 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.2, 1.7)
Chickasaw County No 28.7 (16.0, 48.1) 16 (1, 43) 3
*
*
Coahoma County No 33.3 (21.4, 49.9) 6 (1, 41) 5 stable stable trend 2.1 (0.0, 4.2)
Copiah County No 25.8 (16.0, 39.5) 21 (2, 43) 5 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.4, 1.0)
DeSoto County No 24.9 (20.7, 29.7) 24 (10, 37) 25 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6)
Forrest County No 22.1 (16.4, 29.3) 32 (9, 43) 10 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.6, -0.1)
Grenada County No 37.3 (24.6, 54.9) 4 (1, 37) 6 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.4, 3.0)
Hancock County No 16.2 (10.8, 23.9) 42 (20, 43) 6 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.3, 0.2)
Harrison County No 22.2 (18.6, 26.4) 31 (15, 40) 27 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Hinds County No 25.0 (21.5, 29.0) 23 (10, 36) 38 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.6)
Holmes County No 29.8 (16.9, 49.1) 13 (1, 43) 3
*
*
Jackson County No 19.3 (15.4, 24.0) 38 (19, 43) 18 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.2)
Jones County No 17.6 (12.4, 24.4) 39 (18, 43) 8 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.6, -0.4)
Lafayette County No 19.9 (13.3, 28.9) 36 (11, 43) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.2, 1.8)
Lamar County Yes 14.6 (9.5, 21.4) 43 (24, 43) 5 falling falling trend -2.3 (-4.3, -0.3)
Lauderdale County No 21.0 (15.4, 28.0) 34 (11, 43) 10 stable stable trend 5.5 (-0.2, 11.5)
Leake County No 20.1 (11.3, 33.8) 35 (4, 43) 3
*
*
Lee County No 22.7 (17.3, 29.4) 29 (10, 42) 12 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Leflore County No 28.7 (18.7, 42.3) 17 (1, 42) 5
*
*
Lincoln County No 22.6 (14.7, 33.5) 30 (5, 43) 5 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Lowndes County No 30.7 (23.3, 39.9) 11 (2, 35) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.2, 1.1)
Madison County No 32.9 (26.6, 40.2) 8 (2, 27) 20 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.7, -1.8)
Marion County No 26.2 (16.2, 40.6) 19 (2, 43) 5 stable stable trend 0.6 (-1.9, 3.1)
Marshall County No 28.5 (19.5, 40.6) 18 (2, 41) 7 stable stable trend 1.6 (-0.6, 3.8)
Monroe County No 32.8 (22.9, 45.7) 9 (1, 37) 8 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.8, 1.2)
Oktibbeha County No 21.2 (13.2, 32.3) 33 (6, 43) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.3, 1.7)
Panola County No 25.3 (16.8, 37.0) 22 (3, 43) 6
*
*
Pearl River County No 25.9 (18.8, 35.0) 20 (3, 41) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.4, 1.4)
Pike County No 28.8 (20.3, 39.8) 15 (1, 40) 8 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.3)
Prentiss County No 24.2 (14.1, 38.9) 27 (2, 43) 4
*
*
Rankin County No 17.0 (13.4, 21.2) 41 (26, 43) 17 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.5, -1.0)
Scott County No 23.7 (14.3, 37.3) 28 (2, 43) 4
*
*
Simpson County No 17.5 (10.2, 28.6) 40 (12, 43) 4 stable stable trend -2.0 (-4.0, 0.0)
Sunflower County No 29.8 (18.4, 46.1) 12 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Tallahatchie County No 45.9 (26.3, 75.1) 1 (1, 39) 4
*
*
Tate County No 24.6 (15.6, 37.4) 26 (3, 43) 5 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.4, 0.9)
Union County No 24.9 (15.4, 38.3) 25 (2, 43) 4 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.4, 2.3)
Warren County No 30.8 (22.0, 42.0) 10 (1, 37) 9 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.7, 1.4)
Washington County No 39.8 (29.9, 52.1) 2 (1, 23) 12 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.5)
Yazoo County No 39.3 (26.2, 57.0) 3 (1, 35) 6 stable stable trend 1.2 (-0.8, 3.4)
Amite County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Franklin County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
George County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Issaquena County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Itawamba County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson Davis County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kemper County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Neshoba County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noxubee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pontotoc County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sharkey County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stone County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tippah County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tishomingo County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tunica County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Walthall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Winston County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Yalobusha County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/01/2022 10:35 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top