Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Nebraska Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Male

Sorted by count
Counties
sort alphabetically by name ascending 		Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest
sort by priority index descending 		Recent Trend2
 County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
 Average Annual Count
sort by count ascending 		Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by rate descending 		Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
sort by rate descending 		Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 315,770 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) - -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Nebraska - falling falling trend - 1,825 175.6 (172.0, 179.3) - -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
Douglas County 8 falling falling trend similar 466 188.0 (180.2, 196.1) 1.1 -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Lancaster County 8 falling falling trend similar 251 170.1 (160.5, 180.0) 1.0 -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Sarpy County 8 falling falling trend similar 123 165.7 (152.5, 179.8) 0.9 -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Hall County 8 falling falling trend similar 54 167.3 (147.6, 188.8) 0.9 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Dodge County 5 falling falling trend higher 49 205.4 (180.0, 233.8) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Buffalo County 8 falling falling trend similar 42 175.9 (152.5, 201.8) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Scotts Bluff County 8 falling falling trend similar 40 186.5 (161.0, 215.2) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Lincoln County 8 falling falling trend similar 40 176.5 (152.4, 203.7) 1.0 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Platte County 8 falling falling trend similar 33 164.8 (140.0, 192.8) 0.9 -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Adams County 8 falling falling trend similar 33 166.2 (141.0, 194.8) 0.9 -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Madison County 8 falling falling trend similar 32 158.9 (134.5, 186.6) 0.9 -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Gage County 8 falling falling trend similar 30 187.6 (157.7, 222.0) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Cass County 8 falling falling trend similar 27 173.8 (144.9, 207.0) 1.0 -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Saunders County 8 falling falling trend similar 24 173.3 (143.1, 208.5) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Washington County 8 falling falling trend similar 24 201.1 (165.8, 242.0) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Dawson County 8 falling falling trend similar 21 151.3 (123.2, 184.1) 0.9 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Otoe County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 174.8 (140.7, 215.5) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
York County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 188.7 (150.5, 234.5) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Seward County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 169.2 (134.9, 210.1) 1.0 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Butler County 4 stable stable trend higher 15 265.8 (208.4, 336.0) 1.5 -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Dakota County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 158.6 (124.4, 199.1) 0.9 -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Red Willow County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 185.1 (143.1, 236.9) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Richardson County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 196.3 (150.6, 254.6) 1.1 -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Saline County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 177.9 (137.7, 226.5) 1.0 -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Knox County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 184.2 (139.7, 240.9) 1.0 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Custer County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 156.4 (117.8, 204.8) 0.9 -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Jefferson County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 200.0 (152.3, 261.5) 1.1 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2)
Merrick County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 215.2 (163.5, 280.0) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Cheyenne County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 179.6 (134.7, 235.9) 1.0 -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Holt County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 142.3 (106.5, 188.1) 0.8 -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Keith County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 167.1 (123.8, 223.3) 0.9 -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Box Butte County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 173.3 (128.9, 228.7) 1.0 -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Cuming County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 161.7 (118.7, 216.8) 0.9 -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Phelps County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 172.2 (128.8, 227.2) 1.0 -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Hamilton County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 171.6 (127.7, 227.1) 1.0 -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
Burt County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 199.7 (146.9, 268.6) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Dawes County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 196.2 (144.3, 262.2) 1.1 -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
Fillmore County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 231.0 (170.9, 309.3) 1.3 -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Cedar County 9 falling falling trend lower 9 136.0 (97.8, 186.3) 0.8 -1.9 (-3.1, -0.8)
Nuckolls County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 211.5 (152.6, 293.6) 1.2 -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Johnson County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 240.6 (171.8, 330.0) 1.4 -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Clay County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 188.2 (131.8, 262.2) 1.1 -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
Furnas County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 233.4 (163.4, 326.5) 1.3 -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Nemaha County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 164.9 (116.6, 228.7) 0.9 -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Thayer County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 185.5 (128.1, 264.1) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Kearney County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 168.2 (119.1, 233.1) 0.9 -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Thurston County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 250.4 (175.8, 345.4) 1.4 -0.4 (-2.2, 1.4)
Wayne County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 141.7 (99.7, 196.6) 0.8 -0.4 (-2.2, 1.5)
Kimball County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 237.6 (165.0, 338.3) 1.3 -0.9 (-2.7, 0.9)
Sheridan County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 173.5 (120.5, 246.2) 1.0 -0.1 (-1.6, 1.3)
Antelope County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 154.4 (105.7, 220.2) 0.9 -2.2 (-3.5, -0.8)
Pierce County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 146.9 (102.1, 206.7) 0.8 -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Colfax County 7 stable stable trend lower 7 129.8 (89.8, 181.3) 0.7 -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Howard County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 147.6 (101.9, 209.4) 0.8 -2.0 (-3.0, -1.1)
Webster County 4 stable stable trend higher 7 276.5 (188.0, 396.6) 1.6 -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Chase County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 218.8 (148.4, 316.1) 1.2 -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Boone County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 151.1 (102.1, 219.9) 0.9 -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Cherry County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 132.6 (88.5, 194.1) 0.7 -2.0 (-3.4, -0.6)
Franklin County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 219.6 (142.8, 333.1) 1.2 -2.9 (-4.4, -1.3)
Nance County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 256.5 (167.3, 379.4) 1.4 1.1 (-0.7, 2.9)
Dixon County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 134.2 (88.5, 198.6) 0.8 -1.9 (-3.6, -0.3)
Hitchcock County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 246.2 (158.2, 373.9) 1.4 -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Stanton County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 133.0 (85.2, 199.6) 0.7 -1.9 (-3.9, 0.3)
Valley County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 145.3 (93.7, 221.8) 0.8 -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Perkins County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 216.5 (139.1, 329.0) 1.2 -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Sherman County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 162.1 (101.9, 257.4) 0.9 -0.6 (-2.7, 1.6)
Brown County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 173.1 (108.4, 273.3) 1.0 -0.7 (-2.5, 1.0)
Polk County 9 falling falling trend lower 5 108.7 (68.2, 169.5) 0.6 -2.0 (-3.4, -0.5)
Morrill County 9 falling falling trend lower 4 102.0 (61.1, 164.8) 0.6 -3.0 (-4.8, -1.2)
Pawnee County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 155.2 (88.5, 265.5) 0.9 -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
Boyd County
**
 		** similar 3 219.1 (113.6, 394.5) 1.2
**
Harlan County
**
 		** similar 6 182.4 (120.2, 275.2) 1.0
**
Arthur County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Banner County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Blaine County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Deuel County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Dundy County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Frontier County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Garden County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Garfield County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Gosper County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Grant County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Greeley County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Hayes County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Hooker County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Keya Paha County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Logan County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Loup County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
McPherson County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Rock County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Sioux County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Thomas County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Wheeler County
**
 		**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/17/2024 5:48 am.

Trend2
     Rising    when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable    when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling    when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above    when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar    when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below    when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Arthur County, Banner County, Blaine County, Deuel County, Dundy County, Frontier County, Garden County, Garfield County, Gosper County, Grant County, Greeley County, Hayes County, Hooker County, Keya Paha County, Logan County, Loup County, McPherson County, Rock County, Sioux County, Thomas County, Wheeler County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Boyd County, Harlan County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top