Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report by State

Cervix (All Stages^), 2014-2018

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 7.2?
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 No 7.7 (7.6, 7.8) N/A 13,012 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.1, 2.2)
Puerto Rico 6 No 12.6 (11.9, 13.4) N/A 236 falling falling trend -4.1 (-5.9, -2.3)
Kentucky 7 No 9.8 (9.2, 10.4) 1 (1, 10) 224 stable stable trend 1.7 (-0.2, 3.6)
West Virginia 6 No 9.7 (8.7, 10.6) 2 (1, 16) 93 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2)
Mississippi 6 No 9.5 (8.8, 10.3) 3 (1, 13) 150
*
*
Arkansas 6 No 9.5 (8.8, 10.2) 4 (1, 14) 146 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Oklahoma 6 No 9.5 (8.8, 10.1) 5 (1, 13) 184 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Louisiana 7 No 9.4 (8.8, 10.0) 6 (1, 13) 224 stable stable trend -0.7 (-1.3, 0.0)
Alabama 6 No 9.4 (8.8, 9.9) 7 (1, 13) 240 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Texas 6 No 9.3 (9.1, 9.6) 8 (2, 11) 1,284 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
Nevada 6 No 9.1 (8.3, 9.9) 9 (1, 21) 107
*
*
Florida 6 No 9.1 (8.8, 9.3) 10 (4, 13) 1,030 falling falling trend -0.6 (-1.1, -0.1)
New Mexico 7 No 8.5 (7.7, 9.4) 11 (3, 31) 86 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.8)
Tennessee 6 No 8.5 (8.0, 8.9) 12 (8, 23) 302 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.7)
Indiana 6 No 8.3 (7.8, 8.7) 13 (10, 26) 279 stable stable trend -1.1 (-7.0, 5.3)
Delaware 6 No 8.3 (7.1, 9.5) 14 (1, 39) 42 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.1)
Kansas 6 No 8.3 (7.6, 9.0) 15 (6, 31) 117 stable stable trend 0.9 (-0.5, 2.3)
District of Columbia 6 No 8.2 (6.9, 9.7) 16 (1, 42) 30 falling falling trend -3.8 (-5.9, -1.6)
Missouri 6 No 8.1 (7.7, 8.6) 17 (10, 28) 256 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.4)
Iowa 7 No 8.0 (7.4, 8.7) 18 (9, 34) 123 stable stable trend 2.4 (-0.9, 5.9)
Georgia 7 No 8.0 (7.7, 8.3) 19 (12, 28) 432 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Alaska 6 No 7.9 (6.6, 9.4) 20 (1, 45) 27 stable stable trend -0.1 (-2.0, 1.9)
Ohio 6 No 7.9 (7.5, 8.2) 21 (12, 30) 479 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.0, 0.2)
New Jersey 7 No 7.9 (7.5, 8.2) 22 (13, 30) 389 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.2, -1.2)
South Carolina 6 No 7.8 (7.3, 8.3) 23 (11, 33) 208 falling falling trend -1.1 (-2.0, -0.2)
Illinois 6 No 7.7 (7.4, 8.0) 24 (14, 31) 531 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.9)
New York 7 No 7.7 (7.4, 7.9) 25 (17, 31) 843 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Nebraska 6 No 7.6 (6.8, 8.5) 26 (10, 41) 71 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.8, 1.5)
Wyoming 6 No 7.4 (6.0, 9.0) 27 (2, 49) 22 stable stable trend 12.4 (-13.2, 45.6)
Rhode Island 6 No 7.3 (6.3, 8.5) 28 (10, 45) 42 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.5, 1.3)
California 7 No 7.3 (7.2, 7.5) 29 (24, 34) 1,483 falling falling trend -1.1 (-1.6, -0.6)
Pennsylvania 6 No 7.3 (7.0, 7.6) 30 (22, 36) 505 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.2, -0.2)
Idaho 7 Yes 7.1 (6.3, 8.0) 31 (13, 45) 58 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.3, 1.6)
North Carolina 6 Yes 7.1 (6.8, 7.4) 32 (25, 39) 387 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.3)
Montana 6 Yes 7.0 (6.0, 8.2) 33 (11, 47) 39 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.9, 2.4)
Oregon 6 Yes 7.0 (6.5, 7.5) 34 (22, 43) 148 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.9, 1.3)
Hawaii 7 Yes 6.9 (6.1, 7.9) 35 (14, 46) 50 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
South Dakota 6 Yes 6.9 (5.8, 8.2) 36 (11, 49) 29 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.5)
Michigan 5 Yes 6.8 (6.5, 7.2) 37 (27, 42) 352 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.3)
Washington 5 Yes 6.7 (6.3, 7.1) 38 (29, 44) 250 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.2, 0.1)
Maryland 6 Yes 6.7 (6.3, 7.1) 39 (29, 44) 224 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.6, 1.2)
Wisconsin 6 Yes 6.6 (6.2, 7.0) 40 (29, 45) 196 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.2, 0.8)
Arizona 6 Yes 6.5 (6.1, 6.9) 41 (31, 45) 223 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.1, -0.7)
Colorado 6 Yes 6.3 (5.9, 6.8) 42 (33, 46) 178 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.8, -0.2)
Virginia 6 Yes 6.1 (5.8, 6.5) 43 (37, 47) 274 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.7, -0.4)
North Dakota 6 Yes 6.0 (4.8, 7.3) 44 (21, 51) 21 stable stable trend -0.5 (-3.4, 2.5)
Connecticut 7 Yes 5.8 (5.3, 6.3) 45 (38, 50) 113 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.3)
Maine 6 Yes 5.6 (4.8, 6.5) 46 (33, 51) 42 falling falling trend -2.5 (-4.0, -1.1)
Massachusetts 7 Yes 5.5 (5.1, 5.8) 47 (43, 50) 205 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.2, -0.7)
Minnesota 6 Yes 5.4 (5.0, 5.8) 48 (43, 51) 152 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.3, -0.5)
Utah 7 Yes 5.4 (4.8, 6.0) 49 (42, 51) 73 stable stable trend 0.9 (-1.8, 3.7)
New Hampshire 6 Yes 5.1 (4.3, 5.9) 50 (42, 51) 37 falling falling trend -2.9 (-4.5, -1.3)
Vermont 6 Yes 3.9 (3.0, 5.1) 51 (46, 51) 13
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/26/2022 9:33 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top