Return to Home Incidence > Table

Incidence Rates Table

Data Options

Incidence Rate Report for Wisconsin by County

Kidney & Renal Pelvis (All Stages^), 2017-2021

All Races (includes Hispanic), Both Sexes, All Ages

Sorted by Ruralurban
County
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
2023 Rural-Urban Continuum Codes Φ
 sort by rural urban ascending
Age-Adjusted Incidence Rate
cases per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Incidence Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
Wisconsin 6 N/A 19.2 (18.7, 19.6) N/A 1,429 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.5, 2.4)
US (SEER+NPCR) 1 N/A 17.3 (17.2, 17.4) N/A 67,373 falling falling trend -0.7 (-1.3, -0.1)
Brown County 6 Urban 20.9 (18.6, 23.3) 26 (8, 46) 66 stable stable trend 1.2 (0.0, 2.6)
Calumet County 6 Urban 13.5 (9.7, 18.4) 62 (22, 67) 9 stable stable trend -0.5 (-4.7, 4.1)
Chippewa County 6 Urban 17.8 (14.0, 22.4) 44 (10, 64) 16 stable stable trend -0.1 (-3.2, 3.2)
Columbia County 6 Urban 19.2 (15.0, 24.3) 33 (6, 63) 15 stable stable trend -3.9 (-18.2, 0.1)
Dane County 6 Urban 17.8 (16.3, 19.5) 42 (25, 56) 105 rising rising trend 2.3 (0.2, 5.0)
Douglas County 6 Urban 17.4 (12.8, 23.2) 48 (7, 66) 10 stable stable trend 4.2 (-1.6, 12.1)
Eau Claire County 6 Urban 11.4 (8.8, 14.6) 65 (49, 67) 14 stable stable trend -1.4 (-5.5, 2.7)
Fond du Lac County 6 Urban 17.7 (14.5, 21.4) 45 (14, 62) 24 falling falling trend -9.2 (-19.8, -2.4)
Green County 6 Urban 26.7 (20.6, 34.2) 4 (1, 43) 14 stable stable trend 2.3 (-1.5, 6.9)
Iowa County 6 Urban 19.0 (13.0, 27.2) 34 (3, 67) 7 stable stable trend 2.9 (-0.6, 7.3)
Kenosha County 6 Urban 16.9 (14.4, 19.8) 51 (22, 62) 34 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.0, 2.7)
Kewaunee County 6 Urban 21.4 (14.0, 31.5) 21 (2, 65) 6
*
*
La Crosse County 6 Urban 17.5 (14.4, 21.1) 47 (15, 63) 24 stable stable trend 1.3 (-0.4, 3.3)
Marathon County 6 Urban 18.6 (15.7, 21.8) 36 (13, 59) 33 stable stable trend -2.6 (-10.2, 0.0)
Milwaukee County 6 Urban 21.2 (20.0, 22.6) 23 (11, 36) 215 rising rising trend 2.0 (1.3, 2.8)
Oconto County 6 Urban 19.9 (14.8, 26.4) 31 (4, 64) 11 stable stable trend 1.0 (-1.8, 4.1)
Outagamie County 6 Urban 14.1 (12.0, 16.5) 60 (39, 66) 32 stable stable trend -0.9 (-3.5, 1.8)
Ozaukee County 6 Urban 16.3 (13.2, 19.9) 54 (19, 65) 21 rising rising trend 2.4 (0.4, 4.7)
Pierce County 6 Urban 10.4 (6.5, 15.8) 67 (36, 67) 5
*
*
Racine County 6 Urban 22.0 (19.4, 24.9) 17 (5, 41) 54 stable stable trend 1.8 (-0.1, 3.9)
Rock County 6 Urban 24.3 (21.3, 27.6) 8 (3, 34) 50 rising rising trend 2.6 (0.3, 5.3)
Sheboygan County 6 Urban 20.8 (17.6, 24.5) 27 (6, 53) 32 rising rising trend 2.7 (0.1, 5.6)
St. Croix County 6 Urban 14.4 (11.3, 18.1) 59 (29, 67) 16 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.7, 3.8)
Vernon County 6 Urban 20.8 (15.0, 28.5) 28 (2, 64) 9 rising rising trend 3.6 (0.4, 7.6)
Washington County 6 Urban 22.2 (19.2, 25.7) 16 (4, 45) 42 stable stable trend 1.9 (0.0, 4.2)
Waukesha County 6 Urban 17.8 (16.2, 19.5) 43 (25, 56) 101 stable stable trend 1.1 (0.0, 2.2)
Winnebago County 6 Urban 15.9 (13.5, 18.7) 56 (28, 64) 33 stable stable trend -1.6 (-3.4, 0.1)
Adams County 6 Rural 24.2 (16.3, 35.2) 9 (1, 64) 8 stable stable trend 2.8 (-1.8, 8.4)
Barron County 6 Rural 18.8 (14.1, 24.6) 35 (4, 64) 12 stable stable trend 2.2 (-1.0, 5.9)
Bayfield County 6 Rural 11.3 (6.0, 20.4) 66 (13, 67) 4
*
*
Burnett County 6 Rural 18.4 (12.5, 27.6) 38 (3, 67) 7 stable stable trend 4.7 (-0.5, 11.9)
Clark County 6 Rural 18.0 (12.6, 25.0) 40 (4, 67) 8 stable stable trend 2.0 (-1.5, 6.2)
Crawford County 6 Rural 30.1 (20.4, 43.4) 2 (1, 55) 7 rising rising trend 5.5 (0.9, 12.1)
Dodge County 6 Rural 20.4 (16.7, 24.6) 30 (5, 57) 24 stable stable trend 1.4 (-1.8, 5.0)
Door County 6 Rural 17.2 (12.4, 23.9) 49 (7, 67) 10 stable stable trend 0.4 (-2.3, 3.5)
Dunn County 6 Rural 13.8 (9.6, 19.4) 61 (20, 67) 7 stable stable trend 1.3 (-3.2, 6.5)
Forest County 6 Rural 46.5 (29.5, 70.3) 1 (1, 31) 6 stable stable trend 3.8 (-1.3, 9.8)
Grant County 6 Rural 17.0 (12.8, 22.2) 50 (9, 66) 12 stable stable trend 1.3 (-2.6, 5.8)
Green Lake County 6 Rural 23.5 (15.0, 35.2) 13 (1, 66) 6
*
*
Iron County 6 Rural 24.5 (13.6, 45.8) 7 (1, 67) 3
*
*
Jackson County 6 Rural 21.8 (14.7, 31.6) 18 (2, 65) 6 stable stable trend -0.6 (-5.1, 4.1)
Jefferson County 6 Rural 23.9 (19.9, 28.6) 11 (2, 44) 26 rising rising trend 3.5 (0.7, 7.1)
Juneau County 6 Rural 23.3 (16.7, 32.0) 14 (1, 61) 9 stable stable trend 2.7 (-1.5, 7.8)
Lafayette County 6 Rural 23.6 (15.0, 35.7) 12 (1, 66) 5
*
*
Langlade County 6 Rural 17.9 (11.4, 27.4) 41 (2, 67) 6 stable stable trend -0.2 (-5.6, 5.5)
Lincoln County 6 Rural 28.5 (21.2, 37.8) 3 (1, 47) 12 rising rising trend 4.2 (0.4, 9.0)
Manitowoc County 6 Rural 21.8 (18.0, 26.2) 19 (4, 54) 26 rising rising trend 4.2 (1.9, 7.0)
Marinette County 6 Rural 24.5 (18.8, 31.6) 6 (1, 53) 15 stable stable trend 0.5 (-9.7, 3.5)
Marquette County 6 Rural 14.6 (8.3, 24.7) 58 (5, 67) 4
*
*
Monroe County 6 Rural 23.9 (18.4, 30.7) 10 (2, 57) 14 stable stable trend 2.2 (-0.8, 5.6)
Oneida County 6 Rural 22.5 (16.9, 29.6) 15 (2, 60) 14 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.4, 3.7)
Polk County 6 Rural 16.7 (12.5, 22.0) 52 (11, 66) 12 stable stable trend 2.5 (-1.9, 8.2)
Portage County 6 Rural 17.6 (13.8, 22.1) 46 (10, 64) 16 stable stable trend -0.6 (-3.5, 2.7)
Price County 6 Rural 19.7 (11.8, 31.8) 32 (2, 67) 5 stable stable trend 1.8 (-4.0, 7.8)
Richland County 6 Rural 20.5 (13.2, 31.0) 29 (2, 67) 6 stable stable trend 0.3 (-4.9, 5.8)
Rusk County 6 Rural 16.5 (9.0, 28.5) 53 (2, 67) 4 stable stable trend 0.5 (-4.8, 6.2)
Sauk County 6 Rural 20.9 (16.7, 26.0) 24 (4, 57) 19 rising rising trend 3.7 (0.1, 8.5)
Sawyer County 6 Rural 12.4 (7.5, 20.4) 64 (18, 67) 4
*
*
Shawano County 6 Rural 18.6 (13.7, 24.8) 37 (5, 65) 11 stable stable trend 1.9 (-1.6, 5.8)
Taylor County 6 Rural 21.2 (13.9, 31.5) 22 (2, 67) 6
*
*
Trempealeau County 6 Rural 12.7 (8.4, 18.8) 63 (23, 67) 6 stable stable trend 0.1 (-3.5, 4.3)
Vilas County 6 Rural 26.1 (18.8, 36.0) 5 (1, 55) 11 stable stable trend 3.7 (-0.1, 8.2)
Walworth County 6 Rural 18.1 (15.0, 21.8) 39 (12, 62) 25 stable stable trend -0.2 (-2.3, 1.4)
Washburn County 6 Rural 15.9 (9.8, 25.4) 57 (5, 67) 5 stable stable trend 0.9 (-3.4, 6.1)
Waupaca County 6 Rural 16.2 (12.2, 21.2) 55 (11, 67) 12 stable stable trend 0.8 (-1.4, 3.2)
Waushara County 6 Rural 21.7 (15.0, 30.7) 20 (2, 65) 8 stable stable trend 3.3 (-1.0, 8.3)
Wood County 6 Rural 20.9 (17.0, 25.5) 25 (4, 57) 22 stable stable trend -1.3 (-16.1, 1.6)
Ashland County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Buffalo County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Florence County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Menominee County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Pepin County 6 Rural
*
*
3 or fewer
*
*
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 10/12/2024 2:31 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Incidence rates (cases per 100,000 population per year) are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Rates calculated using SEER*Stat. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used for SEER and NPCR incidence rates.
‡ Incidence data come from different sources. The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

Rates and trends are computed using different standards for malignancy. For more information see malignant.html.

^ All Stages refers to any stage in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Summary/Historic Combined Summary Stage (2004+).
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Φ Rural-Urban Continuum Codes provided by the USDA.
* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).
1 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute. Based on the 2023 submission.
6 Source: National Program of Cancer Registries SEER*Stat Database - United States Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (based on the 2023 submission).
8 Source: Incidence data provided by the SEER Program. AAPCs are calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program and are based on APCs. Data are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84,85+). Rates are for invasive cancer only (except for bladder cancer which is invasive and in situ) or unless otherwise specified. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with SEER November 2023 data.

Data for the United States does not include data from Indiana.
Data for the United States does not include Puerto Rico.

When displaying county information, the CI*Rank for the state is not shown because it's not comparable. To see the state CI*Rank please view the statistics at the US By State level.

Return to Top