Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Alabama by County

Lung & Bronchus (All Stages^), 2015-2019

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Recentaapc
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Alabama 6 62.5 (61.6, 63.4) N/A 3,980 falling falling trend -2.3 (-2.5, -2.0)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 56.3 (56.2, 56.4) N/A 223,216 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.5, -1.8)
Shelby County 6 47.6 (43.7, 51.7) 65 (55, 67) 119 falling falling trend -3.6 (-4.6, -2.7)
Limestone County 6 59.0 (52.9, 65.7) 49 (24, 63) 70 falling falling trend -3.3 (-4.8, -1.8)
Choctaw County 6 43.7 (32.3, 58.9) 66 (34, 67) 10 stable stable trend -3.2 (-6.4, 0.1)
Washington County 6 48.2 (36.4, 63.2) 64 (23, 67) 12 falling falling trend -3.2 (-5.9, -0.5)
Perry County 6 39.2 (25.5, 58.7) 67 (35, 67) 5 stable stable trend -2.9 (-7.3, 1.7)
Butler County 6 56.2 (44.5, 70.5) 53 (10, 67) 17 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.6, -1.0)
Chilton County 6 60.0 (51.2, 70.0) 45 (12, 64) 34 falling falling trend -2.8 (-4.5, -1.0)
Madison County 6 54.9 (51.8, 58.1) 55 (42, 63) 242 falling falling trend -2.8 (-3.8, -1.7)
Tuscaloosa County 6 55.3 (50.9, 60.0) 54 (37, 63) 122 falling falling trend -2.7 (-3.5, -2.0)
Coosa County 6 54.4 (39.7, 73.9) 56 (5, 67) 10 stable stable trend -2.5 (-5.7, 0.8)
Franklin County 6 64.2 (53.4, 76.6) 39 (5, 64) 26 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.3, -1.4)
Houston County 6 56.8 (51.3, 62.8) 52 (29, 63) 80 falling falling trend -2.3 (-3.0, -1.6)
Jefferson County 6 57.7 (55.3, 60.1) 51 (39, 58) 466 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Lauderdale County 6 59.9 (54.1, 66.3) 46 (21, 61) 81 falling falling trend -2.1 (-3.0, -1.2)
Mobile County 6 63.2 (60.1, 66.3) 41 (25, 50) 331 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.7, -1.4)
DeKalb County 6 52.6 (46.2, 59.7) 59 (36, 67) 50 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.3, -0.6)
St. Clair County 6 75.7 (68.6, 83.3) 10 (2, 39) 88 falling falling trend -2.0 (-3.1, -0.9)
Barbour County 6 59.6 (48.7, 72.5) 47 (7, 66) 21 falling falling trend -1.9 (-3.4, -0.5)
Marshall County 6 72.8 (66.2, 79.9) 14 (4, 42) 92 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.1)
Chambers County 6 66.6 (56.6, 78.0) 29 (4, 60) 33 falling falling trend -1.8 (-3.2, -0.5)
Elmore County 6 69.6 (62.3, 77.6) 24 (6, 50) 69 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.6, -0.9)
Dale County 6 65.4 (56.9, 75.0) 32 (6, 60) 43 falling falling trend -1.7 (-3.1, -0.2)
Marengo County 6 52.2 (40.4, 66.6) 60 (13, 67) 14 stable stable trend -1.7 (-3.6, 0.2)
Montgomery County 6 53.7 (49.8, 57.9) 58 (42, 64) 142 falling falling trend -1.6 (-2.6, -0.6)
Fayette County 6 62.3 (49.3, 78.3) 42 (3, 66) 16 stable stable trend -1.5 (-3.9, 0.9)
Cherokee County 6 62.2 (52.0, 74.3) 43 (7, 64) 28 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.4, 0.6)
Dallas County 6 61.4 (52.1, 71.9) 44 (10, 64) 33 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.6, 0.8)
Etowah County 6 69.9 (63.9, 76.4) 23 (6, 45) 103 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.3)
Monroe County 6 52.0 (41.5, 64.7) 61 (17, 67) 17 stable stable trend -1.4 (-3.8, 1.1)
Blount County 6 68.7 (60.7, 77.4) 26 (5, 52) 56 stable stable trend -1.3 (-2.6, 0.0)
Clarke County 6 58.0 (47.1, 71.0) 50 (11, 67) 20 stable stable trend -1.3 (-3.7, 1.1)
Morgan County 6 68.8 (63.1, 74.9) 25 (7, 46) 111 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.5, -0.2)
Calhoun County 6 76.0 (69.8, 82.6) 9 (3, 32) 116 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.2, -0.2)
Marion County 6 70.5 (60.2, 82.5) 20 (2, 56) 34 stable stable trend -1.2 (-2.7, 0.4)
Autauga County 6 70.8 (61.9, 80.6) 19 (3, 51) 47 stable stable trend -1.1 (-2.5, 0.4)
Cleburne County 6 65.0 (50.3, 83.2) 33 (2, 66) 14 stable stable trend -1.1 (-3.3, 1.2)
Lawrence County 6 74.4 (63.9, 86.4) 11 (1, 51) 37 stable stable trend -1.0 (-3.2, 1.2)
Lee County 6 49.5 (44.4, 54.9) 63 (46, 67) 74 stable stable trend -1.0 (-1.9, 0.0)
Talladega County 6 70.3 (63.3, 77.9) 22 (5, 48) 78 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.2, 0.3)
Walker County 6 87.3 (79.0, 96.4) 2 (1, 16) 83 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.1, 0.1)
Cullman County 6 68.3 (61.7, 75.6) 28 (6, 51) 80 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.4, 0.6)
Geneva County 6 78.0 (66.0, 91.8) 6 (1, 46) 31 stable stable trend -0.9 (-2.6, 0.8)
Pickens County 6 65.0 (52.4, 80.1) 34 (3, 65) 19 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.0, 1.3)
Coffee County 6 64.6 (56.2, 73.9) 36 (8, 61) 44 stable stable trend -0.8 (-2.2, 0.6)
Henry County 6 63.3 (50.4, 79.1) 40 (4, 66) 17 stable stable trend -0.7 (-2.8, 1.4)
Baldwin County 6 64.3 (60.4, 68.5) 37 (19, 50) 206 stable stable trend -0.6 (-1.4, 0.3)
Escambia County 6 77.6 (67.0, 89.5) 7 (1, 42) 39 stable stable trend -0.6 (-2.4, 1.2)
Colbert County 6 65.8 (58.0, 74.5) 31 (7, 56) 53 stable stable trend -0.3 (-1.8, 1.2)
Macon County 6 59.5 (47.3, 74.4) 48 (5, 67) 17 stable stable trend -0.3 (-3.4, 2.9)
Russell County 6 68.5 (59.9, 78.2) 27 (4, 54) 47 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.5, 2.2)
Covington County 6 77.1 (67.2, 88.2) 8 (1, 43) 45 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.5, 1.3)
Jackson County 6 71.9 (63.6, 81.1) 16 (3, 49) 57 stable stable trend -0.1 (-1.3, 1.1)
Clay County 6 94.2 (76.1, 116.0) 1 (1, 34) 20 stable stable trend 0.0 (-2.2, 2.2)
Wilcox County 6 64.7 (47.6, 86.6) 35 (1, 67) 10 stable stable trend 0.0 (-3.3, 3.4)
Conecuh County 6 73.2 (57.0, 93.5) 13 (1, 64) 15 stable stable trend 0.1 (-2.7, 3.1)
Sumter County 6 66.5 (49.4, 88.2) 30 (1, 66) 11 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.5, 3.7)
Tallapoosa County 6 72.6 (63.4, 83.0) 15 (2, 48) 47 stable stable trend 0.2 (-1.1, 1.6)
Winston County 6 70.3 (58.8, 83.8) 21 (2, 59) 27 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.5, 5.2)
Bibb County 6 82.0 (67.8, 98.6) 5 (1, 46) 24 stable stable trend 0.4 (-1.8, 2.6)
Pike County 6 64.3 (53.1, 77.2) 38 (4, 64) 24 stable stable trend 0.5 (-2.2, 3.3)
Lowndes County 6 73.6 (54.8, 97.5) 12 (1, 66) 11 stable stable trend 0.6 (-3.4, 4.7)
Lamar County 6 86.7 (69.1, 107.9) 3 (1, 46) 18 stable stable trend 0.7 (-1.5, 2.9)
Bullock County 6 71.6 (52.3, 96.2) 17 (1, 66) 9 stable stable trend 1.2 (-1.5, 4.0)
Randolph County 6 71.0 (58.5, 85.7) 18 (1, 61) 24 stable stable trend 2.3 (-0.5, 5.3)
Crenshaw County 6 85.9 (68.3, 107.2) 4 (1, 48) 17 rising rising trend 3.9 (1.3, 6.7)
Hale County 6 49.8 (37.3, 65.7) 62 (17, 67) 11 stable stable trend 8.0 (-5.6, 23.5)
Greene County 6 53.8 (37.6, 76.1) 57 (5, 67) 7
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 11/30/2022 11:45 am.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.

Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top