Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Nebraska Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Male

Sorted by trend
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend ascending
United States - falling falling trend - 315,770 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) - -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Nebraska - falling falling trend - 1,825 175.6 (172.0, 179.3) - -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
Nance County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 256.5 (167.3, 379.4) 1.4 1.1 (-0.7, 2.9)
Knox County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 184.2 (139.7, 240.9) 1.0 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Jefferson County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 200.0 (152.3, 261.5) 1.1 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2)
Morrill County 9 falling falling trend lower 4 102.0 (61.1, 164.8) 0.6 -3.0 (-4.8, -1.2)
Franklin County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 219.6 (142.8, 333.1) 1.2 -2.9 (-4.4, -1.3)
Antelope County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 154.4 (105.7, 220.2) 0.9 -2.2 (-3.5, -0.8)
Dakota County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 158.6 (124.4, 199.1) 0.9 -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Cherry County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 132.6 (88.5, 194.1) 0.7 -2.0 (-3.4, -0.6)
Polk County 9 falling falling trend lower 5 108.7 (68.2, 169.5) 0.6 -2.0 (-3.4, -0.5)
Howard County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 147.6 (101.9, 209.4) 0.8 -2.0 (-3.0, -1.1)
Stanton County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 133.0 (85.2, 199.6) 0.7 -1.9 (-3.9, 0.3)
Dixon County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 134.2 (88.5, 198.6) 0.8 -1.9 (-3.6, -0.3)
Cedar County 9 falling falling trend lower 9 136.0 (97.8, 186.3) 0.8 -1.9 (-3.1, -0.8)
Hamilton County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 171.6 (127.7, 227.1) 1.0 -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
Cass County 8 falling falling trend similar 27 173.8 (144.9, 207.0) 1.0 -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Adams County 8 falling falling trend similar 33 166.2 (141.0, 194.8) 0.9 -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Sarpy County 8 falling falling trend similar 123 165.7 (152.5, 179.8) 0.9 -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Kearney County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 168.2 (119.1, 233.1) 0.9 -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Holt County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 142.3 (106.5, 188.1) 0.8 -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Saunders County 8 falling falling trend similar 24 173.3 (143.1, 208.5) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Madison County 8 falling falling trend similar 32 158.9 (134.5, 186.6) 0.9 -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Thayer County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 185.5 (128.1, 264.1) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Furnas County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 233.4 (163.4, 326.5) 1.3 -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Washington County 8 falling falling trend similar 24 201.1 (165.8, 242.0) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Douglas County 8 falling falling trend similar 466 188.0 (180.2, 196.1) 1.1 -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Lancaster County 8 falling falling trend similar 251 170.1 (160.5, 180.0) 1.0 -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Red Willow County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 185.1 (143.1, 236.9) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Pierce County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 146.9 (102.1, 206.7) 0.8 -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Nuckolls County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 211.5 (152.6, 293.6) 1.2 -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
York County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 188.7 (150.5, 234.5) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Gage County 8 falling falling trend similar 30 187.6 (157.7, 222.0) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Otoe County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 174.8 (140.7, 215.5) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Buffalo County 8 falling falling trend similar 42 175.9 (152.5, 201.8) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Valley County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 145.3 (93.7, 221.8) 0.8 -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Keith County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 167.1 (123.8, 223.3) 0.9 -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Platte County 8 falling falling trend similar 33 164.8 (140.0, 192.8) 0.9 -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Hall County 8 falling falling trend similar 54 167.3 (147.6, 188.8) 0.9 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Hitchcock County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 246.2 (158.2, 373.9) 1.4 -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Cuming County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 161.7 (118.7, 216.8) 0.9 -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Richardson County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 196.3 (150.6, 254.6) 1.1 -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Box Butte County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 173.3 (128.9, 228.7) 1.0 -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Seward County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 169.2 (134.9, 210.1) 1.0 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Dawson County 8 falling falling trend similar 21 151.3 (123.2, 184.1) 0.9 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Cheyenne County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 179.6 (134.7, 235.9) 1.0 -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Nemaha County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 164.9 (116.6, 228.7) 0.9 -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Kimball County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 237.6 (165.0, 338.3) 1.3 -0.9 (-2.7, 0.9)
Chase County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 218.8 (148.4, 316.1) 1.2 -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Colfax County 7 stable stable trend lower 7 129.8 (89.8, 181.3) 0.7 -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Lincoln County 8 falling falling trend similar 40 176.5 (152.4, 203.7) 1.0 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Clay County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 188.2 (131.8, 262.2) 1.1 -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
Dawes County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 196.2 (144.3, 262.2) 1.1 -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
Fillmore County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 231.0 (170.9, 309.3) 1.3 -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Scotts Bluff County 8 falling falling trend similar 40 186.5 (161.0, 215.2) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Brown County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 173.1 (108.4, 273.3) 1.0 -0.7 (-2.5, 1.0)
Pawnee County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 155.2 (88.5, 265.5) 0.9 -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
Phelps County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 172.2 (128.8, 227.2) 1.0 -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Sherman County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 162.1 (101.9, 257.4) 0.9 -0.6 (-2.7, 1.6)
Johnson County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 240.6 (171.8, 330.0) 1.4 -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Merrick County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 215.2 (163.5, 280.0) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Saline County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 177.9 (137.7, 226.5) 1.0 -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Webster County 4 stable stable trend higher 7 276.5 (188.0, 396.6) 1.6 -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Burt County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 199.7 (146.9, 268.6) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Custer County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 156.4 (117.8, 204.8) 0.9 -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Dodge County 5 falling falling trend higher 49 205.4 (180.0, 233.8) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Wayne County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 141.7 (99.7, 196.6) 0.8 -0.4 (-2.2, 1.5)
Thurston County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 250.4 (175.8, 345.4) 1.4 -0.4 (-2.2, 1.4)
Boone County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 151.1 (102.1, 219.9) 0.9 -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Butler County 4 stable stable trend higher 15 265.8 (208.4, 336.0) 1.5 -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Perkins County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 216.5 (139.1, 329.0) 1.2 -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Sheridan County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 173.5 (120.5, 246.2) 1.0 -0.1 (-1.6, 1.3)
Boyd County
**
** similar 3 219.1 (113.6, 394.5) 1.2
**
Harlan County
**
** similar 6 182.4 (120.2, 275.2) 1.0
**
Arthur County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Banner County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Blaine County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Deuel County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Dundy County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Frontier County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Garden County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Garfield County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Gosper County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Grant County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Greeley County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Hayes County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Hooker County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Keya Paha County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Logan County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Loup County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
McPherson County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Rock County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Sioux County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Thomas County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Wheeler County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/17/2024 4:50 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Arthur County, Banner County, Blaine County, Deuel County, Dundy County, Frontier County, Garden County, Garfield County, Gosper County, Grant County, Greeley County, Hayes County, Hooker County, Keya Paha County, Logan County, Loup County, McPherson County, Rock County, Sioux County, Thomas County, Wheeler County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Boyd County, Harlan County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top