Incidence Rates Table
County
|
Met Healthy People Objective of ***? |
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate† cases per 100,000 (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
CI*Rank⋔ (95% Confidence Interval) 
|
Average Annual Count
|
Recent Trend |
Recent 5-Year Trend‡ in Incidence Rates (95% Confidence Interval)
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio 6 | *** | 113.3 (112.1, 114.4) | N/A | 7,804 |
rising 
|
0.8 (0.6, 1.0) |
| US (SEER+NPCR) 1 | *** | 106.1 (105.9, 106.3) | N/A | 209,535 |
stable 
|
-0.5 (-1.2, 0.1) |
| Vinton County 6 | *** | 184.3 (144.0, 232.4) | 1 (1, 35) | 14 |
rising
|
5.5 (2.6, 8.6) |
| Pike County 6 | *** | 149.0 (123.8, 177.7) | 2 (1, 61) | 25 |
rising
|
2.5 (0.3, 4.8) |
| Lawrence County 6 | *** | 149.4 (132.1, 168.4) | 3 (1, 34) | 55 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.8, 2.8) |
| Hardin County 6 | *** | 143.1 (118.6, 170.9) | 4 (1, 72) | 24 |
stable
|
1.9 (-0.6, 4.4) |
| Jefferson County 6 | *** | 138.8 (122.0, 157.3) | 5 (1, 49) | 50 |
stable
|
1.4 (-0.4, 3.3) |
| Meigs County 6 | *** | 138.6 (111.9, 169.9) | 6 (1, 83) | 19 |
stable
|
2.3 (0.0, 4.6) |
| Highland County 6 | *** | 136.0 (116.4, 158.0) | 7 (1, 75) | 35 |
stable
|
1.5 (-0.6, 3.6) |
| Fayette County 6 | *** | 135.3 (111.5, 162.6) | 8 (1, 82) | 23 |
rising
|
4.0 (1.4, 6.6) |
| Ottawa County 6 | *** | 133.8 (112.4, 158.0) | 9 (1, 79) | 28 |
stable
|
1.5 (-0.3, 3.4) |
| Guernsey County 6 | *** | 133.4 (112.6, 157.0) | 10 (1, 80) | 29 |
stable
|
1.3 (-1.0, 3.7) |
| Adams County 6 | *** | 131.0 (107.3, 158.5) | 11 (1, 85) | 21 |
stable
|
2.4 (-0.1, 5.0) |
| Washington County 6 | *** | 129.9 (113.1, 148.3) | 12 (2, 77) | 44 |
stable
|
0.8 (-1.2, 2.8) |
| Huron County 6 | *** | 129.4 (112.8, 147.7) | 13 (2, 78) | 44 |
rising
|
2.3 (0.1, 4.6) |
| Columbiana County 6 | *** | 129.2 (116.6, 142.7) | 14 (3, 66) | 78 |
rising
|
1.3 (0.2, 2.4) |
| Preble County 6 | *** | 127.2 (107.6, 149.2) | 15 (2, 83) | 30 |
stable
|
2.1 (-0.1, 4.3) |
| Scioto County 6 | *** | 127.2 (113.0, 142.8) | 16 (3, 75) | 58 |
stable
|
0.1 (-0.7, 0.8) |
| Muskingum County 6 | *** | 126.7 (113.0, 141.5) | 17 (3, 72) | 63 |
stable
|
0.8 (-0.6, 2.2) |
| Lake County 6 | *** | 126.2 (117.7, 135.1) | 18 (6, 54) | 168 |
rising
|
2.2 (1.2, 3.2) |
| Fulton County 6 | *** | 126.0 (106.6, 147.8) | 19 (2, 83) | 30 |
rising
|
7.6 (4.7, 10.5) |
| Miami County 6 | *** | 125.5 (113.2, 138.7) | 20 (4, 70) | 77 |
rising
|
1.8 (0.7, 2.9) |
| Clark County 6 | *** | 125.4 (114.3, 137.3) | 21 (4, 69) | 95 |
rising
|
1.7 (0.6, 2.9) |
| Carroll County 6 | *** | 124.3 (100.6, 152.0) | 22 (1, 86) | 19 |
stable
|
1.3 (-0.8, 3.4) |
| Morgan County 6 | *** | 123.8 (91.7, 163.4) | 23 (1, 88) | 10 |
stable
|
0.6 (-2.2, 3.4) |
| Hocking County 6 | *** | 123.5 (100.8, 149.9) | 24 (1, 86) | 21 |
stable
|
0.4 (-1.7, 2.4) |
| Henry County 6 | *** | 122.2 (98.8, 149.5) | 25 (2, 86) | 19 |
stable
|
0.3 (-2.7, 3.5) |
| Lorain County 6 | *** | 122.9 (115.8, 130.4) | 26 (9, 56) | 224 |
rising
|
1.1 (0.3, 1.9) |
| Union County 6 | *** | 120.5 (105.4, 137.2) | 27 (3, 83) | 46 |
stable
|
0.2 (-1.4, 1.9) |
| Medina County 6 | *** | 120.1 (111.0, 129.8) | 28 (8, 72) | 131 |
rising
|
0.9 (0.2, 1.7) |
| Champaign County 6 | *** | 120.5 (101.1, 142.6) | 29 (2, 85) | 28 |
stable
|
1.3 (-0.7, 3.3) |
| Marion County 6 | *** | 120.2 (105.5, 136.5) | 30 (4, 82) | 49 |
stable
|
0.6 (-1.1, 2.3) |
| Coshocton County 6 | *** | 118.5 (98.3, 141.7) | 31 (2, 86) | 24 |
stable
|
2.0 (-0.2, 4.2) |
| Knox County 6 | *** | 117.5 (101.6, 135.1) | 32 (4, 84) | 40 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.6, 2.6) |
| Seneca County 6 | *** | 117.7 (101.0, 136.3) | 33 (4, 85) | 36 |
rising
|
4.3 (1.1, 7.7) |
| Richland County 6 | *** | 116.7 (105.6, 128.6) | 34 (8, 80) | 82 |
rising
|
1.9 (0.9, 2.8) |
| Geauga County 6 | *** | 114.6 (101.7, 128.8) | 35 (7, 84) | 59 |
rising
|
1.3 (0.1, 2.5) |
| Brown County 6 | *** | 115.9 (98.1, 136.0) | 36 (3, 86) | 30 |
stable
|
0.9 (-0.9, 2.7) |
| Allen County 6 | *** | 116.1 (104.0, 129.2) | 37 (8, 83) | 67 |
stable
|
0.5 (-0.8, 1.8) |
| Licking County 6 | *** | 115.5 (106.4, 125.1) | 38 (11, 79) | 121 |
stable
|
0.5 (-0.6, 1.6) |
| Shelby County 6 | *** | 115.5 (98.5, 134.6) | 39 (5, 86) | 33 |
stable
|
1.8 (0.0, 3.5) |
| Ashland County 6 | *** | 115.5 (98.7, 134.2) | 40 (5, 86) | 34 |
rising
|
3.3 (0.5, 6.2) |
| Tuscarawas County 6 | *** | 116.0 (103.2, 129.9) | 41 (7, 84) | 60 |
stable
|
0.7 (-0.5, 1.9) |
| Fairfield County 6 | *** | 115.0 (105.6, 125.1) | 42 (11, 79) | 110 |
stable
|
1.0 (0.0, 2.0) |
| Trumbull County 6 | *** | 114.7 (106.0, 124.0) | 43 (15, 78) | 130 |
stable
|
0.7 (-0.5, 2.0) |
| Morrow County 6 | *** | 115.0 (95.3, 137.7) | 44 (3, 87) | 24 |
stable
|
1.0 (-1.6, 3.7) |
| Montgomery County 6 | *** | 114.5 (109.1, 120.0) | 45 (22, 72) | 349 |
stable
|
1.0 (-6.6, 9.1) |
| Jackson County 6 | *** | 112.8 (92.7, 136.0) | 46 (3, 87) | 22 |
stable
|
-1.0 (-3.3, 1.4) |
| Sandusky County 6 | *** | 113.9 (98.4, 131.2) | 47 (5, 85) | 39 |
stable
|
0.7 (-1.0, 2.3) |
| Clermont County 6 | *** | 113.4 (105.2, 122.1) | 48 (15, 79) | 141 |
stable
|
0.6 (-0.2, 1.3) |
| Cuyahoga County 6 | *** | 112.4 (108.9, 115.9) | 49 (33, 70) | 819 |
rising
|
0.9 (0.5, 1.3) |
| Hamilton County 6 | *** | 112.5 (108.2, 116.9) | 50 (29, 71) | 532 |
rising
|
1.0 (0.6, 1.4) |
| Summit County 6 | *** | 112.3 (107.2, 117.7) | 51 (26, 75) | 360 |
rising
|
1.3 (0.8, 1.9) |
| Ross County 6 | *** | 112.5 (99.7, 126.6) | 52 (11, 85) | 56 |
stable
|
0.3 (-1.0, 1.6) |
| Stark County 6 | *** | 111.6 (105.3, 118.2) | 53 (26, 78) | 237 |
stable
|
0.4 (-0.4, 1.3) |
| Monroe County 6 | *** | 111.2 (80.2, 150.1) | 54 (1, 88) | 9 |
stable
|
0.8 (-2.8, 4.5) |
| Lucas County 6 | *** | 110.4 (104.6, 116.4) | 55 (28, 79) | 278 |
stable
|
0.7 (-0.1, 1.4) |
| Auglaize County 6 | *** | 110.9 (93.6, 130.5) | 56 (7, 87) | 29 |
stable
|
0.3 (-2.1, 2.8) |
| Erie County 6 | *** | 110.7 (96.6, 126.3) | 57 (9, 86) | 45 |
stable
|
1.2 (-0.5, 2.9) |
| Franklin County 6 | *** | 109.8 (106.6, 113.1) | 58 (38, 74) | 897 |
stable
|
0.2 (-0.1, 0.5) |
| Mercer County 6 | *** | 110.5 (91.5, 132.1) | 59 (5, 87) | 24 |
stable
|
0.0 (-2.4, 2.5) |
| Defiance County 6 | *** | 110.3 (91.3, 132.0) | 60 (5, 87) | 24 |
stable
|
1.1 (-0.7, 2.9) |
| Hancock County 6 | *** | 109.4 (95.9, 124.2) | 61 (10, 86) | 48 |
stable
|
0.6 (-0.9, 2.1) |
| Logan County 6 | *** | 109.8 (92.6, 129.2) | 62 (7, 87) | 29 |
stable
|
1.5 (0.0, 2.9) |
| Gallia County 6 | *** | 109.6 (88.4, 134.3) | 63 (4, 88) | 19 |
stable
|
-0.9 (-3.5, 1.7) |
| Wayne County 6 | *** | 108.8 (97.6, 120.9) | 64 (17, 85) | 70 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.2, 2.2) |
| Portage County 6 | *** | 108.5 (99.0, 118.7) | 65 (20, 85) | 99 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.4, 2.5) |
| Greene County 6 | *** | 107.9 (98.5, 117.8) | 66 (20, 85) | 101 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-1.5, 0.6) |
| Clinton County 6 | *** | 107.6 (89.9, 127.8) | 67 (8, 87) | 26 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-2.2, 1.3) |
| Butler County 6 | *** | 107.2 (101.2, 113.4) | 68 (34, 83) | 241 |
stable
|
0.9 (0.0, 1.8) |
| Wyandot County 6 | *** | 107.9 (84.1, 136.4) | 69 (3, 88) | 14 |
stable
|
0.4 (-2.9, 3.7) |
| Paulding County 6 | *** | 102.3 (76.7, 133.5) | 70 (3, 88) | 11 |
stable
|
2.0 (-1.1, 5.2) |
| Darke County 6 | *** | 107.6 (91.2, 126.0) | 71 (9, 87) | 31 |
stable
|
1.2 (-0.6, 3.1) |
| Pickaway County 6 | *** | 106.6 (92.1, 122.7) | 72 (11, 87) | 39 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-2.3, 0.8) |
| Putnam County 6 | *** | 105.8 (86.1, 128.6) | 73 (6, 88) | 20 |
stable
|
0.3 (-2.2, 3.0) |
| Crawford County 6 | *** | 105.7 (88.0, 125.9) | 74 (8, 87) | 25 |
stable
|
0.2 (-2.1, 2.6) |
| Warren County 6 | *** | 105.4 (98.1, 113.0) | 75 (34, 85) | 158 |
stable
|
-0.1 (-1.1, 0.9) |
| Perry County 6 | *** | 104.8 (86.4, 126.0) | 76 (7, 88) | 23 |
stable
|
1.0 (-1.6, 3.6) |
| Madison County 6 | *** | 104.4 (88.6, 122.2) | 77 (9, 87) | 31 |
stable
|
0.5 (-1.3, 2.3) |
| Mahoning County 6 | *** | 104.7 (96.8, 112.9) | 78 (34, 85) | 134 |
stable
|
0.3 (-0.6, 1.2) |
| Ashtabula County 6 | *** | 104.7 (93.1, 117.4) | 79 (23, 86) | 60 |
stable
|
-3.4 (-7.5, 0.8) |
| Athens County 6 | *** | 103.6 (88.3, 120.7) | 80 (12, 87) | 34 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-2.3, 1.9) |
| Delaware County 6 | *** | 104.0 (96.5, 112.1) | 81 (39, 85) | 143 |
stable
|
0.0 (-1.2, 1.2) |
| Belmont County 6 | *** | 103.9 (90.1, 119.2) | 82 (18, 87) | 41 |
stable
|
11.9 (-1.6, 27.2) |
| Wood County 6 | *** | 103.1 (92.8, 114.2) | 83 (31, 87) | 75 |
stable
|
1.0 (-0.7, 2.7) |
| Noble County 6 | *** | 91.6 (61.0, 131.9) | 84 (2, 88) | 6 |
stable
|
0.8 (-3.6, 5.4) |
| Van Wert County 6 | *** | 88.1 (68.7, 111.1) | 85 (22, 88) | 14 |
stable
|
-0.5 (-4.0, 3.1) |
| Harrison County 6 | *** | 89.2 (62.2, 123.6) | 86 (7, 88) | 7 |
stable
|
-0.2 (-4.6, 4.3) |
| Williams County 6 | *** | 88.2 (71.0, 108.3) | 87 (31, 88) | 18 |
stable
|
-2.1 (-4.3, 0.2) |
| Holmes County 6 | *** | 71.4 (56.9, 88.1) | 88 (79, 88) | 17 |
stable
|
-0.8 (-3.6, 2.1) |
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/05/2022 9:22 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 07/05/2022 9:22 am.
State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.
† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The 1969-2018 US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.
^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) summary stage.
Source: SEER and NPCR data. For more specific information please see the table.
Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer incidence statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.