Return to Home Mortality > Table > Data Table

Data Table for Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer

Death Rate/Trend Comparison by Cancer, 2016-2020

Nebraska Counties versus United States

All Cancer Sites

All Races, Male

Sorted by rate
Counties
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Priority Index1
1=highest
9=lowest

 sort by priority index descending
Recent Trend2
County Death
Rate
Compared
to
US Rate
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Age-Adjusted Death Rate

deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate ascending
Rate
Ratio3
County
to
US
 sort by rate descending
Recent 5-Year Trend2 in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States - falling falling trend - 315,770 177.5 (177.2, 177.8) - -2.2 (-2.5, -2.0)
Nebraska - falling falling trend - 1,825 175.6 (172.0, 179.3) - -1.6 (-1.9, -1.4)
Webster County 4 stable stable trend higher 7 276.5 (188.0, 396.6) 1.6 -0.5 (-2.1, 1.1)
Butler County 4 stable stable trend higher 15 265.8 (208.4, 336.0) 1.5 -0.3 (-1.5, 1.0)
Nance County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 256.5 (167.3, 379.4) 1.4 1.1 (-0.7, 2.9)
Thurston County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 250.4 (175.8, 345.4) 1.4 -0.4 (-2.2, 1.4)
Hitchcock County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 246.2 (158.2, 373.9) 1.4 -1.1 (-2.3, 0.2)
Johnson County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 240.6 (171.8, 330.0) 1.4 -0.6 (-2.2, 1.0)
Kimball County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 237.6 (165.0, 338.3) 1.3 -0.9 (-2.7, 0.9)
Furnas County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 233.4 (163.4, 326.5) 1.3 -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Fillmore County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 231.0 (170.9, 309.3) 1.3 -0.8 (-1.9, 0.4)
Franklin County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 219.6 (142.8, 333.1) 1.2 -2.9 (-4.4, -1.3)
Chase County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 218.8 (148.4, 316.1) 1.2 -0.9 (-2.5, 0.7)
Perkins County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 216.5 (139.1, 329.0) 1.2 -0.1 (-1.8, 1.7)
Merrick County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 215.2 (163.5, 280.0) 1.2 -0.6 (-1.9, 0.8)
Nuckolls County 8 falling falling trend similar 9 211.5 (152.6, 293.6) 1.2 -1.3 (-2.5, -0.1)
Dodge County 5 falling falling trend higher 49 205.4 (180.0, 233.8) 1.2 -0.5 (-1.0, 0.0)
Washington County 8 falling falling trend similar 24 201.1 (165.8, 242.0) 1.1 -1.5 (-2.5, -0.5)
Jefferson County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 200.0 (152.3, 261.5) 1.1 0.0 (-1.1, 1.2)
Burt County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 199.7 (146.9, 268.6) 1.1 -0.5 (-1.9, 0.9)
Richardson County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 196.3 (150.6, 254.6) 1.1 -1.1 (-2.3, 0.0)
Dawes County 6 stable stable trend similar 10 196.2 (144.3, 262.2) 1.1 -0.8 (-2.4, 0.8)
York County 8 falling falling trend similar 18 188.7 (150.5, 234.5) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Clay County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 188.2 (131.8, 262.2) 1.1 -0.8 (-2.5, 0.9)
Douglas County 8 falling falling trend similar 466 188.0 (180.2, 196.1) 1.1 -1.5 (-1.8, -1.3)
Gage County 8 falling falling trend similar 30 187.6 (157.7, 222.0) 1.1 -1.3 (-2.2, -0.5)
Scotts Bluff County 8 falling falling trend similar 40 186.5 (161.0, 215.2) 1.1 -0.8 (-1.4, -0.2)
Thayer County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 185.5 (128.1, 264.1) 1.0 -1.5 (-2.8, -0.2)
Red Willow County 8 falling falling trend similar 14 185.1 (143.1, 236.9) 1.0 -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Knox County 6 stable stable trend similar 13 184.2 (139.7, 240.9) 1.0 0.2 (-1.1, 1.5)
Cheyenne County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 179.6 (134.7, 235.9) 1.0 -1.0 (-2.6, 0.6)
Saline County 6 stable stable trend similar 14 177.9 (137.7, 226.5) 1.0 -0.6 (-1.3, 0.2)
Lincoln County 8 falling falling trend similar 40 176.5 (152.4, 203.7) 1.0 -0.9 (-1.6, -0.2)
Buffalo County 8 falling falling trend similar 42 175.9 (152.5, 201.8) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.0, -0.6)
Otoe County 8 falling falling trend similar 19 174.8 (140.7, 215.5) 1.0 -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Cass County 8 falling falling trend similar 27 173.8 (144.9, 207.0) 1.0 -1.8 (-2.7, -0.9)
Sheridan County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 173.5 (120.5, 246.2) 1.0 -0.1 (-1.6, 1.3)
Box Butte County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 173.3 (128.9, 228.7) 1.0 -1.1 (-2.2, 0.1)
Saunders County 8 falling falling trend similar 24 173.3 (143.1, 208.5) 1.0 -1.6 (-2.4, -0.8)
Brown County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 173.1 (108.4, 273.3) 1.0 -0.7 (-2.5, 1.0)
Phelps County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 172.2 (128.8, 227.2) 1.0 -0.7 (-2.1, 0.7)
Hamilton County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 171.6 (127.7, 227.1) 1.0 -1.8 (-3.0, -0.5)
Lancaster County 8 falling falling trend similar 251 170.1 (160.5, 180.0) 1.0 -1.5 (-1.8, -1.2)
Seward County 8 falling falling trend similar 17 169.2 (134.9, 210.1) 1.0 -1.1 (-1.9, -0.3)
Kearney County 8 falling falling trend similar 8 168.2 (119.1, 233.1) 0.9 -1.6 (-3.0, -0.1)
Hall County 8 falling falling trend similar 54 167.3 (147.6, 188.8) 0.9 -1.2 (-1.8, -0.6)
Keith County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 167.1 (123.8, 223.3) 0.9 -1.2 (-2.2, -0.1)
Adams County 8 falling falling trend similar 33 166.2 (141.0, 194.8) 0.9 -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Sarpy County 8 falling falling trend similar 123 165.7 (152.5, 179.8) 0.9 -1.7 (-2.2, -1.1)
Nemaha County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 164.9 (116.6, 228.7) 0.9 -1.0 (-2.3, 0.3)
Platte County 8 falling falling trend similar 33 164.8 (140.0, 192.8) 0.9 -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
Sherman County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 162.1 (101.9, 257.4) 0.9 -0.6 (-2.7, 1.6)
Cuming County 6 stable stable trend similar 11 161.7 (118.7, 216.8) 0.9 -1.1 (-2.3, 0.1)
Madison County 8 falling falling trend similar 32 158.9 (134.5, 186.6) 0.9 -1.6 (-2.3, -0.9)
Dakota County 8 falling falling trend similar 15 158.6 (124.4, 199.1) 0.9 -2.1 (-2.9, -1.2)
Custer County 6 stable stable trend similar 12 156.4 (117.8, 204.8) 0.9 -0.5 (-1.5, 0.6)
Pawnee County 6 stable stable trend similar 4 155.2 (88.5, 265.5) 0.9 -0.7 (-2.4, 1.1)
Antelope County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 154.4 (105.7, 220.2) 0.9 -2.2 (-3.5, -0.8)
Dawson County 8 falling falling trend similar 21 151.3 (123.2, 184.1) 0.9 -1.1 (-1.8, -0.5)
Boone County 6 stable stable trend similar 6 151.1 (102.1, 219.9) 0.9 -0.4 (-2.0, 1.2)
Howard County 8 falling falling trend similar 7 147.6 (101.9, 209.4) 0.8 -2.0 (-3.0, -1.1)
Pierce County 6 stable stable trend similar 7 146.9 (102.1, 206.7) 0.8 -1.3 (-2.7, 0.1)
Valley County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 145.3 (93.7, 221.8) 0.8 -1.2 (-2.8, 0.4)
Holt County 8 falling falling trend similar 11 142.3 (106.5, 188.1) 0.8 -1.6 (-2.6, -0.5)
Wayne County 6 stable stable trend similar 8 141.7 (99.7, 196.6) 0.8 -0.4 (-2.2, 1.5)
Cedar County 9 falling falling trend lower 9 136.0 (97.8, 186.3) 0.8 -1.9 (-3.1, -0.8)
Dixon County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 134.2 (88.5, 198.6) 0.8 -1.9 (-3.6, -0.3)
Stanton County 6 stable stable trend similar 5 133.0 (85.2, 199.6) 0.7 -1.9 (-3.9, 0.3)
Cherry County 8 falling falling trend similar 6 132.6 (88.5, 194.1) 0.7 -2.0 (-3.4, -0.6)
Colfax County 7 stable stable trend lower 7 129.8 (89.8, 181.3) 0.7 -0.9 (-2.2, 0.4)
Polk County 9 falling falling trend lower 5 108.7 (68.2, 169.5) 0.6 -2.0 (-3.4, -0.5)
Morrill County 9 falling falling trend lower 4 102.0 (61.1, 164.8) 0.6 -3.0 (-4.8, -1.2)
Boyd County
**
** similar 3 219.1 (113.6, 394.5) 1.2
**
Harlan County
**
** similar 6 182.4 (120.2, 275.2) 1.0
**
Arthur County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Banner County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Blaine County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Deuel County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Dundy County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Frontier County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Garden County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Garfield County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Gosper County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Grant County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Greeley County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Hayes County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Hooker County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Keya Paha County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Logan County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Loup County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
McPherson County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Rock County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Sioux County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Thomas County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Wheeler County
**
**
*
3 or fewer
*
*
**
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 05/17/2024 6:11 am.

Trend2
     Rising     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
     Stable     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
     Falling     when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.
Rate Comparison
     Above     when 95% confident the rate is above and Rate Ratio3 > 1.10
     Similar     when unable to conclude above or below with confidence.
     Below     when 95% confident the rate is below and Rate Ratio3 < 0.90

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates.
** Data are too sparse to provide stable estimates of annual rates needed to calculate trend.
1 Priority indices were created by ordering from rates that are rising and above the comparison rate to rates that are falling and below the comparison rate.
2 Recent trend in death rates is usually an Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint Version 4.8.0.0. Due to data availability issues, the time period and/or calculation method used in the calculation of the trends may differ for selected geographic areas.
3 Rate ratio is the county rate divided by the US rate. Previous versions of this table used one-year rates for states and five-year rates for counties. As of June 2018, only five-year rates are used.
Source: Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2020 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI. The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
Note: When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate. Suppression is used to avoid misinterpretation when rates are unstable.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data. Data presented on the State Cancer Profiles Web Site may differ from statistics reported by the State Cancer Registries (for more information).

Data for the following has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate and trend estimates:
Arthur County, Banner County, Blaine County, Deuel County, Dundy County, Frontier County, Garden County, Garfield County, Gosper County, Grant County, Greeley County, Hayes County, Hooker County, Keya Paha County, Logan County, Loup County, McPherson County, Rock County, Sioux County, Thomas County, Wheeler County

Trend for the following could not be reliably determined due to small number of deaths per year:
Boyd County, Harlan County


Interpret Rankings provides insight into interpreting cancer statistics. When the population size for a denominator is small, the rates may be unstable. A rate is unstable when a small change in the numerator (e.g., only one or two additional cases) has a dramatic effect on the calculated rate.

Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.

Return to Top