Incidence > Table
Incidence Rates Table
County |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) |
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) |
Average Annual Count |
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
North Carolina 6 | 137.6 (136.3, 138.9) | N/A | 9,160 | rising | 0.9 (0.7, 1.1) |
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | 127.0 (126.8, 127.2) | N/A | 249,750 | rising | 0.5 (0.3, 0.7) |
Gates County 6 | 74.9 (47.8, 112.7) | 100 (44, 100) | 6 | stable | -3.2 (-7.1, 0.4) |
Currituck County 6 | 80.0 (62.4, 101.4) | 99 (84, 100) | 15 | falling | -18.1 (-37.2, -1.5) |
Ashe County 6 | 87.7 (69.2, 110.4) | 98 (68, 100) | 19 | stable | 0.1 (-4.0, 4.5) |
Alleghany County 6 | 90.3 (62.9, 127.9) | 97 (18, 100) | 9 | stable | 0.1 (-4.1, 5.0) |
Hyde County 6 | 90.6 (49.7, 157.5) | 96 (1, 100) | 3 | stable | -0.3 (-4.6, 4.2) |
Camden County 6 | 91.2 (61.6, 131.3) | 95 (6, 100) | 6 | stable | -0.9 (-5.9, 4.8) |
Swain County 6 | 98.6 (70.7, 134.2) | 94 (10, 100) | 9 | stable | -1.9 (-5.4, 1.6) |
Wilkes County 6 | 101.6 (89.1, 115.6) | 93 (66, 99) | 54 | stable | -0.5 (-2.4, 1.6) |
Yadkin County 6 | 102.2 (84.8, 122.5) | 92 (47, 100) | 27 | stable | -0.4 (-2.9, 2.2) |
Graham County 6 | 102.7 (68.8, 149.8) | 91 (2, 100) | 7 | stable | -2.3 (-10.3, 1.5) |
Jackson County 6 | 103.0 (85.0, 123.7) | 90 (42, 100) | 28 | stable | 1.0 (-1.0, 3.3) |
Duplin County 6 | 105.4 (91.1, 121.4) | 89 (52, 98) | 44 | stable | -0.3 (-2.4, 2.0) |
Montgomery County 6 | 110.0 (89.4, 134.2) | 88 (18, 99) | 23 | stable | -1.3 (-3.2, 0.8) |
Avery County 6 | 112.7 (86.0, 146.1) | 87 (3, 100) | 14 | stable | 2.2 (-1.1, 6.1) |
Hoke County 6 | 113.2 (95.6, 133.0) | 86 (23, 99) | 31 | stable | 1.3 (-0.9, 4.1) |
Perquimans County 6 | 114.0 (85.6, 150.1) | 85 (2, 100) | 14 | stable | -1.3 (-5.1, 2.9) |
Watauga County 6 | 114.2 (97.0, 133.9) | 84 (21, 97) | 36 | stable | -0.6 (-2.6, 1.5) |
Hertford County 6 | 114.3 (91.6, 141.5) | 83 (7, 99) | 21 | stable | 0.2 (-2.5, 3.2) |
Columbus County 6 | 114.9 (99.7, 132.0) | 82 (29, 96) | 46 | stable | 0.4 (-1.9, 3.0) |
Burke County 6 | 115.2 (103.5, 128.1) | 81 (42, 95) | 78 | stable | 5.8 (-1.4, 10.9) |
Edgecombe County 6 | 116.0 (100.4, 133.4) | 80 (24, 96) | 46 | stable | -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1) |
Rutherford County 6 | 116.4 (102.9, 131.5) | 79 (30, 96) | 60 | stable | -0.3 (-1.2, 0.6) |
Scotland County 6 | 117.3 (97.1, 140.5) | 78 (6, 97) | 27 | stable | -0.8 (-3.7, 2.2) |
Catawba County 6 | 119.7 (110.3, 129.7) | 77 (41, 91) | 130 | stable | 0.1 (-1.1, 1.3) |
Warren County 6 | 119.7 (94.8, 150.2) | 76 (2, 99) | 20 | stable | -0.9 (-4.6, 2.9) |
Greene County 6 | 121.1 (93.2, 155.0) | 75 (1, 99) | 15 | stable | -0.3 (-3.7, 3.3) |
Caldwell County 6 | 122.0 (109.2, 136.0) | 74 (26, 92) | 73 | stable | 0.6 (-1.4, 2.7) |
Pamlico County 6 | 122.2 (90.6, 163.6) | 73 (1, 99) | 14 | stable | -0.8 (-3.6, 2.1) |
Lee County 6 | 122.5 (107.0, 139.8) | 72 (14, 95) | 48 | stable | -0.4 (-2.3, 1.8) |
Stokes County 6 | 122.8 (105.8, 142.0) | 71 (9, 94) | 43 | stable | 3.1 (-1.8, 12.9) |
Surry County 6 | 123.3 (109.9, 138.0) | 70 (17, 92) | 68 | stable | 0.9 (-0.9, 2.9) |
Vance County 6 | 123.6 (105.6, 143.9) | 69 (6, 96) | 38 | stable | 1.6 (-0.3, 3.6) |
Robeson County 6 | 124.3 (113.3, 136.0) | 68 (23, 89) | 101 | rising | 8.1 (0.8, 16.2) |
Caswell County 6 | 125.5 (100.9, 155.0) | 67 (2, 97) | 22 | stable | 0.6 (-1.5, 2.9) |
Washington County 6 | 126.0 (93.5, 167.6) | 66 (1, 99) | 13 | stable | -0.5 (-3.5, 2.7) |
Harnett County 6 | 126.6 (115.0, 139.0) | 65 (19, 88) | 91 | stable | 0.3 (-1.0, 1.7) |
Davie County 6 | 126.9 (108.8, 147.5) | 64 (4, 93) | 40 | stable | 2.5 (0.0, 5.5) |
Transylvania County 6 | 127.5 (108.0, 150.0) | 63 (3, 94) | 41 | stable | 0.9 (-1.7, 3.9) |
Richmond County 6 | 127.5 (109.7, 147.7) | 62 (4, 93) | 40 | stable | 0.6 (-1.9, 3.2) |
Northampton County 6 | 127.5 (100.1, 160.8) | 61 (1, 97) | 20 | stable | 0.7 (-2.2, 3.7) |
Franklin County 6 | 128.0 (113.3, 144.2) | 60 (8, 90) | 60 | stable | 1.0 (-0.9, 3.3) |
Beaufort County 6 | 128.4 (111.3, 147.7) | 59 (5, 93) | 49 | stable | 0.7 (-1.4, 3.0) |
Macon County 6 | 128.7 (108.3, 152.3) | 58 (3, 94) | 39 | stable | -0.3 (-2.0, 1.4) |
Pender County 6 | 128.9 (113.1, 146.3) | 57 (6, 91) | 53 | stable | 0.6 (-1.8, 3.3) |
Cleveland County 6 | 129.3 (117.0, 142.5) | 56 (13, 86) | 90 | stable | 1.0 (-0.2, 2.4) |
Cherokee County 6 | 129.6 (107.9, 155.1) | 55 (2, 96) | 34 | stable | 0.7 (-1.5, 3.1) |
Gaston County 6 | 130.4 (122.0, 139.2) | 54 (19, 79) | 192 | stable | 0.9 (-0.3, 2.3) |
Rockingham County 6 | 130.8 (118.3, 144.4) | 53 (9, 85) | 91 | stable | 0.8 (-0.4, 2.0) |
Chowan County 6 | 131.1 (99.1, 171.0) | 52 (1, 99) | 15 | stable | 1.3 (-2.9, 5.9) |
Lincoln County 6 | 131.3 (117.9, 145.9) | 51 (6, 86) | 76 | stable | 0.7 (-0.3, 1.8) |
McDowell County 6 | 131.4 (113.4, 151.6) | 50 (3, 92) | 44 | stable | 0.6 (-1.9, 3.3) |
Polk County 6 | 131.6 (105.4, 163.4) | 49 (1, 97) | 25 | stable | -1.2 (-4.8, 2.5) |
Bladen County 6 | 131.7 (111.2, 155.4) | 48 (2, 93) | 34 | stable | 3.3 (-12.3, 19.2) |
Stanly County 6 | 131.9 (115.9, 149.6) | 47 (3, 89) | 55 | stable | 0.8 (-0.5, 2.2) |
Wilson County 6 | 132.5 (119.0, 147.2) | 46 (6, 85) | 76 | stable | 0.3 (-1.1, 1.9) |
Alexander County 6 | 132.9 (112.8, 155.8) | 45 (2, 92) | 35 | stable | 1.2 (-0.4, 3.1) |
Cumberland County 6 | 132.9 (125.3, 141.0) | 44 (19, 73) | 233 | rising | 0.9 (0.2, 1.7) |
Pasquotank County 6 | 133.1 (113.0, 155.9) | 43 (2, 92) | 35 | stable | 1.2 (-0.4, 2.9) |
Iredell County 6 | 133.2 (123.6, 143.3) | 42 (13, 77) | 152 | rising | 1.2 (0.2, 2.5) |
Davidson County 6 | 134.1 (124.4, 144.4) | 41 (10, 77) | 154 | rising | 1.6 (0.7, 2.7) |
Randolph County 6 | 134.3 (123.8, 145.6) | 40 (11, 78) | 131 | stable | 1.0 (-0.2, 2.3) |
Craven County 6 | 135.2 (122.0, 149.4) | 39 (5, 80) | 90 | stable | 0.6 (-0.5, 1.8) |
Moore County 6 | 135.3 (122.9, 148.7) | 38 (6, 78) | 104 | stable | -0.6 (-1.7, 0.5) |
Brunswick County 6 | 136.4 (126.1, 147.6) | 37 (8, 75) | 183 | stable | 0.7 (-0.6, 2.2) |
Forsyth County 6 | 138.3 (131.6, 145.3) | 36 (12, 63) | 339 | stable | 0.5 (-0.3, 1.4) |
Haywood County 6 | 138.5 (122.9, 155.7) | 35 (2, 83) | 70 | stable | 1.3 (-0.5, 3.3) |
Onslow County 6 | 139.0 (127.4, 151.4) | 34 (5, 74) | 110 | stable | 1.1 (-0.1, 2.5) |
Nash County 6 | 139.3 (126.1, 153.6) | 33 (4, 76) | 90 | stable | 0.6 (-0.8, 2.2) |
Dare County 6 | 140.6 (120.1, 163.9) | 32 (1, 89) | 39 | stable | -0.3 (-2.3, 1.8) |
Cabarrus County 6 | 141.5 (132.1, 151.3) | 31 (5, 64) | 175 | rising | 1.3 (0.2, 2.7) |
Johnston County 6 | 141.5 (131.9, 151.6) | 30 (4, 64) | 169 | rising | 3.6 (1.7, 10.1) |
Wayne County 6 | 142.3 (130.2, 155.3) | 29 (3, 69) | 111 | stable | 1.3 (-0.1, 2.9) |
Mecklenburg County 6 | 142.6 (138.3, 147.1) | 28 (12, 45) | 845 | rising | 0.8 (0.2, 1.6) |
Durham County 6 | 142.7 (134.8, 150.9) | 27 (6, 59) | 262 | stable | -2.0 (-8.4, 1.3) |
Granville County 6 | 142.7 (125.8, 161.4) | 26 (1, 80) | 56 | stable | 1.8 (0.0, 3.9) |
Yancey County 6 | 143.1 (114.4, 177.6) | 25 (1, 94) | 21 | stable | 0.8 (-1.0, 2.6) |
Sampson County 6 | 144.0 (127.1, 162.6) | 24 (1, 79) | 59 | rising | 2.5 (1.4, 3.7) |
Chatham County 6 | 144.2 (129.8, 159.9) | 23 (2, 73) | 87 | stable | 0.7 (-0.7, 2.3) |
Alamance County 6 | 144.2 (133.9, 155.1) | 22 (4, 61) | 157 | stable | 0.9 (-0.6, 1.8) |
New Hanover County 6 | 145.3 (136.6, 154.5) | 21 (3, 53) | 226 | stable | 1.1 (-0.1, 2.6) |
Halifax County 6 | 145.8 (127.2, 166.6) | 20 (1, 80) | 53 | stable | 0.4 (-0.8, 1.7) |
Carteret County 6 | 146.2 (130.9, 162.9) | 19 (1, 70) | 82 | rising | 4.9 (1.9, 10.8) |
Clay County 6 | 147.0 (112.2, 191.9) | 18 (1, 95) | 15 | stable | 0.4 (-3.5, 4.8) |
Wake County 6 | 147.4 (143.0, 151.8) | 17 (6, 36) | 892 | rising | 0.9 (0.5, 1.4) |
Bertie County 6 | 147.4 (118.0, 182.7) | 16 (1, 93) | 22 | stable | 1.7 (-0.6, 4.1) |
Pitt County 6 | 147.9 (137.1, 159.3) | 15 (2, 56) | 147 | rising | 8.6 (1.7, 14.3) |
Orange County 6 | 148.2 (136.5, 160.8) | 14 (2, 58) | 125 | stable | 0.7 (-0.7, 2.4) |
Lenoir County 6 | 148.4 (131.1, 167.5) | 13 (1, 75) | 62 | stable | 0.7 (-0.8, 2.2) |
Union County 6 | 148.4 (139.2, 158.1) | 12 (2, 47) | 201 | rising | 1.8 (0.9, 3.0) |
Henderson County 6 | 150.2 (138.5, 162.8) | 11 (1, 57) | 148 | rising | 1.4 (0.1, 2.8) |
Mitchell County 6 | 150.8 (117.9, 191.0) | 10 (1, 94) | 18 | stable | 2.6 (-0.6, 6.3) |
Madison County 6 | 151.2 (124.2, 182.9) | 9 (1, 87) | 26 | stable | 0.7 (-2.3, 4.3) |
Guilford County 6 | 151.5 (145.5, 157.7) | 8 (2, 33) | 507 | rising | 1.7 (1.0, 2.4) |
Buncombe County 6 | 153.5 (145.2, 162.1) | 7 (1, 35) | 287 | rising | 0.9 (0.1, 1.9) |
Martin County 6 | 153.9 (127.5, 184.8) | 6 (1, 84) | 29 | stable | 1.3 (-1.0, 3.8) |
Rowan County 6 | 155.1 (143.6, 167.3) | 5 (1, 43) | 147 | rising | 6.0 (3.6, 10.0) |
Person County 6 | 159.2 (138.0, 183.1) | 4 (1, 67) | 46 | stable | 2.5 (-0.2, 5.7) |
Jones County 6 | 160.1 (116.9, 215.4) | 3 (1, 95) | 11 | stable | 2.5 (-1.2, 6.7) |
Anson County 6 | 161.8 (134.0, 194.1) | 2 (1, 80) | 27 | stable | 2.5 (-0.7, 6.3) |
Tyrrell County 6 | 168.0 (98.1, 272.2) | 1 (1, 100) | 4 | stable | 2.8 (-2.5, 9.3) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/02/2024 5:29 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/02/2024 5:29 pm.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Data for the United States does not include data from Nevada.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.