Return to Home Mortality > Table

Death Rates Table

Data Options

Death Rate Report by State

Cervix, 2016-2020

All Races (includes Hispanic), Female, All Ages

Sorted by CI*Rank
State
 sort alphabetically by name ascending
Met Healthy People Objective of 84.3?
Age-Adjusted Death Rate
deaths per 100,000
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by rate descending
CI*Rank⋔
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by CI rank descending
Average Annual Count
 sort by count descending
Recent Trend
Recent 5-Year Trend in Death Rates
(95% Confidence Interval)
 sort by trend descending
United States Yes 2.2 (2.2, 2.2) N/A 4,191 falling falling trend -0.7 (-0.9, -0.6)
Oklahoma Yes 3.6 (3.2, 4.0) 1 (1, 5) 76 rising rising trend 2.1 (0.3, 4.0)
Mississippi Yes 3.4 (3.0, 3.8) 2 (1, 9) 59 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.6, -0.5)
Arkansas Yes 3.2 (2.8, 3.6) 3 (1, 12) 56 falling falling trend -0.8 (-1.2, -0.3)
Alabama Yes 3.1 (2.8, 3.4) 4 (1, 11) 92 stable stable trend 0.3 (-0.5, 1.1)
Louisiana Yes 3.0 (2.7, 3.3) 5 (1, 13) 78 stable stable trend 0.0 (-1.0, 0.9)
West Virginia Yes 2.9 (2.5, 3.5) 6 (1, 21) 33 falling falling trend -1.7 (-2.4, -1.0)
Texas Yes 2.8 (2.7, 3.0) 7 (4, 12) 418 stable stable trend 0.2 (-0.8, 1.2)
Tennessee Yes 2.7 (2.5, 3.0) 8 (3, 17) 109 stable stable trend 0.3 (-1.8, 2.4)
Indiana Yes 2.7 (2.5, 3.0) 9 (4, 17) 99 rising rising trend 1.7 (0.1, 3.4)
Kentucky Yes 2.7 (2.4, 3.0) 10 (3, 19) 69 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.8, -1.6)
Florida Yes 2.7 (2.5, 2.8) 11 (6, 15) 356 stable stable trend -0.1 (-0.8, 0.7)
District of Columbia Yes 2.4 (1.8, 3.3) 12 (1, 44) 9
*
*
Nevada Yes 2.4 (2.1, 2.8) 13 (5, 32) 42 falling falling trend -1.2 (-2.0, -0.5)
New Mexico Yes 2.4 (2.0, 2.9) 14 (3, 35) 27 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Missouri Yes 2.4 (2.2, 2.7) 15 (7, 25) 87 stable stable trend -0.4 (-1.2, 0.5)
Kansas Yes 2.4 (2.1, 2.8) 16 (5, 33) 37 stable stable trend 3.6 (-0.4, 7.7)
South Carolina Yes 2.4 (2.1, 2.6) 17 (8, 28) 72 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.2, -0.4)
Georgia Yes 2.3 (2.1, 2.5) 18 (11, 25) 138 falling falling trend -1.5 (-1.9, -1.2)
Ohio Yes 2.2 (2.1, 2.4) 19 (13, 28) 157 falling falling trend -0.9 (-1.6, -0.1)
California Yes 2.2 (2.1, 2.3) 20 (15, 26) 484 stable stable trend -0.4 (-0.8, 0.0)
Delaware Yes 2.2 (1.7, 2.8) 21 (5, 45) 14
*
*
Illinois Yes 2.1 (2.0, 2.3) 22 (14, 32) 163 falling falling trend -2.1 (-2.3, -1.8)
Nebraska Yes 2.1 (1.7, 2.5) 23 (9, 42) 23 stable stable trend -0.9 (-1.8, 0.0)
New Jersey Yes 2.0 (1.9, 2.2) 24 (16, 36) 116 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.6, -1.9)
Maryland Yes 2.0 (1.8, 2.2) 25 (16, 40) 74 falling falling trend -2.2 (-2.7, -1.8)
Pennsylvania Yes 2.0 (1.8, 2.1) 26 (20, 38) 160 falling falling trend -1.0 (-1.9, -0.1)
Arizona Yes 2.0 (1.8, 2.2) 27 (18, 40) 79 stable stable trend -3.6 (-7.4, 0.4)
Wyoming Yes 2.0 (1.3, 2.8) 28 (4, 51) 6
*
*
Michigan Yes 1.9 (1.8, 2.1) 29 (20, 39) 114 stable stable trend -0.5 (-1.5, 0.5)
North Carolina Yes 1.9 (1.8, 2.1) 30 (20, 39) 121 stable stable trend -1.0 (-2.4, 0.3)
New York Yes 1.9 (1.8, 2.0) 31 (21, 38) 237 falling falling trend -4.7 (-6.8, -2.6)
Oregon Yes 1.9 (1.7, 2.2) 32 (17, 43) 48 falling falling trend -1.2 (-1.9, -0.5)
Virginia Yes 1.9 (1.7, 2.0) 33 (22, 42) 93 stable stable trend 0.6 (-2.6, 4.0)
South Dakota Yes 1.8 (1.3, 2.5) 34 (8, 51) 9
*
*
Idaho Yes 1.8 (1.4, 2.2) 35 (14, 48) 17 falling falling trend -1.4 (-2.4, -0.4)
Washington Yes 1.8 (1.6, 1.9) 36 (24, 44) 74 falling falling trend -1.5 (-2.1, -0.9)
Hawaii 8 Yes 1.7 (1.4, 2.2) 37 (15, 50) 15 falling falling trend -1.3 (-2.3, -0.3)
Utah Yes 1.7 (1.4, 2.0) 38 (20, 48) 25
*
*
Iowa Yes 1.7 (1.4, 2.0) 39 (21, 48) 30 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.3, -1.2)
Alaska Yes 1.7 (1.1, 2.4) 40 (11, 51) 6
*
*
Colorado Yes 1.5 (1.4, 1.8) 41 (32, 48) 48 falling falling trend -1.9 (-2.6, -1.2)
Vermont Yes 1.5 (1.0, 2.2) 42 (13, 51) 6
*
*
Wisconsin Yes 1.5 (1.3, 1.7) 43 (35, 49) 53 falling falling trend -2.6 (-3.2, -2.0)
Montana Yes 1.5 (1.0, 2.0) 44 (19, 51) 9
*
*
New Hampshire Yes 1.4 (1.1, 1.9) 45 (24, 51) 13
*
*
Rhode Island Yes 1.4 (1.0, 1.9) 46 (24, 51) 8
*
*
Connecticut Yes 1.3 (1.1, 1.5) 47 (40, 51) 30 falling falling trend -2.4 (-3.1, -1.7)
North Dakota Yes 1.3 (0.8, 1.9) 48 (25, 51) 5
*
*
Maine Yes 1.2 (0.9, 1.6) 49 (34, 51) 11
*
*
Minnesota Yes 1.2 (1.0, 1.4) 50 (42, 51) 40 falling falling trend -1.8 (-2.5, -1.2)
Massachusetts Yes 1.1 (1.0, 1.3) 51 (44, 51) 48 falling falling trend -3.5 (-4.1, -2.9)
Puerto Rico 8 Yes 2.2 (1.9, 2.5) N/A 47 stable stable trend -0.2 (-15.1, 17.3)
Notes:
Created by statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov on 03/28/2024 3:35 pm.

State Cancer Registries may provide more current or more local data.
Trend
Rising when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is above 0.
Stable when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change includes 0.
Falling when 95% confidence interval of average annual percent change is below 0.

† Death data provided by the National Vital Statistics System public use data file. Death rates calculated by the National Cancer Institute using SEER*Stat. Death rates are age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population (19 age groups: <1, 1-4, 5-9, ... , 80-84, 85+). The Healthy People 2030 goals are based on rates adjusted using different methods but the differences should be minimal. Population counts for denominators are based on Census populations as modified by NCI.
The US Population Data File is used with mortality data.
‡ The Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) is based on the APCs calculated by Joinpoint. Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.
⋔ Results presented with the CI*Rank statistics help show the usefulness of ranks. For example, ranks for relatively rare diseases or less populated areas may be essentially meaningless because of their large variability, but ranks for more common diseases in densely populated regions can be very useful. More information about methodology can be found on the CI*Rank website.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

8 Due to data availability issues, the time period used in the calculation of the joinpoint regression model may differ for selected counties.

* Data has been suppressed to ensure confidentiality and stability of rate estimates. Counts are suppressed if fewer than 16 records were reported in a specific area-sex-race category. If an average count of 3 is shown, the total number of cases for the time period is 16 or more which exceeds suppression threshold (but is rounded to 3).

Please note that the data comes from different sources. Due to different years of data availability, most of the trends are AAPCs based on APCs but some are APCs calculated in SEER*Stat. Please refer to the source for each graph for additional information.
Data for United States does not include Puerto Rico.
CI*Rank data for Puerto Rico is not available.

Return to Top