Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

All Cancer Sites (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Rate
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama 6 451.7 (449.3, 454.2) N/A 27,407 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.0, -0.3)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 449.4 (449.1, 449.7) N/A 1,728,431 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.0, 0.2)
Lee County 6 384.5 (370.4, 399.1) 67 (60, 67) 587 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.0, 0.4)
DeKalb County 6 388.0 (369.4, 407.2) 66 (55, 67) 348 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.1, -0.5)
Hale County 6 402.1 (362.7, 445.0) 65 (21, 67) 83 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.9, 1.2)
Cherokee County 6 402.8 (373.6, 434.0) 64 (29, 67) 161 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.7)
Coosa County 6 402.9 (357.1, 453.5) 63 (15, 67) 66 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.6, 1.4)
Russell County 6 405.2 (383.1, 428.2) 62 (40, 67) 265 stable stable trend -0.5 (-2.3, 1.4)
Winston County 6 412.1 (381.2, 445.2) 61 (25, 67) 145 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.6, -0.7)
Monroe County 6 413.9 (380.4, 449.9) 60 (20, 67) 123 stable stable trend -2.6 (-5.3, 0.3)
Choctaw County 6 414.2 (372.7, 459.4) 59 (14, 67) 82 stable stable trend -8.6 (-22.5, 7.9)
Chilton County 6 414.7 (390.2, 440.4) 58 (28, 67) 226 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.4, 0.4)
Washington County 6 417.6 (379.2, 459.1) 57 (12, 67) 94 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.5, 0.3)
Cleburne County 6 419.2 (379.4, 462.4) 56 (12, 67) 87 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.5, 1.5)
Shelby County 6 421.8 (410.2, 433.7) 55 (40, 64) 1,048 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.3, -0.4)
Lauderdale County 6 423.0 (406.3, 440.3) 54 (32, 64) 530 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.1, 1.7)
Coffee County 6 428.7 (405.8, 452.5) 53 (21, 65) 276 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.5, 0.8)
Randolph County 6 431.9 (399.1, 467.0) 52 (12, 67) 140 stable stable trend 0.8 (-0.5, 2.1)
Tuscaloosa County 6 432.0 (419.3, 444.9) 51 (31, 60) 929 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.4, -1.1)
Cullman County 6 434.7 (416.7, 453.3) 50 (23, 62) 469 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.3, 0.6)
Franklin County 6 435.4 (405.8, 466.7) 49 (13, 65) 167 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.6)
Covington County 6 436.4 (410.7, 463.4) 48 (16, 64) 235 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.4)
Conecuh County 6 437.8 (393.0, 486.7) 47 (6, 67) 80 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.4, 0.9)
Blount County 6 438.7 (417.3, 461.0) 46 (18, 62) 332 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.7, 0.8)
Houston County 6 439.7 (423.6, 456.3) 45 (21, 59) 591 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.3)
Mobile County 6 440.1 (431.7, 448.7) 44 (29, 54) 2,208 falling falling trend -1.3 (-1.7, -0.9)
Marshall County 6 440.8 (423.6, 458.5) 43 (20, 59) 526 falling falling trend -0.4 (-0.7, -0.1)
Dale County 6 440.8 (416.9, 465.8) 42 (14, 62) 269 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.0, 0.7)
Madison County 6 441.1 (432.0, 450.3) 41 (28, 54) 1,881 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.7, 0.3)
Fayette County 6 442.0 (403.0, 484.1) 40 (7, 66) 104 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.8, 1.7)
Escambia County 6 442.7 (416.0, 470.8) 39 (13, 63) 214 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.4, -0.4)
Marengo County 6 444.0 (407.0, 483.7) 38 (7, 66) 116 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.4, 0.9)
Greene County 6 446.5 (390.2, 509.1) 37 (2, 67) 54 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.1, 1.9)
Pike County 6 446.7 (415.5, 479.7) 36 (9, 63) 161 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.2, 1.2)
Colbert County 6 446.8 (425.1, 469.6) 35 (14, 59) 340 rising rising trend 0.8 (0.1, 1.5)
Barbour County 6 447.2 (415.4, 480.9) 34 (8, 63) 156 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.1, 0.9)
Butler County 6 448.8 (412.1, 488.0) 33 (5, 64) 122 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.7, 1.6)
Geneva County 6 453.9 (422.7, 486.9) 32 (7, 62) 170 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Baldwin County 6 455.7 (444.6, 467.2) 31 (16, 45) 1,369 stable stable trend 0.1 (-0.4, 0.5)
Marion County 6 455.9 (427.0, 486.4) 30 (7, 60) 200 stable stable trend 0.7 (0.0, 1.4)
Jefferson County 6 456.3 (449.4, 463.2) 29 (19, 40) 3,597 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.4)
Jackson County 6 456.5 (433.8, 480.2) 28 (10, 56) 331 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.4, 1.5)
Limestone County 6 456.8 (439.1, 475.2) 27 (12, 52) 519 stable stable trend 0.0 (-0.6, 0.5)
Montgomery County 6 457.5 (445.6, 469.5) 26 (15, 45) 1,185 stable stable trend 0.4 (0.0, 0.8)
Henry County 6 461.3 (423.1, 502.4) 25 (4, 63) 119 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.6, -0.1)
Perry County 6 465.6 (409.1, 528.1) 24 (2, 66) 55 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.6, 2.2)
Sumter County 6 465.9 (416.2, 520.1) 23 (2, 66) 74 stable stable trend 1.2 (0.0, 2.4)
Bibb County 6 466.1 (430.3, 504.3) 22 (3, 60) 130 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.7, 1.2)
Talladega County 6 467.0 (448.0, 486.8) 21 (8, 45) 484 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.3, 0.4)
Etowah County 6 467.9 (451.3, 485.0) 20 (9, 41) 643 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4)
St. Clair County 6 469.7 (451.3, 488.7) 19 (8, 41) 519 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.6, 0.4)
Lawrence County 6 473.5 (444.3, 504.3) 18 (4, 50) 210 stable stable trend -0.2 (-0.9, 0.6)
Bullock County 6 475.2 (421.5, 534.3) 17 (2, 65) 60 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Pickens County 6 477.8 (440.1, 518.1) 16 (2, 58) 129 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.7, 1.5)
Morgan County 6 480.0 (464.1, 496.3) 15 (6, 31) 729 stable stable trend -1.5 (-7.2, 4.6)
Wilcox County 6 482.7 (430.9, 539.4) 14 (1, 63) 70 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.2, 1.0)
Clarke County 6 483.3 (449.3, 519.3) 13 (2, 51) 161 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.3, 0.8)
Calhoun County 6 485.9 (469.5, 502.7) 12 (5, 28) 709 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.1, 0.8)
Dallas County 6 491.5 (463.2, 521.2) 11 (2, 40) 247 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.6, 1.3)
Clay County 6 492.0 (446.6, 541.1) 10 (1, 55) 94 stable stable trend -0.2 (-1.1, 0.7)
Macon County 6 492.2 (452.1, 535.2) 9 (2, 51) 126 stable stable trend 1.3 (0.0, 2.7)
Chambers County 6 500.1 (470.6, 531.2) 8 (2, 32) 233 stable stable trend 0.4 (-0.5, 1.4)
Lamar County 6 500.5 (455.3, 549.4) 7 (1, 52) 100 stable stable trend 0.7 (-0.6, 2.1)
Tallapoosa County 6 504.6 (477.8, 532.7) 6 (2, 25) 300 rising rising trend 0.9 (0.4, 1.3)
Autauga County 6 506.4 (481.9, 531.8) 5 (2, 23) 331 stable stable trend 0.5 (-0.1, 1.1)
Elmore County 6 512.9 (492.3, 534.2) 4 (2, 17) 492 rising rising trend 0.6 (0.1, 1.1)
Walker County 6 521.7 (499.6, 544.6) 3 (1, 14) 455 rising rising trend 0.5 (0.2, 0.8)
Crenshaw County 6 559.3 (510.0, 612.4) 2 (1, 16) 104 rising rising trend 2.8 (1.6, 4.1)
Lowndes County 6 593.4 (533.9, 658.1) 1 (1, 9) 80 stable stable trend -1.3 (-13.7, 12.8)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 12/08/2022 4:02 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top