Incidence > Table
Incidence Rates Table
County |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
North Carolina 6 | 137.6 (136.3, 138.9) | N/A | 9,160 | rising | 0.9 (0.7, 1.1) |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | 127.0 (126.8, 127.2) | N/A | 249,750 | rising | 0.5 (0.3, 0.7) |
Pitt County 6 | 147.9 (137.1, 159.3) | 15 (2, 56) | 147 | rising | 8.6 (1.7, 14.3) |
Robeson County 6 | 124.3 (113.3, 136.0) | 68 (23, 89) | 101 | rising | 8.1 (0.8, 16.2) |
Rowan County 6 | 155.1 (143.6, 167.3) | 5 (1, 43) | 147 | rising | 6.0 (3.6, 10.0) |
Burke County 6 | 115.2 (103.5, 128.1) | 81 (42, 95) | 78 | stable | 5.8 (-1.4, 10.9) |
Carteret County 6 | 146.2 (130.9, 162.9) | 19 (1, 70) | 82 | rising | 4.9 (1.9, 10.8) |
Johnston County 6 | 141.5 (131.9, 151.6) | 30 (4, 64) | 169 | rising | 3.6 (1.7, 10.1) |
Bladen County 6 | 131.7 (111.2, 155.4) | 48 (2, 93) | 34 | stable | 3.3 (-12.3, 19.2) |
Stokes County 6 | 122.8 (105.8, 142.0) | 71 (9, 94) | 43 | stable | 3.1 (-1.8, 12.9) |
Tyrrell County 6 | 168.0 (98.1, 272.2) | 1 (1, 100) | 4 | stable | 2.8 (-2.5, 9.3) |
Mitchell County 6 | 150.8 (117.9, 191.0) | 10 (1, 94) | 18 | stable | 2.6 (-0.6, 6.3) |
Anson County 6 | 161.8 (134.0, 194.1) | 2 (1, 80) | 27 | stable | 2.5 (-0.7, 6.3) |
Davie County 6 | 126.9 (108.8, 147.5) | 64 (4, 93) | 40 | stable | 2.5 (0.0, 5.5) |
Jones County 6 | 160.1 (116.9, 215.4) | 3 (1, 95) | 11 | stable | 2.5 (-1.2, 6.7) |
Person County 6 | 159.2 (138.0, 183.1) | 4 (1, 67) | 46 | stable | 2.5 (-0.2, 5.7) |
Sampson County 6 | 144.0 (127.1, 162.6) | 24 (1, 79) | 59 | rising | 2.5 (1.4, 3.7) |
Avery County 6 | 112.7 (86.0, 146.1) | 87 (3, 100) | 14 | stable | 2.2 (-1.1, 6.1) |
Granville County 6 | 142.7 (125.8, 161.4) | 26 (1, 80) | 56 | stable | 1.8 (0.0, 3.9) |
Union County 6 | 148.4 (139.2, 158.1) | 12 (2, 47) | 201 | rising | 1.8 (0.9, 3.0) |
Bertie County 6 | 147.4 (118.0, 182.7) | 16 (1, 93) | 22 | stable | 1.7 (-0.6, 4.1) |
Guilford County 6 | 151.5 (145.5, 157.7) | 8 (2, 33) | 507 | rising | 1.7 (1.0, 2.4) |
Davidson County 6 | 134.1 (124.4, 144.4) | 41 (10, 77) | 154 | rising | 1.6 (0.7, 2.7) |
Vance County 6 | 123.6 (105.6, 143.9) | 69 (6, 96) | 38 | stable | 1.6 (-0.3, 3.6) |
Henderson County 6 | 150.2 (138.5, 162.8) | 11 (1, 57) | 148 | rising | 1.4 (0.1, 2.8) |
Cabarrus County 6 | 141.5 (132.1, 151.3) | 31 (5, 64) | 175 | rising | 1.3 (0.2, 2.7) |
Chowan County 6 | 131.1 (99.1, 171.0) | 52 (1, 99) | 15 | stable | 1.3 (-2.9, 5.9) |
Haywood County 6 | 138.5 (122.9, 155.7) | 35 (2, 83) | 70 | stable | 1.3 (-0.5, 3.3) |
Hoke County 6 | 113.2 (95.6, 133.0) | 86 (23, 99) | 31 | stable | 1.3 (-0.9, 4.1) |
Martin County 6 | 153.9 (127.5, 184.8) | 6 (1, 84) | 29 | stable | 1.3 (-1.0, 3.8) |
Wayne County 6 | 142.3 (130.2, 155.3) | 29 (3, 69) | 111 | stable | 1.3 (-0.1, 2.9) |
Alexander County 6 | 132.9 (112.8, 155.8) | 45 (2, 92) | 35 | stable | 1.2 (-0.4, 3.1) |
Iredell County 6 | 133.2 (123.6, 143.3) | 42 (13, 77) | 152 | rising | 1.2 (0.2, 2.5) |
Pasquotank County 6 | 133.1 (113.0, 155.9) | 43 (2, 92) | 35 | stable | 1.2 (-0.4, 2.9) |
New Hanover County 6 | 145.3 (136.6, 154.5) | 21 (3, 53) | 226 | stable | 1.1 (-0.1, 2.6) |
Onslow County 6 | 139.0 (127.4, 151.4) | 34 (5, 74) | 110 | stable | 1.1 (-0.1, 2.5) |
Cleveland County 6 | 129.3 (117.0, 142.5) | 56 (13, 86) | 90 | stable | 1.0 (-0.2, 2.4) |
Franklin County 6 | 128.0 (113.3, 144.2) | 60 (8, 90) | 60 | stable | 1.0 (-0.9, 3.3) |
Jackson County 6 | 103.0 (85.0, 123.7) | 90 (42, 100) | 28 | stable | 1.0 (-1.0, 3.3) |
Randolph County 6 | 134.3 (123.8, 145.6) | 40 (11, 78) | 131 | stable | 1.0 (-0.2, 2.3) |
Alamance County 6 | 144.2 (133.9, 155.1) | 22 (4, 61) | 157 | stable | 0.9 (-0.6, 1.8) |
Buncombe County 6 | 153.5 (145.2, 162.1) | 7 (1, 35) | 287 | rising | 0.9 (0.1, 1.9) |
Cumberland County 6 | 132.9 (125.3, 141.0) | 44 (19, 73) | 233 | rising | 0.9 (0.2, 1.7) |
Gaston County 6 | 130.4 (122.0, 139.2) | 54 (19, 79) | 192 | stable | 0.9 (-0.3, 2.3) |
Surry County 6 | 123.3 (109.9, 138.0) | 70 (17, 92) | 68 | stable | 0.9 (-0.9, 2.9) |
Transylvania County 6 | 127.5 (108.0, 150.0) | 63 (3, 94) | 41 | stable | 0.9 (-1.7, 3.9) |
Wake County 6 | 147.4 (143.0, 151.8) | 17 (6, 36) | 892 | rising | 0.9 (0.5, 1.4) |
Mecklenburg County 6 | 142.6 (138.3, 147.1) | 28 (12, 45) | 845 | rising | 0.8 (0.2, 1.6) |
Rockingham County 6 | 130.8 (118.3, 144.4) | 53 (9, 85) | 91 | stable | 0.8 (-0.4, 2.0) |
Stanly County 6 | 131.9 (115.9, 149.6) | 47 (3, 89) | 55 | stable | 0.8 (-0.5, 2.2) |
Yancey County 6 | 143.1 (114.4, 177.6) | 25 (1, 94) | 21 | stable | 0.8 (-1.0, 2.6) |
Beaufort County 6 | 128.4 (111.3, 147.7) | 59 (5, 93) | 49 | stable | 0.7 (-1.4, 3.0) |
Brunswick County 6 | 136.4 (126.1, 147.6) | 37 (8, 75) | 183 | stable | 0.7 (-0.6, 2.2) |
Chatham County 6 | 144.2 (129.8, 159.9) | 23 (2, 73) | 87 | stable | 0.7 (-0.7, 2.3) |
Cherokee County 6 | 129.6 (107.9, 155.1) | 55 (2, 96) | 34 | stable | 0.7 (-1.5, 3.1) |
Lenoir County 6 | 148.4 (131.1, 167.5) | 13 (1, 75) | 62 | stable | 0.7 (-0.8, 2.2) |
Lincoln County 6 | 131.3 (117.9, 145.9) | 51 (6, 86) | 76 | stable | 0.7 (-0.3, 1.8) |
Madison County 6 | 151.2 (124.2, 182.9) | 9 (1, 87) | 26 | stable | 0.7 (-2.3, 4.3) |
Northampton County 6 | 127.5 (100.1, 160.8) | 61 (1, 97) | 20 | stable | 0.7 (-2.2, 3.7) |
Orange County 6 | 148.2 (136.5, 160.8) | 14 (2, 58) | 125 | stable | 0.7 (-0.7, 2.4) |
Caldwell County 6 | 122.0 (109.2, 136.0) | 74 (26, 92) | 73 | stable | 0.6 (-1.4, 2.7) |
Caswell County 6 | 125.5 (100.9, 155.0) | 67 (2, 97) | 22 | stable | 0.6 (-1.5, 2.9) |
Craven County 6 | 135.2 (122.0, 149.4) | 39 (5, 80) | 90 | stable | 0.6 (-0.5, 1.8) |
McDowell County 6 | 131.4 (113.4, 151.6) | 50 (3, 92) | 44 | stable | 0.6 (-1.9, 3.3) |
Nash County 6 | 139.3 (126.1, 153.6) | 33 (4, 76) | 90 | stable | 0.6 (-0.8, 2.2) |
Pender County 6 | 128.9 (113.1, 146.3) | 57 (6, 91) | 53 | stable | 0.6 (-1.8, 3.3) |
Richmond County 6 | 127.5 (109.7, 147.7) | 62 (4, 93) | 40 | stable | 0.6 (-1.9, 3.2) |
Forsyth County 6 | 138.3 (131.6, 145.3) | 36 (12, 63) | 339 | stable | 0.5 (-0.3, 1.4) |
Clay County 6 | 147.0 (112.2, 191.9) | 18 (1, 95) | 15 | stable | 0.4 (-3.5, 4.8) |
Columbus County 6 | 114.9 (99.7, 132.0) | 82 (29, 96) | 46 | stable | 0.4 (-1.9, 3.0) |
Halifax County 6 | 145.8 (127.2, 166.6) | 20 (1, 80) | 53 | stable | 0.4 (-0.8, 1.7) |
Harnett County 6 | 126.6 (115.0, 139.0) | 65 (19, 88) | 91 | stable | 0.3 (-1.0, 1.7) |
Wilson County 6 | 132.5 (119.0, 147.2) | 46 (6, 85) | 76 | stable | 0.3 (-1.1, 1.9) |
Hertford County 6 | 114.3 (91.6, 141.5) | 83 (7, 99) | 21 | stable | 0.2 (-2.5, 3.2) |
Alleghany County 6 | 90.3 (62.9, 127.9) | 97 (18, 100) | 9 | stable | 0.1 (-4.1, 5.0) |
Ashe County 6 | 87.7 (69.2, 110.4) | 98 (68, 100) | 19 | stable | 0.1 (-4.0, 4.5) |
Catawba County 6 | 119.7 (110.3, 129.7) | 77 (41, 91) | 130 | stable | 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3) |
Dare County 6 | 140.6 (120.1, 163.9) | 32 (1, 89) | 39 | stable | -0.3 (-2.3, 1.8) |
Duplin County 6 | 105.4 (91.1, 121.4) | 89 (52, 98) | 44 | stable | -0.3 (-2.4, 2.0) |
Greene County 6 | 121.1 (93.2, 155.0) | 75 (1, 99) | 15 | stable | -0.3 (-3.7, 3.3) |
Hyde County 6 | 90.6 (49.7, 157.5) | 96 (1, 100) | 3 | stable | -0.3 (-4.6, 4.2) |
Macon County 6 | 128.7 (108.3, 152.3) | 58 (3, 94) | 39 | stable | -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4) |
Rutherford County 6 | 116.4 (102.9, 131.5) | 79 (30, 96) | 60 | stable | -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6) |
Lee County 6 | 122.5 (107.0, 139.8) | 72 (14, 95) | 48 | stable | -0.4 (-2.3, 1.8) |
Yadkin County 6 | 102.2 (84.8, 122.5) | 92 (47, 100) | 27 | stable | -0.4 (-2.9, 2.2) |
Edgecombe County 6 | 116.0 (100.4, 133.4) | 80 (24, 96) | 46 | stable | -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1) |
Washington County 6 | 126.0 (93.5, 167.6) | 66 (1, 99) | 13 | stable | -0.5 (-3.5, 2.7) |
Wilkes County 6 | 101.6 (89.1, 115.6) | 93 (66, 99) | 54 | stable | -0.5 (-2.4, 1.6) |
Moore County 6 | 135.3 (122.9, 148.7) | 38 (6, 78) | 104 | stable | -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5) |
Watauga County 6 | 114.2 (97.0, 133.9) | 84 (21, 97) | 36 | stable | -0.6 (-2.6, 1.5) |
Pamlico County 6 | 122.2 (90.6, 163.6) | 73 (1, 99) | 14 | stable | -0.8 (-3.6, 2.1) |
Scotland County 6 | 117.3 (97.1, 140.5) | 78 (6, 97) | 27 | stable | -0.8 (-3.7, 2.2) |
Camden County 6 | 91.2 (61.6, 131.3) | 95 (6, 100) | 6 | stable | -0.9 (-5.9, 4.8) |
Warren County 6 | 119.7 (94.8, 150.2) | 76 (2, 99) | 20 | stable | -0.9 (-4.6, 2.9) |
Polk County 6 | 131.6 (105.4, 163.4) | 49 (1, 97) | 25 | stable | -1.2 (-4.8, 2.5) |
Montgomery County 6 | 110.0 (89.4, 134.2) | 88 (18, 99) | 23 | stable | -1.3 (-3.2, 0.8) |
Perquimans County 6 | 114.0 (85.6, 150.1) | 85 (2, 100) | 14 | stable | -1.3 (-5.1, 2.9) |
Swain County 6 | 98.6 (70.7, 134.2) | 94 (10, 100) | 9 | stable | -1.9 (-5.4, 1.6) |
Durham County 6 | 142.7 (134.8, 150.9) | 27 (6, 59) | 262 | stable | -2.0 (-8.4, 1.3) |
Graham County 6 | 102.7 (68.8, 149.8) | 91 (2, 100) | 7 | stable | -2.3 (-10.3, 1.5) |
Gates County 6 | 74.9 (47.8, 112.7) | 100 (44, 100) | 6 | stable | -3.2 (-7.1, 0.4) |
Currituck County 6 | 80.0 (62.4, 101.4) | 99 (84, 100) | 15 | falling | -18.1 (-37.2, -1.5) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/02/2024 7:38 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/02/2024 7:38 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.