Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Mississippi by County

Breast, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Mississippi *** 22.8 (21.9, 23.9) N/A 440 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
United States *** 19.9 (19.8, 20.0) N/A 41,951 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.5, -1.3)
Franklin County *** 50.7 (29.4, 85.1) 1 (1, 38) 3
*
*
Grenada County *** 37.3 (24.8, 54.5) 2 (1, 37) 6 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.4, 3.2)
Yalobusha County *** 37.0 (21.0, 61.9) 3 (1, 42) 3
*
*
Adams County *** 36.0 (25.6, 49.8) 4 (1, 33) 9 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.9, 1.1)
Sunflower County *** 35.9 (23.2, 53.2) 5 (1, 39) 5 stable stable trend -0.3 (-2.1, 1.6)
Yazoo County *** 34.1 (22.0, 50.7) 6 (1, 40) 5 stable stable trend 1.4 (-0.9, 3.7)
Marshall County *** 33.8 (23.8, 47.0) 7 (1, 36) 8 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.4, 4.1)
Madison County *** 33.7 (27.4, 41.2) 8 (1, 25) 21 falling falling trend -3.1 (-4.7, -1.5)
Coahoma County *** 33.7 (22.0, 49.8) 9 (1, 40) 5 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.2, 4.5)
Washington County *** 33.2 (24.4, 44.4) 10 (1, 33) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 0.9)
Lowndes County *** 31.4 (23.7, 40.8) 11 (2, 34) 12 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.2)
Bolivar County *** 30.8 (21.0, 43.8) 12 (1, 39) 7 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.2, 2.0)
Monroe County *** 30.0 (20.5, 42.5) 13 (1, 40) 7 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.3)
Chickasaw County *** 28.3 (15.8, 47.3) 14 (1, 43) 3
*
*
Holmes County *** 27.9 (15.5, 46.7) 15 (1, 43) 3
*
*
Leflore County *** 27.7 (18.1, 41.0) 16 (2, 42) 5
*
*
Attala County *** 27.7 (16.4, 44.6) 17 (1, 43) 4
*
*
Pike County *** 27.7 (19.4, 38.5) 18 (2, 41) 8 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.5)
Pearl River County *** 26.8 (19.5, 36.1) 19 (3, 41) 10 stable stable trend 0.1 (-1.4, 1.7)
Panola County *** 26.8 (17.8, 38.9) 20 (2, 42) 6
*
*
Copiah County *** 26.6 (17.3, 39.5) 21 (2, 42) 5 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.7, 0.9)
Warren County *** 26.1 (18.1, 36.5) 22 (3, 41) 7 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.3, 1.0)
Winston County *** 24.9 (14.1, 41.7) 23 (1, 43) 3
*
*
DeSoto County *** 24.6 (20.4, 29.4) 24 (10, 37) 25 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.4, 0.6)
Prentiss County *** 24.4 (14.2, 39.2) 25 (2, 43) 4
*
*
Oktibbeha County *** 23.8 (15.1, 35.6) 26 (3, 43) 5 stable stable trend -0.4 (-2.5, 1.8)
Forrest County *** 23.5 (17.6, 30.8) 27 (8, 41) 11 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.7, -0.1)
Leake County *** 23.3 (13.9, 37.5) 28 (3, 43) 4
*
*
Hinds County *** 23.0 (19.6, 26.9) 29 (14, 38) 34 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.5, -0.7)
Scott County *** 22.3 (13.0, 35.7) 30 (2, 43) 4
*
*
Harrison County *** 22.3 (18.6, 26.5) 31 (15, 40) 27 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Tate County *** 22.2 (13.6, 34.7) 32 (4, 43) 4 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.6, 1.1)
Jackson County *** 20.8 (16.7, 25.7) 33 (16, 41) 19 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.9, -1.1)
Lafayette County *** 20.7 (13.7, 30.1) 34 (9, 43) 6 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.7, 1.7)
Union County *** 20.3 (11.8, 32.8) 35 (5, 43) 4 stable stable trend 28.9 (-51.3, 241.5)
Lauderdale County *** 20.2 (14.7, 27.2) 36 (13, 43) 10 stable stable trend 5.9 (-0.9, 13.3)
Lee County *** 19.1 (14.1, 25.4) 37 (16, 43) 10 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.3, 0.8)
Jones County *** 18.9 (13.6, 25.9) 38 (14, 43) 9 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.5, -0.2)
Alcorn County *** 17.8 (11.2, 27.3) 39 (12, 43) 5 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.8, 0.7)
Lincoln County *** 17.5 (10.7, 27.4) 40 (12, 43) 4 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.1, 0.4)
Rankin County *** 16.3 (12.8, 20.5) 41 (27, 43) 15 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.7, -0.9)
Hancock County *** 15.8 (10.4, 23.4) 42 (20, 43) 6 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.9, -0.1)
Lamar County *** 12.0 (7.5, 18.2) 43 (32, 43) 5 falling falling trend -3.6 (-5.5, -1.6)
Amite County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Benton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Calhoun County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Carroll County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Choctaw County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Claiborne County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clarke County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Clay County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Covington County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
George County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Greene County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Humphreys County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Issaquena County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Itawamba County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jasper County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Jefferson Davis County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Kemper County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Lawrence County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Marion County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Montgomery County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Neshoba County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Newton County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Noxubee County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Perry County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pontotoc County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Quitman County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Sharkey County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Simpson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Smith County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Stone County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tallahatchie County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tippah County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tishomingo County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Tunica County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Walthall County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wayne County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Webster County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Wilkinson County ***
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/30/2021 2:00 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).


Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top