Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report for Washington by County

All Cancer Sites, 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of ***?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Washington *** 149.4 (148.2, 150.6) N/A 12,739 falling falling trend -1.7 (-1.9, -1.6)
United States *** 152.4 (152.3, 152.6) N/A 598,381 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Columbia County *** 192.5 (150.3, 246.7) 1 (1, 35) 15 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.6, -0.3)
Cowlitz County *** 184.2 (174.3, 194.6) 2 (1, 8) 272 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.4)
Grays Harbor County *** 182.1 (170.8, 194.2) 3 (1, 9) 203 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.8)
Lewis County *** 178.6 (167.7, 190.1) 4 (1, 11) 210 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.1, -0.5)
Mason County *** 172.1 (160.4, 184.5) 5 (1, 18) 175 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.6, -0.8)
Okanogan County *** 171.1 (156.3, 187.0) 6 (1, 22) 107 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.1, -0.3)
Pacific County *** 168.5 (150.9, 188.2) 7 (1, 29) 75 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Ferry County *** 165.9 (133.2, 205.6) 8 (1, 38) 21 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.8)
Pend Oreille County *** 164.9 (140.9, 192.7) 9 (1, 35) 38 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.1, -0.2)
Spokane County *** 163.7 (159.1, 168.4) 10 (5, 17) 995 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.2, -0.8)
Clallam County *** 162.2 (152.5, 172.6) 11 (4, 24) 241 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.3, -0.6)
Yakima County *** 160.8 (153.9, 168.0) 12 (5, 22) 421 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.0, -0.6)
Pierce County *** 159.3 (155.6, 163.1) 13 (7, 20) 1,480 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.0, -1.4)
Grant County *** 158.3 (147.2, 170.1) 14 (5, 29) 154 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.3, -0.5)
Skagit County *** 158.2 (149.9, 166.9) 15 (5, 26) 289 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.2, -0.6)
Clark County *** 157.3 (152.4, 162.2) 16 (8, 23) 829 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.4)
Snohomish County *** 156.3 (152.4, 160.3) 17 (9, 23) 1,295 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.4, -1.0)
Thurston County *** 149.6 (143.8, 155.6) 18 (13, 31) 521 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.5, -1.6)
Whatcom County *** 149.5 (142.9, 156.4) 19 (12, 31) 406 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.5, -0.9)
Stevens County *** 148.4 (135.6, 162.3) 20 (7, 36) 108 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.8)
Klickitat County *** 148.0 (129.8, 168.4) 21 (5, 37) 53 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.9, -0.8)
Island County *** 147.7 (138.0, 157.9) 22 (10, 34) 195 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.2, 5.4)
Kitsap County *** 147.1 (141.2, 153.3) 23 (15, 32) 495 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.2)
Walla Walla County *** 146.8 (134.8, 159.6) 24 (8, 36) 119 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Chelan County *** 146.0 (135.5, 157.1) 25 (10, 35) 153 falling falling trend -1.4 (-1.7, -1.0)
Benton County *** 145.2 (138.0, 152.7) 26 (15, 34) 318 falling falling trend -2.0 (-2.6, -1.4)
Asotin County *** 144.9 (127.9, 164.0) 27 (6, 38) 56 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.8)
Lincoln County *** 144.8 (120.1, 174.2) 28 (2, 39) 27 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.8, -0.4)
Jefferson County *** 143.4 (129.8, 158.7) 29 (9, 37) 102 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.0, -1.0)
Garfield County *** 142.7 (95.6, 212.6) 30 (1, 39) 6 falling falling trend -2.5 (-3.9, -1.2)
Kittitas County *** 139.3 (125.4, 154.5) 31 (11, 38) 76 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.1, -1.1)
Douglas County *** 136.5 (122.7, 151.7) 32 (13, 39) 73 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.3, -1.0)
Adams County *** 136.3 (111.9, 164.2) 33 (5, 39) 23 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Franklin County *** 135.5 (122.9, 149.1) 34 (17, 39) 90 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.4, -1.3)
King County *** 131.0 (128.9, 133.2) 35 (30, 38) 2,976 falling falling trend -2.5 (-2.9, -2.2)
Wahkiakum County *** 130.0 (97.5, 175.0) 36 (2, 39) 12 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.7, 0.7)
San Juan County *** 121.5 (103.8, 142.5) 37 (20, 39) 41 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Whitman County *** 121.2 (106.1, 138.0) 38 (26, 39) 48 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.9, -0.7)
Skamania County *** 118.7 (96.2, 145.7) 39 (15, 39) 21 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.0, -0.9)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 09/25/2021 4:57 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

*** No Healthy People 2020 Objective for this cancer.
Healthy People 2020 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.



Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top