Incidence > Table
Incidence Rates Table
County |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
North Carolina 6 | 137.6 (136.3, 138.9) | N/A | 9,160 | rising | 0.9 (0.7, 1.1) |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | 127.0 (126.8, 127.2) | N/A | 249,750 | rising | 0.5 (0.3, 0.7) |
Wake County 6 | 147.4 (143.0, 151.8) | 17 (6, 36) | 892 | rising | 0.9 (0.5, 1.4) |
Mecklenburg County 6 | 142.6 (138.3, 147.1) | 28 (12, 45) | 845 | rising | 0.8 (0.2, 1.6) |
Guilford County 6 | 151.5 (145.5, 157.7) | 8 (2, 33) | 507 | rising | 1.7 (1.0, 2.4) |
Forsyth County 6 | 138.3 (131.6, 145.3) | 36 (12, 63) | 339 | stable | 0.5 (-0.3, 1.4) |
Buncombe County 6 | 153.5 (145.2, 162.1) | 7 (1, 35) | 287 | rising | 0.9 (0.1, 1.9) |
Durham County 6 | 142.7 (134.8, 150.9) | 27 (6, 59) | 262 | stable | -2.0 (-8.4, 1.3) |
Cumberland County 6 | 132.9 (125.3, 141.0) | 44 (19, 73) | 233 | rising | 0.9 (0.2, 1.7) |
New Hanover County 6 | 145.3 (136.6, 154.5) | 21 (3, 53) | 226 | stable | 1.1 (-0.1, 2.6) |
Union County 6 | 148.4 (139.2, 158.1) | 12 (2, 47) | 201 | rising | 1.8 (0.9, 3.0) |
Gaston County 6 | 130.4 (122.0, 139.2) | 54 (19, 79) | 192 | stable | 0.9 (-0.3, 2.3) |
Brunswick County 6 | 136.4 (126.1, 147.6) | 37 (8, 75) | 183 | stable | 0.7 (-0.6, 2.2) |
Cabarrus County 6 | 141.5 (132.1, 151.3) | 31 (5, 64) | 175 | rising | 1.3 (0.2, 2.7) |
Johnston County 6 | 141.5 (131.9, 151.6) | 30 (4, 64) | 169 | rising | 3.6 (1.7, 10.1) |
Alamance County 6 | 144.2 (133.9, 155.1) | 22 (4, 61) | 157 | stable | 0.9 (-0.6, 1.8) |
Davidson County 6 | 134.1 (124.4, 144.4) | 41 (10, 77) | 154 | rising | 1.6 (0.7, 2.7) |
Iredell County 6 | 133.2 (123.6, 143.3) | 42 (13, 77) | 152 | rising | 1.2 (0.2, 2.5) |
Henderson County 6 | 150.2 (138.5, 162.8) | 11 (1, 57) | 148 | rising | 1.4 (0.1, 2.8) |
Pitt County 6 | 147.9 (137.1, 159.3) | 15 (2, 56) | 147 | rising | 8.6 (1.7, 14.3) |
Rowan County 6 | 155.1 (143.6, 167.3) | 5 (1, 43) | 147 | rising | 6.0 (3.6, 10.0) |
Randolph County 6 | 134.3 (123.8, 145.6) | 40 (11, 78) | 131 | stable | 1.0 (-0.2, 2.3) |
Catawba County 6 | 119.7 (110.3, 129.7) | 77 (41, 91) | 130 | stable | 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3) |
Orange County 6 | 148.2 (136.5, 160.8) | 14 (2, 58) | 125 | stable | 0.7 (-0.7, 2.4) |
Wayne County 6 | 142.3 (130.2, 155.3) | 29 (3, 69) | 111 | stable | 1.3 (-0.1, 2.9) |
Onslow County 6 | 139.0 (127.4, 151.4) | 34 (5, 74) | 110 | stable | 1.1 (-0.1, 2.5) |
Moore County 6 | 135.3 (122.9, 148.7) | 38 (6, 78) | 104 | stable | -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5) |
Robeson County 6 | 124.3 (113.3, 136.0) | 68 (23, 89) | 101 | rising | 8.1 (0.8, 16.2) |
Harnett County 6 | 126.6 (115.0, 139.0) | 65 (19, 88) | 91 | stable | 0.3 (-1.0, 1.7) |
Rockingham County 6 | 130.8 (118.3, 144.4) | 53 (9, 85) | 91 | stable | 0.8 (-0.4, 2.0) |
Nash County 6 | 139.3 (126.1, 153.6) | 33 (4, 76) | 90 | stable | 0.6 (-0.8, 2.2) |
Craven County 6 | 135.2 (122.0, 149.4) | 39 (5, 80) | 90 | stable | 0.6 (-0.5, 1.8) |
Cleveland County 6 | 129.3 (117.0, 142.5) | 56 (13, 86) | 90 | stable | 1.0 (-0.2, 2.4) |
Chatham County 6 | 144.2 (129.8, 159.9) | 23 (2, 73) | 87 | stable | 0.7 (-0.7, 2.3) |
Carteret County 6 | 146.2 (130.9, 162.9) | 19 (1, 70) | 82 | rising | 4.9 (1.9, 10.8) |
Burke County 6 | 115.2 (103.5, 128.1) | 81 (42, 95) | 78 | stable | 5.8 (-1.4, 10.9) |
Wilson County 6 | 132.5 (119.0, 147.2) | 46 (6, 85) | 76 | stable | 0.3 (-1.1, 1.9) |
Lincoln County 6 | 131.3 (117.9, 145.9) | 51 (6, 86) | 76 | stable | 0.7 (-0.3, 1.8) |
Caldwell County 6 | 122.0 (109.2, 136.0) | 74 (26, 92) | 73 | stable | 0.6 (-1.4, 2.7) |
Haywood County 6 | 138.5 (122.9, 155.7) | 35 (2, 83) | 70 | stable | 1.3 (-0.5, 3.3) |
Surry County 6 | 123.3 (109.9, 138.0) | 70 (17, 92) | 68 | stable | 0.9 (-0.9, 2.9) |
Lenoir County 6 | 148.4 (131.1, 167.5) | 13 (1, 75) | 62 | stable | 0.7 (-0.8, 2.2) |
Rutherford County 6 | 116.4 (102.9, 131.5) | 79 (30, 96) | 60 | stable | -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6) |
Franklin County 6 | 128.0 (113.3, 144.2) | 60 (8, 90) | 60 | stable | 1.0 (-0.9, 3.3) |
Sampson County 6 | 144.0 (127.1, 162.6) | 24 (1, 79) | 59 | rising | 2.5 (1.4, 3.7) |
Granville County 6 | 142.7 (125.8, 161.4) | 26 (1, 80) | 56 | stable | 1.8 (0.0, 3.9) |
Stanly County 6 | 131.9 (115.9, 149.6) | 47 (3, 89) | 55 | stable | 0.8 (-0.5, 2.2) |
Wilkes County 6 | 101.6 (89.1, 115.6) | 93 (66, 99) | 54 | stable | -0.5 (-2.4, 1.6) |
Halifax County 6 | 145.8 (127.2, 166.6) | 20 (1, 80) | 53 | stable | 0.4 (-0.8, 1.7) |
Pender County 6 | 128.9 (113.1, 146.3) | 57 (6, 91) | 53 | stable | 0.6 (-1.8, 3.3) |
Beaufort County 6 | 128.4 (111.3, 147.7) | 59 (5, 93) | 49 | stable | 0.7 (-1.4, 3.0) |
Lee County 6 | 122.5 (107.0, 139.8) | 72 (14, 95) | 48 | stable | -0.4 (-2.3, 1.8) |
Columbus County 6 | 114.9 (99.7, 132.0) | 82 (29, 96) | 46 | stable | 0.4 (-1.9, 3.0) |
Edgecombe County 6 | 116.0 (100.4, 133.4) | 80 (24, 96) | 46 | stable | -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1) |
Person County 6 | 159.2 (138.0, 183.1) | 4 (1, 67) | 46 | stable | 2.5 (-0.2, 5.7) |
McDowell County 6 | 131.4 (113.4, 151.6) | 50 (3, 92) | 44 | stable | 0.6 (-1.9, 3.3) |
Duplin County 6 | 105.4 (91.1, 121.4) | 89 (52, 98) | 44 | stable | -0.3 (-2.4, 2.0) |
Stokes County 6 | 122.8 (105.8, 142.0) | 71 (9, 94) | 43 | stable | 3.1 (-1.8, 12.9) |
Transylvania County 6 | 127.5 (108.0, 150.0) | 63 (3, 94) | 41 | stable | 0.9 (-1.7, 3.9) |
Davie County 6 | 126.9 (108.8, 147.5) | 64 (4, 93) | 40 | stable | 2.5 (0.0, 5.5) |
Richmond County 6 | 127.5 (109.7, 147.7) | 62 (4, 93) | 40 | stable | 0.6 (-1.9, 3.2) |
Dare County 6 | 140.6 (120.1, 163.9) | 32 (1, 89) | 39 | stable | -0.3 (-2.3, 1.8) |
Macon County 6 | 128.7 (108.3, 152.3) | 58 (3, 94) | 39 | stable | -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4) |
Vance County 6 | 123.6 (105.6, 143.9) | 69 (6, 96) | 38 | stable | 1.6 (-0.3, 3.6) |
Watauga County 6 | 114.2 (97.0, 133.9) | 84 (21, 97) | 36 | stable | -0.6 (-2.6, 1.5) |
Alexander County 6 | 132.9 (112.8, 155.8) | 45 (2, 92) | 35 | stable | 1.2 (-0.4, 3.1) |
Pasquotank County 6 | 133.1 (113.0, 155.9) | 43 (2, 92) | 35 | stable | 1.2 (-0.4, 2.9) |
Bladen County 6 | 131.7 (111.2, 155.4) | 48 (2, 93) | 34 | stable | 3.3 (-12.3, 19.2) |
Cherokee County 6 | 129.6 (107.9, 155.1) | 55 (2, 96) | 34 | stable | 0.7 (-1.5, 3.1) |
Hoke County 6 | 113.2 (95.6, 133.0) | 86 (23, 99) | 31 | stable | 1.3 (-0.9, 4.1) |
Martin County 6 | 153.9 (127.5, 184.8) | 6 (1, 84) | 29 | stable | 1.3 (-1.0, 3.8) |
Jackson County 6 | 103.0 (85.0, 123.7) | 90 (42, 100) | 28 | stable | 1.0 (-1.0, 3.3) |
Scotland County 6 | 117.3 (97.1, 140.5) | 78 (6, 97) | 27 | stable | -0.8 (-3.7, 2.2) |
Yadkin County 6 | 102.2 (84.8, 122.5) | 92 (47, 100) | 27 | stable | -0.4 (-2.9, 2.2) |
Anson County 6 | 161.8 (134.0, 194.1) | 2 (1, 80) | 27 | stable | 2.5 (-0.7, 6.3) |
Madison County 6 | 151.2 (124.2, 182.9) | 9 (1, 87) | 26 | stable | 0.7 (-2.3, 4.3) |
Polk County 6 | 131.6 (105.4, 163.4) | 49 (1, 97) | 25 | stable | -1.2 (-4.8, 2.5) |
Montgomery County 6 | 110.0 (89.4, 134.2) | 88 (18, 99) | 23 | stable | -1.3 (-3.2, 0.8) |
Bertie County 6 | 147.4 (118.0, 182.7) | 16 (1, 93) | 22 | stable | 1.7 (-0.6, 4.1) |
Caswell County 6 | 125.5 (100.9, 155.0) | 67 (2, 97) | 22 | stable | 0.6 (-1.5, 2.9) |
Yancey County 6 | 143.1 (114.4, 177.6) | 25 (1, 94) | 21 | stable | 0.8 (-1.0, 2.6) |
Hertford County 6 | 114.3 (91.6, 141.5) | 83 (7, 99) | 21 | stable | 0.2 (-2.5, 3.2) |
Northampton County 6 | 127.5 (100.1, 160.8) | 61 (1, 97) | 20 | stable | 0.7 (-2.2, 3.7) |
Warren County 6 | 119.7 (94.8, 150.2) | 76 (2, 99) | 20 | stable | -0.9 (-4.6, 2.9) |
Ashe County 6 | 87.7 (69.2, 110.4) | 98 (68, 100) | 19 | stable | 0.1 (-4.0, 4.5) |
Mitchell County 6 | 150.8 (117.9, 191.0) | 10 (1, 94) | 18 | stable | 2.6 (-0.6, 6.3) |
Clay County 6 | 147.0 (112.2, 191.9) | 18 (1, 95) | 15 | stable | 0.4 (-3.5, 4.8) |
Currituck County 6 | 80.0 (62.4, 101.4) | 99 (84, 100) | 15 | falling | -18.1 (-37.2, -1.5) |
Greene County 6 | 121.1 (93.2, 155.0) | 75 (1, 99) | 15 | stable | -0.3 (-3.7, 3.3) |
Chowan County 6 | 131.1 (99.1, 171.0) | 52 (1, 99) | 15 | stable | 1.3 (-2.9, 5.9) |
Avery County 6 | 112.7 (86.0, 146.1) | 87 (3, 100) | 14 | stable | 2.2 (-1.1, 6.1) |
Pamlico County 6 | 122.2 (90.6, 163.6) | 73 (1, 99) | 14 | stable | -0.8 (-3.6, 2.1) |
Perquimans County 6 | 114.0 (85.6, 150.1) | 85 (2, 100) | 14 | stable | -1.3 (-5.1, 2.9) |
Washington County 6 | 126.0 (93.5, 167.6) | 66 (1, 99) | 13 | stable | -0.5 (-3.5, 2.7) |
Jones County 6 | 160.1 (116.9, 215.4) | 3 (1, 95) | 11 | stable | 2.5 (-1.2, 6.7) |
Swain County 6 | 98.6 (70.7, 134.2) | 94 (10, 100) | 9 | stable | -1.9 (-5.4, 1.6) |
Alleghany County 6 | 90.3 (62.9, 127.9) | 97 (18, 100) | 9 | stable | 0.1 (-4.1, 5.0) |
Graham County 6 | 102.7 (68.8, 149.8) | 91 (2, 100) | 7 | stable | -2.3 (-10.3, 1.5) |
Camden County 6 | 91.2 (61.6, 131.3) | 95 (6, 100) | 6 | stable | -0.9 (-5.9, 4.8) |
Gates County 6 | 74.9 (47.8, 112.7) | 100 (44, 100) | 6 | stable | -3.2 (-7.1, 0.4) |
Tyrrell County 6 | 168.0 (98.1, 272.2) | 1 (1, 100) | 4 | stable | 2.8 (-2.5, 9.3) |
Hyde County 6 | 90.6 (49.7, 157.5) | 96 (1, 100) | 3 | stable | -0.3 (-4.6, 4.2) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/02/2024 6:43 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/02/2024 6:43 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.